
Yeoh Siew Hoon has been writing on travel for two decades. For 18 months she recently used a hard cast. It changed her writing.
See her piece "This Much I Know About Accessible Tourism." You'll find some themes we all share here:
I am an eternal optimist and I believe in these tough times, and with what has brought the global economy to its knees –all the stories of greed and fraud we have heard – we will become a more caring world. And if each of us look hard for our silver lining, we will all find it.The niche market of accessible tourism could well be the silver lining for travel companies who are smart enough to recognise the potential and go after it in a targeted, responsible manner. Since it is such a new field, the ones who do it first and who get it right will have an advantage.
I see accessible tourism as the second wave behind the environment, which is now finally top on the agenda for tourism and other businesses. And just as it did with environmental issues, it will take a combination of political will, legislation and growing consumer demand to force the pace of change.
The Financial resports on the Good Design Award for 2008 - an example of the Universal Design/Green convergence:
The JAL First Class chopsticks won a 2008 Good Design Award in the category of Tabletop for their elegant aesthetics and ergonomic functionality. Commissioned by JAL, the chopsticks were designed by Tripod Design Co. Ltd, Tokyo, represented by Satoshi Nakagawa, Japan.
The Good Design award is a prestigious international award that puts the spotlight on innovative new product designs and graphics. The Museum’s historic GOOD DESIGN program was founded in Chicago in 1950 by some of America’s most important designers, and it remains one of the world’s oldest and most important Awards ProgramMade of cedar wood, the smooth surfaced chopsticks have slightly been narrowed towards their upper ends to make them easier and more comfortable to grip. Fulfilling the principles of the Universal Design, this chopstick was created with special consideration for elderly passengers, and passengers who may not be frequent users of chopsticks.
Universal design is an approach to the development and improvement of products, services and environments so that they are usable by as many people as possible regardless of age, ability or situation.
From an environmental perspective, as with all chopsticks used onboard JAL, the award-wining chopsticks have been made with wood obtained in Japan from forest-thinning to supports forest conservation efforts.
Source:
http://finchannel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=27676&Itemid=4
Image via Wikipedia
MIUSA strives to organize programs that include people with and without disabilities and people from diverse cultural backgrounds. First time travelers with disabilities who are from a cultural minority and of low socioeconomic status are included every year. MIUSA exchange programs are inclusive of people who are Deaf and hard of hearing, or have cognitive, visual, physical, psychiatric, systemic, non-apparent, or other types of disabilities.
* ASL staff interpreters are provided by MIUSA for the duration of the program.
* Materials in alternative formats are provided for all scheduled program activities.
* Personal assistant funding may be available to assist participants who need personal assistance during the program.
PROGRAM DETAILS
When: June 26 – July 10, 2009
Where: San Jose, Costa Rica
Program Cost: $1,100, which includes: round-trip international airfare from US city of departure to San Jose, Costa Rica; one-night hotel in US city of departure; lodging; meals and activities. Program cost does not cover participants’ airfare to the US city of departure or personal spending money. Accepted participants are required to pay a minimum of $220 towards the program fee.
Scholarships: Generous partial scholarships available to qualified applicants.
Deadline: March 20, 2009. Late applications considered as space permits.
ELIGIBILITY
Participants must be excited about new experiences, a once in a lifetime adventure and tolerant of the challenges brought on by a new cultural environment and inconsistent accessibility. Participants are expected to act as positive and respectful citizen ambassadors of the United States and must be committed to work across cultural and other differences to promote intercultural understanding. Participants must show previous leadership experience, positive communication skills and be committed to disability rights.
Participants must be:
* U.S. citizens
* Ages 18 – 24 by summer 2009
To apply see:
http://www.miusa.org/exchange/costarica09/index_html
Image via Wikipedia
One of the most enjoyable of New Year's traditions is counting achievements and blessings. Here, from Shivani Gupta of India's AccessAbility in New Delhi, is just one example of how Inclusive Tourism is professionalizing and institutionalizing around the world. Watch for more in 2009!
It has been an exciting year for AccessAbility. Some of our key achievements in 2008 have been:
1. Launch of our Diversity Employment Initiative at www.AccessAbility.co.in/jobs that has brought together over 70 sensitised employers who regularly use this portal to recruit disabled job seekers. Working closely with CII & Naukri.com we hope to extend the reach of this initiative to a pan-India level.
2. Launch of Free2Wheel - www.Free2Wheel.co.in - the first Indian tourist guide for disabled travelers. The travel portal is being advertised by the Ministry of Tourism on the Incredible India home page to promote India as an accessible destination.
3. Our Access Consultancy division has assisted premier brand names in the travel and hospitality industries, higher educational institutes, retail and office complexes and builders in incorporating disabled friendly infrastructure in their existing and upcoming properties. We have also had an opportunity to review and develop some path breaking policies with various Government Ministries.
4. Publication of books authored by us:
1. Employing Persons with Disabilities (online version at http://www.accessability.co.in/files/Employing-Persons-with-Disabilities.pdf)
2. A Guidebook on Creating Sporting & Recreational Facilities for Persons with Disabilities (online version at http://ccdisabilities.nic.in/Sportsf.pdf )
5. AccessAbility team members have been adorned with prestigious awards such as the CavinKare Ability Award 2008 and Helen Keller Award 2008.
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has announced a new standard to make sites more accessible to older and disabled people.
Version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) will apply to text, images, audio and video.
It also covers web applications and is said to give developers more flexibility than the old guidelines.
According to the consortium, WCAG 2.0 should also be easier to understand and use.
The guidance is designed to address barriers encountered by people with visual, hearing, physical, cognitive and neurological disabilities and older people with access needs.
For more news see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7789622.stm or watch the video: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7792662.stm
Travel author and supporter of the principles of Inclusive Tourism, Imtiaz Muqbil, offers the following
THE FOUR PHILOSOPHIES OF THE FUTURE OF TOURISM ARE ALL IN ASIA
The crisis-hit travel & tourism industry is now in search of truly meaningful, sustainable, long-term remedies. And the answers can be found in Asia. The four primary business models and philosophies that will, without a doubt, become the future pillars of the industry were compiled for the first time in a study presented at the first ITB Asia in October 2008.
The holistic social, economic, cultural and environmental concepts of Mahatma Gandhi, the kings of Thailand and Bhutan, and Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus contain clear pointers for a more realistic revival of the industry in a way that puts the fundamentals of need above speed and greed. The study was commissioned by ITB Asia, and compiled by Imtiaz Muqbil, Executive Editor, Travel Impact Newswire. It is available free of charge upon request.
Industry conferences seeking more information about the study, and/or willing to hear insightful forecasts from a travel trade journalist ready to challenge conventional wisdom and stoke democratic public debate on issues that matter, can contact Imtiaz Muqbil at imtiaz@travel-impact-newswire.com.
Travel author and supporter of the principles of Inclusive Tourism, Imtiaz Muqbil, offers the following study:
THE FOUR PHILOSOPHIES OF THE FUTURE OF TOURISM ARE ALL IN ASIA
The crisis-hit travel & tourism industry is now in search of truly meaningful, sustainable, long-term remedies. And the answers can be found in Asia. The four primary business models and philosophies that will, without a doubt, become the future pillars of the industry were compiled for the first time in a study presented at the first ITB Asia in October 2008.The holistic social, economic, cultural and environmental concepts of Mahatma Gandhi, the kings of Thailand and Bhutan, and Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus contain clear pointers for a more realistic revival of the industry in a way that puts the fundamentals of need above speed and greed. The study was commissioned by ITB Asia, and compiled by Imtiaz Muqbil, Executive Editor, Travel Impact Newswire. It is available free of charge upon request.
Industry conferences seeking more information about the study, and/or willing to hear insightful forecasts from a travel trade journalist ready to challenge conventional wisdom and stoke democratic public debate on issues that matter, can contact Imtiaz Muqbil at imtiaz@travel-impact-newswire.com.

Simon Darcy has written the definitive article on the needs of travelers with disabilities for lodging information. Most importantly he tackles the question of how to present that information in the article, "A Methodology for Testing Accessible Accommodation Information Provision Formats." Download file
OK, so with a title like that most people will be waiting for the video version to come out...
We will be using Darcy's paper as background to prepare presenters at the 2009 SATH Conference for the panel, "Will this Hotel Fit My Needs?" Some new ideas will be presented involving streamlined accessibility audits and videotaped room reviews. In the meantime, while the travel industry stumbles idly in the general direction of a solution, the folks at Dapper may have created a way to bootstrap to Internet stardom the first hotel chain to get it right.
With accurate and relevant accessibility information captured in its databases and exposed for web developers to use ( to "mashup") such innovators could see themselves as Internet celebrities with a viral word-of-mouth campaign online promoting them.
Who might these disabled-friendly innovative hotel chains turn out to be?
My bets, based on past and current exemplary performance, would be Microtel in the US, Protea in Africa, or the ITC-Welcome group in India.
Below is a screencast on the technology that might be an unexpected boon to hotels pursuing inclusion. Learn how to make a dynamic contextual ad with MashupAds in 5 minutes: Part 1 of 2:
Part 2 of how to make a dynamic, contextual ad with Dapper MashupAds for a travel website and travel publisher.

Special Needs at Sea offers equipment for travelers with disabilities. They have just announced a program to partner with travel agents allowing agents to source equipment for clients and make a seamless one-stop experience for their clients. The company offers electric scooters, wheelchairs, power chairs, oxygen, supplies for companion animals, hearing devices and Braille printing.
“Travel agents play an important role in vacation planning and we are excited to reward them for working with us on meeting their clients’ needs,” says Andrew Garnett, the company’s founder and CEO. “Beyond the commissions for the special needs equipment rentals, agents have the opportunity to increase overall bookings by offering the travel experience to individuals who might otherwise have opted to avoid travel.”
Mr. Garnett points out that the disability travel market represents $13.6 billion in annual revenues for the industry. An estimated 40 million Americans---about 1 in 7---have some form of disability. Even so, many rentals at Special Needs at Sea are to travelers who may not use scooters or wheelchairs at home, but are concerned about walking long distances on tours or shore excursions and navigating long corridors on the newer, larger cruise vessels.
“There is a large pool of potential travelers waiting to be tapped,” adds Mr. Garnett. “Importantly, with multi-generational travel a growing trend, there’s no need to cancel a family trip or leave anyone out because of a special need or physical limitation.”
Agents can reserve the equipment their clients need via phone or fax. Special Needs at Sea delivers directly to the ship or hotel so the equipment is waiting when the client arrives. The company has a global distribution network and delivers to ports, cruise ships and hotels around the world. Special Needs at Sea, a Special Needs Group Inc. company, is a member of the American Society of Travel Agents (ASTA), the National Association of Career Travel Agents (NACTA) and a sponsor of the Society for Accessible Travel & Hospitality (SATH). Special Needs at Sea is not a travel agent, does not compete with travel agents and protects the commission for its preferred agents if a client reserves equipment directly, based on the preferred agent’s referral.
Travel agents must register in advance of any client bookings to qualify for commissions. They may register for the travel agent program at http://www.specialneedsatsea.com/agents/. To reserve equipment, for more details about Special Needs at Sea, or to request a brochure call Special Needs at Sea toll free 1.800.513.4515, (1.954.585.0575 international), email info@specialneedsatsea.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it or log onto www.specialneedsatsea.com.
Source:
http://www.ftnnews.com/content/view/4384/31/lang,english/
Working with People with Disability in the region
It is widely recognised that people with disability are among the poorest and most vulnerable in developing countries. The United Nations estimates that approximately 10% of the world’s population, or approximately 650 million people, have a disability and about 80% of the population with a disability live in developing countries (UN Secretariat Disability Paper E/CN.5/2008/6 available at www.ods.un.org).People with disability face many barriers to full participation in society and are likely to face an increased risk of social exclusion. This may include being unable to access education, health services, earn a living or participate in decision making. Social exclusion is a major contributor to the level of poverty which people with disability experience, particularly those who live in developing countries.
The Australian Government recognises that poverty is both a cause and consequence of disability and is committed to ensuring that the benefits of development reach those who are most excluded. Further, to achieve the targets set for the Millennium Development Goals and to alleviate poverty, the Government believes that people with disability must be actively included in development activities and processes. Therefore, people with disability have been identified as a priority for Australia’s aid program.
Source:
Disability Update: November 25, 2008
The 2008-09 budget honours the Australian Government's commitment to working with people with disability in our region and will invest $45 million over two years to address avoidable blindness and develop a comprehensive strategy to guide a disability-incusive Australian overseas aid program.
Development for All: Towards a disability-inclusive Australian aid program 2009-2014AusAID, in consultation with key regional and Australian stakeholders, particularly people with disability and their representative organisations, developed the Australian Government's first strategy to make people with disability a priority for Australia’s aid program. On 25 November 2008, Parliamentary Secretary for International Development Assistance, Mr Bob McMullan, launched Development for All: Towards a disability-inclusive Australian aid program 2009-2014, publicly committing the Australian Government to ensuring that people with disability are comprehensively included and supported in improving their quality of life through all aspects of the aid program.
Development for All seeks change over time in the way Australia's aid program is delivered, and central to this change will be the focus on people with disability as an inherent part of all aspects of program planning and development.
The Strategy seeks to improve the quality of life of people with disability through a range of programs and funding mechanisms - including targeted initiatives to meet the specific needs of people with disability, building the leadership skills of people with disability and their organisations, and ensuring major programs in sectors such as education and infrastructure meet the needs and priorities of people with disability. The Strategy will also focus on reducing preventable impairments through support for avoidable blindness and road safety. It will seek to improve our understanding of disability and its links to poverty through strengthened research and data and build AusAID’s leadership and advocacy role in promoting disability as a development priority.
In recognition of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Development for All will also ensure that the rights of people with disability are respected and promoted. Development for All: Towards a disability-inclusive Australian aid program 2009-2014 is available below as a PDF or word document and in large print. Audio format is also available. Braille copies can be ordered online at: www.ausaid.gov.au/publications
For more info go to:
Imtiaz Muqbil writes the insightful newsletter Travel Impact Newswire. Below he argues for more rational development in the travel industry - and calls for input from new voices. As the world's population ages who is advising the industry on how to make the structural, operational, and conceptual adjustments necessary to thrive as some degree of disability becomes commonplace through longevity?
AN AGENDA FOR THE FUTUREThe travel & tourism industry is caught in an unprecedented cycle of boom and bust. It is being affected by too much happening too quickly in too many different sectors and parts of the world. The need for new ideas, from new people for a new era has never been more important. Here are some areas that may help fulfill that objective:
1. DEMOCRATISE THE INDUSTRY: The “World” Travel Market reflects the “world” on the trade floor but in the accompanying panels, seminars and discussions there is a distinct lack of representation by industry leaders from Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Arab world. Most of the speakers are from western, and largely British, organisations, companies, universities and institutions who reflect, quite naturally, their own perspective. Most of them tend to be CEOs, ministers or other “top people”.
Also poorly represented are environmentalists, NGOs, trade unionists, consumer protection organisations. There is no forum for young people, indigenous peoples or small and medium-sized enterprises. This appears to reflect a somewhat undemocratic industry and a patronising, top-down attitude that leaves no space to create the pressure groups mentioned by Mrs Hulya Aslantas, the Skål International President (see story above). The assumption is that only CEOs, and mainly those from the west, deserve a platform and have the answers. But whose interests do these industry leaders truly represent? Their own? Their investors? Shareholders? Board members? Or their staff and their guests? What’s good for the rich and the powerful is not necessarily good for those at the bottom of the heap.
One organisation already realising its mistakes is PATA which in the last six years was headed by a European and became a hugely centralised, autocratic organisation that lost sight of many of its grassroots members. An organisation that claims to be the “voice of Asia Pacific travel & tourism” ceased to be a “voice” for its members. This process is now being undone; “democratisation” of the organisation is a primary priority.
2. BROADEN THE AGENDA & CREATE REAL DEBATE: Constructive debate, and a healthy check and balance mechanism is a vital part of any democratic society. A number of sessions at the WTM 2008 were referred to as “debates”. But none were debates in the real sense of the term, with no cross-fire of opposing viewpoints. Perhaps in order not to upset sponsors and corporate backers, hard questions are seldom raised. The result is that new agendas do not enter the mainstream discussion process. An industry of dreams refuses to confront its nightmares. It also conveys the image of an industry that does not tolerate opposing viewpoints and sees critics as enemies.
Although the agenda of economic growth, job creation and sustainability is now well accepted, hearing the other side of the coin is becoming imperative. Numerous issues need to be raised – from the management of security concerns to consumer protection complaints, from human resources management to privacy and the impact of technology and even ceksual harassment in the workplace.
3. BATTLE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM: Not everything that was said to be good for the industry 10 years ago is actually turning out that way. And what may have been good in the past will not necessarily be good in future. Globalisation was seen as a panacea but is coming under increasing fire in global forums. For example, the industry is all excited about how mobile phones are becoming new marketing tools but appears less concerned about the environmental impact of millions of discarded mobile units. At one session on technology in travel, I raised this question, only to receive a frosty non-response from haughty panellists who thought the issue was not worth their time.
Many of the marketing and management and forecasting gurus who made lofty predictions and trends forecasts were just plain wrong. Much is made these days about promoting competitiveness and branding. But branding is becoming boring and the need to compete is diminishing in importance, especially as there is plenty of business going around. In the years ahead, competition may be better directed at raising standards, not raising visitor arrival numbers. Even the industry's focus on sustainability and responsible tourism begins to sound hollow when one sees the monumental waste of paper on the exhibition floor.
4. LEARN FROM OTHER INDUSTRIES: The travel & tourism industry is a major buyer of goods and services from other industries, such as food & beverage, telecommunications, finances and banking. So far, not a single travel conference has chosen to hear the issues and trends prevailing in other sectors. Hence, travel & tourism misses a golden opportunity to indulge in a two-way discussion with its suppliers, get some free market research and influence the way products and services are designed on both sides.
5. BOOST LEVELS OF ACCOUNTABILITY: Leadership means being held accountable, and holding others accountable. In travel & tourism, holding ministers, corporate leaders and association CEOs accountable is virtually unheard of. At the same time, our own industry leaders show a surprising reluctance to hold external political, government and corporate leaders for causing problems. Mr Frangialli's fleeting comment on Alan Greenspan was a rare reference. Mr d'Amore of the IIPT dwelt at length about military expenditures but shows no inclination to hold many of the arms-exporting countries, specifically his own country, the USA, responsible for fomenting war and conflict. Speculation in oil and commodity prices, plus currency speculation, contributes to industry instability and kills jobs. So do the misguided policies of politicians and fundamentalist religious leaders of all ilk. Why should the travel & tourism industry not hold them accountable?
6. BALANCING THE IMBALANCES: One of the most important trends today is a rebooting of the world order. This includes everything from the geopolitical impact of the rise of India and China to addressing the rich-poor income gap and the imbalance between economic growth and ecological impact. Although travel & tourism is being hugely influenced by these trends, it is totally in the dark about how to influence it in a positive way. The key to gaining respect as an important industry sector in the new world order lies in clearly establishing and identifying this role – influencing change, rather than being influenced by it. So far, this has not happened.
ABOUT TRAVEL IMPACT NEWSWIRE
Set up in August 1998, Travel Impact Newswire is the Asia-Pacific's first email travel industry news feature and analysis service. Mission Statement: Dedicated to reporting with Integrity, Trust, Accuracy and Respect the issues that impact on the Asia-Pacific Travel & Tourism industry. Distributed every week to 45,000 senior industry readers worldwide, mainly in the Asia-Pacific and Middle East.
Advertorial sponsorship messages cost 1,000 Euro per dispatch. Please contact: Imtiaz Muqbil, Executive Editor, 24 Soi Chidlom, Bangkok, Thailand 10330. T: (66-2) 2551480, 2537590. Fax: (66-2) 2544316. Email: imtiaz@travel-impact-newswire.com
The Journal for Disability and International Development has issued a Call for Contributions for its January 2009 Issue The Topic is, Women with Disabilities: Identification and Participation in the Women’s and Disability Movement
Deadline is 31.01.2009
Since the early 1990s, women with disabilities have increasingly been calling for the recognition and inclusion of the gender dimension to disability, both in disability politics and in the women’s movement.
The women’s movement as such has been emphasising on the multiple dimensions that make up the diverse situations of women around the world. While it therefore could have been key to addressing the specific concerns of women with disabilities, it has fallen short of acknowledging disability as an added liability in the past. As such, disability has long been ignored by the mainstream women’s movement both in theory and practice.At the same time, the disability movement has, in its beginnings, conveyed disability as a homogeneous aspect: In its efforts to bring disability to the public’s attention, individual diversities in impairments and other dimensions to disability such as the gender dimension, were largely neglected which finally led to limited agendas, excluding women with disabilities over long periods.
Where do we stand now and how has the situation for women with disabilities changed?
Since recent years the international legal framework for women with disabilities has changed positively. Global and regional networks of disabled women have been formed and are now actively promoting their agenda in both the women’s as well as the disability movement. Stakeholders of both movements are increasingly engaging in dialogue or are openly recognising and even including the perspective of women with disabilities.
This issue 01-2009 of the Journal of Disability and International Development intends to look at how these changes have been translated into practice and how these developments have impacted on the identification and participation of women with disabilities in both movements.
Suggestions for contributions:
We welcome contributions especially with a regional or country-specific perspective on:
* What are lessons learned/success stories in bringing/including women with disabilities onto the agenda of both movements?
* How does culture influence the promotion and perception of the rights of women with disabilities in these movements?
* What are barriers for women with disabilities in becoming active participants/actors in the disability and/or women’s movement? Which developments have the disability and/or women’s rights movement undergone with regards to women with disabilities?
* What are ways and means for ensuring the integration of the rights of disabled women and participation of disabled women in these movements?
* What is the impact of these developments on identity and self-perception of women with disabilities as individuals as well as in organisations?
* What are the developments with regard to women with disabilities in these movements in the academic field/research and teaching?
* What has been the influence of including a gender dimension in disability and development on the policy and programming work of international development organisations, especially those working in the field of disability in development of women in development?Contact: Dr. Christiane Noe: Noe.Christiane@web.de , Susanne Wilm: Susanne_Wilm@yahoo.de
About us
The Journal for Disability and International Development is published by the forum ‘Disability and International Development’. Since 1990, it is published three times a year. The target group of the journal are scientists, activists, professionals and interested people from all over the world.
It aims to be a forum for international exchange about the disability. Beside this, it promotes professional discussions on educational, social, developmental and intercultural issues in the context of disability and development. Each issue of the journal has a leading topic that brings together different articles and views.
The journal team and the advisory board try to win experts from all continents to contribute to the journal. The journal is published in German and English and available online at: http://www.zbdw.de.

The Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre (STCRC) has recently produced a new publication Accessible Tourism: Challenges and Opportunities. This is a FREE resource available here: http://www.crctourism.com.au/BookShop/BookDetail.aspx?d=632
From the book:
“American adults with disabilities or reduced mobility currently spend an average of $13.6 billion a year on travel. Creating accessible cruise ships, accessible ship terminals, accessible ground transportation, and accessible tourism destinations is not charity. It is just good business.”
Dr Scott Rains, a US expert on disability issues
This publication provides an easy-to-read summary of four key research pieces into accessible tourism, including:
* Setting a Research Agenda for Accessible Tourism
* Developing Business Case Studies for Accessible Tourism
* Tourist Experiences of Individuals with Vision Impairment
* Visitor Accessibility in Urban Centres
The research can be used to assist in better planning for and addressing the needs of visitors with disability and other access issues.
******************************
About STCRC
Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre (STCRC) was established under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres program in 1997, and has grown to be the largest dedicated tourism research organisation in the world. STCRC has more than 300 tourism research reports available for free download at www.crctourism.com.au/bookshop
Contact:
Amber Brown
General Manager, Communications and Industry Extension
Sustainable Tourism CRC
Gold Coast Campus
Griffith University QLD 4222
Ph: (07) 5552 8116
Mob: (0434) 622 466
Fax: (07) 5552 8171
Email: amber.brown@crctourism.com.au
www.crctourism.com.au

Travel agents are a resourceful lot. It's their job to be geographers, bargain-hunters, problem-solvers, diplomats -- and insatiably curious!
After posing the question to myself this morning about the accessibility of tourism in South Africa I began an online researching path that led me to the South African Fundi certification on the country.
The online training available for travel agents is well done and engaging. I certainly learned many things I had not known before.
They say that the sure way to knowledge is to ask the right questions. As a traveler with a mobility I impairment writing for others who have disabilities - and for those who supply them with travel options - the course leaves me with many new questions:
The safari Big Five consists of lion, elephant, leopard, rhino, and Cape Buffalo. Can people with disabilities ride domesticated elephants in South Africa as in Thailand?
Nelson Mandela was held for years in the prison on Robben Island. Are the ferries to the island wheelchair accessible?
One of South Africa's Blue Flag beaches is Camps Bay Beach. It is know for its accessibility to people with disabilities. Do they have beach wheelchairs for hire or loan?
Dullstrom on Highlands Meander is an excellent spot for fly fishing. Do the outfitters and hotels accommodate fly fishermen with disabilities?
The Victoria & Alfred Waterfront in Capetown is home to a marina, restaurants, and hotels that are highly popular tourist destinations. Are the yacht docks and marina accessible if someone using a power wheelchair sails in?
John Keeter writes from AmeriGlide - a company
that sells mobility lifting aids:
My company offers a scholarship that I thought might be of interest to your and your readers. The scholarship is available to students who are enrolled full time at a 2 or 4 year university and use a wheelchair. Students can apply for the $500 scholarship completely online, or they can print up the application and mail it to us. In addition to completing the application, they must also write a short essay on the ADA.I was hoping that you could help us spread the word about our
scholarship.For more information, you can visit our site at:
More than happy to spread the word about such an important bit of philanthropy, john. Kudos to AmeriGlide!
On the Visitability web site, Concrete Change, you will find this goal statement:
VISIT-ABILITY (Inclusive Home Design)
Our focus is new homes. Not government buildings, restaurants, etc. (important as they are). Our goal is to make ALL homes visitable, not just “special” homes — to be at the party, meeting, and family reunion . . . not isolated. We narrow the emphasis from a long list of access features to the most essential: entering a home and fitting through the interior doors. So that widespread construction change is more likely to happen quickly.Steps at every entrance of a home shut out people who use wheelchairs or walkers, or have weakness, stiffness or balance problems. A narrow door stops wheelchair users from fitting through the bathroom door in a friend or relative’s home.
You will also find the slide show below.
The fundamental cognitive shift necessary to apply Universal Design is to overcome the mental barrier that attributes "normalcy" to some and results in "exclusion by design" for others. Konrad Kaletsch is tackling that problem in his post Universal Design: You Are The Expert:
You unknowingly became an expert by the very attributes that make you unique. What works for you doesn’t always work for someone else. Someone with great physical strength uses force; genius uses intelligence. What emerges is that the variety of human ability is infinite. It is variety that is normal, not some standard that there is a normal. Let’s start with 1000 people and sort out who is normal: If our first filter is average height, we quickly reduce the number of “normal” people in our survey down to a few hundred. Our next filter, average weight, reduces our “normal” people further. Let’s have one more filter, age. Now we have a handful of people that constitute normal based on just three filters! If we build for this “normal” person we are in fact building for a very few people leaving the other 900 to bend lower, reach higher, and in other ways force their bodies to work in ways that don’t feel normal (a few won’t be able function at all).
A normal person doesn’t really exist yet we design as if they do. Primary work stations such as kitchens still have a one size-fits-all approach. This leaves many unable to use parts because they are too high, too low, too dark, too heavy, etc. You adapt your kitchen as best as possible to work for you.
If we shift the focus from an expert over there to the expert in you, your contribution matters greatly, yet, there is no place for your experience to be recorded; there is no place where you and other experts can collectively design a better kitchen. Until that opportunity exists, some guy in front of a computer fishing for statistics will design for a “normal” person hoping to sell as many products as possible at the lowest cost.
Universal Design Resource is developing a new web experience where your collective knowledge is brought into forums, discussions and blogs where the best solutions can emerge and guide those that design and fabricate our products and environments. Our launch is in early 2009.Konrad Kaletsch
November 19, 2008
Full article:
http://universaldesignresource.blogspot.com/2008/11/universal-design-you-are-expert.html

Mike Vowels of Stewardship Remodeling has just published an article on sustainability's triple bottom line for the Eastside Business Journal - Sustainability and Remodeling your Home.. He observes that "Only in the past five years, however, has sustainability become a catchword capable of capturing the attention not only of environmental scientists and activists but also of (some) mainstream economists, other social scientists, and policymakers.'
He goes on to succinctly make the case. Note his approach. It's quotable:
Potentially, sustainability can have a three-prong effect on the remodeling plans for your home, as follows:
* Environmental Sustainability (e.g., Green Remodeling Practices). * Economic Sustainability (e.g., Return on Investment & future Marketability of your home). * Social Sustainability (e.g., your design changes enable you to live in the comfort and safety of your home much longer).“Universal Design is also called Inclusive Design, Design-for-All and Lifespan Design. Universal Design focuses on Social Sustainability which relates to basic needs such as freedom, happiness, safety and dignity.”
Further reading:

From GAATES:
It is with praise and thanks that the Global Alliance on Accessible Technologies and Environments (GAATES) presents Eduardo Alvarez with a special Award of Recognition in honour of his outstanding leadership in the creation of the first International Standard for Accessibility and Usability of the Built Environment (ISO TC59/SC16). Mr. Alvarez has demonstrated great leadership, perseverance, and determination in the development of the Accessibility Standard that will impact the lives of people with disabilities around the world.This award will be presented on December 3rd, 2008 at the Diplomat Radisson SAS Hotel, Residence and Spa in the Kingdom of Bahrain, UAE, in celebration of the United Nations International Day of Persons with a Disability.
The Global Alliance on Accessible Technologies and Environments (GAATES) is the leading international not-for-profit organization that brings together experts in accessibility of the Built, Virtual and Social Environments. GAATES was incorporated by an international consortium of experts dedicated to promoting accessibility worldwide, and has an International presence in 6 regions: the Asia-Pacific, Arab, North America, South America, European and African Regions. GAATES members include technical experts, individuals, organizations of people with disabilities, companies involved in information and communication technologies, architects and interested supporters.
For more information on GAATES, please contact us at info@gaates.org, or visit us at www.gaates.org.

J. W. Elphinstone does a very good job of arraying the research-based arguments for Universal Design in home remodeling. Quoting Wendy Jordan, author of a book I highly recommend "Universal Design for the Home: Great Looking, Great Living Design for All Ages, Abilities, and Circumstances" the piece notes:
"A lot of people think that making a house more accommodating will make the house less stylish, but there are many (universally designed) homes that are beautiful and still work well for people young or old, tall or short, or if they have any kind of limitations."
Who will be the author- and the organizational champion that AARP has been - to popularize Universal Design in hotel design?
Homeowners are starting to warm to the concept, especially Baby Boomers of which 10,000 are turning 60 every day. Last Year, an American Institute of Architects survey found that nearly three-quarters of 500 architecture firms said that homeowners were asking for greater accessibility within the home through wider hallways, fewer steps and single-floor design. That was up from 66 percent the year before.
The National Association of Home Builders also reported that 63 percent of upscale builders and 56 percent of average home builders believe they'll see a growing trend toward universal design over the next decade as Baby Boomers advance in age and decline in health.
While many homeowners start taking universal design elements into consideration as retirement nears, AARP suggests making these changes as soon as possible.
"There's no time like the present," said Elinor Ginzler, senior vice president for livable communities at AARP. "All of these changes will make your life easier starting immediately."
Source:
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=773&sid=1514664

eTurboNews reports that the National Tour Association is extending its campaign to advise the US government on issues of tourism:
Leaders of the travel and tourism sector of the national economy will convene to share ideas and prepare recommendations to assist President-elect Barack Obama in accelerating the economy through travel and tourism. The outcomes will be presented to President-elect Obama, his transition team, and key members of Congress following a meeting in Washington, DC on December 16.A broad cross-section of travel and tourism leaders has been invited to be a part of creating workable solutions for the struggling economy. The participation of more than 20 organizations has been confirmed including leaders representing packaged travel, lodging, travel agents, cruise lines, ground transportation, air transportation, and special interest travel, according to the National Tour Association, which is managing the effort.
Source:
http://www.eturbonews.com/6047/travel-and-tourism-sector-convenes-draft-recommendations-presiden
At the time of this post staff at the National Tourism Association are researching my inquiry on how the organization intends to position Inclusive Tourism as well as the market of senior and disabled travelers in their policy recommendations.
From a press release:
The National Association of the Remodeling Industry (NARI) has launched the Universal Remodeling--Creating Comfortable and Accessible Homes Education Program.
According to AARP's "Fixing to Stay" study, 60% of respondents who have already modified their home did so to increase the ability to live independently and 55% did so to provide flexibility to adapt to the changing needs of family members. NARI recognizes how important a person's home is to them and that interest is growing in modifying a home to fit the changing families' needs. This Universal Remodeling education program is designed to teach remodelers how to interview clients with an understanding and consideration of their special needs, how to build these projects and the seven principles of Universal Remodeling, according to North Carolina University's The Center for Universal Design. These principles include:
Equitable Use: The design is useful and marketable to people with diverse abilities.Flexibility in Use: The design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities.
Simple and Intuitive Use: Use of the design is easy to understand, regardless of the user's experience, knowledge, language skills, or current concentration level.
Perceptible Information: The design communicates necessary information effectively to the user, regardless of ambient conditions or the user's sensory abilities.
Tolerance for Error: The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or unintended actions.
Low Physical Effort: The design can be used efficiently and comfortably and with a minimum of fatigue.
Size and Space for Approach and Use: Appropriate size and space is provided for approach, reach, manipulation, and use regardless of the user's body size, posture or mobility.
"No matter what the age of the family members, remodelers should discuss these issues when performing any remodeling or renovation work," says Renee Rewiski, president of NARI. "Teenagers playing sports potentially will have temporary injuries; visitors may have varying levels of eyesight, or physical abilities; elderly loved ones may require special needs. All these should be considered during any remodel, and our members will have a standard to use when discussing these issues during a consultation."
A remodeler who has taken NARI's Universal Remodeling course will have gained an in-depth, thorough knowledge of all aspects of Universal Remodeling. It gives the contractor a competitive edge in this increasingly-popular segment of remodeling.
"The Universal Remodeling program is so important because it will provide remodelers with the expertise for remodeling with today, tomorrow, and well into the future in mind for their customer," says Bryce Jacob, chair of the Universal Remodeling Education Sub-Committee. "Our members will learn how to dig deeper into the dynamics of their clients' lives so their remodeling solutions will better serve their clients' entire family."
NARI's Universal Remodeling course will allow the remodeling contractor to bring to their clients specific expertise in allowing a family to stay in their home, regardless of the specific needs of various family members. The opportunities offered by NARI are easily accessible; the class will meet once a week for two hours via a teleconference/Webinar. The course will last for four weeks.
To learn more about the Universal Remodeling program, or to enroll, call NARI Headquarters toll-free at 800-611-6274 and ask for Jessica Noe or Dan Taddei.
The cost of this program will be $295 for NARI Members and $395 for Non-Members. For a limited time, NARI members will receive a discounted rate of $195. Space is limited so sign up now.
Occasionally the question arises, "What's with the interest in home design when the main topic here is travel?"
The answer is, "Because trends in home design are currently our best demonstration of future trends in hospitality design." Terms like "livability" are arising to measure the desirability of communities. The immediate post-WW II push to sell home appliances on the appeal of convenience has the following generations thinking bigger. They are evaluating the architecture of their entire domestic envelope -- home, neighborhood, and destinations of choice
The demographic bulge in aging is driving a boom in home design using Universal Design. That population contains the prime candidates for travel. Hotel, resort, and cruise ship businesses are responding by incorporating Universal Design to attract this demographic - although at a painfully slow pace in many cases.
Below is a speech by Chris Hansen, Group Executive Officer of State and National Initiatives at AARP from 2005 hitting all the key themes of this opportunity: Universal Design, Visitability, and Livabiity
No Place Like Home: AARP's View on Livable Communities
2011 is the Symbolic Beginning of Our "Changing Face of Aging"
* The year 2011 just six years from now, will mark the symbolic beginning of a "changing face" of aging in America. That's when the first wave of the 76 million-strong post-World War II "baby boom" generation begins turning 65. The "boomers," of course are those of us born in this country between 1946 and 1964.
* So, it's clearly time to break away from the status quo in our thinking and start focusing on how things should be and can be, given what we know today about the boomers and the aging of America.
* From now on, every planning decision made in every community must take into account the impact on older residents, who can no longer be an afterthought. The ability of our communities to adapt to an aging nation will paramount in the 21st century.
What AARP has Learned About the Boomers
* AARP has done extensive research on the boomers with surveys, studies, and focus groups. So what have we found out about these boomers?
Boomers are More Ethnically Diverse than Prior Generations
* Less than three-quarters of the boomers are white, while nearly 90 percent of Americans born before 1946 are white. Hispanics are now the fastest growing ethnic group and have surpassed African-Americans as our largest minority group.
And More Highly Educated than Their Predecessors
* Twenty-seven percent have college degrees, compared with 12 percent for today's older Americans. More than 60 percent of the boomers have a high school diploma, while only 44 percent of the older groups made it that far.
Boomers Do Not Plan to "Retire" in the Traditional Sense
* They view their "old age" or "retirement years" as a time of lifestyle transition rather than a termination of employment. Many of them fully intend to keep working, although not necessarily in their primary occupations.
* Fully 8 out of 10 of the boomers we surveyed said they will continue to work during their "retirement years." Only 16 percent expect not to work at all, after they retire from their career employment.
Most Boomers Living in the Same "State"
* Something else we've discovered about the boomers: When it comes to aging, most boomers are living in the same state ? the state of denial!
Vast Majority of Boomers Want to Remain in Their Own Homes
* But, for our purposes today, the most important fact about the boomers is that, when asked where they want to live as they age, full 90 percent say, "In my home." They do not want to live with relatives, in a nursing home, or at an assisted care facility. They want to live at home.
No Place Like Home
* The word "home" is one of the most emotionally charged words we ever use. Our homes are central to our identities. They hold our possessions; they hold our memories; they give us a sense of place and belonging, comfort and security.
* Our homes offer us both independence and engagement in community life. We open the doors to our homes to socialize with family, friends and neighbors; and we walk out those doors to work and play in the community.
But Can Boomers Expectations be Realized?
* We may be on a collision course in some key areas with the boomers expectations for their retirement years. The aging of the boomers is merely the beginning of a tidal wave.
America—Like the World—is Aging
* To understand how urgent the challenge of really is, our policymakers must understand our rapidly changing demographics. We are experiencing nothing short of a fundamental change of the age distribution in the United States — and throughout the world.
Worldwide
* By the year 2050, there will be 2 billion older persons in the world-compared with 600 million today. For the first time in world history, older people will outnumber children.
* Every month, approximately 1 million persons reach 60 years of age, and 80 percent of them are in developing countries.
* Nearly two-thirds of all human beings who have ever lived to age 65 are alive today!
United States
* From the birth of Christ to 1900, the beginning of the 20th century, life expectancy in the United States increased each year by an average of three days. Since 1900, life expectancy has increased each year by an average of 110 days, or by 3 2/3 months.
* In 1900, only 13 percent of the U.S. population was 50 or over. By 2000, the percentage had doubled, to over 27 percent. And, by 2020, over 35 percent of our population will be 50 or over.
* One member of the 76 million-strong baby boom generation turns 50 ? and becomes eligible for AARP membership ? every 7.5 seconds. Each coming year, over 4 million men and women will join the ranks of 50+ America.
* A child born in the U.S. in 2000 could expect to live 77 years - fully 30 years longer than a child born in 1900, when life expectancy was only 47years.
* A person reaching 65 today can expect to live an additional 18.6 years, and 2 out of every 5 will reach age 90.
* The size of our 65 and over population has grown from just over 3 million in 1900 to 35 million today ? and is expected to double over the next 30 years, to over 70 million.
* Our fastest growing population segment is people 85 years of age and over. And the second fastest growing population is those who have celebrated their 100th birthday.
AARP
* Many organizations would be happy to have 35,000 members. We have 35,000 members who are over 100 years old!
Aging Demographic will Affect ALL Regions
* Some places, like Sun Belt retirement communities, will be affected more than others, but the aging demographic is a nationwide phenomenon. In fact, there's less migration to places like Florida and Arizona than is commonly assumed.
* Since 1990, roughly 90 percent of older Americans have stayed in the county they've been living in, if not the very same home!
* In the 90s, all but 11 of our 318 metropolitan areas saw an increase in their 65+ population. And looking ahead, the 65+ population will grow faster than the population at-large in all 50 states, with 10 states finding themselves in the unique situation of having more Medicare-eligible seniors than school-age children!
We Face Three Major Challenges
* Essentially, we face three major challenges as we approach the boomers' retirement years. Actually, I prefer to call them "opportunities."
1. An opportunity to transform the nation's health-care system;
2. An opportunity to strengthen our retirement income system; and
3. An opportunity to create more livable communities;
* Today, I will devote my time to opportunity number 3 — Livable Communities
Significant Barriers to Spending Aging Years at Home
* Often people don't think about this until they're suddenly confronted with too many steps, hard-to-handle doorknobs, or slippery bathroom floors that can become treacherous overnight.
* Too late, many people discover that they're trapped in towns with poor public transportation. Medical centers and simple services, like grocery or drug stores, can become too hard to reach without the help of a neighbor or friend. Even walking, if there are no sidewalks, can become problematic.
What are Livable Communities?
* It might be helpful if I discuss what we mean by "livability" at this point. While all of us here have at least some familiarity with the concept, it can mean different things to different people.
* In AARP's recently released study, A Report to the Nation on Livable Communities: Creating Environments for Successful Aging, we define livable communities as having "affordable and appropriate housing, supportive community features and services, and adequate mobility options, which together facilitate personal independence and the engagement of residents in civic and social life."
* To put it in simpler terms, we're talking about day-in day-out tasks and activities that are the stuff of life. Livability means visible traffic signs, handrails, one-story living and no-step entry, sidewalks you can actually walk on, bus stops with benches, libraries and parks that are easily accessible and much more.
Most Communities Now Playing Catch-Up
* When it comes to livability, most of our communities are now playing a frantic game of catch-up…and many others don't even realize what's about to hit them. This could be like the clogged artery that goes undetected until it's too late.
Elements of Livability-Housing
* First, and possibly most important, is the problem of affordability. This is of particular interest when so many real estate markets are soaring. For many people, their homes have become their nest eggs, growing almost daily, providing greater financial independence. But these same markets are also making it harder for many other people to find affordable housing.
* After affordability, next in importance is what's called "accessibility". Making a house accessible means figuring out how existing homes can be modified and how new homes should be built so that residents can operate freely and comfortably throughout their lives.
Universal Design
* There is an exciting trend in architecture today known as Universal Design. Some of the features of Universal Design include: No-step entryways, wider doorways, floors and bathtubs with non-slip surfaces, lever door handles, and easy to reach light switches and electrical outlets.
* Another important trend in making housing more accessible is called "visitability." The term means making a home accessible for visitors who might have special needs. It's about creating a home where the welcome mat truly welcomes everyone.
What Some Are Already Doing
* In Vermont, there is a Home Accessibility Program that helps pay for home modifications for disabled persons. But beyond that, Vermont has a Visitability Law, making it the first state to mandate accessibility requirements for new 1-to-3 bedroom housing.
* The state of Georgia has an EasyLiving Home Program, which AARP had a hand in developing. It is a certification program that encourages builders to design single-family homes and town homes with "easy living" features - for example, one stepless entrance into the house; wide doorways; at least one accessible toilet on the main floor.
Elements of Livability - Transportation
* Transportation is another livability challenge that is getting less attention than it should. The 1991 passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act - or ISTEA, as it's known-was a positive step. For the first time, citizens were empowered to make decisions about local transportation funding participation, with environmental impact and other community concerns finally given due consideration.
* And hopefully, we'll soon get a new transportation bill out of Congress that acknowledges the livability challenge and takes some steps to address the mobility needs of older Americans.
* Still, transportation policy remains focused overwhelmingly on the construction and maintenance of roads to accommodate the automobile. And once again, that policy is a response to social behavior. But if we don't start expanding our transportation vision to include buses, rail, walkability, bicycles and more…what's going to happen when millions of baby boomers begin outliving their ability to drive by a decade or more?
* We need huge investments in our mass transit infrastructure. In the Beyond 50 livable communities report AARP released recently, 60 percent of seniors reported that there was no public transportation within a 10-minute walk from their homes. Suburbs and rural areas are especially underserved.
* Public transportation shouldn't just be a last resort for older people who can no longer get behind the wheel safely. Public transportation should be so prevalent and accessible in the community people of all ages use it throughout their lives.
What Some are Already Doing
* In Missouri, the Older Adults Transportation Service (or OATS) provides door-to-door car service at no cost to the elderly and disadvantaged. OATS is an ambitious program, with hundreds of employees and a strong volunteer network serving 87 counties across more than 50,000 square miles. Its fleet of more than 600 vehicles made 1.6 million one-way trips last year.
* In the Washington,DC area, there's Friendship Heights, Maryland, a small village where half the residents are over 50. They have a bus that takes residents to and from stores and the medical building.
Elements of Livability - Mobility
* Mobility is essential to independent living. It gives people the feeling that they have control over their lives. A truly livable community must provide as much mobility to older persons as possible, and it must offer real options that meet individual needs.
* Nearly three quarters of people between the ages of 50 and 74 rely mostly on driving. But that figure drops significantly after the age of 75. And many of those non-drivers say they face severe restrictions on their daily activities. In fact, they were six times as likely to miss doing something they would have liked to do because they did not have the transportation.
* Livable Communities should make life more comfortable and convenient for the active and able as well as those with disabilities. They should offer adequate, smooth, wide sidewalks and well-marked crosswalks. They should make bike riders feel welcome with bike lanes and bike paths. And livable communities should make it easy for those in wheelchairs to navigate curbs and give them adequate time to get across the street.
What Some are Already Doing
* In Los Angeles and in Portland, Oregon, microwave technology is being used to detect when a pedestrian is moving more slowly across an intersection; the detector automatically extends the "Walk" signal for several more seconds to allow for safe crossing.
* Downtown Holland, Michigan, not only has heated sidewalks to make walking safer during the icy winter months; it is also the first community in the nation to propose wiring most churches, public facilities, businesses and homes to deliver broadcast signals to individuals with certain kinds of hearing aids.
* The Friendship Heights, Maryland community has been recognized for its disability access and its park renovations to upgrade lighting and eliminate tripping hazards. There's also a partnership with nearby Suburban Hospital that includes free weekly blood pressure checks and periodic health screenings.
What AARP is Doing
* Right now AARP is engaged in a national dialogue about how to plan for successful aging. We're talking to city planners and community developers. We're talking to home builders and legislators, decision makers and service providers. We're encouraging people to transform their present communities into livable communities.
* We're talking about transforming communities so people can age in place, so they can continue to lead active lives, so they can continue to have independence and freedom, so they can continue to feel connected and be of service to others.
To Succeed - We Need to Change Our Thinking
* Perhaps the greatest challenge we face to creating livable communities is not a simple one to overcome. It's not just a matter of a little more innovation here and a little more money there. What's required is a wholesale overhaul in the way we think about our homes and our environment.
* We can afford our aging baby boomers, and we'll all benefit from a society in which the wisdom, time, and efforts of our older citizens continue to be a vital part of our lives.
* Policymakers and the decisions they make are largely a reflection of prevailing social attitudes. We're all responsible for thinking about these issues and adapting our lifestyles accordingly. We all need to be thinking in terms of how things should be and can be if we act now.
* Livability is not just "a seniors issue." We can and must celebrate the benefits that livable communities offer to all of their residents. After all, a curb-cut designed for a wheelchair user also benefits a parent pushing a baby stroller.
* At its core, livability is about preserving those values that have always been central to the American way of life - independence, self-determination, dignity and choice.
* Building livable communities to accommodate an aging population is a practical goal, but it's also a moral imperative for a society committed to empowering its people and safeguarding their freedom.
Let me close by quoting Fred Astaire. As he put it: "Old age is like everything else. To make a success of it, you've got to start young." So, let's get started!
Source:
http://www.aarp.org/aarp/presscenter/speech/articles/livable_communities.html
The Diverse Voices Project III, with up to $100,000 in co-production funding available to emerging filmmakers, is P.O.V.'s initiative to support stories about diverse communities. This co-production initiative is dedicated to supporting emerging filmmakers. Filmmakers with a prior national broadcast credit are not eligible for the Diverse Voices Project. Filmmakers who submit a film for DVP funding will be notified of the status of their submission in early spring 2009. The submission ARRIVAL deadline is October 31, 2008.
Have-a project you'd like to submit? http://cfe.pov.org
Have questions about DVP? Please e-mail dvp3@pov.org or call 1-800-756-3300 x380
Films supported in prior rounds of DVP include:
a.. "Made in L.A." by Almudena Carracedo and Robert Bahar
b.. Sierra Leone's Refugee All Stars by Zach Niles and Banker White
c.. Nerakhoun by Ellen Kuras and Thavisouk Prasavath
d.. "Flag Wars" by Linda Goode Bryant and Laura Poitras
e.. "American Aloha: Hula Beyond Hawai'i" by Lisette Marie Flanary and
Evann Siebens
f.. "90 Miles" by Juan Carlos Zaldívar
g.. "Soldados: Chicanos in Viet Nam" by Charley Trujillo and Sonya Rhee
h.. "The Sixth Section" by Alex Rivera and Bernardo Ruiz

This travel writing competition is open to UK residents age 16 and over. Click here to register. Here's the offer:
Have you recently been on a fabulous day out? Have you discovered a hidden gem? Or do you simply feel the Rough Guide to Accessible Britain has overlooked one of your favourite trips?If so, tell us about one of your own favourite days out and you could see your review in print. The best five entries will be featured in the next edition of the Rough Guide to Accessible Britain, due for publication in spring 2009. But please hurry as the competition ends Friday 7 November 2008!
Source: http://www.accessibleguide.co.uk/write_review
Rough Guides and Motability have joined forces to produce an inspiring new Rough Guide to Accessible Britain. Packed full of ideas on days out across the UK, this pocket-sized guide lists 100 wonderful places, tested and recommended by our researchers. Read what people who have bought the Guide say about it here.Badge User friendly, with colour coded sections of different days out in Britain, it highlights the accessible facilities at each location as well as containing handy maps to help plan your day.
The Guide is FREE to Blue Badge holders (£1.99 for postage and packing) and just £6.99 (inc p&p) to others.
Please click to read our Terms and Conditions
Source: http://www.accessibleguide.co.uk/
The goal of our work is "inclusion."
It's the perfect work. The goal is universally appealing. By the time you have succeeded nobody can understand why the world would have ever been otherwise.
That is why these reviews of universally designed homes are so illustrative. They document the cultural shift towards the "new common sense" approach to the built environment.
One by one people all over the world are making a lifestyle change. As homes are redesigned for owners to live in them for much longer periods (aging-in-place) they also naturally become available as places of hospitality for those with disabilities who are currently excluded by design (Visitability.) As domestic standards of comfort and socializing turn toward environments that accept social inclusion as fundamental commercial environments such as hotels, resorts, and vacation vehicles feel the market pressure to do the same.
This review of a universally designed home in Virginia tells the story of one more step toward the human-centered approach to hospitality.
"One of the goals with universal design is to make all these features invisible so you don't notice them," Thomas said. "The house in Mountain Run doesn't look any different from any home but it's fully functional and accessible."The idea behind universal design is to make a home accessible to all people, regardless of disabilities or age, he said.
"If builders would start to look at new ideas instead of continuous patterns, they could be doing a better job of making buildings more user-friendly for everyone," said Michael Chenail, senior consultant at Compliance Alliance, an Americans with Disabilities consulting company that has worked with Thomas.
As a baby boomer, Thomas realizes the growing need to build homes that will accommodate people as they age.
Having wider doorways and stepless entryways, for instance, enables anyone, regardless of age or impairment, to visit or maneuver through a house, said Thomas, who also has a Certified Aging-in-Place Specialist designation from the National Association of Home Builders
Notice this from the NAHB web site:
Certified Aging-In-Place Specialist (CAPS)
The Certified Aging-in-Place Specialist (CAPS) designation program teaches the technical, business management, and customer service skills essential to competing in the fastest growing segment of the residential remodeling industry: home modifications for the aging-in-place.
Full home review article:
More on Visitability:
http://www.npr.org/news/specials/housingfirst/whoneeds/visitability.html

Danishkadah is offering a free course on inclusion through web design:
Greetings from DANISHKADAH (an organization for empowerment of Persons with Disabilities)!We are working for promotion of web / information accessibility since many years. In past we just tried to raise awareness for the importance of web / information accessibility. Now we are taking a step forward and offering accessible web development course for Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) and for those working for/with Disabled People Organizations.
Objectives of this course are
1. Raising the awareness about web accessibility and equipping more people with knowledge of how to develope accessible website.
2. Capacity development of Human resources of DPOs and individual PWDs in web base networking and accessible Information and Communication Technology (ICT).
3. Enhancing the web base networking of DPOs, by enabling them to build their own accessible websites.
4. Offering a new IT skill to PWDs that may help in income generating.
5. To promote distance education, training course for outreach marginalized communities.Course Outline:
* 1. HTML (Hyper Text Markup Language)
* 2. CSS (Cascading Style Sheet)
* 3. Accessibility issue when developing the websites
* 4. Validation your HTML and CSS
* 5. Localization and related accessibility issue
For more on the course see:
http://www.danishkadah.org.pk/Projects/training_AWeb/index.html
With English used in so many geographically distinct regions differences arise in usage. Here Jim Sandhu's classic paper on "design for all" creates the path to the current global dialogue on Universal Design as applied to services not simply to built environments.
The design for all approach covers a range of meanings which are synonymous with - barrier-free, inclusive, transgenerational, universal design, etc. Another often quoted phrase associated with design for all is "designing for the broader average." This far the approach has focused mainly on the built environment and products. However, in the last few years there has been an increasing awareness that the approach is fundamental to the provision of public services through telematics and to a barrier-free Information Society. That is the main focus of this paper.The approach recognises that accessible systems, products, reliable information sources and environments can maximise choice and enhance the ability of the individual to live independently and to exercise citizenship proactively. Underlying this is the fact that although not everyone needs assistive technology or specialised products like wheelchairs, everyone but everyone needs good design whatever the context. Good design enables, whilst bad design disables, irrespective of the user's abilities. That in essence is what design for all is about in the context of public services.
For the full article see:
What is Design for All?
http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/Us_Eu/conf/tide98/72/sandhu_jim.html
The Graz Declaration on Disability and Ageing resulted from the June 8-9, 2006 conference on Ageing and Disability in Graz, Austria.
The GRAZ DECLARATION on DISABILITY and AGEING
Preamble
Throughout this declaration we use the term “ageing people with disabilities”. People with disabilities are a diverse group including people with physical, sensory, intellectual disabilities[1], developmental disabilities, people with mental health problems as well as with complex and multiple disabilities as outlined in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (WHO, 2001). These disabilities may be life-long, or acquired during the ageing process. It is broadly recognised that many of the disabling conditions for people as described here are caused by society.
In constructing a European area of rights, participation and inclusion, special attention should be given to elderly citizens with disabilities in order that they may be enabled to enjoy a life of opportunities that are equal to those of other citizens.
The topic of ageing has been recognised as a top theme on the European agenda. European societies are characterised by a rising proportion of old and very old citizens. A continuing increase in life-expectancy is predicted for the decades to come along with a continuing reduction in birth rates in most of the European countries (described in the European Commission’s Green Paper “Confronting demographic change: a new solidarity between the generations”, (March 2005). We are in a society that is increasingly getting older but one that is unprepared to meet the needs and interests of this group of people, particularly those with disabilities.
Fundamentally, we believe that ageing is associated with the development and acquisition of experience, wisdom, competence and respect. These developments and values apply equally to ageing people with disabilities. Ageing can often, however, be associated with negative connotations, such as declining physical health and cognitive abilities, inactivity, poverty, social isolation and social dependency. Moreover, with respect to ageing, greater prominence should be given to concepts of healthy and active ageing. Promoting positive perspectives through active ageing strategies may result in an added value to the individual as well as to society. We also recognise that ageing people with disabilities are progressing towards the ends of their lives and that this may bring particular challenges in ensuring that they achieve this with dignity and respect.
Issues for consideration by governments are the financial costs of providing for old age: the increasing needs for social and health care, as well as the growing need for assistance and care for older ageing people with disabilities (compare the special report 1/2006 of the European Commission, Economic an Financial Affairs: “The impact of ageing on public expenditure (2004-2050)”). Thus ageing and disability will be the test for inclusiveness of European societies for the decades to come, with community living and independent living being key elements on that journey. Overall, it will be about the quality of people’s lives in the community and about appropriate support services required. The greater challenge is to be able to recognise and address the general and shared needs of all ageing people and those with disabilities at the same time as being able to emphasise and meet the very specific and varied needs of the individuals in these groups.
Within the group of older citizens in general, two groups can be identified that need special attention in terms of policy planning, systems of supports and rights - groups specifically addressed in the Graz Declaration.
Firstly, people with intellectual disabilities who now enjoy a similar life expectancy to the general population, are not considered in most of the programmes, strategies and statistics either on European or on national levels. Systems of support for citizens with intellectual disabilities are often poorly or not developed when dealing with the issue of ageing. There are consistently gaps in the legislations in the various member states with respect to emerging groups of disabled older citizens, such as people with intellectual disabilities.
Secondly, a significant proportion of older people experience dependency for the first time during the later stages of their life, often as a consequence of age-related loss in functional capacity. A substantial proportion of older people with functional dependency may need long-term nursing-type care during the final years of their lives.
Recognition must also be given for both these groups to the increasing number of ageing people with disabilities who are living in mutual dependency with elderly family members.
There may be differences between these two groups in terms of their needs and supports, as well as differences between them and the general elderly population, a background often neglected and now addressed in the Graz Declaration.
Furthermore, policies tend to be focused only on the issue of care, disregarding necessary policy reforms for developing mechanisms for participation and independence. Without legislation that will allow the removal of barriers in goods and services, a more inclusive labour market, with measures for accommodating the work environment and facilitating job retention, society will be unable to meet current challenges.
Finally, little is being done to support the emergence of a “silver economy”, reflecting both the economic pressure of old age related expenses and the potential economic contribution of older citizens.
As a society Europe is only at the beginning of a learning process about old age. The fundamental challenge is to make the shift from the “welfare state” to the “welfare society” through developing structures and regulations that allow people at all ages, whether they have a life-long disability or age-related dependency, to have equal opportunities for participation through inclusive policies and adequate support which are the main ingredients for a good life for older citizens with disabilities.
The delegates of the European conference on “Disability and Ageing – Ageing and Disability”, held in Graz, Austria, including various stakeholders from both the disability and ageing field:
· People with physical, sensory and intellectual disabilities,
· Older people,
· Family and professional carers,
· Service providers,
· Authorities,
· Politicians and policy makers,
· Academics and researchers
· Health professionals
a) promote a positive ageing concept in which ageing is seen as a performance and achievement on the individual as well as a societal level;
b) affirm that ageing people with disabilities are entitled to basic human rights and fundamental freedoms as proclaimed in the “Charter of the United Nations” (1948), and as embedded in many other international declarations and conventions;
c) recognise the importance of the principles and policy guidelines contained in the “United Nations Standard Rules on Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities” (1993) as well as recognising the “UN Principles for Older Persons” (1991) promoting the principles of independence, participation, care, self-fulfilment and dignity “in order to add life to the years that have been added to life” (UN, 1992);
d) recognise further the diversity of persons with disability as well the diversity of older disabled persons;
e) refer to the “Treaty of Amsterdam” (1997), developing the concept of citizenship in the European Union and reinforcing the guarantee of non-discrimination (Article 13);
f) are mindful that according to the “EU Charter on Fundamental Rights” (2000) discrimination both on the grounds of age and disability is prohibited by Article 21 and thus is a violation of the inherent dignity of the human person, and are mindful of the right of elderly people and people with disabilities to benefit from measures designed to ensure their independence and to participate in the life of the community (Article 25 and 26);
g) re-affirm the principle of “nothing about us without us”; striving to ensure that policies and measures affecting disabled persons cannot be decided without their involvement and consultation.
1) Declare
a) that all ageing persons with disabilities are full citizens, entitled to exercise their rights on the basis of respect of their individual choices and their differences;
b) that a culture of autonomy, dignity, choice and respect should be promoted towards ageing people with disabilities;
c) that all ageing persons with disabilities have the same right as others to make decisions about their own lives;
d) that there should be a presumption of capacity to make decisions and choices;
e) that support may be required for those with limited capacity to express choices and decisions, to enable the individual to do so. It is essential that such support respects the will and preferences of the person and is free from undue influence;
f) that it is unacceptable that ageing persons with disabilities continue to face significant barriers in terms of activities and full participation in society;
g) that it is unacceptable that a significant number of ageing persons with disabilities live without dignity in inappropriate, restrictive, secluded, non person-centred accommodation settings, regardless of their will, preferences, requirements and rights;
h) that there are strong concerns about the high risk of multiple, aggravated forms of discrimination, such as social exclusion, marginalisation, poverty, neglect, violation and abuse for ageing people with disabilities;
i) that ageing people with disabilities have as equal a right as the general population to health promotion / disease prevention programmes and health care as well as to appropriate support systems, enabling better quality of life and thus facilitating active ageing and full participation in society;
j) that it is essential to respect human and civil rights in the day-to-day lives of ageing people with disabilities;
k) that home care and independent living measures should be promoted and segregating residential arrangements (e.g. institutions with no respect for options and choices) be replaced by community living in small groups, fostering social participation and citizenship, through adequate incentives and reform of social protection systems;
l) that elderly people, disabled people, and families should be involved in the definition of policies;
m) that professional as well as family carers should be consulted about their needs in the care of ageing people with disabilities;
n) that dialogue among all stakeholders (people with disabilities, families, providers, policy makers, researchers) be promoted by governments at all levels;
2) Agree
a) to promote a positive approach to, and empowerment of, ageing people with disabilities;
b) to defend human and civil rights of highly vulnerable ageing people with disabilities;
c) to strengthen social inclusion, integration and participation by promoting self-help and by respecting as well as supporting existing social, community and family networks;
d) to promote the needs of ageing people with disabilities within mainstream policy and strategy development, at the same time to promote the specific needs of this population within special parts of policy and strategy documents (twin-track approach);
e) to support a human rights and person-centred approach, recognising the individual needs, requirements, and preferences in the planning, development, funding and evaluation of national service provision;
f) to request the availability and affordability of community-based services and community living be developed in order to replace all kinds of segregating settings;
3. Recommend to
3.1. The European Commission
a) to produce, within a green paper, a framework for the development of standards of support and living conditions for ageing people with disabilities. The green paper should address topics such as living in the community, access to health and social care, the barriers to employment, design for all, e-inclusion, as well as ageing and dying with dignity;
b) to address this issue within the open method of coordination on social protection;
c) to develop comprehensive non-discrimination legislation in all areas of EU policy on the ground of disability and of age;
d) to address barriers in access to goods and services in the development of legislation in the internal market and transport;
3.2. The Member States
a) to develop supports for ageing people with disabilities that will ensure equal participation in the community, and to address affordability, accessibility, availability and adaptability of services, including health services (EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, Article 21, 25,26 and 35);
b) to take a human rights and person-centred approach to enabling ageing people with disabilities to live and participate in their community;
c) to gradually replace all kinds of segregating settings by community-based individual and small group living arrangements, and support for ageing people with disabilities living with their families;
d) to develop specific programs of health promotion / disease prevention for ageing people with disabilities;
e) to actively involve ageing people with disabilities and their families, in an outcome-based quality-management system of service provisions;
f) to develop existing and new, independent systems of advocacy, free of undue influence, to specifically address the individual needs of ageing people with disabilities who cannot advocate for themselves or have no natural informal social support network (e.g. family);
g) to be proactive in anticipating and developing specific support for ageing people with disabilities who live with ageing family carers;
h) to ensure that national legislation promotes and recognises supported information and decision making for ageing people with disabilities and to replace single- person substituted decision making and removal of legal capacity;
i) to adopt a stakeholder approach to involving people with disabilities, families, social service providers, policy planners and researchers in the definition of policies, and frameworks of provisions, services and supports;
j) to develop formal educational programs, training and information provision on ageing and disability issues (knowledge, attitudes and values), including a human rights and citizenship perspective for staff and other carers;
k) to recognise, encourage and reward informal social support arrangements through attractive frameworks;
l) to encourage and invest in both fundamental and applied research (holistic approach), including assistive technologies and new technologies on issues of age-related disabilities, as well as the ageing effects on people with disabilities, through public and private funding strategies;
3.3. Various social and civil actors
a) to develop existing or new social/civic structures to monitor and uphold the human rights and fundamental freedoms of ageing people with disabilities;
b) to promote collaboration between stakeholders both in the fields of disability and of ageing;
3.4. National and international organizations
a) to disseminate the principles of the Graz Declaration and to communicate their support of the present declaration to national and regional governments and bodies;
b) to communicate their support of the present declaration to the President of the Commission of the European Union.
______________________________________________________________
The GRAZ Declaration coalition:
European NGOs (in alphabetical order):
AGE: European older people’s platform www.age-platform.org
ARFIE: Association on research and training in Europe www.arfie.info
EASPD: European association of service providers for people with disabilities
www.easpd.org
EDF: European Disability Forum www.edf-feph.org
EURAG: European Federation of Older Persons www.eurag-europe.org
Inclusion Europe: The European association for persons with intellectual disability and their families www.inclusion-europe.org
Austrian NGOs (in alphabetical order):
Lebenshilfe Österreich www.lebenshilfe.at
Die Steirische Behindertenhilfe www.behindertenhilfe.or.at
Supportive correspondence will be transmitted through the GRAZ Declaration consortium via EASPD to the President of the Commission of the European Union.
Address:
EASPD
Av. d’Auderghem / Ouderghemlaan 63, B-1040 Brussels
Tel: +32/2/282 46 10, Fax: +32/2/230 72 33, e-mail: info@easpd.be
[1] Terminology: in the UK people with intellectual disabilities are commonly referred to as people with learning disabilities.
Siource:
http://www.ageing-and-disability.com/aad/index.php?seitenId=4
Straight from a press release doe Smart Design we begin to see Emotional Design and Universal Design start to interact in the marketplace:
*Workshops focus on three stages of consumer experience: awareness, decision-making and usage * Positive feedback from launch at Frost & Sullivan's Fourth Annual Innovations in New Product Development and Marketing 200829 September, 2008 - Smart Design, one of the world's leading consumer product design firms, now offers Customer Experience Lifecycle workshops as part of the design service framework for translating customers' emotional responses into commercially successful products. The Workshops are the brainchild of Smart Design President Tom Dair, and enable more inclusive discussions and evaluations of new ideas between a wider variety of business divisions - from marketing teams and engineers to upper management and board executives. The non-technical workshops aim to understand the different stages of consumer experience of new products or services over time from a customer rather than a competitor point of view.
Customer Experience Lifecycle Workshops (cont'd):
Smart Design's Customer Experience Lifecycle workshops focus on the three essential stages a consumer has with a given product/service: awareness, decision-making and usage. The awareness stage is a pre-purchase ‘read’ that encapsulates an individual's first reaction to a product/service and their initial emotional response - i.e. curiosity, intrigue, confidence, etc. The second stage is the decision-making that entails a closer inspection of the given product/service, with the final 'read' being a post-purchase usage experience. This is drilled down into two sections, a consumer's first time use and an ongoing usage experience."Focusing on a consumer's experience over time encourages repeat customers and promotes brand loyalty," commented Tom Dair, Co-Founder and President of Smart Design. "Businesses can only compete on price and technology for so long before parity is reached. The next level centres on design. Companies are under immense pressure nowadays to come up with new ideas and developments for innovative designs to compete for market share. However, they don't always realise the importance of a customer’s emotional responses that greatly influence an individual's decision to buy, use and keep a product."
Smart Design launched its Customer Experience Lifecycle workshop at Frost & Sullivan's Fourth Annual Innovations in New Product Development and Marketing 2008 to executives from a variety of sectors, including the aircraft, consumer, telecoms and medical industries. All responded very positively to the new approach to product design. "Designers tend to think about products 'frozen in time' at the moment the design is finished. They tend not to think about people’s interactions with a given product/service - and even less about the different types of interactions a consumer might have over time," continued Tom Dair. "Our evaluation tool forces designers and innovators, as well as anyone involved in the design process from any division within a company, to think about consumers' personal experiences with a product/service during the first, second and third stages."
Participants of Smart Design's first Customer Experience Lifecycle workshop were surprised by the experience and how their perceptions of a product/service changed as they spent more time with it. Feedback provided during the workshop highlighted how participants focused more on the amount of items sold, without realising the potential a person’s positive experience with a product can have on a company's bottom line: a significant increase in sales.
About Smart Design
Smart Design has been turning insight and innovation into successful consumer experiences for over 25 years. The company's approach integrates product development, interactive experiences, brand communication, and strategic insights to ensure winning design solutions. From its pioneering Universal Design collaboration with OXO International, developing its renowned line of kitchen tools, to its work with leading multi-national companies including HP, Microsoft, Lexar and Acer, developing user-friendly electronics and humanising technology, Smart Design creates products that truly connect with the consumer. Smart Design has offices in New York, San Francisco and Barcelona. Please visit www.smartdesignworldwide.com for more information or contact:Thomas Isaacson
Marketing
Tel: +1 212 784 4052
Email: thomas.isaacson@smartdesignworldwide.comManuela Whittaker
The PressOffice - PR for Smart Design
Tel: +44(0)1780 721433
Email: mwhittaker@pressoffice.targetwire.comAldo deJong
European Office Contact
Tel: +34 935 846 615
Email: aldo.deJong@smartdesignworldwide.com
![]()
I was finishing up my presentation for the 2008 Universal Design in Airports Conference that will start next Tuesday in Chicago. I speak on a panel led by my colleague and Greek-Brazilian-American friend Gus Zografopoules. The topic is "Where do people with disabilities go to get information on flying?" I thought I had nailed down the content. I was looking forward to exploring one of the wheelchair accessible trails shown to me last weekend by folks from the San Francisco Bay Greenbelt Alliance. Then I saw Jim's blog.
Jim Fruchterman's blog at Benetech.org will now be front and center in my talk.
The Rolling Rains blog chronicles a small percentage of the stories on air travel and disability that are sent here (see below) but Jim's tale helps us illustrate what is sometimes overlooked.
Some violations are so egregious that reflection on their deeper meaning requires a cooling down period. The shock value of some stories evoke outrage. Jim's story documents classic nonviolent praxis in the face of injustice. He tells the story in a way that allows for some critical thinking even while the story itself is fresh.
Simon Darcy made an observation about the market dynamics of travelers with disabilities in his game-changing research entitled "From Anxiety to Access." He alerted the world that that we are very well networked and leverage a disproportionately large referral market.
That point didn't need to be made explicit when we reported on billionaire Sminu Jindahl's mistreatment by Jet Air. It seems rather obvious that a billionaire might have more socially beneficial things to do than argue about her competence to sit in an airline seat - and probably had an influential social network.
Jim's Benetech.org is one of the San Francisco Bay Area's premiere social entrepreneurial enterprises. It builds technological solutions for entrenched social problems with such products as a database for documenting (and prosecuting) human rights violations called Martus and their rapidly-expanding service for those who need audio books known as Bookshare. He speaks regularly to industry leaders at events including the World Economic Forum in Davos.
Perhaps it is true that "all publicity is good publicity" but If Dragonair had contracted me to produce a "short list" of people who they would definitely
It was unfortunate that Rami Rabby, the first blind foreign service officer working for the US State Department, was thrown off their Dragonair flight from from Hong Kong to Fuzhou. Like Jim I applaud Rami for the courage of his convictions.
But Jim is being overly humble so I also want to recognize his everyday heroism of solidarity and citizen journalism. He could easily have argued that he had more pressing things to do (yes he is literally a rocket scientist by training) yet he stood by witnessing and documenting this act of all-too-common injustice. Thank you Jim from our entire global community
A select list of similar incidents endured by air travelers with disabilities:
Katrina Segundo-Casino on Cebu Airlines
Lori Mango on American Airlines
Deaf discrimination by Tiger Airways
Rajeev Rajan on SpiceJet, AirSahara, and JetLite
Qantas Issues a 'Non Servium" to a 72 year old
Deaf culture's response to airline discrimination
"Sometimes your just seen as a piece of luggage."
What was my presentation topic again - "Where do people with disabilities go to get information on flying?"
Same answer/new meaning: We go to our friends.
Read more on Benetech's contributions to the world at:
Leslie Carothers has published another insightful article, What does Target know that we don't know?
The principles of Universal Design often take center stage in kitchen design and redesign. Here expert Rex Pace walks viewers through the kitchen in the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority CRDA Universal Design Demo home
SeniorResource.com features a page with definitions and tips on Aging-in-Place. Among the resources is this definition of a "NORC":
A NORC is a community or neighborhood where residents remain for years, and age as neighbors, until a Naturally Occurring Retirement Community develops. A NORC may refer to a specific apartment building, or a street of old single family homes. Residents would just have stayed and just aged.It is possible to band together and develop, or seek help to develop, access to services to aid those needing assistance, thereby retaining the highest quality of life for all residents as they age. Some 27% of seniors live in a NORC.
http://www.seniorresource.com/ageinpl.htm#remodserv
Carlos Sprei at Brazil 10 is in the process of growing his product line. Look for inclusive travel packages into Brazil starting withe Parque dos Sonhos in Socorro.
See:
http://www.brasil10.com/novidades5en.php
It is also the spirit that brings disabled adventure travel experts to the podium at Adventure Travel World Summit, the Adventure Travel World Fair, and the Brazilian Adventure Society in São Paulo, Brazil right now and to the 2009 national conference of SATH and the Adventure Tour Operators' Association of India 2009 national conference in India this coming January.
(New York, September 5, 2008) – Despite recent positive steps, discrimination against persons with disabilities continues in China and organizations for the disabled face government pressure and harassment, Human Rights Watch said today on the eve of the September 6 Paralympic Games in Beijing.“The Chinese government deserves praise for enacting laws and ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” said Sophie Richardson, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch. “But so far these protections have meant little to persons with disabilities and their advocates in China who struggle to promote their rights and, in particular, to fairly compete for employment.”
The Chinese government has in recent years enacted a variety of new laws including the Law on the Protection of Disabled Persons, Regulations on the Education of Persons with Disabilities, and the Regulations on Employment of Persons with Disabilities, which on paper provide impressive protections of the rights of China’s estimated 82.7 million persons with disabilities. Human Rights Watch applauded the Chinese government’s August 1, 2008, ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Human Rights Watch said that the new laws have not ended discriminatory employment practices.

In June 2007, shocking images of workers who had been held in slave-like conditions in Shanxi brick kilns were published; many of the workers proved to have mental disabilities. Over the next two months, authorities endeavored to free 1,340 people from similar working conditions in kilns, mines, and other forced labor situations. In August 2007, the State Council, China’s cabinet, announced that 367 of those freed had mental disabilities, underscoring that this population remains highly vulnerable to such exploitation.
A 2007 survey by the China University of Political Science and Law of 3,454 people in 10 cities, including Beijing, Guangzhou and Nanjing, among others, revealed that 22 percent of the respondents said their physical disabilities had prompted employers in both the public and private sectors to reject them for jobs. Those attitudes may have contributed to unemployment of the disabled. Official statistics show that more than 8.58 million employable people with disabilities did not have jobs in 2007 and that this number rises by 300,000 per year. Although the government has imposed a mandatory quota requiring that people with disabilities comprise a minimum of 1.5 percent of all employees of government departments, enterprises, and institutions, there is little evidence of official efforts to enforce that quota.
Human Rights Watch called for the Chinese government to ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Optional Protocol, and to loosen restrictions on grassroots civil society organizations dedicated to assisting people with disabilities. Citizens of states which join the Optional Protocol can seek redress at the UN’s Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities after they exhaust domestic legal remedies for convention violations.
The Chinese government has only in the past two decades begun to tolerate grassroots civil society organizations, which operate outside official bureaucracy and control of the Chinese Communist Party. However, such organizations, particularly those devoted to addressing the needs of China’s HIV/AIDS and chronic hepatitis B sufferers, continue to be targets for repression by Chinese security forces suspicious of such groups.
Meng Weina, founder of China’s Huiling Community Services, a nongovernmental organization which assists disabled people in eight major Chinese cities, complained of harassment by Shanghai police in a letter to the International Olympic and Paralympic Committees. A group of Meng’s mentally disabled students were harassed en route to the Special Olympics in Shanghai on October 11, 2007; Meng described the incident as evidence that Chinese police “believe that events initiated by civil society must be ‘dangerous’ and ‘destructive.’”
“Until the Chinese government tolerates a civil society which operates without threat of official repression and improves ordinary citizens’ access to justice, its commitments on paper to people with disabilities will remain limited,” Richardson said.
Human Rights Watch said that the Beijing Paralympics also offer the Chinese government an opportunity to fulfill its Olympics-related commitments to media freedom and internet access. During the August 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the Chinese government continued to obstruct media freedom and to restrict foreign journalists’ access to the internet.
“The Paralympics are the Chinese government’s last chance to live up to the Olympics-related human rights commitments made to the international community, but which were repeatedly violated during the Beijing Games,” Richardson said.
Source:
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/09/04/china19751.htm
Esperamos tantos anos para um evento igual em Recife. E com orgulho nas colegas Pernambucanos que anuncio:
O 1º Congresso Nacional de Turismo Muito Especial de Pernambuco é um evento que visa difundir o turismo para pessoas com deficiência no Brasil, sensibilizando e mostrando cases de sucesso para o trade turístico, empresários, gestores públicos, organizações não governamentais, profissionais da área, acadêmicos e demais interessados.
O congresso será realizado de 10 a 12 de setembro de 2008 no Recife Palace Hotel, Av. Boa Viagem, 4070 - Boa Viagem - Recife - PE.
O Congresso »
Objetivo Geral
Realização de um Congresso na cidade de Recife, capital do Estado de Pernambuco, sobre Turismo Especial e a inclusão das pessoas com deficiência, no intuito de promover e divulgar o Turismo para pessoas com deficiência e/ou mobilidade reduzida.
Objetivos Específicos
· Desenvolvimento do turismo para as pessoas com deficiência no Brasil;
· Difundir no Mercado Turístico a necessidade de investir no atendimento as pessoas com deficiência para atender a demanda crescente deste público;
· Difundir o conceito de Turismo Especial;
· Difundir o conceito de inclusão social das pessoas com deficiência;
· Difundir o conceito de quebra de barreiras arquitetônicas e atitudinais;
· Contribuir para atualizar o conhecimento técnico dos profissionais da área;
· Contribuir para um melhor atendimento às pessoas com deficiência e/ou mobilidade no turismo.
Programa do Congresso »
10 de Setembro de 2008 – Quarta - feira:
08:00 – Abertura da secretaria para credenciamento
18:30 – Cerimonial de abertura
19:00 – Apresentação do Instituto Muito Especial e do Congresso
19:45 – Show de abertura - Apresentação de Música e Dança
20:30 – Coquetel de Boas - vindas
11 de Setembro de 2008 – Quinta - feira:
( Mediadora: Maria Beatriz Würth Lagranha, com assessoria de Patricia Würth Medina )
08:00 – Abertura da secretaria para credenciamento
08:30 – Welcome Coffee
09:00 – Mesa - TURISMO ESPECIAL
Marcus Scarpa
Vera Sanches
Adriana Braun
José Otávio de Meira Lins
Jorge Sales
Ricardo Shimosakai
Sílvio Costa Filho
Helcio Eustaquio Rizzi
Debate
12:00 – Almoço
14:00 – Mesa - COMO LIDAR COM AS PESSOAS COM DEFICIÊNCIA NO TURISMO
Ethel Rosenfeld
Jefferson Maia
Sarita Araújo Pereira
Antonio José de Athayde Junior
Debate
15:50 – Coffee Break
16:10 – Mesa - RESPONSABILIDADE SOCIAL E INCLUSÃO
Rebecca Monte Nunes Bezerra
Rosangela Cavalcante Lopes
Adilson Ventura
Edgar Werblowsky
Nerivaldo Lira Alves
Debate
18:30 – Encerramento
12 de Setembro de 2008 – Sexta - feira:
08:00 – Abertura da secretaria para credenciamento
08:00 – Mesa - ROTEIROS TURÍSTICOS – CASE
Adriana Braun
Maria Cristina Dal Pozzo Arzolla
Roger José Baqui
José Rogério Arruda
Gustavo Mauricio Estevão de Azevedo
Debate
09:40 – Coffee Break
10:00 – Mesa - ACESSIBILIDADE NO TURISMO
José Antonio Lanchoti
Maria Paula Teperino
Ângela Carneiro da Cunha
Artur Mendonça
Debate
12:00 – Almoço
14:00 – Mesa - MERCADO DE TRABALHO NO TURISMO E O SISTEMA DE COTAS
Romeu Kazumi Sassaki
Dadá Moreira
Leda Azevedo
Debate
15:50 – Coffee Break
16:20 – Mesa - A MIDIA E O TURISMO ESPECIAL
Cristina Lira
Cláudia Jacob
Janaína Lima
Alexandre Galvão
Rhaldney Santos
Antonio Roberto Rocha
Debate
18:00 – Avaliação dos Trabalhos
18:30 – Encerramento
Durante o evento ocorrerão debates e exposições sobre a temática do Turismo Acessível.
A programação está sujeita a alterações.
Local do evento »
O Congresso será realizado no Recife Palace Hotel.
O hotel fica na praia de Boa viagem, um cenário deslumbrante, e um dos pontos turísticos mais visitados da cidade de Recife. Av. Boa Viagem, 4070 - Boa Viagem Recife - Pernambuco - Brasil
Research and Markets may be a bit ignorant of the history of Universal Design but it does get the motivator right for its ubiquitous adoption in Japan -- the demographic age inversion that will sequentially impact all countries in the world:
DEMOGRAPHICS TRENDS & A NEW DESIGN MOVEMENTChanging demographics in Japanese society mean that the population is ageing rapidly, resulting in dramatic changes in lifestyles and consumer expectation.
UNIVERSAL DESIGN (UD) is a new revolutionary movement to promote a different way of thinking about the functionality of the package builds accessibility and user-convenience into the initial concept: easy opening for the elderly yet child proof, clearly labeled instructions for eyesight impaired yet hold shelf appeal, pre-cooked meals in retortable or mircrowavable pouches are self-venting to release steam and prevent scalding.
This new UD movement has been adopted by ALL of the major packaging producers and brand owners in Japan collaborating to develop new active intelligent packaging materials, substrates and closures.
This report analyses the impact of UD and includes practical examples of new packaging formats which have found success in the market as a result of UD.
Press release:
Top-Level Data and a Strategic Analysis of the Key Drivers of Japan's US$54.8 Billion Package Production Industry
Anyone following the Paralympics, the impact of Article 30 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, or who just wants inclusion and accessibility to really mean something should spend a few minutes reading Corey Fairbanks' article in Athletic Business "Obstacle Course."
His piece begins like any good travelogue by someone with a disability -- with the recognition that all travel is adventure travel for a person with a disability - and proceeds to extend the principles of Universal Design into the locker room (yes, complete with photos and illustrations):
To be part of Nebraska's elite football program, I had spent countless hours in weight rooms and recreation facilities preparing my body for competition. Now, wheelchair tennis matches notwithstanding, I find myself challenged by wet and cluttered locker rooms that lack proper shower accessories, as well as inaccessible weight and cardio rooms, gymnasiums and swimming pools. I, like so many others, also face the negative stigma attached to people with disabilities, despite the fact that we form a demographic that has begun to understand in greater numbers the benefits of good health and fitness. Unfortunately, our best efforts to maintain a healthy lifestyle are too often met by unaccommodating recreation centers. Accessing facilities by way of stairs, restricted paths and narrow doorways can be a workout in itself. One is left to imagine the obstacles that wait inside.According to the most recent U.S. Census Bureau figures, more than 14 million Americans live with some form of physical disability. Whether these individuals are accommodated or excluded depends greatly on the way architects choose to conduct their business and design buildings.
His closing call for an "attitude adjustment" is widely shared by Rolling Rains Report readers around the world:
It is hard to believe, but even today I encounter basic discrimination based on my disability. Some recreation facility operators still have the attitude that their facility is only for healthy, able-bodied individuals and that they are not responsible for accommodating those with disabilities. Nothing could be further from the truth. These facilities must be designed for the health and well-being of all people.More common, still, are the curious stares I get from other facility users. Human beings are methodical by nature and tend to get upset when they encounter anything that throws them off their routine; or is it just that they are afraid of what they don't understand? Fear of the unknown can be discomforting. I argue that it is therefore more important than ever to integrate members of the disabled community with their able-bodied neighbors. The more these two groups interact, the more comfortable all people will be.
I share these thoughts as a plea to recreation center designers and operators. The concepts discussed here should be integrated into the design of the facility from the beginning, when it is much more cost-effective, rather than renovating at a later date. Whether preparing for a new facility or the renovation of an existing one, facility operators should consult with members of the disabled community to learn firsthand their needs and desires, and they shouldn't be afraid to go above and beyond the norm.
Whether they lack enlightenment on the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities or empowerment to make changes to their facilities, too many operators do only what is required by law. More need to look at the issue from a different perspective and create something truly functional — for everyone.
IssueLab is a free online archive of social research by nonprofits
Stacy at IssueLabs reports:
Changing Lives through Sport -- A Report Card on the Impact of Special Olympics
This report is a nice, though brief, testament to the virtues and benefits of the Special Olympics. Though it sometimes reads like a mission statement, this ends up being less troubling than you would think since the mission is admirable and, as evidence shows, effective. More than 75% of Special Olympics athletes participate for longer than 5 years, and athletes, family, and coaches report impressive social, health, skills, and personal improvement. The Special Olympics clearly affect many people in many ways, but lest we forget they are at heart a sports competition the report offers the fact that, "During the 2003 Special Olympics World Summer Games in Dublin, Ireland, 38 individual athletes' performances would have bettered performances by athletes in the 2004 International Summer Olympics in Athens." It's not hard for me to imagine how the Special Olympics are doing great things for people with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and "to impact the perspectives of society at large toward this population." Now, after reading the report, I don't have to imagine.
IssueLab's recently launched collection of research on the Olympics.
The following titles in the collection might be of particular interest to you:
"Oscar Pistorius and the Future Nature of Olympic, Paralympic, and Other Sports"
"Changing Lives through Sport -- A Report Card on the Impact of Special Olympics"
IssueLab is a free online archive of social research by nonprofits. We have non-corporate-sponsored research on a wide variety of subjects that might be of use to you in your blogging. I hope you get a chance to check out the Olympics CloseUp and IssueLab's archive in general. If you like what you see, perhaps you could mention us in a post!
Thanks so much!
Vanessa Beck
IssueLab
3940 N. Ravenswood Ave., Suite 2E
Chicago, IL 60613
773.649.1790
vanessa@issuelab.org
http://www.issuelab.org
IssueLab: bringing nonprofit research into focus
http://www.issuelab.org/subscribe/public/index.php
Candy Harrington's work is featured at the Daily Herald today in Ideas for planning an accessible vacation by Jane Oppermann.
An International Institute for Social Entrepreneurs (IISE) in Trivandrum, created by the Founders of the Braille Without Borders Sabriye Tenberken, who herself is blind and Paul Kronenberg, is all set to train about 40 young visually impaired persons from different parts of the world with skills to set up their own social or environmental projects in their countries.
Send applications BrailleWB@gmx.net or www.Braillewithoutborders.org
One measure of the penetration of Universal Design thinking into the mainstream is the rhetoric of articles on the topic.
This piece by Melissa Birdsong enhances the appeal of UD with good writing.
Adding the Human Element to Your New Home
RISMEDIA, August 4, 2008-Thoughtful design can create a home that’s more usable by people of all ages and abilities-a home truly designed for life.
Have you ever struggled to open a door with arms full of groceries, tried to take a stroller up the front steps or maneuver a wheelchair into a too-narrow bathroom? If so, you’ve experienced the challenges of dealing with less-than-thoughtful home design. Universal design is a philosophy borne out of the need to make homes and other buildings more accessible and more usable for most people, regardless of age or ability. Creating a home that makes life easier, safer and more comfortable for the people who live there, and the people who visit, is at the heart of this idea.
Universal design is a guiding principle that, when applied, makes every home family-friendly for all. Fortunately, better functionality and good aesthetics are not mutually exclusive. The best home design incorporates both, and home buyers are demanding that their homes support healthier living without sacrificing style. With better planning, a home becomes more useful-and more marketable-to a broader audience of potential buyers.
Savvy home buyers are looking for cues that communicate livability and maneuverability: wide, no-step, zero-threshold entryways; a main floor master suite and seamless transitions from room to room. Little things make a big difference. Lever handles instead of knobs are easier to grasp when opening doors or turning on faucets, whether you’re dealing with arthritis or just slippery hands. Integrating “layered” lighting-general, task and accent-supports better vision for both young and old eyes. And those stylish rocker switches are much easier to turn on and off with a free elbow than the standard toggle.
A kitchen designed for versatile activities and family members opens up possibilities: varying counter heights, open-base cabinetry to allow stools, and easy-access side-by-side refrigerators reduce fatigue. In the bath, low- or no-threshold showers with integrated seating and adjustable handheld showerheads, taller toilets and grab bars-always grab bars-help prevent falls whether you’re young or young at heart.
So the question is not why build accessibility into a home, but rather why not? Issues in existing homes can be addressed with modifications and upgrades. For new construction, making simple adjustments to the plan before building begins can often cost just a few hundred dollars extra. Many consumers are putting greater emphasis on health and well-being, and having a home that supports a safer, more comfortable life while still delivering charm and curb appeal add up to a winning proposition.
Melissa Birdsong is vice president for Trend, Design & Brand, Lowe’s Companies, Inc.
For more information, please visit [1] www.lowes.com.
RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: [2] realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.
More Home Trends by Melissa Birdsong:
*
[3] Utilizing Consumer Resources - Time, Energy, Money
[4] Go Beyond Beige - Color vs. Neutral Schemes
[5] Home Trends - Outdoor Living
[?] [6] Share This With a Friend
Article printed from RISMedia: http://rismedia.com
URL to article: http://rismedia.com/wp/2008-08-01/adding-the-human-element-to-your-new-home/
URLs in this post:
[1] www.lowes.com: http://www.lowes.com
[2] realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com: mailto:realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com
[3] Utilizing Consumer Resources - Time, Energy, Money: http://rismedia.com/wp/2008-06-09/utilizing-consumer-resources-time-energy-money/
[4] Go Beyond Beige - Color vs. Neutral Schemes: http://rismedia.com/wp/2008-05-16/go-beyond-beige-color-vs-neutral-schemes/
[5] Home Trends - Outdoor Living: http://rismedia.com/wp/2008-04-07/home-trends-outdoor-living/
[6] Share This With a Friend: http://rismedia.com/?p=29369&akst_action=share-this

Los gobeirnos de las naciones de America Central han prodizido un curso ejectutivo sobre turismo para todos.

EN EL CASO DEL TRATO CON PERSONAS CON DISCAPACIDAD
* La falta de INFORMACION para el libre desplazamiento en un destino
Las personas afectadas por alguna forma de minusvalía (concepto que involucra entre otros segmentos de la demanda al grupo de la tercera edad, grupo familiar con niños pequeños, niños, discapacitados temporales -mujeres embarazadas, enyesadas, etc.- y permanentes -motrices, sensoriales y mentales-, etc.), en el uso de su tiempo libre destinado a actividades turísticas y/o recreativas generalmente encuentran distintas situaciones de conflicto en el espacio turístico, que podemos agrupar en :
* Los ESPACIOS VERDES (Plazas y parques), en la ESTRUCTURA URBANA (Obras de saneamiento, cruces peatonales y vehiculares, etc.), en el MOBILIARIO URBANO (laminarías, bebederos, bancos, etc.)
* Los EDIFICIOS, en los que podemos destacar los destinados a ALOJAMIENTO hotelero y extrahotelero, las instalaciones para GASTRONOMIA (Bares, confiterías y restaurantes), y las instalaciones para el desarrollo de ACTIVIDADES CULTURALES como museos y salas de espectáculos.
* Las instalaciones para ACTIVIDADES CIENTIFICAS (Congresos y convenciones) se suman a las instalaciones para el desarrollo de ACTIVIDADES RECREATIVAS- DEPORTIVAS como estadios y sus espacios complementarios (Vestuarios, gimnasios, etc.). Estos son los ejemplos mas significativos de este segmento.
* El desarrollo de ACTIVIDADES LUDICAS en áreas naturales (Montañas, playas y ríos) y en áreas urbanas (zoológicos, casinos y discotecas) impiden por su conformación el acceso a estos atractivos.
*El variable TRANSPORTE también presenta situaciones de conflicto en el caso de terminales, accesos y áreas de estacionamiento, junto con los medios específicos de transporte aéreo, marítimo, terrestre y fluvial.Las personas con discapacidad particularmente requieren índices mayores de seguridad durante su desplazamiento durante su tiempo productivo y durante el tiempo libre, principalmente en la faz informativa de servicios al usuario. Es conveniente considerar las siguientes recomendaciones de la Comisión Nacional Asesora para la Integración de Personas con Discapacidad:
"...Una persona con discapacidad podrá integrarse más o menos adecuadamente, de acuerdo al ambiente en el que le toque vivir: empezando por la familia y continuando con el medio educativo, recreativo, laboral, cultural, etc.: dentro de un enfoque físico e histórico concreto.
Por ello es necesario combatir la ignorancia, el desconocimiento, el mito, el prejuicio, etc., en que suele enfrentarse en torno de estas personas.
En este sentido se surgieron algunas propuestas con el objetivo de contribuir a la concientización y motivación de la comunidad en relación a la integración de las personas con discapacidad.La integración es un proceso mutuo en el que intervenimos todos y se basa en el respaldo por el otro. Estar discapacitado no es estar enfermo; evite referirse a estas personas como enfermas o tratarlos como tales.
Fuente: http://www.paph-oea-cct.com/publicaciones/st01/libro/indice.htm
La Oraganizacion Mundial de Turismo en su documento "Para un turismo accesible a los minusválidos en los años 90" considera con relación a este tema ciertas pautas de diseño:
"...A. Terminales, estaciones e instalaciones afines
1- Los pasajeros con deficiencias de movilidad en especial los que utilizan sillas de ruedas, deberían tener fácil acceso a servicios de transporte de ida y vuelta hacia y desde todas las terminales de los c/ Los prestadores de servicios deben contar con personal capacitado en la atención de PMR. medios de transporte.
2- Siempre que sea posible, las terminales deberían estar situadas a un mismo nivel o equipadas con rampas donde exista un cambio de altura.
3- Cuando sea necesario, deberían preverse rampas especiales o ascensores no utilizados para carga y otros fines, con destino a las personas con deficiencias de movilidad y a las que utilizan sillas de ruedas.
4- Los cruces de las vías de acceso deberían estar provistos de señales especiales y semáforos para las personas con deficiencias visuales o auditivas para que puedan atravesarlas con seguridad.
5- El acceso a los medios de transporte debería ser lo más sencillo posible y disponer de asistencia cuando sea requerida.
6- Las personas en silla de ruedas que tengan que trasladarse a sillas especiales de embarque, deberían poder hacerlo lo más cerca posible del medio de transporte, y las sillas de ruedas deberían ser almacenadas de modo que se les pueda devolver intactas inmediatamente a la llegada al destino o punto de tránsito
Fuente:
http://www.turismoparatodos.org.ar/tu
A new research report commissioned by the Government shows that while progress is being made, disabled people in Britain are still more likely than non-disabled people to experience disadvantage in a variety of areas.
Experiences and Expectations of Disabled People, the first comprehensive study of disability issues in six years, looked at key policy areas including employment, education, transport, health and discrimination across Great Britain in 2007.
The research, which was commissioned by the Office for Disability Issues (ODI), provides a unique snapshot of the lives of nearly 2,000 disabled people. The study was ground-breaking in that it actively involved disabled people throughout the research process.
For downloading full report please visit: http://www.officefordisability.gov.uk/research/eedp.asp
One of the joys of opening up the real world of people with disabilities to others is sharing the moment when a light goes on and the seemingly vast distance between disabled and non-disabled disappears.
Sometimes we do that with a role-playing exercise, a discussion, an article or just in casual conversation.
For those who will attend the New Delhi, Mumbai, Kochi, or Chennai workshops sponsored by ASTA - India I offer the following online videos to trigger that moment. Welcome to the art and images of disability culture from around the world.
From USA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc1YdL_w1Hg
From Portugal:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFUacatn0IM
From Germany:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDnNrBPh1KU
From England:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZfOVNwjFU0
In ASL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBWaXGNUubA
From Brazil:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAknXbxPJg4
From USA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYPQ5UbrK1I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFUacatn0IM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTxWoiefu3I&feature=related
One organization in India has distinguished itself on the national and international stage for innovation and expertise in Inclusive Tourism - Samarthya. It follows the path of "Promotion of a Barrier Free, Rights-Based Inclusive Society."
At the center of this remarkable organization are Ms. Anjlee Agarwal and Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva. They have been trained in the Promotion of Accessible Tourism at Bali (Indonesia), 2000; Non-Handicapping Environment for Disabled People by United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2002 & Asia Pacific Development Centre on Disability (APCD), Bangkok (Thailand) 2004. They have in turn taken this training and put it to continuous use for the benefit of their nation and the region.
* Sanjeev and Anjlee have represented India at various International forums such as: International Conference on Transport & Mobility for Elderly and the Disabled (TRANSED), Hamamatsu (Japan), 2004;
* Panelist at the 2nd International Conference for Universal Design, Kyoto;
* Guest Lecturer at Osaka Municipal Lifelong Learning Centre, Osaka, (Japan) October 2006
* Resource Persons at International Workshop on Implementing Accessibility Regulations in Sri Lanka, Colombo (Sri Lanka) December 2006
So far Samarthya has conducted Access Audits (facilities checks) of more than 80 public utility buildings in various States, most of them with implementation results.
In addition, Samarthya has organized more than 60 Awareness & Capacity Building Excursion Tours for persons with severe disabilities to Indian places of historical, cultural, religious and tourist interests’ promoting the concept of Barrier-Free Tourism. Some of the places visited include Agra, Mathura, Bharatpur, Jaipur, Udaipur, Mt. Abu, Ahmedabad, Vadodra, Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine, Dalhousie, Chamba, Amritsar, Shimla, Kurushetra, Rishikesh, Mussoorie, Nainital, Lucknow, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Mysore, Chennai, Tirupati, Goa, Port Blair, Bangalore, Gauhauti and Shillong.
Publications include:
* Access for All- Technical Brochure on Internal & External Design Considerations prepared in consonance with internationally accepted standards and building bylaws fourth edition in English, Hindi and Braille for Professionals, Administrators and Planners.
* Authored first Training Manual to promote Barrier Free Environment- Guidelines for Training of Trainers, 2005 published by Rehabilitation Council of India (RCI). The contents as far as practicable, developed in Indian perspective with simple line illustrations, easy to understand format and result oriented case studies with photographs. Second Edition of the Manual is underway.
* Authored chapter in Handbook of Inclusive Education for Educators, Administrators and Planners, 2005 published by SAGE Publications; New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London
* Authored chapters in Work Book for In-service Teachers, 2006 on Barrier Free Environment in Inclusive School published by Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)
* Currently reviewing of first edition of Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier Free Environment for Disabled and Elderly Persons, 1998 by Central Public Works Department (CPWD), Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment, Government of India, is underway.
Other reports on Samarthya at RollingRains.com dating back to 2004 are available here.
As I prepare to fly to India to deliver a series of workshops on disability to the travel industry the following bulletin came in from the European Blind Union. With such common sense affirmations of the right to travel by people of all abilities it become all the more important that all tourist destination nations abandon discriminatory practices if they wish to participate in the profits of the growing seniors and disabled traveler market:
Over the past ten years the European Blind Union has been working to improve travel by air for blind and partially sighted, deaf blind and blind people with additional disabilities. As a result of our work, we are pleased to inform you that from 26 July 2008, the new Air Regulations come into operation at all airports throughout Europe.To ensure these regulations work, we need your help in monitoring them at your local airport, to find out if they have in place, their staff with disability awareness training.
This must include the special requirements of training staff in the needs of blind and partially sighted people, which should include guiding a blind person, making sure that a wheelchair is not offered as an automatic help but only offered if the blind person has difficulty in walking.
Following are the parts of the regulations that you need to be aware of, and which we would like you to monitor for us. If you require a full set of the regulations they will be available from the Federation's office, address as above.
This summary is based on Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air.
Disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility have the same right as all other citizens to free movement, freedom of choice and non-discrimination. This applies to air travel as to other areas of life.Disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility should therefore be accepted for carriage and not refused transport on the grounds of their disability or lack of mobility, except for reasons which are justified on the grounds of safety and prescribed by law. Before accepting reservations from disabled persons or persons with reduced mobility, air carriers, their agents and tour operators should make all reasonable efforts to verify whether there is a reason which is justified on the grounds of safety and which would prevent such persons being accommodated on the flights concerned.
In order to give disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility opportunities for air travel comparable to those of other citizens, assistance to meet their particular needs should be provided at the airport as well as on board aircraft, by employing the necessary staff and equipment. In the interests of social inclusion, the persons concerned should receive this assistance without additional charge.
Assistance given at airports situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies should, among other things, enable disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility to proceed from a designated point of arrival at an airport to an aircraft and from the aircraft to a designated point of departure from the airport, including embarking and disembarking. These points should be designated at least at the main entrances to terminal buildings, in areas with check-in counters, in train, light rail, metro and bus stations, at taxi ranks and other drop-off points, and in airport car parks. The assistance should be organised so as to avoid interruption and delay, while ensuring high and equivalent standards throughout the Community and making best use of resources, whatever airport or air carrier is involved.
To achieve these aims, ensuring high quality assistance at airports should be the responsibility of a central body. As managing bodies of airports play a central role in providing services throughout their airports, they should be given this overall responsibility.
Managing bodies of airports may provide the assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility themselves. Alternatively, in view of the positive role played in the past by certain operators and air carriers, managing bodies may contract with third parties for the supply of this assistance.
In deciding on the design of new airports and terminals, and as part of major refurbishments, managing bodies of airports should, where possible, take into account the needs of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility. Similarly, air carriers should, where possible, take such needs into account when deciding on the design of new and newly refurbished aircraft.
All essential information provided to air passengers should be provided in alternative formats accessible to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility, and should be in at least the same languages as the information made available to other passengers.
Where wheelchairs or other mobility equipment or assistive devices are lost or damaged during handling at the airport or during transport on board aircraft, the passenger to whom the equipment belongs should be compensated, in accordance with rules of International, Community and National Law.
Complaints concerning assistance given at an airport should be addressed to the body or bodies designated for the enforcement of this Regulation.
Member States should lay down penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and ensure that those penalties are applied. The penalties, which could include ordering the payment of compensation to the person concerned, should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
An air carrier or its agent or a tour operator shall not refuse, on the grounds of disability or of reduced mobility, to accept a reservation for a flight departing from or arriving at an airport to which this Regulation applies.
An air carrier or its agent shall make publicly available, in accessible formats and in at least the same languages as the information made available to other passengers, the safety rules that it applies to the carriage of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility, as well as any restrictions on their carriage or on that of mobility equipment due to the size of aircraft.
A tour operator shall make such safety rules and restrictions available for flights included in package travel, package holidays and package tours which it organises, sells or offers for sale.
The managing body of an airport shall, taking account of local conditions, designate points of arrival and departure within the airport boundary or at a point under the direct control of the managing body, both inside and outside terminal buildings, at which disabled persons or persons with reduced mobility can, with ease, announce their arrival at the airport and request assistance.
The points of arrival and departure shall be clearly signed and shall offer basic information about the airport, in accessible formats.
Air carriers, their agents and tour operators shall take all measures necessary for the receipt, at all their points of sale in the territory of the Member States to which the Treaty applies, including sale by telephone and via the Internet, of notifications of the need for assistance made by disabled persons or persons with reduced mobility.
When an air carrier or its agent or a tour operator receives a notification of the need for assistance at least 48 hours before the published departure time for the flight, it shall transmit the information concerned at least 36 hours before the published departure time for the flight: (a) to the managing bodies of the airports of departure, arrival and transit, and (b) to the operating air carrier, if a reservation was not made with that carrier, unless the identity of the operating air carrier is not known at the time of notification, in which case the information shall be transmitted as soon as practicable.
As soon as possible after the departure of the flight, an operating air carrier shall inform the managing body of the airport of destination, if situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies, of the number of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility on that flight requiring assistance and of the nature of that assistance.
When a disabled person or person with reduced mobility arrives at an airport for travel by air, the managing body of the airport shall be responsible for ensuring the provision of the assistance in such a way that the person is able to take the flight for which he or she holds a reservation, provided that the notification of the person's particular needs for such assistance has been made to the air carrier or its agent or the tour operator concerned at least 48 hours before the published time of departure of the flight. This notification shall also cover a return flight, if the outward flight and the return flight have been contracted with the same air carrier.
Where use of a recognised assistance dog is required, this shall be accommodated provided that notification of the same is made to the air carrier or its agent or the tour operator in accordance with applicable national rules covering the carriage of assistance dogs on board aircraft, where such rules exist.
If no notification is made, the managing body shall make all reasonable efforts to provide the assistance in such a way that the person concerned is able to take the flight for which he or she holds a reservation.
The assistance provided shall, as far as possible, be appropriate to the particular needs of the individual passenger.
Air carriers and airport managing bodies shall ensure that all their personnel, including those employed by any sub-contractor, providing direct assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility have knowledge of how to meet the needs of persons having various disabilities or mobility impairments. They should also provide disability-equality and disability-awareness training to all their personnel working at the airport who deal directly with the travelling public, including that upon recruitment, all new employees attend disability-related training and that personnel receive refresher training courses when appropriate.
National Federation of the Blind of the UK
http://www.nfbuk.org
Steve Kuusisto will speak Thursday July 24 at Diversity Focus' Brown Bag Lunch Series, from noon to 1 p.m. at the Iowa City Chamber of Commerce, 325 E. Washington St. No. 100, Iowa City, Iowa.
The event is free and open to the public. Kuusisto will present "Universal Design and the Town Square: Why Disability Affects Everyone." He will discuss disability history and the development of new models of accessibility.
Kuusisto is an author and holds a dual appointment at the University of Iowa, where he teaches courses in creative nonfiction and serves as a public humanities scholar in the University of Iowa College of Medicine. He speaks widely on diversity, disability, education and public policy. For more information, call 363-3707.
As inscrições para o Curso de Atendimento a Turista com Deficiência, com disponibilidade de 30 vagas, a iniciar-se no dia 11, estão abertas até o dia 7 de agosto. Os interessados podem fazê-la pelo site www.rio.rj.gov.br/pessoascomdeficiencia
A iniciativa é das secretarias municipais da Pessoa com deficiência e Especial de Turismo. O objetivo é beneficiar profissionais dos setores público e privado que trabalham no atendimento a turistas.
Conforme comunicado no Diário Oficial desta sexta-feira, as aulas-gratuitas, com total de 50 horas, serão ministradas às segundas-feiras, entre 9h e 12h, no Ciad - Centro Integrado de Ateção à Pessoa com Deficiência - Mestre Candeira, que fica na Avenida Presidente Vargas, 1.997.
Fonte:
http://jbonline.terra.com.br/extra/2008/07/18/e180717430.html
Está disponível para download em PDF o Manual de Convivência, um guia prático de como se relacionar com as pessoas com deficiência.
Manual de Convivência: Pessoas com deficiência e mobilidade reduzida
http://www.vereadoramaragabrilli.com.br/manualc/manual_web.pdf
Desde El Cisne:
El coordinador de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Oficina de Accesibilidad de Bélgica, Steven Vos, afirmó durante su intervención en el 'II Congreso de Turismo para Todos ENAT' que, teniendo en cuenta a las personas con discapacidad, a los mayores, a las mujeres embarazadas, a las familias con niños pequeños y a quienes tienen otras limitaciones, 'alrededor del 35% de todos los europeos pueden beneficiarse de las mejoras de la accesibilidad en el turismo', como las instalaciones y los servicios accesibles."No obstante, sólo un porcentaje muy pequeño del mercado se ocupa de las necesidades en materia de turismo accesible", agregó Vos. Este experto belga comentó que hay una gran cantidad de hoteles, servicios de transporte y lugares turísticos que "no son físicamente accesibles" para muchas personas con discapacidad y personas mayores. "Falta información precisa y accesible, los empleados no están capacitados para proporcionar servicios adaptados a las personas con discapacidad, y el personal de los servicios de turismo a menudo carece de formación sobre los medios para satisfacer las necesidades de accesibilidad de los turistas con discapacidad", agregó Vos.
Por su parte, la directora de Ocio y Bienestar del Reino Unido, Susan Thomas, hizo un llamado a los estados miembros de la UE para que compartan "las buenas prácticas", armonicen los criterios de accesibilidad y fomenten y permitan que todos los servicios relacionados con el turismo "elaboren y apliquen planes de acción sobre accesibilidad para mejorar la experiencia de los viajes y el turismo del cliente".
Por su parte, Ercan Tutal, representante de la Asociación Turca de Agencias de Viajes, habló sobre el turismo accesible en Turquía y comentó que en los últimos años se han producido muchos avances con el objetivo de convertir a Turquía en un lugar más accesible, con "más habitaciones para personas con discapacidad en los servicios de alojamiento, nuevos hoteles sin barreras y nuevos reglamentos en la accesibilidad del transporte". Asimismo, recordó que la normativa de la UE en materia de accesibilidad turística se basa no sólo en la "rehabilitación" de las personas con discapacidad, sino también en la "integración" de este colectivo en la sociedad, lo que se considera "una cuestión de derechos humanos". Tutal explicó que la asociación a la que pertenece creó una "Comisión de turismo sin barreras para todos", que, entre otras iniciativas, ayuda en la creación de una guía turística titulada "Estambul sin barreras para todos", dirigida a personas mayores y personas con discapacidad.
En representación de Noruega, Aina Olsen, consultora de la Dirección de Sanidad y Asuntos Sociales, destacó el hecho de que en el 2004 se estableciera una comisión en su país con el objetivo de crear un "sistema de etiquetado" para los destinos turísticos accesibles. Ello supone, en su opinión, un gran reto para "ver cómo un sistema nacional de etiquetado puede abarcar las necesidades de todos los grupos de discapacitados". En cuanto a las medidas que se pueden tomar para convencer al sector turístico de la necesidad de adoptar el sistema de etiqueado, Olsen destacó que hay que "apelar a la conciencia social", porque el bienestar de las personas con discapacidad "no es sólo responsabilidad del sector sanitario, sino también del turístico", sin obviar que "la gran proporción de personas con discapacidad y mayores suponen un área de mercado muy importante".
En este sentido, la secretaria delegada de la Asociación de Turismo y Discapacidad de Francia, Emmanuelle Tulliez, comentó que desde su institución se ha creado la etiqueta "Turismo y Discapacidad", que comprende los cuatro tipos de discapacidad (motora, visual, auditiva y mental) y todos los alojamientos turísticos, hostelería, sitios turísticos, lugares de ocio, etc. Dicho sello distintivo, explicó, "sirve para potenciar los esfuerzos de las personas que trabajan en la industria del turismo y hace una invitación a todos los que quieran abrir sus lugares a la mayor variedad de clientes".
The Ecumenical Council on Tourism has published, "Transforming / Re-Forming Tourism. Perspectives on Justice and Humanity in Tourism," edited by Ceasar D'Mello
A review by Dr. T T Sreekumar entitled, "Practicing the Rage: Perspectives from 25 years of civil society engagement in Tourism", begins:
Tourism has eclipsed traditional industries and livelihood options in many parts of the world and has emerged as the single most important industry in several countries. However, studies that seek to understand its impacts on economy, environment, and culture are constrained by methodological and theoretical limitations. One of the reasons for the ambiguities and inadequacies in the area of tourism research has been its inability to properly appreciate the importance of the ethical dimensions of human development.
The review continues:
Review of TRANSFORMING, RE-FORMING TOURISM: PERSPECTIVES ON JUSTICE
AND HUMANITY IN TOURISM-A Publication marking the twenty fifth
anniversary of the Ecumenical Coalition on Tourism. Editor: Ceasar
D’Mello by Dr. T T Sreekumar
A focus on the distributional and socio-cultural effects of tourism within the framework of ecological approaches to development would help understand the complex and diverse impacts of tourism on nations, regions and local communities. Tourism certainly engenders a framework for redistribution as it opens avenues for consumption and production. Nonetheless, redistribution that disregards the political and ethical imperatives that would mould its shape and directions would reinforce structures of unequal exchange.ecRegarded as a third world phenomenon, tourism is indeed a post
colonial challenge. Its discourses encompass some of the major debates
in justice, development, deprivation and freedom in the era of
decolonization. Institutional critique of tourism began to take shape
in the post colonial period responding to the growing concerns about
combating poverty and other development maladies in the poor
countries. Janus-faced character of tourism in contemporary
discourses, (as a universally replicable model of development and as
an instrument of oppression, dispossession and cultural
disintegration), emanates from the contestations that generated the
new debates on the impacts of post colonial tourism.The book under review, “Transforming, Re-Forming Tourism”, published
on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of The Ecumenical Coalition of
Tourism (ECOT) is subtitled “perspectives on justice and humanity in
Tourism”. It is a bold attempt to address this challenge reexamining
facts and perceptions, rhetoric and reality, ironies and paradoxes
while exploring spaces for initiating changes in the unequal economic
and social power equations that tourism has engendered. It is now
clearly known that one of the most important international agendas of
global tourism industry is to silence the civil society.
Contextualized in the dilemmas of contemporary civil society
interventions for claiming its rightful place in current debates, a
book that looks at the processes and patterns in global tourism from
perspectives that provide models and paradigms for alternatives is
deeply political and challenging.Enriched by a reflexive reassessment of the role of ECOT in shaping
the current debates the introduction by Ceasar D’Mello sets the
underlying tone and tenor of the book with his reflections, inter
alia, on how post colonial tourism has disadvantaged local
communities. He says that “from the very beginning, ECOT’s
‘preferential option’ has been with the communities marginalized and
made vulnerable by tourism” (P.12). The substantial work that ECOT has
carried out in defining, positioning, sustaining and redefining
alternative policies and practices in Tourism in the last two and a
half decades forms the subject matter of Peter Holden’s informative
essay “Maintaining the Rage: Roots of ECOT”. Transforming a post
colonial rage against global iniquities of modern tourism into
concrete action has been a particularly challenging task given the
multitude of institutional and organizational barriers in mobilizing
resources for developing an alternative platform. Holden brings to our
attention the fact that a post colonial dimension has been deeply
built into the programme of alternative tourism from the very
beginning. Holden makes several insightful observations in his essay.
Reciting ECOT’s history, he says “tourism in the context of Third
World people have had effects which are qualitatively different from
the impacts which it has outside Third World. Consequently it is third
worldness and not simply tourism where the rage needs to be
maintained” (P. 26). This is a broader view that must help shape
future civil society interventions and guard activists from cynical
retrogressions.The book is usefully divided into several sections of uniting themes
and concerns. The first substantive thematic section explores the
contestations of Tourism as a tool for building a world community. The
articles by Tricia Barnett, Rosemary Viswanath, Annette Groth and
Judith Almeida look at the ethical, economic, environmental and gender
dimensions of global tourism. Barnett’s article reassesses the
possibilities of transcending cultural and economic barriers through a
transformed tourism informed by ethical guidelines. Recognizing the
place of tourism within formidable economic project of neo-liberal
policies thrust upon third world by global financial institutions,
Viswanath provides an illuminating narrative of the processes that
keeps the quest for justice and humanity in tourism disappointingly
elusive. Taking the argument a step further, Groth discusses the
intensifying corporatization of tourism industry and its disempowering
effect on local communities. She concludes that increased
concentration in the tourism industry in the recent decades is a cause
for serious concern. Quite insightfully, she also argues that the
tweezers-grip of corporatization will affect the nature and quality of
critical research and action in tourism. Nothing could be closer to
truth than her observation that “it is increasingly difficult to find
political analysts and academics, generally, and in the field of
tourism who have the background as well as financial means to conduct
neutral and objective research. Academics and scholars are
increasingly dependent on consultancies paid by multinational
organizations and/or companies and therefore ot independent” (P.60).
Irrespective of one’s reservations on the notion of what constitutes
“neutral and objective research" her argument on the constraints of
freedom of research remains valid. Almeida’s paper focuses on the Goan
(India) experience of gender representation and women’s participation
in tourism industry. The essay seeks to challenge the economic
conservatism of the UNWTO that tourism offers “enormous opportunities”
for women’s advancement.The section on Tourism and Development consists of three
contributions. The essay by Jeff Wild argues for the necessity of
engaging the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by religious and
civil society organizations. This, for him would be a more strategic
approach than either ignoring or too heavily criticizing the project.
Heinz Fuchs’s note reflects on the joint journey by ECOT and Church
Development Service, Germany. The essay by Julia Schornhall and
Shirley Susan explores in some detail the nexus between tourism,
poverty and AIDS. They argue that tourism industry must discard its
inhibition to recognize the relationship between tourism and AIDS and
join the campaigns that fearlessly address the issue.The section on “Tourism and Faith Perspectives” addresses the
spiritual dimensions of tourism and approaches of world religions to
the question of just tourism. Archbishop Agostino Marchetto and
Anthony Rogers in separate notes provide different aspects of pastoral
approaches to the awareness and critiquing of tourism. Buddhism’s
perspectives on tourism are sketched in the contribution by Sukthawee
Suwannachairop. Muhammad Abdus Sabur provides a brief introduction to
the contours of Islamic approach to the question of accountability in
tourism. The need for including tourism and human rights perspectives
in theological education is convincingly brought out in the paper by
Margit Leuthold and Christian Baumgartner.In the section on Tourism and Environment, two short essays and an
interview with Oliver Hillel are included. The essay by Marco Vinicio
Garcia critically reviews the concept of eco tourism while ECOT’s
interview with Hillel brings out some dilemmas faced by international
organizations like UNEP in addressing ecological questions related to
mass tourism practices. Rungrot Tangsurakit and Sabine Minninger
shares some experiences from the post Tsunami field work and draws
lessons for future policy making and disaster prevention interventions
in Coastal tourism destinations. The two subsequent sections on
“Regional perspectives” and “Case studies” provide glimpses and
snapshots of the diverse impacts of modern tourism on Nations and
local communities. The insights and caveats in the essays by Rami
Kassis and Regula Kauffman, Peter Rezel, Nic Maclellan, Ernest Canada
and Jordi Gascon help readers to appreciate better the similarities
and dissimilarities in the effects of tourism in different regions.
The illuminative case studies by Alison Johnston, Maureen Seneviratne,
Frederick Noronha and Nicole Haeusler adds immensely to the to value
of the book and its authenticity as a volume that seeks to balance
theory and practice. Ron O’Grady’s post script “The end and the
beginning” consolidates the book’s message for readers and for ECOT.The most surprising aspect of the book, perhaps, is the poetry of
Cecil Rajendra appended below each section. He narrates a deepening
sense of alienation and an intensified experience of loss in the hyper-
real consumerist world. The drastic scaling down of expectations and
aspirations of fishers, farmers and folks at large caused by the
disempowering imperatives of global tourism is innovatively captured
in the deep and dark poetic imageries of emerging realities:“The bulldozers, tractors
And tourists have moved
in with a vengeance;
hotels duty-free
shops, cafes and chalets
have sprung like fungi.As the bewildered villagers
are pushed off their land
to make way for another
billion-dollar condominium
they begin to question
which was the greater burden:
Mashuri’s or our Century’s
Curse of dust and development?”(Cecil Rajendra, “Lankawi, Mashuri and the 21st Century”)

While I have not reviewed the final curriculum I did contribute in the research phase of this promising new course:
At the 4th IIPT African Conference, May 20th – 25th 2007, Kampala, Uganda, a course on Peace through Tourism was launched, discussed and enthusiastically received by the international community. WICE – World Leisure International Centre of Excellence at Wageningen University, The Netherlands – developed this course; course director is Drs Jan te Kloeze.The course is an initiative aiming to consolidate the concept of Peace through Tourism. It is open to external participants, members of institutions interested in the subject, and tourism and peace policy makers.
The course – duration 4 weeks – is divided in four thematic units:
1. Sustainable tourism and the world today;
2. Theory of peace making and peace keeping in a national and international context;
3. The role of tourism in promoting international understanding; and
4. Tourism and community development: tourism as an agent for poverty reduction.
Peace through Tourism Course Launched
A trans-interdisciplinary approach is used to outline the potential of tourism as a peace tool. Lecturers from WICE together with international academics, carefully selected from the WICE world wide network of renowned experts are giving the lectures.
The classes will take place at Wageningen University in the Netherlands. When certain conditions are met, the course can be given in other guest countries too.
Costs and fees: € 3,770.—[including living costs, travel costs, and fee; fee only: € 1,750.–].
About World Leisure International Centres of Excellence (WICE)
In 1988 the Association began exploring the concept of a truly international post-graduate programme in leisure studies. Ultimately this led to the creation of a framework for the World Leisure International Centres of Excellence (WICE). The purpose was to provide an unique opportunity whereby postgraduate students from countries around the world and international leisure specialists come together in one location for a two-year program leading to a graduate degree.
The first such program was established in The Netherlands in 1992, with substantial support from the Dutch government. Today, through a contract with Wageningen University, a leading international institution in Holland, the WICE program gives students access to the resources of the University and at the same time provides instruction and consultation through a visiting faculty of 40 professors in any given year. Up to 25 students are admitted each year. Students completing the program receive a M.Sc. degree in Leisure and Environments. Many of the graduates have gone on to occupy senior leadership positions in their home countries.
A WICE Advisory Panel, responsible to the World Leisure Board, reviews and advises on existing programmes and new initiatives. For more information, visit www.worldleisure.org.
Wild Iris Medical Education offers a useful course entitled, Traveling with Disabilities and authored by Anne M. Becker, MS, RN, CNS and Miriam R. Breslauer, BS, MS.
The course is free through June 30, 2008
Here a description of the learning objectives:
Upon completion of this course, you will be able to:
* Discuss the special needs of disabled travelers using various modes of transportation.
* Describe the role and duties of a healthcare professional who assists a disabled traveler.
* Identify three groups of disabilities that may affect a person's ability to travel alone.
* List examples of advance preparation for the trip of a disabled traveler.
* Summarize the elements of a medical documentation travel file.
* Identify the disability-related challenges to traveling on a commercial vehicle.
* Identify potential hazards at vacation destinations that may affect a disabled person's ability to function in a crisis.
For the course see:
http://www.nursingceu.com/courses/219/index_nceu.html

To the extent that the Travel Industry Association takes seriously the disability community as a travel market the following letter from Roger Dow, TIA President and CEO, is a hopeful sign:
As you may know, TIA has been sharing information in recent months on the personal benefits of travel and taking a trip. I am happy to note that the media is beginning to report on the contributions travel makes to individuals, as illustrated in articles in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times.
I was also introduced recently to a blog called Sure To Meet, which provides tips and information on business and social networking. It highlighted how face-to-face meetings are still best for building relationships. I want encourage you to help us get the word out by passing along the articles and the information we’ve compiled.
Through the Benefits of Travel, TIA provides a one-stop shop for survey results and facts that demonstrate how travel benefits everyone personally in the areas of:
* relationship building,
* career success and productivity, and
* health and wellness.In addition, there is an interesting "Other Important Facts" section. All of this information is also available online at www.tia.org/Benefits.
Let’s work together to help everyone better understand that when we travel, the benefits are everywhere.
Best regards,
Roger Dow, TIA President and CEO
Travel Industry Association
Para diretor do Ministério do Turismo, Diogo Demarco é preciso que grandes empresas, governos, entidades e consumidor final exijam empresas certificadas no setor.O consumidor irá impulsionar uma verdadeira revolução no setor de turismo quando começar a exigir a certificação das empresas das empresas do setor, acredita Diogo Demarco, diretor do Departamento de Qualificação e Certificação e Produção Associada ao Turismo, do Ministério do Turismo.
Revolução no turismo passa por consumidor exigente
Segundo ele, a certificação dos estabelecimentos e das empresas que trabalham com turismo só acontecerá de fato à medida em que grandes empresas, governos, entidades e o consumidor final exijam que empresas sejam certificadas para a aquisição de produtos.
Quando uma Petrobras exigir que seus funcionários só se hospedem em hotéis certificados, será uma correria pela certificação, diz. Demarco lembra que o Rio de Janeiro está vivendo uma situação parecida provocada por uma exigência do Comitê Olímpico Internacional. Eles querem uma lista de hotéis por classificação. Todo mundo começou a correr atrás para conseguir uma classificação. Atualmente no Brasil há apenas 18 hotéis classificados por classe no País, segundo o representante do Ministério do Turismo.
De acordo com o diretor, a proximidade com a Copa do Mundo de 2014 já está fazendo com que algumas empresas estejam procurando as certificações necessárias. Não é fácil certificar o setor de serviços. Quando falamos de produto é fácil conseguir uma padronização por tamanho, tipo, etc. Mas o serviço prestado é subjetivo.
Dival Schmidt, consultor do Sebrae Nacional, lembra as dificuldades nos anos 80 para implementação da ISO. A Europa restringiu a compra de produtos que não tivessem a ISO. Foi uma correria e tanto no Brasil. Segundo ele, a certificação no turismo exige campanhas de esclarecimento à população, nos moldes das campanhas sobre epidemias, como Aids e Paralisia Infantil.
Os dois especialistas participaram no último sábado (21) da palestra 'Certificação no Turismo: Desafios e Perspectivas', durante a terceira edição Salão do Turismo, realizado entre 18 e 22 de junho no Parque de Exposições do Anhembi, em São Paulo.
Normas no turismo
Atualmente existem 67 normas técnicas em vigor no setor de turismo, sendo que apenas 10 não foram publicadas. Desse total, 28 foram elaboradas a partir do apoio direto do MTur a projetos de formulação dessas regras.
A consulta às normas pode ser feita pelo endereço http://www.abntnet.com.br, pelos sites do MTur e da ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas). Para realizar a consulta, o usuário terá que fazer um cadastramento, prestando informações como nome completo, CPF e RG e motivo de interesse.
Desde 2003, o Ministério do Turismo aposta em programas de capacitação e certificação para pessoas, produtos e empreendimentos nos segmentos do turismo, mais especificamente em turismo sustentável, turismo de aventura e competências profissionais. Vale lembrar também que o Brasil conta com 40 mil profissionais certificados nos diferentes ramos do turismo. A maioria deles é de garçons e cozinheiros.
Projetos
Um acordo de cooperação técnica assinado no ano passado entre Sebrae, Ministério do Turismo (MTur) e Instituto Brasileiro de Turismo (Embratur) prevê investimentos de cerca de R$ 21,5 milhões para o turismo nacional, com foco no desenvolvimento das micro e pequenas empresas. As ações têm prazo de dois anos, com a possibilidade de renovação pelo mesmo período.
O convênio se baseia no Plano Nacional de Turismo 2007/2010 e pretende utilizar a capacidade do setor para promover inclusão social. Pela parceria, serão realizadas ações como capacitação dos profissionais, incentivo para adoção das melhores práticas de gestão e fortalecimento do trabalho desenvolvido pelos órgãos estaduais de turismo e pelas empresas do setor.
O acordo também terá investimentos para a criação de um banco de dados do setor turístico e para a produção do Guia do Empreendedor do Turismo, entre várias outras iniciativas.
O trabalho conjunto do Sebrae e do MTur ainda aborda a questão ambiental, com o objetivo de promover a sustentabilidade no entorno das áreas de preservação e dos parques nacionais. Os especialistas em turismo hoje chamam a atenção para a necessidade de conciliar o potencial turístico com o respeito à ecologia e à preservação ambiental.
Fonte: Portugal Digital
I am reproducing this press release from PopCap Games in its entirety below. It reports on a study on video game-playing by PwD. It would be interesting to relate these fact about computer use to strategies for improving services in travel & hospitality for customers with disabilities
Seattle, Washington June 11, 2008 Tens of millions of disabled consumers have gravitated to "casual video games as a source of relief or distraction from their infirmities, as well as a sense of accomplishment or belonging, according to a new survey conducted by Information Solutions Group on behalf of PopCap Games. According to the survey, more than one in five (20.5%) players of casual video games have a physical, mental or developmental disability; this compares to 15.1% of the American population overall who are disabled, according to the latest U.S. Census data. Over three quarters of the more than 2,700 disabled consumers who participated in the study described their disabilities as "moderate or "severe, and the benefits to, and methods of play by, disabled gamers vary considerably from those of non-disabled casual gamers.Compared to the casual gamer population as a whole (which industry estimates peg at 300 million to 400 million players worldwide), those with disabilities play more frequently, for more hours per week, and for longer periods of time per gaming session. They also report that they experience more significant benefits from playing and view their game-playing activity as a more important factor in their lives than do non-disabled consumers.
Profile of Respondents
A total of 13,296 casual game players responded to the survey, with 2,728 respondents (20.5%) identifying themselves as "mildly (22%), "moderately (54%) or "severely (24%) disabled. Of those, 46% indicated that their primary disability was physical, 29% said it was mental, and 25% stated they had a developmental or learning disability. Over two thirds (69%) of disabled respondents were female, and a third (35%) of all respondents had another person parent, adult offspring, spouse, guardian or caregiver assist them in taking the survey.The most common types of disabilities and medical conditions cited by respondents, by category, were:
Physical: Rheumatoid Arthritis/Osteoarthritis (14%); Fibromyalgia (11%); Multiple Sclerosis (7%).
Mental: Moderate/Severe Depression (41%); Bipolar Disorder (16%); Anxiety Disorder (15%).
Developmental/Learning: ADD/ADHD (46%); Autism (15%); Dyslexia (11%).
The majority (61%) of those survey respondents with a physical disability are age 50 or older, while slightly more than half (52%) of those with a developmental/learning disability are under 18 years of age.Perceived Benefits of Play
Fully 94% of disabled players of casual games said they believe playing casual games "provides physical or mental benefits compared to 80% of casual game players overall. The most common benefits cited by disabled gamers (when asked to choose as many as applied) were stress relief (81%), mood lifting (69%), distraction from issues related to disability (66%), improved concentration (59%) and mental workouts (58%). Interestingly, the top benefits varied significantly based on the type of disability; the top three benefits by disability type were:
Physical: Stress relief (84%) and distraction from issues related to disability (73%)
Mental: Stress relief (87%) and mood-lifting (78%)
Developmental/Learning: Improved concentration (79%) and improved coordination/manual dexterity (73%)
Those with developmental/learning disabilities cited learning (pattern recognition, spelling, typing skills) far more often (61%) than those with disabilities that were mental (26%) or physical (23%).Furthermore, 77% of disabled players said playing casual games provides them with "additional benefits over and above what a typical non-disabled player might experience.
Of the "additional benefits, responses were numerous and varied, often citing deeper sensations of achievement and "belonging, or distraction from loneliness and/or chronic pain. As one respondent put it, "Our son with Attention Deficit Disorder does not really remember he has a disability when he is playing. Dr. Carl Arinoldo, a Stony Brook, New York-based psychologist of 25 years' experience who has treated patients with a range of physical and mental disabilities, agrees: "With some forms of depression, a person may be very focused on something that clearly amounts to a misperception of reality. So the chance to distance themselves from the perceived negative situation and relax may allow them to think more clearly and consider the situation later in a more realistic manner.
Gary Robinson, a 58-year-old North Carolina resident with severe physical disabilities, states "Games like Bejeweled and Peggle, with simple controls that are also mentally challenging and engaging are ideal for me, because my mind moves as quickly as the next guy's but I type with a mouth-stick. In some ways, games like these are the greatest thing that's appeared on the computer scene for people like me.
Playing Habits
Among all disabled gamers, nearly two thirds (64%) said they play casual games every day, and an additional 28% play several times per week. By comparison, 57% of casual game players overall say they play daily. In terms of time spent playing, disabled gamers are more "avid consumers than the average casual game player:
60% of disabled gamers play casual games for five or more hours per week, (vs. 52% of casual gamers overall)
40% of disabled gamers play for 10 or more hours per week (vs. 29% of overall casual gamers)
24% of disabled gamers play for 16 or more hours per week (vs. 13% of overall casual gamers)Gary Robinson estimates he spends four or more hours each day playing casual games. "Let's just say that playing the games helps my whole well-being; sometimes they give me a direct and immediate purpose in life, and that's an important sensation to have every so often.
When asked to choose the single most frequent time for playing casual games, 26% of survey respondents with physical disabilities, and 29% of those with mental disabilities, indicated "late at night, before bed, compared to just 11% of those with developmental/learning disabilities. The latter group indicated weekends (30%) was the time they played most often. This is presumed to be due to the large number of children in the category.
Playing Preferences
Almost half (44%) of all disabled gamers indicated that they had recommended playing casual games to others with significant disabilities, and more than a tenth of respondents (11%) said that a "physician, psychiatrist, physical therapist or other medical professional had prescribed or recommended playing casual games as part of the treatment for their disability.As for solitary versus companion game play, 44% of disabled gamers said they played casual games with other people at least part of the time. Of those, more than one in four (28%) said they played casual games with other disabled individuals. Among respondents with developmental/learning disabilities specifically, 60% said they played casual games with other people.
When asked to pick their favorite categories of casual games, disabled gamers' choices closely mirrored those of non-disabled players, with "puzzle (84%), "word and trivia (61%) and "arcade (59%) being the three most-cited genres. "Card (54%) and "hidden object (51%) games rounded out the top five categories among disabled gamers.
Casual Vs. Hardcore
Only 26% of disabled casual gamers said they also play traditional, "hardcore video games; among those respondents with physical disabilities specifically, that figure dropped to 18%. Among all disabled gamers who also play hardcore games, 25% said they played hardcore games on a daily basis compared to 64% who play casual games daily.Survey Methodology
This international research was conducted by Information Solutions Group (ISG; www.infosolutionsgroup.com) for PopCap Games. These results are based on online surveys completed by 2,728 respondents randomly selected between April 2 and April 17, 2008. In theory, in 19 cases out of 20, the results will differ by no more than 1.9 percentage points from what would have been obtained by seeking out and polling all PopCap.com users. Survey subjects were presented with exhaustive lists of various types of disabilities by category in order to assist in accurately categorizing themselves. For the purpose of this survey, a disabled person is defined as one who has a significant medical condition or a physical, mental, developmental or learning impairment/disability. This includes, but is not limited to, medical conditions that affect mobility, vision, hearing and learning. It also includes chronic diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and chronic fatigue syndrome; mental disorders, such as depression or anxiety; and developmental disabilities, such as ADD/ADHD (recently re-diagnosed as AD/HD Predominantly Inattentive Type), dyslexia and autism.About PopCap
PopCap Games (www.popcap.com) is the leading multi-platform provider of "casual games fun, easy-to-learn, captivating computer games that appeal to everyone from age 6 to 106. Based in Seattle, Washington, PopCap was founded in 2000 and has a worldwide staff of over 200 people in Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago, Vancouver, B.C. and Dublin. Its games have been downloaded more than 1 billion times by consumers worldwide, and its flagship title, Bejeweled®, has sold more than 10 million units across all platforms. Constantly acclaimed by consumers and critics, PopCap's games are played on the Web, desktop computers, myriad mobile devices (cell phones, smartphones, PDAs, Pocket PCs, iPod and more), popular game consoles (such as Xbox), and in-flight entertainment systems. PopCap is the only casual games developer with leading market share across all major sales channels, including Web portals, retail stores, mobile operators and developers, and game device manufacturers.
# # #
The PopCap logo and all other trademarks used herein that are listed at www.popcap.com/ trademarks are owned by PopCap Games, Inc. or its licensors and may be registered in some countries. Other company and product names used herein may be trademarks of their respective owners and are used for the benefit of those owners.
PR Contacts:
North America:
Garth Chouteau
garth@popcap.com
415-602-8147
International:
Cathy Orr
corr@popcap.com
+353 1 480 6286
"There is nothing -- absolutely nothing -- half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." ~ Kenneth Grahame
Except maybe reflecting on it afterwards!
Below are links to each Rolling Rains post on exploring Glacier Bay, Alaska. Starting with:
Cruising in Alaska
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002267.html
It Would be Easier if…
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002269.html
Meet Annie Mae
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002270.html
Reporting from a Different Perspective
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002271.html
Journaling and Natural Beauty
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002272.html
Food – the Key to Nautical Tranquility!
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002273.html
Photos from Glacier Bay
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002274.html
My First Kayak Trip ( or Ode to the McKinnon Hugger and Crew of the Sea Wolf!)
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002283.html
Return from Kayaking Glacier Bay, Glacier Bay, Alaska
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002282.html
Sound Sketch – Multisensory Travel to a Glacier
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002287.html
Transfers – Aboard and Abroad
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002289.html
Resources on Glacier Bay, Alaska
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002288.html
Why Go?
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002231.html
After Tourism Alaska – Ripples of Inclusive Destination Development
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002276.html
“This I Believe” by Colin Bates ( A Man Who has Discovered the Core value of Disability Culture – Interdependency )
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002276.html
Co-Dependent Arising: Retrospective on Wheelchair-Accessible Cruising
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/002290.html
Por Nélida Barbeito, Lic. en Turismo y Asesora en viajes y accesibilidad desde el Clarin.com:
"Soy un cliente. ¡Pago por su servicio, y lo quiero acorde a mis necesidades!"Esto deberíamos vociferar quienes tenemos alguna discapacidad antes de iniciar un viaje. El viaje es un proceso: lo imaginamos, lo planeamos y lo realizamos. Para ello hay que considerar los aspectos que deben ser accesibles: traslado al aeropuerto, al hospedaje y a los atractivos. Si falla un eslabón, el viaje no se concreta. Es como alquilar un auto sin volante.
¿La gran falencia en Argentina? El transporte terrestre de enlace (para llegar al hotel, al atractivo), y los autos de alquiler. ¿Un gran avance? La cantidad de hoteles que construyen habitaciones accesibles y los parques nacionales, en especial las concesiones, que ofrecen dispositivos especiales.
¿El desafío? Capacitación de recursos humanos. De nada sirve la mejor rampa si el anfitrión no sabe cómo atender las necesidades de sus huéspedes.
Fuente:
Desafíos para un turismo accesible
http://www.clarin.com/suplementos/viajes/2008/06/08/v-01689293.htm
The following news comes from Only Finance.com:
Travel insurers have been accused of contravening the Disability Discrimination Act by unfairly treating 9 million sufferers of medical conditions like diabetes, epilepsy, asthma, and Parkinson’s disease etc in the UK.Managing Director of karmainsurance.com, Brian Wright who made the allegation, said they flout the law which requires insurers to justify their action if they wished to differently treat people with medical conditions from others.
Reminding that premiums ought to be based on actuarial statistics and thorough knowledge of a condition, he said the opposite is usually what happens.
“As soon as people with pre-existing medical conditions ask for a travel quote, discriminatory assumptions are made and they’re faced with higher insurance premiums or no quote at all,” he explained.In a recent survey by Parkinson’s Disease Society, in a sample of 10,000 respondents, it was found that 27 per cent of people had either been quoted increased premiums for travel insurance or refused cover.
This was in spite of the fact that Parkinson’s does not affect longevity.
Also, another study revealed that diabetics had been given quotes four times more expensive than the normal price.
For the full story see:
http://www.onlyfinance.com/Travel-Insurance-News/12749064-Travel-Insurers-Accused-of-Breaching-Disability-Act.aspx
<--!
Mr Brian said a situation whereby insurers stigmatise those with pre-existing conditions should be challenged. “They take a one size fits all approach, believing specific conditions present the same symptoms and are at the same stages.”
But their argument or judgement often crumbles under scrutiny as they have no statistical proof to justify their assumption, he said.
Although most people heading off on holidays and wanting to purchase cover do not see their condition as medical but a normal way of life, the expert said insurers often refuse to accept this position.
He thus called on the industry to reconsider its risk assessment, pricing strategies and intrusive medical screening processes so as to make insurance policy accessible and affordable to everyone.
--!>
Candy's work in this field is legendary. Her multiple books, magazine Emerging Horizons, and behind-the-scenes support of the travelers with disabilities market keeps our work in focus. Read here her analysis of amendments to the US Air Carriers Access Act.
O Instituto Paradigma o Novotel Jaraguá São Paulo realizam nesta segunda-feira, 26 de maio, das 9h às 13h, a última turma do curso de Capacitação para a Excelência no Atendimento de Pessoas com Deficiência na indústria hoteleira.O programa foi desenvolvido com exclusividade para o Novotel Jaraguá São Paulo Conventions, mas deverá ser estendido para os outros hotéis da Accor Hospitality. Foram capacitadas cerca de 240 pessoas, em seis turmas.
Durante o curso, as pessoas sem deficiência vivenciem as barreiras enfrentadas pelas pessoas com deficiência no dia a dia. Na oportunidade, também será apresentada a Cartilha de Excelência no Atendimento de Pessoas com Deficiência na Rede Hoteleira.
http://www.mercadoeeventos.com.br/script/FdgDestaqueTemplate.asp?pStrLink=3,28,0,31694&IndSeguro=0
--
Noticias gracas a Marta Gil do Amankay Instituto de Estudos e Pesquisas
The IDEA Center announces that registration for the first
course in its new online continuing education program is now open.
Registration will be limited to the first 20 individuals. The four week
course will begin July 7, 2008 and the topic will be The Nature of
Barriers and the New Demographics.
For registration information and an
overview of the course and continuing education curriculum, go to
http://udeworld.com/education/index.php.
The continuing education program is designed for anyone (e.g., advocates, builders/contractors, planners, architects, occupational and physical therapists, and policymakers) interested in learning about the universal design of places, products, and systems with a particular focus on the implications of a life span perspective.If you choose to register for the course, you will receive an email once
your registration has been processed. Information on how to access the
course will be emailed to you at least two weeks prior to the course
start date.If you have any questions on the course, curriculum or registration
process, please feel free to call or email me at jlmaisel@buffalo.edu.
Jordana L. Maisel
Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access
School of Architecture and Planning
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
3435 Main Street, 375 Hayes Hall
Buffalo, NY 14214-3087phone: 716.829.3485 x329
fax: 716.829.3861
web: http://www.ap.buffalo.edu/idea
I have just been invited to contribute to two books on tourism:
ACCESSIBLE TOURISM CONCEPTS/ISSUES: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism
ACCESSIBLE TOURISM PRACTICE: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism
My chapter is titled, "Social networks for senior and accessible tourism."
As I research I would be interested to receive suggestions on social networks, publications, and/or marketing campaigns that you know of that are addressing these groups and their travel behavior. Contact Scott Rains with your recommendations.
The books aim to provide a comprehensive investigation to accessible tourism:
ACCESSIBLE TOURISM CONCEPTS/ISSUES: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism
This book is looking into the issues associated with accessible tourism and explores the concepts and importance
ACCESSIBLE TOURISM PRACTICE: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism
This book is more practical and aims to increase awareness, provide guidelines and
demonstrates best examples through case studies.
This project is not only about tourism for people with disabilities but also for third age citizens.
The ageing population will bring about an inevitable rise in the proportion of disabled people. In past times being (or becoming) disabled was associated with greater dependency and reduced mobility. However, the international trend towards legislating for inclusion of all people in leisure activities, and the desire to travel, coupled with increased spending power, demonstrate that this is a really significant market and that tourism providers will need to take it seriously in order to address its needs.
The World Tourism Organization has published its long-term forecast and assessment of the development of tourism up to the first 20 years of the new millennium in its Tourism 2020 Vision.
An essential outcome of the Tourism 2020 Vision are quantitative forecasts covering a 25 years period, with 1995 as the base year and forecasts for 2000, 2010 and 2020. WTO's Tourism 2020 Vision forecasts that international arrivals are expected to reach over 1.56 billion by the year 2020, double the volume from 700 million international arrivals in 2000. Of these worldwide arrivals in 2020, 1.18 billion will be intra-regional and 0.38 billion will be long-haul travellers. Out of those visitors Buhalis et al (2005) estimated that 25% of the travellers have some sort of disability or impairment. This is estimated to increase as the ageing populations becomes more active and would like to participate more to the leisure activities.
The books aim to:
• provide a conceptual frame for the accessible tourism concepts and issues
• document the principle international and European regulatory frameworks which impact on accessible tourism
• evaluate the market and examine the needs and requirements of the demand side
• explore techniques and methods to improve accessibility from the supply side
• examine architectural and facility design issues
• discuss issues related to service provision
• explore the requirements for information provision
• provide a range of best practice case studies
• Set up the research agenda for the future
The books bring both an academic and practitioner focus to ensure that it is well documented and applicable as well as to expand its readership to all relevant markets.
One way to understand the Rolling Rains Report - and the network thriving behind the published word - is to think of it as the Think Tank and resource archive for implementing Article 30 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
A new tool exists to help understand the impact of the CRPD with reference to US standards. The United States National Council of Disabilities has released a Comparative Analysis of Disability Laws in the United States to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). I encourage readers to facilitate similar studies in their own countries and disseminate them internationally. In particular I encourage analysis of Article 30 and contribution of those analyses to the Google group Article 30: The CRPD on Tourism, Sports, & Leisure
Here is the document's analysis of Article 30 of the CRPD as it relates to US Law:
Article 30 - Participation in Cultural Life, Recreation, Leisure, and Sport
The United States’ approach to participation in cultural life, recreation, leisure, and sport is based almost entirely on an antidiscrimination model. This means that to the extent that such opportunities exist for the general population, the federal government provides a legal right to people with disabilities to participate in such activities without discrimination. In terms of enforcement, the Department of Justice has made accessibility of cultural and recreation facilities a priority. But the larger project envisioned by Article 30, including enabling persons with disabilities to develop and utilize creative and artistic potential, establishing support and recognition of specific cultural and linguistic identities, and encouraging mainstreaming of sporting opportunities, is largely left to private actors and advocacy organizations. Accordingly, a gap exists between U.S. law and CRPD protection, albeit one that could be filled with aggressive implementation and/or additional Congressional action.
In the Appendix they further elaborate:
Coverage of United States Law
United States domestic law has several provisions that prevent discrimination against people with disabilities in cultural life, recreation, leisure, and sport. Many such activities take place at privately owned places of public accommodation – that is, privately owned businesses or establishments that open themselves up to the public – and are covered by Title III of the ADA. As such, the owners and operators cannot discriminate in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations.Title III’s reach has therefore extended significantly into recreation and cultural opportunities for people with disabilities. The organizers of sports and recreation activities must make reasonable accommodations unless such accommodation would fundamentally alter the nature of the goods or services being provided. Thus, for example, the Professional Golf Association had to provide a golf cart as a reasonable accommodation to a professional golfer to allow him to participate in tournament play. A requested accommodation also does not have to made if it causes a direct threat to the health or safety of others. Title III has been applied to sports leagues; i.e., its coverage is not limited to actual locations.
As discussed above, pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Federal Communications Commission has adopted rules requiring closed captioning of most, though not all, television programming.
Similarly, as with any Title III covered entity, facilities that house cultural and recreational opportunities have accessibility obligations. Facilities that predate the ADA must be accessible to the extent that doing so is “readily achievable,” and new facilities (and modifications to existing facilities) must be more fully accessible to people with disabilities in accordance with the ADAAG standards. The accessibility of entertainment venues (sports stadiums and movie theatres) has been a heavily litigated area. In particular, there have been several “line of sight” cases, involving the issue of whether people who used wheelchairs are entitled to seats where they can see over people who stand in the rows in front of them. Another frequently litigated issue is whether wheelchair seating in stadium-style movie theaters must offer choices of position within the theater, and to what extent wheelchair seating must be integrated into the stadium seating section of the theater.
Some of the parties that control and manage recreational opportunities are public entities; for example, public parks and high school athletic associations. Therefore, Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (to the extent these entities receive federal funds) are relevant as well. A public entities’ obligations regarding recreation opportunities under Title II and Section 504 closely track those of private operators of places of public accommodation: they cannot discriminate on the basis of disability in their operations (which includes a duty to provide reasonable accommodation), and must make their facilities accessible. One frequently litigated issue in this area involves public sports associations’ role as standard-setters for who gets to participate in high school athletics.
O Aeroporto Internacional de João Pessoa (PB), Presidente Castro Pinto, realizou 06/05 até o dia 10, o Curso de Atendimento às Pessoas com Deficiência ou Mobilidade Reduzida. Além dos profissionais da Infraero e das empresas que atuam em suas dependências, o órgão oficial de turismo do Estado, a Polícia Rodoviária Federal (PRF), o Serviço de Atendimento Médico de Urgência (Samu) e taxistas forão capacitados para lidar com o público que necessita de atendimento especial.
Mais de cem pessoas participam desse curso, que tem um cronograma para percorrer todos os aeroportos da rede, em cumprimento à legislação vigente. As peculiaridades regionais são observadas. O aeroporto de João Pessoa, por exemplo, está situado em outro município, em Bayeux, distante 25 km da capital. Por isso a PRF, o Samu e os taxistas participam do evento. A idéia é integrar o aeroporto a todo o sítio aeroportuário, e dele partir para a integração com a rodovia (BR) e as cidades.
O conteúdo programático abrange política de acessibilidade, sensibilização, direitos humanos, perfil dos consumidores, técnicas de atendimento, facilidades, segurança e equipamentos. Os participantes assistirão, ainda, a palestras ministradas por deficientes.
http://www.mercadoeeventos.com.br/script/FdgDestaqueTemplate.asp?pStrLink=3,26,0,31185&IndSeguro=0
Reuters has done a story on the suit car designers use to to experience disability. See the full article but note this attention to market realities justifying Universal Design:
Launched in a rapidly graying nation where over 40 percent of the population is expected to be over 65 age by mid-century...Over 40 percent of Nissan's Japanese and U.S. sales are to customers over 50 years old, according to the company.
I take his development to be a positive sign. This announcement was in my Inbox when I got home today:
The Global Universal Design Commission (GUDC) is a new non-profit organization that has been established to promote the adoption of universal design. It is modeled after the Green Building Council which has played an important role in increasing adoption of sustainable design practices in the building industry. Our intent is to address the need for greater usability in buildings in response to many social trends, e.g. the aging of society, globalization and social diversity.Our first activity will be to develop voluntary guidance standards for applying universal design to commercial buildings. These standards will complement existing accessibility standards and regulations. In fact, we expect that no building will receive an accreditation from the GUDC if it does not meet accessibility regulations as a basic requirement and thus, our work will improve compliance with access laws. Like the GBC's LEED standards, the UD Standards will provide a rating system to accredit buildings that address higher levels of usability than accessibility codes and include issues beyond their scope.
The UD Standards will be flexible and allow each project to achieve accreditation in different ways in response to different conditions. Points will be awarded in different categories and there will be a graduated level of achievement based on a percentage of total points received. Neither the rating system nor the accreditation levels have been established, but work is underway on a preliminary draft that will be presented to the public at a kick-off meeting at the end of May. Attached is an announcement for that meeting. An open process will be used to develop the UD Standards, including the conceptual framework for the rating system and levels. The preliminary draft will simply be a point of departure.
We welcome your involvement in this process and the new Commission and hope that you will be able to attend the kick-off meeting for the standards development project.
*This activity is partially supported by the RERC on Universal Design and the Built Environment through funding from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
(Source: RERCUD-ENEWSLETTER-LIST@LISTSERV.BUFFALO.EDU )
Note that this is something that we called for at ICAT 2007 in Bangkok and, although I was unaware of this initiative, the move toward standardization by industry was the pivotal "sign of the times" that my address to the gathering revolved around.
InvitationOrganizational Meeting:
Voluntary Standards Development Process for Universal Design (UD) in Commercial DevelopmentHosted by:
• Global Universal Design Commission, Inc.
• Burton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University
• Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access (IDEA)
• National Council for Independent Living (NCIL)As a member of the design, development, disability and/or aging communities, you are invited to attend the inaugural meeting of the Global Universal Design Commission, Inc., and join with other hosts to organize a consensus voluntary standard development process that accelerates the consistent, knowledge-driven translation and use of UD across commercial development and the built environment.
Sincerely,
Peter Blanck, Chairman, Global Universal Design Commission, Inc.
Ed Steinfeld, Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access
Graham Hill, Global Universal Design Forum, Inc. - Chair of Standards Development CommitteeDate: May 30, 2008
10am – 1pmLocation: Carousel Mall
Sky Deck, 6th Floor
Syracuse, New YorkPurpose: To organize and initiate the process to develop a consensus guidance standard for Universal Design (UD) in commercial development. UD is the design of the built environment and products to be useable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design.
The First National Conference on Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities March 27-28, 2008 at the Great Eastern Hotel, Quezon City, Philippines. The objectives of the conference were "to promote transport accessibility as an entry point to building a non-handicapping environment for persons with disabilities."
At the end of the Conference the participants shall have:• Developed common inter-sectoral understanding and dialogue on public transport and accessibility issues.
• Linked the call for accessible transportation to efforts on creating non-handicapping public transport facilities and physical environments.
• Identified the consideration needed for drawing an intervention plan for increasing inter-sectoral partnership for transport and accessibility issues.
• Recommended measures to address the identified gaps and issues in the public transportation system that limits the mobility of persons with disabilities resulted from the regional transport summits held in 2007.
• Drawn and formulated a National Plan of Action for an accessible public transportation system for persons with disabilities in the country.
“ACCESS 2010”:
First National Conference on Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities
DECLARATION OF SUPPORT AND COMMITMENT
We, the participants of the Access 2010: First National Conference on Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities belonging to the government and the private sectors, declare to commit ourselves to work together in a common platform and uphold the principles of :
Respect for the dignity and rights of all persons with disabilities; and,
Empowering them to live independently and participate fully and equally in all aspects of community life especially the women with disabilities whose involvement in community activities have been undermined because of gender
biases and discriminations.
We pledge to participate actively and unfailingly in the implementation of the National Plan of Action for an Accessible Land, Rail, Air and Sea Public Transportation System for Persons with Disabilities in the country.
Further, we resolve in particular to achieve the following five-point action agenda in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, BIWAKO Millennium Framework for Action Towards an Inclusive, Barrier-Free and Rights-Based Society for Persons with Disabilities and the Accessibility Law:
1. Formulate strategies that will improve attitudes and behavior towards persons
with disabilities particularly in the public transport sector;
2. Undertake comprehensive review of accessibility standards for planning of
public transport systems, as well as universal vehicular standards for
indigenous public transport;
3. Provide opportunities for the development of a strong multi-sectoral
partnership for public transport accessibility;
4. Improve existing public transport systems and ensure new and renovated public
transport systems are accessible; and,
5. Provide education and training for public transportation stakeholders on
accessibility issues facing persons with disabilities.
To achieve this five-point agenda, the participants commit to undertake the following:
Assist in the development of an effective mechanism for the implementation and monitoring of laws and policies pertaining to the accessibility of transportation services provided to the public;
Review and amend existing policies, guidelines and standards on public transport systems as well as universal vehicular standards for indigenous public transport that restricts mobility resulting in the discrimination of persons with disabilities in the transport industry;
Actively support the development of a strong multi-sectoral partnership for public transport accessibility among government organizations, non-government organizations and the sector of persons with disabilities that will result in a pro-active public transportation industry responsive to the enjoyment of persons with disabilities of their rights as Filipino citizens;
Support the development of existing transport systems to include standards in the designs of vehicles and other transportation facilities as well as ensure that new and renovated public transport systems are accessible; and,
Provide continuing capability-building activities for public transportation stakeholders on accessibility for the effective implementation of guidelines/policies/standards as well as ensure that persons with disabilities have the same access and are treated in a dignified and non-discriminatory manner.
Finally, in support of the above five-point agenda, we urge all persons with disabilities to organize themselves in all levels of the political subdivisions of our country so that with one voice they can call for government’s affirmative action in pursuit of the attainment of the objectives of this Declaration.
Signed this 28th day of March 2008 at Great Eastern Hotel, Quezon City.
Undersecretary Anneli R. Lontoc –DOTC
Asst. Secretary Elmer A. Soneja – DOTC
Director Ildefonso T. Patdu, Jr. - DOTC
Undersecretary Rosie Lovely Romulo –NCDA
Asst. Secretary Nora Salazar – NCDA
Michael P. Davies – CBM-Seapro
ies
By Ivor Ambrose, European Network for Accessible Tourism
Mrs. Waterman, who wrote to Athens News (Letters to the Editor, 14 March 2008) is, of course, absolutely right. Her husband has a medical condition preventing him from climbing stairs. But when travelling on a Greek ferry they were initially refused access to the lift to take them from the car deck to the passenger decks, as Mr. Waterman does not have a disability permit nor does he use a wheelchair, both of which, they were told, are required by “The Regulations”. Only after a hefty argument were they allowed to take the lift, and then only with the unsettling message that this was an exception, not to be repeated.The regulations for carrying passengers in lifts may have made sense to the team of bureaucrats who penned them but in applying the rule in practice, common sense is thrown overboard, the ship’s captain becomes a sea monster and the fare-paying passengers have the prospect of experiencing what should be a delightful Mediterranean sea journey from the confines of the ship’s bilges.
Continued -
This sad episode has probably been replicated many times all over Greece. I have a similar lift-regulation-experience from the Acropolis of Athens, a World Heritage Site, which was made accessible for “People with Special Needs” in 2004 by means of a remarkable stair lift and a near-vertical lift which scales the western wall of the edifice. In 2005 I visited the Acropolis with a group of international experts in Accessible Tourism, three of whom use wheelchairs. The walkers in our group took the main path while the wheelchair users were directed to the lift entrance. As our party included a Greek mother with two small children, one sitting in a pushchair, she followed the wheelchair group towards the lift entrance. However, she was refused access to the lift as the guards (- it is hard to call them assistants) told her she was not considered a “Person with Special Needs”, and was therefore not allowed to use the lift. She was left waiting outside, unable to enter the Acropolis at all. At the top we also met an elderly American lady who had struggled to make the long climb with a recently sprained ankle, (twisted, unfortunately, on an Athenian pavement). She had not been informed of the lift access at the main gate, she told us, but had noticed the elevator at the top and asked if she could use it to descend. ‘The lift is only for wheelchair users’, said the two lift attendants. Do you have a disability permit? No, of course she did not! On their refusal, with her painful ankle and her feelings also hurt, she turned and took the long walk down. Certainly, this was an unforgettable tourist experience of Greece!The lessons of these examples go far beyond the immediate issue of inconvenience and degrading treatment inflicted on the unfortunate passengers and tourists who find themselves on the wrong side of the ‘exclusive’ Greek lift regulations.
The well-known Greek term “Ατομα με Ειδικές Ανάγκες” (A.M.E.A.) – Persons with Special Needs – was defined ten years ago in the Accessibility Guidelines of the Hellenic Ministry of Environment to include: persons with permanent or temporary functional impairments… as well as persons who may be frail, such as those of the third or fourth age, and people of large or small physical stature and also those who, for example carry heavy luggage. [1]
The Greek Accessibility Guidelines take the needs of disabled people as the yardstick for inclusive design, which aims to make environments accessible and usable for all, meaning both disabled and non-disabled persons. It was these guidelines which, along with the national building regulations and transport regulations, so successfully produced the accessibility provisions for visitors and spectators at the Athens 2004 Olympic and Paralympic Games. This makes it all the more puzzling that the present lift regulation goes against the official policy of an inclusive approach to the design and use of lifts. This deserves to be investigated, clarified, and possibly corrected. Is it the regulation itself which is at fault or the lack of awareness and training among those who should apply it? Or perhaps a bit of both?
A well-designed, accessible environment, when managed correctly, is good for all people, and it makes full participation in travel and social life possible for those with disabilities. Lifts, ramps and spoken announcements of train stations on the Metro are all examples of features that make mobility easier for everyone. But if the regulatory authorities and those in charge of transport or visitor attractions lack awareness of customers’ access needs, then the best designed facilities in the world will not give full benefit to all users.
Spreading greater awareness about accessibility and the best means of achieving it for everyone is the primary aim of the ‘European Network for Accessible Tourism’ (ENAT), a non-profit association registered in Brussels with its Secretariat in Halandri, Athens. ENAT was formed with European Union support in 2006 by a group of nine organisations, including the Hellenic Ministry of Tourism, VisitBritain and disability NGOs from six EU Member States, including the Greek ΝGΟ ‘Disability Now’ (ΑΝΑΠΗΡΙΑ ΤΩΡΑ). ENAT now has over 440 members in 52 countries. The members include tourism and travel enterprises, policy makers, national authorities, tourism education and training bodies, user organisations, professionals and some individuals. The network is actively sharing information about good accessibility practices in every area of tourism though the website www.accessibletourism.org and by means of international events and publications.
For those in the tourism industry the most compelling reasons to take note of the accessibility issue are to do with the demographic ageing of the populations of Europe and other western economies, which is reflected in rising numbers of older tourists around the world. The 55+ age group is the fastest growing inbound market segment in the UK. They spend more, stay longer and travel throughout the year, as opposed to younger age groups. These tourists, who may have small impairments or health problems as they get older, might not call themselves ‘disabled’ but they certainly want to continue travelling. And they have expectations about good accessibility at airports, in hotels, restaurants, tourist attractions, and of course in planes, ferries, buses and taxis.
The University of Surrey School of Tourism Management estimated in 2005 that the ‘accessible tourism market’ of older and disabled people and their families, (as these customers don’t usually travel alone), amounts to around 130 million people in Europe alone, with a potential revenue of some 80 million Euro per year.
ENAT wants these customers to enjoy travel in Europe and we want to help tourism providers meet this challenge, competently and with confidence. The task requires networking and greater use of standards for accessible infrastructure and staff training, as well as partnerships between tourism enterprises, the public sector and user organisations, to build the right frameworks and leverage this growing market.
Here in Greece, tackling lack of awareness about customers’ access needs and rights, and removing access barriers should be an ongoing and urgent priority of all actors – the public regulators, enterprises, Chambers of Commerce, trade associations, passenger transport businesses and others – both for the good of citizens living in Greece and the millions of visitors who come here to experience the best that Greece has to offer. The job of making Greece accessible wasn’t finished in 2004. There is much more to be done!
Of course, customers’ needs are one thing, their rights are another. Those who manage public places and provide services for payment, such as archaeological sites and ferry transport, must actively avoid discriminating against any groups of citizens who have the same right to access. Paying customers should be given the same level of service, wherever possible. In practical terms it does not make sense to distinguish between the access rights of local citizens and the rights of visitors from other countries, who have paid to enjoy the same services, nor between ‘able-bodied’ and disabled visitors. Such discrepancies run contrary to UN human rights policies, and it is worth noting that consumer protection legislation is moving inexorably against such unequal treatment both in European Union countries and the rest of the world.
Perhaps the most important lesson from Mr. and Mrs. Waterman’s ferry boat experience is that all of those who are engaged in the tourism and travel industry, from the policy makers to the deck-hand, must pay attention to the demands of all those customers who need good access, otherwise the market will either simply go elsewhere or, taking the other tack, we might expect a burgeoning growth of legal proceedings against providers – or the State - on the grounds of discriminatory practices. Far better then, to meet access demands with improved information, better awareness and infrastructure that is designed for and usable by all citizens.
Ivor Ambrose is Managing Director of the European Network for Accessible Tourism
[1] Greek Accessibility Guidelines, Ministry of Environment (1998) in Greek only. http://www.minenv.gr/1/16/162/16203/g1620300.html

A special issue of the magazine Ethical has been published on Barrier-Free Tourism. The 13 page pdf download is available here.
Articles include:
Tourism Accessible for All in Europe
0,6 Mb
For those who associate tourism only with holiday and leisure and luxury it should be mentioned that tourism is a sector of remarkable economic importance. The European tourism economy contributes to about 5 % (depending on its definition up to 11 %) to the GDP of the European Union and provides between 8 and 24 million jobs (depending on the definition of the sector). Furthermore, it should be taken into account that tourism is indispensably linked with travel...
Case Study: Economic Advantages of Accessible Tourism in Germany
0,3 Mb
In November 2002 Germany's Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour commissioned a project group, comprising the University of Münster and the consulting firms NEUMANNCONSULT and Reppel + Lorenz, to conduct a study on the economic impulses of accessible Tourism for All. For the first time reliable data and statements were brought together, which represent the customer’s potential and manner regarding accessible Tourism in Germany...
Merging Architecture and Accessibility
0,4 Mb
In the Nordic countries, improving disabled people's access to museums, art galleries and other cultural institutions has been an important consideration for a number of years. It is evident that museum buildings and the way displayed objects are presented should embrace all visitors; one of the challenges confronting museums at the turn of the twenty-first century is to ensure the greatest possible accessibility for all without compromising the architectural expression...
Providing Services in an Accessible Manner
0,4 Mb
Access is about the absence of barriers to the use of facilities. Although this is usually seen in terms of physical access or access to informa¬tion and communication, poorly trained staff can represent a serious barrier for disabled people if they are unable to provide services in an appropriate, non-discriminatory way...
Barrier-Free Asia?
Dr. Donald Hawkins is interviewed at the Ashoka Geotourism Challenge. He gives a good overview of how ecotourism is morphing into geotourism and cites some of the necessary alliances -- pro-poor tourism and gender equity. Apparently we need to do more public education about the economic realities of disability and Article 30 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) for the disability community to regularly be cited in the litany of the ecosystem of geotourism allies:
While ecotourism is still associated with the natural environment, there is now a sensitivity to the cultural dimension as well, and strong emphasis on engaging and involving the communities that surround very valued, high-quality cultural and natural resources. This is one of the challenges we have in the years ahead: we have more work to do in finding ways of tapping into tourism—which is really the largest ever transfer of wealth from rich to the poorer countries. ... is there potential for creating more business-related activities—such as tours, interpretation, facilities, or ecolodges—where consumers pay for services rendered and the money then sticks within the local communities in gateways near the protected areas?
He goes on to answer Lou D'Amore's question and the one we addressed in the Ecumenical Council on Tourism's anniversary issue of the Contours journal:
Can tourism be used to address the causes of conflict and war?What we really need is the freedom to travel anywhere we want in the world, and to be safe and secure. Freedom to travel, and safety and security, are probably the main concerns that people who live in these places are concerned about too.
Then there’s the whole education side of travel. It is such an intensive opportunity to learn and gain practical exposure to the world. We certainly need more of that people-to-people contact in this day and age where there is so much conflict.
Now we are bringing together Lou D’Amore’s International Institute For Peace Through Tourism and the Institute for Corporate Responsibility (ICR), a new institute that has been created at the GW School of Business, to collaborating. They will be offering a symposium in May titled “Peace Through Commerce, Tapping the Potential of the Global Travel Industry.”
For the full interview:
http://www.changemakers.net/node/7069
Architectural Record notes the Freedom by Design project to bring Universal Desgn experience to a new generation of architects:
Michael Graves, FAIA, has channeled many avatars during his career, from one of the academically minded New York Five in the 1970s, to a populist product designer for the retailer Target. After a bacterial infection paralyzed him from the waist down in 2003, the now wheelchair-bound (sic) architect works to be a champion of universal design, a movement that advocates creating spaces and products that any person, regardless of physical ability, can use.The American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS) recently appointed Graves as the honorary chair of its “Beyond Architecture” campaign, which seeks to establish a $2 million endowment to support its Freedom By Design program (FBD), among other initiatives. FBD enlists architecture students to renovate houses for low-income and disabled people. The AIAS had already raised half of its goal as of January, when Graves joined, and it hopes that his affiliation will be a driving force in raising the remaining amount.
Source:
http://archrecord.construction.com/news/daily/archives/080317graves.asp
Tourism and accessibility awareness are on the rise throughout India. Could a Rolling Rains reader become a 2008-2009 Indicorps Fellow and in the process gain the competencies needed to eventually develop a truly sustainable Inclusive Tourism project in India? Why not?
Indicorps is a non-profit organization that offers opportunities for aspiring young leaders of Indian-origin to engage in intense grassroots development projects through one or two-year public service fellowships. We are currently recruiting soon-to-be college graduates and professionals of Indian origin for our August 2008-2009 Fellowship.Indicorps seeks to engage the most talented young Indians from around the world on the frontlines of India's most pressing challenges; in the process, we aim to nurture a new brand of socially conscious leaders with the character, knowledge, commitment, and vision to transform India and the world.
From IndicorpsWhy Now?
We are currently recruiting soon-to-be college graduates and professionals of Indian origin for our August 2008-2009 Fellowship. There are over 50 exciting community-based projects ranging from educating tribal youth in Maharashtra to increasing production of natural dye based products in Karnataka.
Why Indicorps?
• The structured program encourages young professionals from the Indian diaspora to challenge their comfort zones, place others' interests before their own, push their own potential to affect change, explore their relationship with India, and understand what it means to lead by committing themselves to innovative grassroots projects.
• Indicorps believes that giving one's time and energy, without any attachment to the outcome, regardless of the circumstances, is an unparalleled personal experience in service. At the same time, the fellowship is a chance for fellows to address their own identity, recognize their personal boundaries, and understand how to produce change in their environment(s). The fellowship is deeply rewarding, a transformational and challenging personal journey, and part of Indicorps’ collective experiment for change.
• Indicorps firmly believes that contributing to the development of India at a grassroots level will help Indians around the world better understand their heritage, explore ways to strengthen the global Indian community, and encourage civic responsibility at home in their respective countries. Indicorps focuses on the Diaspora in order to foster a sense of responsibility within the Indian community.
Deadline: Applications are due March 31st, 2008.
Contact: If you have any questions or need any more information, please contact Shilpa Shah (outreach@indicorps.org) or visit (http://www.indicorps.org)
Call for Papers: Session Sponsored by the Modern Language Association (MLA) Committee on Disability Issues in the Profession, MLA Annual Convention, San Francisco, Calif. -- December 27-30, 2008"Disability and Human Rights"
In recent years, disability scholars and activists have increasingly
turned to the language of human rights as a framework for advocating
and understanding the ethical claims of the disability rights movement
and the aims of politicizing disability as a social justice project.
For many, the appeal of such an approach lies in large part with its
explicitly inclusive reach; for to speak of "disability rights" as
"human rights" insists that disability matters are universal concerns
rather than "special needs."
Correlatively, this holistic and integrative approach to disability has also been promoted by the international human rights community. For their political project, incorporating disability under the rubric of human rights consolidates a more robust and expansive framework for the politics of "rights", as it reflects the postulate that, in the words of a 2002 report sponsored by the United Nations, "civil and political rights, on the one hand, and economic, social and cultural rights, on the other, are interdependent and interrelated."This special session, sponsored by the MLA?s standing committee on
Disability Issues in the Professions, invites papers that explore the
intersections of disability rights and analysis in terms of the
political language of human rights. We seek papers that historicize,
theorize, or chronicle this development in any national or global
contexts. We are especially interested in papers that consider the
linkage of disability and human rights as it implicates or is
implicated in the contemporary critique of the human rights
political project as implicitly individualistic, universalizing,
Western, and colonial. Papers may address cultural histories, legal
discourse, critical theory, literature, visual culture, public policy,
and/or the academic profession. We are especially interested in
considerations that engage global concerns and would additionally
welcome responses to from feminist, queer, or postcolonial theoretical
perspectives.Possible topics include:
-- the language of "disability", the language of "human rights"
-- disability-based response to the challenge of cultural relativism
and other critiques of international human rights project
-- representations of "disability rights" as "human rights" in
literature, art,
performance, or film
-- disability rights in academic contexts
-- legal texts, such as treaties, constitutions, cases, etc.
-- disability and the construction of the human
-- conceptualizations of the post-human or non-human
-- issues of political and cultural praxis
-- transnational contexts and comparative approaches
-- cultural historical and critical legal approaches
-- discourses of "dignity" and "inclusion"
-- the critical/political limits of "rights" discourse (i.e., how
"rights" function as "norms")
-- human rights, civil rights, and citizenshipPlease send abstracts of 250-300 words and a short (2 page) CV with
updated contact information by March 28 to:Dr. Eden Osucha (English, Bates College) by email at eosucha@bates.edu
Note: Panelists must become members of the MLA by April 7
Wireless technology and its impact on people with disabilities is the focus of study for the Wireless Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center (RERC). Below is a press release explaining results from a new survey they have done. For the purposes of the Rolling Rains' central topic -- travel, disability, & Universal Design -- this finding seemed key:
* Explaining why wireless devices are important to them, survey participants cited convenience and a sense of security - much like the general population. But they also noted that wireless devices often serve as assistive technologies. For example, one respondent noted, “The camera helps me remember things.” Another participant reported that with the texting feature, “I can communicate with hearing people, like hearing people use cell phones.”
Mirroring a trend among the general public, an increasing number of people with disabilities regularly use wireless technologies, including cell phones - and find them easier to use.But a number of people with disabilities cite a need for improved functionality of wireless devices, such as a feature to enable service dogs to call for help in an emergency, according to the initial results of a survey funded by the U.S. Department of Education’s National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR).
Wireless device ownership increased 13 percent - from 72 to 85 percent - among people with disabilities from the first generation of the survey of user needs - conducted from 2001 to 2007 - and the current survey, which began in April 2007. Also, more than three-fourths of respondents last year reported that their wireless devices are easy or very easy to use, compared to only half of those who responded to the earlier survey. Still, 73 percent said they likely would change wireless service providers, if necessary, to get additional features that enhance accessibility.
“The data these consumers share through our research helps our wireless industry partners meet customers’ needs and also helps identify applications useful to people without disabilities,” said survey project director Jim Mueller of the Wireless Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center (RERC), a collaboration between Atlanta-based Shepherd Center and the Georgia Institute of Technology. “We are not encouraging the wireless companies to make special products. We want products that will work for everyone.”
The RERC, which received its second, multi-year grant from NIDRR in 2007, promotes equitable access to wireless technologies and encourages adoption of universal design -design that benefits users of all ages and abilities - in future generations of wireless devices and applications.
The 1,208 people who completed the RERC survey in 2007 are representative of a large portion of the estimated 40 million Americans with disabilities, researchers noted. They compared the demographics of survey respondents to the U.S. Census and noted that 77 percent of respondents are 25-61 years of age; 5 percent are younger; 18 percent are older.
Researchers are comparing and contrasting the initial results from the current survey to the RERC’s previous user-needs survey of 1,200 people. Also, they are tracking trends among 165 people who have participated in both studies. In addition, researchers are comparing their results to findings reported by other wireless industry groups in 2007.
Here are some highlights from the analysis:
* Comparing the earlier survey results to the current responses, researchers found that respondents who use their wireless devices every day increased from 40 to 65 percent. Those who consider their wireless devices “very important” increased from 60 to 77 percent.
* Explaining why wireless devices are important to them, survey participants cited convenience and a sense of security - much like the general population. But they also noted that wireless devices often serve as assistive technologies. For example, one respondent noted, “The camera helps me remember things.” Another participant reported that with the texting feature, “I can communicate with hearing people, like hearing people use cell phones.”
* Among respondents to the survey last year, 77 percent said they are satisfied, very satisfied or extremely satisfied with their current wireless provider.
* About 68 percent of 2007 survey respondents said they are satisfied, very satisfied or extremely satisfied with their present wireless devices.
* The most important wireless functions cited by survey participants are: voice communication, 78 percent; Enhanced 911, 45 percent; text messaging, 43 percent; e-mail, 41 percent; and Internet access, 35 percent.
* The most important handset features to these users are: long battery life, 63 percent; durability and toughness, 61 percent; low cost, 57 percent; and simple operation, 56 percent.
* Survey respondents suggested some additional features they would like to have in a wireless device: “feature to enable service dog to call for help in emergency”; “ability to switch to voice carry-over during call (in case voice becomes unintelligible or environmental noise is too great)”; and “[ability to] scan and speak medication labels.”
* Survey respondents also commented on ways to make wireless devices easier to use. Their comments related to: incompatibility with assistive technologies, especially hearing aids or cochlear implants, design of the handset, including their difficulties holding it, seeing the display, and manipulating the controls.People with disabilities may participate through 2011 in the RERC survey, which is available online at http://www.wirelessrerc.org. The survey is also available by phone and in print. For more information, call 800-582-6360, send email to rerc@wirelessrerc.org or send correspondence via regular mail to:
Wireless RERC Research Coordinator
Crawford Research Institute
Shepherd Center
2020 Peachtree Road NW
Atlanta, GA 30309.About Shepherd Center
Shepherd Center is a private, not-for-profit hospital devoted to the medical care and rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury and disease, acquired brain injury, multiple sclerosis and other neuromuscular problems. Each year Shepherd Center admits more than 750 patients and conducts thousands of outpatient clinic visits. For more information, visit Shepherd Center online at http://www.shepherd.org.

Changemakers, a project of Ashoka, launched their Geotourism Challenge on January 31, 2008. There are many Rolling Rains Report readers who will know of and may even run projects that would be excellent nominees for this project.
Head over to their nomination form and let them know about Inclusive Tourism by adding your nomination:
http://www.changemakers.net/en-us/geotourismchallenge/nominate/2104
"Nominate your favorite example of geotourism -- defined by National Geographic as tourism that sustains or enhances the geographical character of a place: its environment, heritage, culture, aesthetics, and the well-being of its residents."
In the Changemaker Library you will find such helpful documents as, "The Tourism Industry and Poverty Reduction:
A Business Primer" a Pro-poor tourism briefing
One of the theses of this site is that as Universal Design moves into the mainstream it will have wider social impact than ever imagined when it was invented as part of the civil rights era in the US.
As a philosophy of liberation at its core that should not be surprising but the actual interplay of historical factors shaping the development and spread of his approach to building for humans-as-they-are is fascinating. I have written an article, Culture and the Future of Universal Design, for Design for All India on the need to study how various cultures accept, reject, or transform Universal Design. The following entry from the AGIS site entitled Housing and Technology illustrates one example of Universal Design become situated in broader historical trends. Here UD is placed in a discussion of aging, smart homes, and gerontechnology:
Each generation or cohort of aging individuals reaching older adulthood will also bring their experience, education, lifestyle, human associations and connections, and their needs and desires with them as they age. Computerphobia, and technophobia in general, will eventually evaporate, even if it remains in the post–World War II generation. Indeed, discretionary income among older adults is generally high, and housing purchases of single-family dwellings at the upper end of the price spectrum is, and will remain, a purchase made mainly by older adults. With those housing purchases come all of the opportunities for technology; both that which is part of the original purchase and that acquired after purchase. Technology and affluence go hand-in-hand. The acquisition of goods and services, however, is made by older adults only if they meet certain lifestyle requirements.
Have the product development professions, technology innovators, and the homebuilders begun to anticipate new markets for houses, consumer products, and technologies? Those who generate technology have begun, albeit late in the game, to see the demographic changes that are coming, and they have established a variety of approaches to make their product development efforts inclusive. Universal design is an approach that recognizes the diversity of the world population. This philosophy of designing encompasses the diversity brought about by recognizing aging, the expansion of the racial and ethnic base, and the increasing prevalence of individuals with both moderate and severe disabilities, in the population (Covington and Hannah). Another philosophy of design is referred to as transgenerational design (Pirkl). Transgenerational design extends the human factors associated with product development to include characteristics of normal age related change. Theoretically, inclusiveness of this kind offsets disability. In both philosophic approaches, disability can be measured as the difference between a person's ability to cope with his or her environment with and without the support of technology. For many older adults, technology can be the difference between continuous participation in all forms of activity or exclusion from the spectrum of activities that give meaning and enhance and invigorate all people throughout life.
Further reading:
http://www.agis.com/Document/211/housing-and-technology.aspx

La Cátedra Ocio y Discapacidad, del Instituto de Estudios de Ocio de la Universidad de Deusto, organiza e imparte 28 Cursos de Formación sobre Turismo Accesible para profesionales, en 25 ciudades. Patrocinados por la Secretaría General de Turismo y el Fondo Social Europeo, los cursos son de carácter gratuito para los profesionales del sector turístico.
Desde Turismo Polibea:
El Instituto de Estudios de Ocio de la Universidad de Deusto nace como proyecto en 1988. Su objetivo es estudiar la incidencia y creciente relevancia que adquiere el ocio en la sociedad actual. Desde el inicio se caracteriza por su naturaleza interdisciplinar, conectado a los planteamientos académicos internacionales, así como por la defensa de un ocio humanista, es decir, un ocio impulsor de desarrollo personal y social. Su cometido es la investigación, documentación y formación en los temas relacionados con los múltiples contextos en los que se realiza el ocio: Cultura, Turismo, Deporte, y Recreación.El proyecto Cátedra Ocio y Discapacidad es la expresión de uno de los objetivos del Instituto, la defensa del Derecho al ocio de todo ciudadano. Su realización fue posible gracias al convenio de colaboración firmado por primera vez en 1994 y renovado trienalmente hasta el 2004, entre la Organización Nacional de Ciegos de España (O.N.C.E.), la Fundación ONCE y la Universidad de Deusto. La Cátedra es un foro de encuentro desde el que se pretende dar a conocer nuevas propuestas relacionadas con el libre ejercicio y disfrute del ocio de las personas con discapacidad. Su finalidad es el impulso de actividades docentes, investigadoras, documentales y de difusión de los estudios relacionados con su área de interés. Para ello, la Cátedra colabora con los agentes sociales implicados en estos temas, apoyando la labor que realizan y generando nuevas iniciativas. En octubre de 2000 el Proyecto se denomina Cátedra ONCE Ocio y Discapacidad (antes Cátedra Ocio y Minusvalías). En el año 2004 el proyecto pasa a llamarse Cátedra Ocio y Discapacidad, del Instituto de Estudios de Ocio de la Universidad de Deusto . La línea de trabajo Ocio y Discapacidad está consolidada y reconocida en el ámbito universitario, el equipo de la Cátedra continua desarrollando su labor centrada fundamentalmente en la Investigación, Formación y Consultoría. Centra todos sus esfuerzos en el conocimiento exhaustivo y el desarrollo de herramientas que garanticen el ejercicio del derecho al ocio en todas las personas con discapacidad.
Logo Ministerio Industria Comercio. Pulsar para ampliar imagenPatrocinado por el Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio( Secretaría General de Turismo) y por el Fondo Social Europeo, el Programa Formativo para el fomento de la accesibilidad en los destinos y empresas turísticas consta de 28 cursos impartidos en 25 ciudades del estado español y está dirigido a profesionales y empresarios/as del sector turístico que quieran mejorar la calidad de los servicios, establecimientos y destinos turísticos y ahondar en la accesibilidad como factor de calidad de la oferta turística.
Cada sesión contará con un máximo de 20 participantes, y los/las alumnos/as tendrán acceso, además de a las sesiones presenciales, a la herramienta del Campus Virtual a través de la cual podrán profundizar en los materiales propuestos, realizar tutorías personalizadas con el equipo docente y acceder en los foros de discusión habilitados para los participantes.
La inscripción deberá realizarse a través de la página www.turismoaccesible.deusto.es en el apartado de inscripción (columna izquierda). Esta página web será el sitio de referencia actualizado para el alumno e incluirá cualquier cambio o información relevante sobre el programa y sus cursos. Asimismo se puede solicitar información en ocio@ocio.deusto.es
Cursos previstos en el mes de Febrero.Oviedo
Tarde y mañana, días 12 y 13Tarragona
Tarde y mañana, días 27 y 28Girona
Tarde y mañana, días 27 y 28Barcelona 1
Día entero, 29-02-2008Barcelona 2
Día entero 29-02-2008
Universidad de Deusto
Avenida de las Universidades, 24
48007 Bilbao
Tel. 94 413 90 00
e-mail ocio@ocio.deusto.esInstituto de Estudios de Ocio
ocio@ocio.deusto.es
Tel: 94 413 90 75 (Xabier Landabidea)
www.ocio.deusto.es
SlideShare.net began as an archive for posting and sharing digital slide shows. It quickly expanded into a social network with the capability to add sound to slide shows as SlideCasts. SlideShare is a valuable tool for virtualizing participation in conferences before, during, and after the event.
For example, I upload a slide show that I will use in a conference presentation so that I can either play it from the server or download it at the other end. I also extend the discussion from an event by forming a group such as the one to the right entitled "Universal Design."
Rolling Rains Report readers with slide shows invited to share them and join the group.
Anthropometry and biomechanics lie behind the advances that Universal Design has offered society in general and that Inclusive Tourism has offered travelers in particular. For a handbook overview of the two fields this NASA site is helpful: http://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/sections/section03.htm
We received the following request for participants in a research project conducted by Anna Pakman entitled, Media Consumption & People with Disabilities.
My name is Anna Pakman and I am a first year MBA student at Columbia Business School. I am conducting a survey as primary research for my paper on Media Consumption & People with Disabilities for my Consumer Behavior class. I would appreciate it if you could take a few minutes of your time to answer some questions about your consumption of television, film, Internet, and radio programming. As you probably know, the Nielsen ratings track media consumption for just about every population EXCEPT our community so the only way I can get this data is through your assistance. All individual survey responses are anonymous and will be kept strictly confidential.You may access the survey at:
http://withtv.typepad.com/weblog/2008/02/survey-media-co.html
The deadline for filling this out is March 31, 2008. Please feel free to forward this on to any and all individuals and organizations that may have an interest in completing the survey or getting their constituents to do so.
Should you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at apakman09@gsb.columbia.edu If the survey presents any problems for those using screen reading software please let me know and I can figure out another way to get it to you. Unfortunately, I need to use Qualtrics as it is the only surveying software provided by Columbia University and I have no control as to how accessible/unaccessible it is. If you have a lot of trouble, please record your problems and e-mail them to me so I can forward it on to our IT people who can then relay this feedback to the vendor.
Thanks in advance for your time.Regards,
Anna Pakman
MBA Class of 2009
One of the most important experiences of my teen years was as an exchange student in Guatemala. Later, in college in Brazil, I returned home leaving unused more than a year's scholarship at the University of Sao Paulo due to inaccessibility of the campus.
If you know anyone who is eligible for this wonderful opportunity to study in Central America pass it along:
Go Abroad with Mobility International USA June 27 to July 12, 2008Application Deadline: Friday, March 28, 2008
Generous Scholarships Available!
Applications available online now
First time travelers with disabilities who are between 18-24 years old, from cultural minority and low-income backgrounds are encouraged to apply
For more information:
apply@miusa.org
or
541-343-1284 (tel/tty)
The article below was forwarded to me by Disabled People's International. It provides a useful introduction to the basics of Adaptive or "Assistive" Technology.
Disablement, needless to say, significantly reduces the life quality of a person as it substantially diminishes their work ability. Assistive or adaptive technology, however, can bring back the individual's employability at an acceptable level.
Unfortunately, most people, even the disabled themselves, in the third world countries are not aware that assistive technology may become their real friend in assisting them in everyday life. I would like to highlight in this article some assistive technologies for different types of disabilities; before that it is worth mentioning what an assistive technology means.
There is no specific definition of Assistive Technology (AT). It simply denotes any item, piece of equipment, or system that is used to increase, maintain or improve functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities.
The definition does not necessarily imply that AT must include computers, or that it must be expensive, or that certain medical professionals can only prescribe it. This definition permits AT to be restricted by your own creativity and imagination.
The followings represent samples of the many types of AT, grouped by the nature of a user's disability, that are available.
AT for visual impairments
Visually impaired users face a great challenge when interacting with graphical user interfaces. Typically, they use software applications known as screen readers that turn the texts, events, and elements in applications and websites into synthesised speech. For example, when a user opens a new window in Microsoft Internet Explorer, a screen reader such as JAWS (Job Access with Speech) or Home Page Reader might say "new browser window".
A physically challenged person, I took part in a specialised training program last year, where 19 other physically challenged people also participated. Of them, 12 were visually challenged. I observed with sheer astonishment how my visually impaired friends worked smoothly on computer using screen reader software like JAWS or FSB reader. They used special key combinations to move around screen in order to direct the screen what to read. By listening to this speech, they were able to understand a screen's content.
Another AT for the visually challenged is refreshable Braille display, which may be used as an alternative to screen reader. These devices convert screen text into Braille and display the Braille on a number of cells comprised of independently controlled pins. When editing and reviewing text, refreshable Braille displays can be much better to work with because a vision-impaired user can easily reread characters on the same line and check spelling. Screen readers are capable of reading words character by character, but the process of moving backwards in text to review and then moving forwards can be cumbersome. Despite their potential advantage, refreshable Braille displays are less common due to their higher cost.
In addition, a Braille embosser converts computer-generated text into embossed Braille output. Braille translation programs convert text scanned in or generated via standard word processing programs into Braille, which can be printed on the embosser. The results on thick paper are the individual dots that constitute Braille characters.
However, choice of appropriate hardware and software will depend on the user's level of functional vision. Put another way, it relies on the intensity of impairment. For example, low-vision users can use hardware such as large monitors, adjustable task lamp, Copyholder, closed circuit television, modified cassette recorder, and scanner to improve visibility. Moreover, this can be helpful to people who have difficulty reading or seeing self-voicing applications such as talking web browsers.
AT for the hearing challenged
Although hearing impaired individuals encounter less accessibility than the visually challenged do, they face tremendous difficulty in terms of learning, job access and social inclusion. These are due to the traditional way of learning.
However, computer technology has emerged as blessing to the hearing impaired. As computer prompts such as spoken messages and beeps can be misunderstood or go unnoticed by hearing impaired individuals, this problem is solved through the use of tools that produce visual warning when the system plays a sound and/or display captions in place of a spoken message. Light signaller alerts the computer with light signals. This is useful when a computer user cannot hear computer sounds. As an example, a light can flash alerting the user when a new e-mail message has arrived or a computer command has completed.
In addition, hearing impaired person can use TTY/TDD (Telecommunication Device for the Deaf), which is an electronic device for text communication via a telephone line, telecare, closed captioning, teletext and multimedia projector to address accessibility problem. Moreover, newer text-based communication methods such as short message service (SMS), internet relay chat (IRC) and instant messaging have also been accepted by the deaf as an alternative or adjunct to TDD.
AT for mobility impairments
Mobility impairment refers to any condition that limits an individual's ability to navigate through their environment. Mobility assistive technology products and services for the physically challenged are used to ensure freedom of movement around the home or office. For example, persons with mobility impairment can use wheelchair or electric wheelchair to overcome challenges to daily activities. A permanent or portable ramp can also help in this regard.
In addition, alternative pointing devices allow mobility-impaired individuals to control the mouse pointer via a mechanism other than the mouse. These are typically used when someone lacks dexterity to manipulate a standard mouse. Again, some software exists that converts the keyboard arrow keys into directional movements for the pointer. Other keys are used to signal a left and right mouse click. Besides, for individuals with severe impairments who are entirely unable to manipulate the mouse and/or use a standard keyboard can use HeadMouse wireless pointing device that converts the movements of a user's head into corresponding movements of the mouse pointer by tracking the motion of a single point on the user's head. A standard keyboard may be completely replaced by using this system in conjunction with software that produces an on-screen keyboard.
Mobility-impaired individuals may utilise speech recognition applications. This software can be used to both control applications via speech commands and as a means to dedicate text, with speech converted into text in real time.
Disability is not inability; rather, it is a blessing in disguise. If the disabled get some opportunity, they can also prove their potential in the real field. As evidenced by the above descriptions, assistive technology services address a variety of disabilities in numerous ways. Regretfully, technology, created without regard to people with disabilities, often creates undesired hindrances to hundreds of millions of people. We should know that assistive technology, or more specifically universally acceptable technology, equally yields great rewards for the typical users. One example is the kerb cuts in the sidewalk at street crossing. While these kerb cuts enable pedestrians with mobility impairments to cross the street, these also aid parents with carriages and strollers, shoppers with carts, and travellers and workers with pull-type bags.
And here in Bangladesh, though the availability of disabled friendly or assistive technology is alarmingly low, YPSA -- a specialised non-profit social development organisation -- is doing some exciting work in this respect. As a result, the organisation has been selected by DAISY (Digital Accessible Information System) Consortium, to ensure information in accessible format for people with disabilities (PWDs), especially for the print disabled. We sincerely hope that other organisations would follow YPSA's effort in this regard to make the PWDs lives somewhat easy and enjoyable.
The author, a physically challenged person, is a trainee at Thakral Information Systems Pvt Ltd, Dhaka.
http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=2062
I appreciate what James David is writing on design over at The Groundswell Blog. Today he looks at the post The Revolution Will Not Be Designed by Alix Rule in his post Designing the Revolution.
Social justice inherently seeks systemic change to redress oppression. Rule’s objection to design thinking is that it serves as a”post-ideology” ideology, one which is stripped of considerations for “the long process by which consensus is built—a.k.a. politics.” Her case is that:In particular, design metaphors obscure the ideological—and political—decisions involved in tackling societal issues. Depending on your perspective, “drunk driving” can be a symptom of some broader systemic failure (from un-walkable suburbs to deficient public education), a lapse of individual responsibility, or a right to be defended. The solution to the problem is inseparable from its conception. Conceiving of global ills as design challenges may sometimes be in order, but only when a consensus exists on goals, budgets and relevant values. Such is rarely the case.
Reading Jame's thought-provoking analysis reminded of a a distinction that Rudiger Leidner of NATKO made in a 2006 presentation "Tourism Accessible for All in Europe."
The distinction was between US conceptualizations of Universal Design and a European reformulation known as Design for All:
"...the main difference between the D[esign]F[or]A[all] idea and similar approaches such as “Universal Design” is that the targeted users should be involved in the process of product development."
Ii was just on Sandy Dhuyvetter's Travel Talk Radio. It's always great to talk to Sandy.

As a wrap-up question she asked about positive trends in the industry. Let me highlight five suppliers who represent what is up-and-coming in Inclusive Travel -- accessible yacht rentals and critical mass in Mexico and in the deaf travel market:
Rent Yachts and Take Small Ship Tours:
Sherri Backstrom
Waypoint Charter Services
http://waypointcharter.com/accessible_travel.htm
1 888 491-2949
Visit Mexico as a Traveler with a Disability or on Fam as a Travel Agent:
Judith Cardenas
Cancun Accesible
Cancun Accesible (notice only one "s)
Teléfono +52 (998) 883 1978
info@cancunaccesible.com
Skype: Cancún.accesible
Adriana Ramirez
Mexico Accesible
http://www.accesiblemexico.com/ (notice only one "s")
1-866-519-6165
Meet the Deaf Travel Market:
Maria Gilda L. Quintua
M.G.L.Q. Deaf Tour Assistance, Philippines
http://www.mglq-dtap.com-a.googlepages.com/home
gilda_tourguide@yahoo.com
Text: +639108392799
Tabitha and MacPartlow
Passages Deaf Travel
Office: (757) 599-9181 Voice / TDD
passagestravel@aol.com
http://www.passagesdeaftravel.com/index.htm
A prefeitura do Rio pretende contratar empresa especializada em formação profissional para treinar 200 pessoas com deficiência física para atuar na área de turismo. O edital da licitação foi publicado no Diário Oficial nesta segunda-feira (14), segundo a Secretaria especial de Turismo.
O subsecretário de Turismo, Paulo Barros, explicou que, em muitas oportunidades, uma empresa pretende contratar um profissional com deficiência, mas não encontra candidatos com o treinamento necessário. Ele acredita que a demanda é grande nas empresas turísticas e em hotéis da cidade, seja para melhor atender aos clientes deficientes ou mesmo para cumprir a legislação que determina a obrigatoriedade de 2 a 5% de funcionários com deficiência em firmas com mais de 100 empregados.
"Essa medida ajuda a criar uma cultura favorável ao atendimento às pessoas com deficiência. Um profissional com formação adequada que seja deficiente atende melhor ao cliente que está na mesma situação. No 1º semestre, a intenção é que o curso treine 200 pessoas. Mas o número pode aumentar no 2º semestre de 2008", declarou Barros.
Pontos turísticos devem ser adaptados
Outra medida voltada ao turista com deficiência física foi a assinatura de um convênio entre a prefeitura do Rio e a instituição francesa Tourisme et Handcap, organização não governamental especializada em turismo inclusivo. A parceria foi firmada nesta segunda, pelas secretarias especial de Turismo e da Pessoa com Deficiência, depois da visita da diretora da instituição francesa ao Rio.
Segundo o subsecretário de Turismo, Paulo Barros, um tour informal por hotéis, restaurantes e pontos como o Corcovado e o Pão de Açúcar no fim de semana do dia 14 e 15 de janeiro forneceu dados iniciais à instituição, que deve elaborar até meados de 2008 um manual com as adaptações necessárias nos pontos turísticos do município.
"Nessa visita já foi possível constatar que a situação é melhor do que se imaginava. O Cristo e o Pão de Açúcar, por exemplo, precisam de pequenas adaptações para ficarem totalmente acessíveis. A instituição deixou conosco as normas da União Européia, que vão guiar o trabalho, que está apenas começando", disse o subsecretário, que apontou o Hotel Sofitel, em Copacabana, como o ideal em termos de acessibilidade aos deficientes físicos.
O secretário especial de Turismo, Rubem Medina, informou que já está sendo feito o levantamento do que precisa ser adaptado.
Banheiros feminino e masculino separados
Segundo a deputada Sheila Gama (PDT), presidente da comissão de Defesa da Pessoa Portadora de Deficiência da Assembléia Legislativa do Rio, existem especificações de acessibilidade definidas pela Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT).
A deputada informou que o local é considerado acessível quanto tem rampas, piso tátil e sinal sonoro para os deficientes visuais, indicações em braile nos elevadores, banheiros adaptados e portas com largura adequada à passagem de cadeiras de rodas.
"É importante verificar se será respeitada a lei que garante banheiros adaptados separados; um feminino, outro masculino. A lei é clara. Algumas obras recentes, como o estádio do Engenhão e o novo estacionamento subterrâneo na Avenida Presidente Antônio Carlos, no Centro, só tem um banheiro para deficientes", denunciou a deputada.
http://g1.globo.com/Noticias/Rio/0,,MUL259301-5606,00.html
Kango.com is a travel site that is still in private beta but offers some well thought out features. Some of the initial reviews are positive:
Tim from Business of Online Travel talks about how Kango is the natural evolution of meta-search to solve the problem of too much information – Kayak aggregates price, Travelzoo aggregates deal and Kango aggregates content, reviews and travel information,”(Kango) takes all of the unstructured data out there from web based sources (TripAdvisor, Travelpost, Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity, etc) and combines it into a structured data result…into a contextual summary”.
Source:
http://blog.kango.com/kango_news/analyst_and_blog_feedback_on_kangos_private_beta_152.html
But what tells me that they really understand industry trends and consumer needs is when I see them bring in experienced Inclusive Travel advocates like Craig Grimes of Accessible Barcelona and Accessible Nicaragua. See his piece at Disability Travel, Part I: Plan Accessible Trips
Grace Becker, Acting Assistant Attorney General impressed us with her grasp of the current state and future needs of Inclusive Tourism with her opening remarks at the ADA Business
Connection Leadership meeting.
Prepared Remarks of Grace Chung Becker
Acting Assistant Attorney General
ADA Business Connection Leadership Meeting
Contemporary Resort, Disney World
Lake Buena Vista, Florida
January 7, 2008
Thank you, Loretta, for the kind introduction. My thanks to Stuart Vidockler, of Society
for Accessible Travel and Hospitality (SATH), and Jeannie Amendola of Disney World,
for co-hosting this meeting and helping us bring together this extraordinary group of
people. I also want to thank our speakers Nadine Vogel, President, Springboard
Consulting, and Ms. Amendola, for talking to us today about the power of accessible
customer service to improve business accessibility and welcome the market of people
with disabilities. And, thanks to Jani Nayar of SATH, Jack Humburg, of the Boley
Centers, Elizabeth Howe of the Center for Independent Living of Central Florida, and
Shelley Kaplan, of the Southeast DBTAC, for the great help they gave us in putting this
meeting together.
Most notably, thank you all for making time in your busy schedules. We appreciate your
willingness to participate in this important discussion that we call the ADA Business
Connection Leadership meeting. As I was named Acting Assistant Attorney General
fairly recently, this is my first ADA Business Connection meeting. I am looking forward
to learning from our co-hosts and speakers and to developing a discussion that will
result in ongoing relationships within the greater Orlando area as well as in the national
disability rights and business communities.
Today’s presentations and discussion will focus on the mutual benefits of accessible
customer service in the travel and hospitality industry. In business management books
and articles, we find repeated references to the need for today’s companies to become
“customer-centric” and to offer customers as many choices as possible in products and
services in order to remain competitive. Experts talk about “re-inventing the customer
experience’” and “turning ordinary into extraordinary “ because customers expect more
and base their loyalty to businesses on whether they get what they want and get it in
ways that make them feel valued by the company.
All too often, however, customers with disabilities are not part of the equation when
providing these new and over-the-top experiences. Yet some of what business experts
are touting now as providing exemplary customer service is exactly what the ADA
requires. For example, Jonathan Tisch, CEO of Loews Hotels and author of Chocolates
on the Pillow Aren’t Enough, writes about how a company can individualize its services
by giving staff permission to adjust standard procedures as needed to best serve a
customer. The ADA calls that modification of policies, practices, and procedures.
Tisch also argues that attracting diverse customer groups – and he includes people with
disabilities in this group – will be key to success for businesses in the coming years.
But he cautions that “respecting diversity doesn’t happen automatically; it requires
thought, training, and commitment.” I am sure we will talk often this afternoon about the
value of these three elements when creating a welcoming environment for customers
with disabilities.
Organizations large and small can win over this market with good service. In his book,
The Starbucks Experience, Joseph A. Michelli relates numerous success stories about
Starbucks employees and their efforts to provide exemplary customer service. One
story took place in a California Starbucks where the baristas observed that many of their
customers were deaf. Wanting to improve the customer experience, the baristas
independently took the initiative to enroll in sign language classes to improve their
communication with these patrons. With such a warm welcome, the deaf customers not
only continued to patronize that Starbucks, but also created a website called Deaf Chat
Coffee at www.deafcoffee.com to encourage deaf individuals throughout the U.S. and
Canada to set up coffee groups in their own neighborhoods. Even the site's logo is a
salute to the ubiquitous Starbucks insignia. There are three Deaf Chat Coffee groups in
the Orlando area, two of which are held in Starbucks stores. I guess that’s what
Howard Schultz, Chairman and CEO of Starbucks, meant when he said, “We are not in
the coffee business serving people, but in the people business serving coffee.”
Reinventing the customer experience for people with disabilities can boost a company’s
accessibility and its compliance with the ADA, draw in a new market, and improve
service for all of its customers. In an IBM executive brief, Dr. Paul Horn, senior vice
president of IBM research, is quoted as saying “Out of our work making computing
easier to use for people with disabilities we will think of radically new approaches. Out
of these approaches we will find not just ways of helping people with . . . disabilities but
ways of making computing far more natural and intuitive.” If accessibility can make
computing more intuitive, just think of what it can do for the service-oriented hospitality
industry.
The market is there, it is growing, and it is expecting accessible customer service. The
proof of this market's importance is in the statistics:
• The U.S. Census Bureau's 2002 Survey of Income and Program
Participation (SIPP) found that there are 51.2 million people with
disabilities in the United States. To put that number into perspective, the
2002 SIPP indicates that the U.S. population's percentage of people with
disabilities is 18.1 percent. That is larger than the percentage of
Hispanics in the U.S. population (13.3%), the country's largest ethnic,
racial, or cultural minority group.
• Almost 21 million American families have at least one member with a
disability.
• According to the Department of Labor, individuals with disabilities have
$175 billion in annual discretionary income to spend.
• A 2005 study by the Open Doors Organization (ODO), a Chicago nonprofit
organization, found that more than 21 million adults with disabilities
traveled at least once in the preceding two years. More than 50% of
adults with disabilities stayed in hotels while traveling within this two-year
period. In a 2002 study, the ODO found that spending by travelers with
disabilities exceeded $13.6 billion annually.
• According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2002, more than 42 percent of
those 65 and older had disabilities. In 2000, in the U.S. alone, there were
35 million people in this age group. Doing the math, we can estimate that
approximately 14.7 million of these older adults have disabilities. Globally,
the story is even larger: a recent UN study reported that between 2005
and 2050, the worldwide population of people 60 and older is expected to
almost triple.
• In addition, those 76 million Baby Boomers -- the oldest of whom turned
60 last year -- experience biological and psychological changes before
age 65 that might not be identified as disabilities but can be
accommodated by accessibility in businesses. A Deloitte Research Study,
"Tracking Travel: Exploring the Latest Trends in Business and Leisure
Travel," adds that while customer ratings for preferred lodging amenities
were similar among age groups, the 51-65 year old group had two
additional choices: comfortable beds and easy-to-use electronics. Those
accessible features do make a difference.
• Older adults also have money. A Deloitte's research study states that
consumers over age 50 control almost half of all consumer spending in the
United States; and that consumers 65 and older are the most affluent of
any U.S. age group.
• And, they like to spend it. Reports from Deloitte, Canada Statistics, and
Abacus International indicate that the older adult demographic segment in
the U.S., Canada, Asia, and Europe dominate all other age groups in
travel: traveling more and spending more on their travel.
Businesses are focusing on this audience not for altruistic reasons but for the bottom
line: millions of customers with billions of dollars in disposable income.
And finally, a recent study by Weber Shandwick found that Baby Boomers regularly look
to their peers for product recommendations and consider them to be trusted sources of
information. Anecdotally, persons with disabilities across the country maintain informal
but very strong information-sharing networks about accessible venues. In these days of
blogs, online reviews, and omnipresent, immediate communication, this is an audience
to cultivate and keep satisfied.
I would like to conclude with a quote from IBM Global Business Services: "To stand out
in a crowded marketplace, retailers need customer advocates, not just shoppers . . .
Becoming more customer focused is a multiyear journey that will require executive
sponsorship in order to orchestrate the changes required in culture, organization,
processes and technology. It is a vital strategy for all retailers and the means for turning
shoppers into advocates and creating a sustainable, differentiated advantage." I hope
that after today's meeting, the people in this room will embrace the cultivation of
customer advocates among people with disabilities, Baby Boomers, family, and friends
through providing accessible customer service that “turns ordinary into extraordinary.”
Thank you all for coming.
Several colleagues have recently commented about the uncritical adoption of an ethos of competitiveness in the travel industry - which is by its nature a people-centered enterprise. Excesses in the airlines industry reported here as violating the civil rights of travelers with disabilities are only one manifestation of an imbalance. Below is one reflection on the limits to competition as paradigm. Let me start with its conclusion:
Knowledge itself often does better in a collaborative environment than in a competitive one. Debates with a winner and loser are usually not very productive or conducive to genuine learning. Collaborative environments that embrace many points of view, especially where those views are in perpetual conversation with one another, overall are richer in what they know and what they understand. Within them, knowledge can be what it is and not what the dominant side would like it to be. Knowledge finds its integrity in the perpetual conversation where it is in play.
I’m years late getting to Jack Welch’s Jack: Straight from the Gut. I had to read it for a project I was working on recently, and I’m glad I did, but not so much for what he says. His story of his tenure as General Electric’s CEO is interesting, but the subtext is positively fascinating.There’s no arguing with Welch’s success, except perhaps by arguing with his definition of success. GE was a big, profitable business when Welch got there. When he left, it was much bigger and much more profitable because Welch redefined success as winning. It was not enough to be profitable. Instead, the company had to shed every area of business where it could not be #1 or #2. Where global competitors were arising that would drive GE out of the business, that was a shrewd,
preemptive move. But as a strategy applied across the board, it seems from Welch’s book to have had another motive as well.
Self-created strifeWelch’s story is that of overcoming adversity. His family was comfortably working class. They did not have it easy, but they got by. That’s not the adversity I’m referring to. And while Welch obviously had to struggle and compete to make it all the way to the top, the story, as he tells it (of course), is of an honest process that rewarded his skills, drive and personal qualities.
The most important adversity in his story is that which Welch created. On the one hand, he is exceptionally modest throughout his book. He takes every opportunity to tell us of his mistakes, and to remind us that he didn’t know as much about any of the areas of the business as those who were running them. He claims to have been a poor—or at least nervous—public speaker. So, how does he account for his rise and subsequent success? In part, it was his
passion and hard work. But lots of people work hard. More important, he says, was his integrity, by which he means his insistence on being who he is and not pretending to be something else.Rare commodity
Integrity is so important to Welch that he stressed it as GE’s #1 value. But, by insisting on his integrity, Welch implicitly defined his circumstances as corrupt: Welch succeeded because his integrity was a rare virtue at GE. Welch doesn’t state it this baldly or generally, but that is how his story reads. Time and again, Welch stands out because he’s the one willing to speak the hard truths, face "reality" and rise above the "butt-kissers," all because he was the one with the integrity to stay true to who he is.
Constant struggle
Welch, in fact, realigned GE so that it was in perpetual struggle. The requirement to be #1 or #2 in the market meant that everyone at GE—after Welch’s mass layoffs—was in constant struggle to gain or maintain marketshare. And Welch instituted an internal system of "differentiation"—ranking—that required managers not only to rate their employees as As, Bs or Cs but to always assign 10 percent to the Cs. Then the Cs had to be improved or fired. That ensured that GE internally became a system of constant struggle and adversity. Or, so it seems from Welch’s book.
Untrammeled passion
A system of adversity enables strong leaders to emerge. In fact, adverse times demand strong leaders. One’s left wondering if that is in fact what drove Welch to build adversity into the fabric of GE, creating an environment that needed a strong leader like Welch—one with the "integrity" to be who he is.
There are obvious advantages to having a tightly controlled and well-led enterprise. But as we look at the Internet and some of the most remarkable achievements on it—Linux, Wikipedia, the blogosphere, the Internet itself—we now have proof that there are also advantages to collaborative networks that spurn leadership. In fact, those networks are where you’ll find the true, untrammeled passion that is Welch’s other main value.
Perpetual conversationKnowledge itself often does better in a collaborative environment than in a competitive one. Debates with a winner and loser are usually not very productive or conducive to genuine learning. Collaborative environments that embrace many points of view, especially where those views are in perpetual conversation with one another, overall are richer in what they know and what they understand. Within them, knowledge can be what it is and not what the dominant side would like it to be. Knowledge finds its integrity in the perpetual conversation where it is in play. That play is not Welch’s idea of adversity because in it, there are winners but no losers.
Source:
http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=37313
As any idea or invention becomes disseminated through a society it changes. Similarly as ideas move from their cultural contexts and take root in another changes occur.
Here Shoji Nakanishi of Disabled People International (DPI) Japan re-clarifies the founding concepts and principles of the Independent Living Movement as it undergoes the two-fold process of mainstreaming in its host context and internationalization to new cultural contexts. The question arises, "Is the new faithful to the intentions of the original?"
See the Independent Living Movement in Developing Countries
As Inclusive Tourism and Inclusive Destination Development emerge further into mainstream thinking it is important the its implementation be truly "universal."
With the age inversion of populations in an increasing number of countries, the prevalence of older travelers, and the frequency of blindness as a consequence of aging the observations and guidance of those who have had long experience with blindness is a social asset of increasing value. Below is the document, Creating A Barrier Free Society, from the World Blind Union on the proposer implementation of the seven principles of Universal Design.
Creating A Barrier Free Society
Creating a barrier free society for persons who are blind and partially sighted is a goal of the World Blind Union. Over the years a great deal of attention has been given to the accessibility requirements of persons with ambulatory disabilities however the need to create a barrier free society for persons who are blind and partially sighted is equally important and not to be forgotten.
In more recent years a movement known as "Universal Design" has evolved. Universal design is based on the principle that, the built environment, communication and products should be accessible to the widest range of people possible. Universal design is different from accessible design in that accessible design creates products and environments for people with disabilities, which often tend to segregate people creating separate systems. Universal design is considered to be usable and inclusive to all, including people with disabilities.
Although the concept of universal design is well documented, the unique design needs of persons who are blind and partially sighted have not always been fully considered or incorporated into the built environment.
One very important component to consider in advocating for a barrier free society is the development of a consumer group that represents different consumer groups, organisations and individual advocates. The group is an invaluable asset to obtain ideas, and consensus and endorsement on areas of importance to person's who are blind and partially sighted. It is important to note that many countries have developed excellent laws, standards, guidelines and recommendations governing the accessibility requirements. (Please see websites and material noted at the end of this document)
The information that follows provides guidelines and recommendations on key areas related to the built environment for people who are blind and partially sighted. These areas are key in creating a built environment that is barrier free and inclusive for persons who are blind and partially sighted. You may wish to consider them in your advocacy efforts of person's who are blind and partially sighted.
Lighting
Adequate lighting is the single most important aid to vision. The lighting needs of persons who are blind or visually impaired vary according to the individual and their particular eye condition. One level of light might work well for a person with glaucoma and be to low for someone with macular degeneration.
The three principle light sources are natural light; incandescent and florescent each has their own attributes and weakness when considering lighting situations for persons who are blind or partially sighted. The key is to utilize these light sources optimally and considering the following:
* Avoid glare and reflection, which are often caused by shinny or glossy surfaces.
* Place light sources in locations to avoid creating shadows. Shadows created by natural or artificial light can create optical illusions.
* Distribute light levels evenly throughout working and walking areas as many people have difficulty adjusting to fluctuations in light levels.
* Include task and spot lighting to augment the overall lighting system.
* Use of dimmer switches allows light levels to be adjusted to suit the unique needs of users.
Colour Contrast
Colour contrast is another key component in designing spaces for persons who are partially sighted; its importance cannot be overemphasized enough. A building can be logically laid out, include proper use of signage, provide good lighting but the building can cause disorientation if there is very little use of colour contrast within the building. Colour can be used effectively for many purposes such as:
• To draw attention to signage.
• To define a route of travel.
• To define areas.
Colour contrasting items, is also a very effective means in defining spaces. A colour contrast of 70% is generally accepted in many countries as the preferred amount to define items such as:
* A dark door frames, against a light door and a light wall.
* A light floor colour with a dark perimeter against a light coloured wall.
* Hand rails that colour contrast with the surrounding wall colour.
* Stair nosing is best seen when a colour-contrasted edge is provided.
Furniture that is colour contrasted with the floor and walls assists in locating furniture. Considerations when using colour: * Colours to avoid using together include red/ black, yellow/ grey, yellow /white, red/green, black /violet and blue /green.
• Be consistent in use of colour to convey messages.
• Limit use of colour and keep colour schemes simple and avoid large-scale patterns. Keeping in mind that too many Colours used in design can create confusion.
Acoustics
Sounds can assist in providing orientation clues about a space. A person can use reflected sound to determine a room size, the presence of corridors and proximity of walls or other structural barriers.
Inappropriate use of sound can create problems such as high levels of ambient sound or high levels of reflective sound. Some things to consider when planning space are:
* Well-defined, acoustically alive spaces are easier for people who are visually impaired to negotiate safely. Position items such as escalators, fountains, and elevators to create useful sounds.
•* Carpets, acoustic tiles and furniture reduce sound reflectance. Consideration should be given to providing some reverberation so that people can obtain a feel of the space.
* Noise sources may mask sounds intended to provide directional cues, such as ventilation ducts or air-conditioning units. These sounds may be useful, however they should not obscure the sound of an elevator.
* Sound reflections are frequently a good source of auditory cues.
• Consideration should be given to the structure and texture of planned circulation routes and how they would interact with the sound created by the tapping of a cane.
Signage: Tactile Signs
Information on signs should be available for persons who are blind and visually impaired. It is commonly considered adequate for tactile signs to consist of raised characters only. However, Braille can be read so much faster and easier than raised print for those who read it. A best practice in some countries is to include raised print and Braille in signage that identify rooms or spaces such as auditoriums, cafeterias, washrooms and elevator floor numbers.
Signage should be consistently located at a height and distance from the door to which it defines. The raised tactile lettering should be colour contrasted with the background. The sign should be colour contrasted with the surrounding wall surface.
Protruding Objects
Objects that protrude into paths of travel can be hazardous to persons who are visually impaired. In many cases protruding objects consist of:
• Signs
• Canopies
• Underside of stairs
• Drinking fountains
• Items protruding from walls
• Over hanging branches
• Telephone booths
Consideration should be given to eliminating these hazards such as:
* Placing a railing or planters below the underside of stairs.
* Ensuing all overhangs are removed within a certain height range.
* Telephone booths and drinking fountains are cane detectable. This can be achieved by placing an object at floor level.
Detectable Warning Surfaces
Detectable warning surfaces have a texture that can be felt under foot or detected by a person using a long cane. The texture is usually built in or applied. The texture alerts a person who is visually impaired to a hazard.
Detectable warning surfaces should be used on unprotected platforms, around reflecting pools, top of stairs, and curb ramps.
Detectable warnings should be consistently used to identify features in the built environment.
Audible Pedestrian signals (APS)
Accessible Pedestrian Signals are common in many countries and can assist people in knowing when it is legal to cross an intersection.
Fundamentally APS's should have the following:
* Two distinct tones one to indicate a north crossing and one to indicate a south crossing.•
* APS should be standard throughout a country or region.
* APS should provide both audible and verbal tactile information so that they are usable by person's who are deafblind.
* All light controlled intersections should have APS's, so that travelers who are visually impaired will always know they are available.
* APS's should not require a user to have special equipment to use them.
* APS's should be audible to users only and should not interfere with the area.
* APS's should be pedestrian activated.
* APS' s should emit a sound during the wait phase to help people to locate the button to actuate the sound.
Bank Machines
A movement is underway to develop bank machines that are accessible to people who are blind and partially sighted. In considering the bank in machine requirements of those who are blind and partially blind. Consideration should be given to the following when designing bank machines for the blind and partially sighted:
* All banking machines in a country or region should be consistent.
* All banking machines should have an access card that identifies the orientation of the card i.e. a notch.
* All portals should have a tactile graphics that are colour contrasted with the background symbol to identify them.
* Characters and symbols on the keys should be visually contrasted with the background and as large as the area on the key permits and have a sans serif font
* Each key press should be acknowledged visually audibly and by tactile registration
* The keypad should be telephone style, have the number five with a raised dot. The function keys should be separated by at least three times the distance from the numeric keys, and the surface should be such that it minimizes glare and is placed on an angle.
* The function keys should be placed to the right of the numeric keys and be arranged vertically, top to bottom, in the following order Cancel, correction OK/Enter
* Raised tactile symbols should be used to identify the function keys, either to the right or on the key itself. Using the following symbols: cancel X- correction- raised arrow<, and OK/ enter-raised circle O. Each function key if colored should be Cancel red correction, yellow and OK/enter- green.
* The functional display keys should correspond with in screen instructions, have a surface that is minimizes glare and leader lines that contrast with their background. * There should be an audio interface that is provided. The audio interface should have a socket with a raised ridge or a telephone hand set. The audio display should provide an orientation of the bank machine. The audio communication should be in the lower frequency range.
* Information printed by the ABM should be a minimum of 14 point.
•* Screen and printed material should contrast with the background. The text should use sans serif font and be mix an upper and lower text. Decimals and commas should be larger than normally used. Known advertising should be displayed with in the instructional area.
Further information
Following is a list of Recommended Websites and Material Websites: www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.html www.ap.buffal.edu/idea/publications/udnypdf.htm www.tiresais.org/terminal.htm
www.tiresais.org/tdiff.htm
www.design.ncsu.edu:8120/cud/univ_design/princ_overview.htm
www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/
www.inclusive-enviroments.com
www.jmuaccess.org.uk
www.csa.ca
Publications
Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB), Clearing our Path ISBN 0-921122-28-4 August 1998 contact CNIB 416 413 -9480
Transportation Development Centre, Going Places ISBN 0-921122-
22-5 August 1997 contact CNIB 416 413-9480.
U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. Building a True Community Final Report Public- Rights- of Way. Access Advisory Committee.
The Canadian Institute on Barrier free Design and Betty Doing Enterprises LTD, International Best Practices In Universal Design: A comparative Study, March 2000
Canadian Standards Association, B651.1-01 Barrier Free Design for Automated Banking Machines February 2001
Products:
Armor Tile Tactile Systems
ENGINEERED PLASTICS INC.
300 International Drive Suite 100
Williamsville, NY 14221
Phone: 1-800-682-2525
http://www.armor-tile.com/detectable-warnings_info.html
The end of 2007 saw the ENAT and ICAT conferences on Inclusive Tourism. Early January 2008 will be the SAT conference and may 2008 will see the IIDI Turismo para Todos conference. At the same time ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities continues at a rapid pace.
With so much progress on the stabilization of human rights for persons with disabilities the actions of the Federation of Indian Airlines to subvert the ' Carriage by Air of Disabled Persons or Persons with Reduced Mobility' proposed by India's Office of The Director General of Civil Aviation is especially out of step with the global consensus on the value of travelers with disabilities as a market. One would think that no one in the industry is doing their diligence on market forecasting.
Dear Kiki and Friends,
I would like to thank you for your responses...and I will go through the attachment you have sent.
In the meanwhile there has been a new development in India on the 30th Dec 2007 - this time by the FIA - Federation of Indian Airlines.
The FIA are not ready to accept the new guideline on ' Carriage by Air of Disabled Persons or Persons with Reduced Mobility' proposed by DCGA (Office of The Director General of Civil Aviation). The same was to come into force from 1st Jan 2008. I have attached the draft guideline with this mail for your reference. And in the last few months we had strongly lobbied for many changes before this final draft.
FIA says "Free help to disabled can't be enforced" - kindly read on for the article that was published in yesterday's news paper for your reference.
Kind Regards
Mahesh
'Free help to disabled can't be enforced', Times of India, 30th Dec 2007
NEW DELHI: The government's first attempt to regulate pricing policy of airlines could come to naught and add to the costs of physically challenged passengers.
Following several complaints from disabled rights groups, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) had about a month back issued a draft civil aviation requirement (CAR) on the subject. Among other things, it asked airlines to mandatorily provide free assistance to such passengers. The rule was to go into effect from January 1.
While most airlines currently provide wheelchairs, stretchers and ambulifts free, they have strongly opposed making the free service compulsory. The Federation of Indian Airlines — a joint body of Air India, Jet, Kingfisher, Deccan, GoAir, IndiGo, Paramount and SpiceJet — has said that the industry must be free to recover any extra cost that's incurred in the process of providing assistance to handicapped passengers.
Saying airlines are aware of their responsibilities towards physically challenged passengers, FIA has submitted its reply to the CAR to the ministry and DGCA.
"FIA believes that the issue of costs and cost-recovery for such special facilities cannot be mandated through the CAR. In our consultation with members, all carriers have expressed their strong opposition to airlines being denied the right to charge and recover costs for service provided," it said.
It goes on to add: "No other passengers are provided services free of charge. Any additional service should necessarily come at a charge to the passenger using the service, else the increased costs will need to be borne by the other airline passengers which is unfair. Airlines should be allowed to independently decide the charges, which certainly should be communicated clearly to passengers."
It has pointed out that the earlier CAR of July, 2005, allows airlines to charge for any additional service provided to passengers with special needs.
The new CAR stipulated that no airline would refuse to carry persons on a stretcher if they are accompanied by an escort who would look after them in flight. While FIA agrees to this, it says: "However, the carriage must be paid for. For example, a stretcher requires displacing nine seats that would otherwise be sold as revenue. It must be clear that these seats must be reserved in advance and paid for."
Similarly, the new rules say that all airlines must provide assistance to persons with disabilities/reduced mobility from the departing airport terminal to the destination airport terminal without any additional charge. "The Airlines strongly disagree with this statement. It is one thing to provide service, another to do it for free. No other passengers are provided free-of-charge services," the FIA has said.
Asked about this stand, a member airline of FIA said that most carriers provide these services free of charge and may even continue to do so. "But the decision to charge or provide assistance free must be the commercial decision of airlines. It can't be legally mandated," he said. This is not the first time airlines are spurning government's moves on influencing their charges. While the aviation ministry strongly opposed the term "congestion surcharge", airlines continue to levy it.
saurabh.sinha@timesgroup.com http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Free_help_to_disabled_cant_be_enforced/articleshow/2661352.cms
****************************** Response to the Article **********************
31.12.07
Dear Mr. Saurabh,
Greetings and thank you very much for publishing the article titled "Free help to Disabled Can't be enforced"
This is a significant development and a new hurdle posed by The Federation of Indian Airlines (FIA) towards the new Civil Aviation guidelines by DGCA for "Carriage by Air of Disabled Persons or Persons with Reduced Mobility".
In the last few months, we as a group of disabled persons have been lobbying with the DGCA in drafting these guidelines and finally when it was to come into effect from 1 Jan 2008 - the FIA has sprung a surprise.
We as persons with disabilities are not asking for free service, we want to use the services like any other passengers. However the limitations posed by the procedures adopted by the different airlines further reduces our mobility and prevents us from using the airline just like any other.
Some examples that prevent us are highlighted below:
1. From the point of check-in - the airline asks us to use the wheelchair provided by them - these wheechairs cannot be self-propelled and therefore we need a ground staff.
2. The airline do not handle our personal wheelchair safely and many times they have broken my wheelchair because of their careless attitude.
3. Where ever there is an aerobridge facility passengers using wheelchair are not given access to use them and they are not alloted the first row of seats - because of which we physically lifted by 3-4 persons with our wheelchair up and down the stairs to the aircraft.
4. We cannot use the buses/ transport facilities provided by the airline on the tramac as there are steps and no ramps to get into the coach. Therefore we need assistance to be lifted up and down from the bus or wheeled on the tarmac till the aircraft.
5. There are no wheelchair accessible toilets in many of the airport, the ones that are built are not according to standard specifications therefore one needs assistance to access the toilets.
Who is to be blamed for creating such obstacles? Why should the passenger using wheelchair or a person with limited mobility bear the cost towards these procedural and architectural barriers created by the airlines and at the airports.
Closing with warm regards
Mahesh
****************** A Prior Violation of Rights ******************************
Dear Friends,
Greetings,
Through this mail I would like to highlight the practice adopted by some of the airlines where passengers using wheelchairs have to sign in the "APPLICATION FOR THE CARRIAGE OF MEDICAL PASSENGER".
The most offending paragaraph in the 'APPLICATION' that we as passengers using wheelchair are forced to sign reads as follows -
"I the undersigned .....hereby indemnify and hold harmless, DECCAN from any and against any liability arising out of any bodily injury, and / or death. damage or loss that I may suffer/ experience and also from any damages, payments, expenses, face and cost which DECCAN may incur directly or indirectly as a result of accepting me on its Flight No. .........from ....... to ...... on date.....
I hereby further indemnify DECCAN from any payments that DECCAN makes to meet any of my expenses towards damages, loss etc for the said purpose."
This I feel is both humiliating and discriminating towards persons with limited mobility.
Do passengers with limited mobility have to sign similar forms in other countries too before boarding the flight?
Please find below my letters written to both the Commissioner (Disabilities) and DGCA (Director General Civil Avaiation) highlighting this practice and with suggested changes.
Closing with best wishes for Christmas and New Year...
Kind regards
Mahesh
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24.12.2007
To
The Commissioner (Disabilities)
Office of the Commissioner Disabilities
Govt. of Karnataka
40, Thambuchetty Road, Cox Town
Bangalore. Email: discom@vsnl.net
Copy
Mr. R. P. Sahi
Jt. Director General
Office of the
Director General of Civil Aviation
Opp. Safdarjung Airport
New Dehli – 110 003
Tel: 011-24611504. Email: rpsahi@dgca.nic.in
Respected Sir,
Greetings,
This letter is to bring to your kind notice the prevailing discriminatory practice adopted by some of the airlines who force passengers who use wheelchairs to sign the "APPLICATION FOR THE CARRIAGE OF MEDICAL PASSENGER" before boarding the flight.
Although, I, as a passenger who uses wheelchair did clarify that I am not a medical passenger, the ground staff are in no mood to listen and we are left with no choice but to fill and submit the form if not we should be prepared to miss our flight.
In this connection, I would like to quote my recent experience:
During my recent return journey from Kolkata to Bangalore by AIR DECCAN on 18th Nov 2007, I was asked to fill the "APPLICATION FOR THE CARRIAGE OF MEDICAL PASSENGER" as I use a wheelchair. I did argue that I am not a "MEDICAL PASSENGER" but the ground staff were in no mood to listen. Therefore I filled in the form during check-in but deliberately did not submit the same while boarding the aircraft.
The most offending paragaraph in the 'APPLICATION' that we are forced to sign reads as follows -
"I the undersigned .....hereby indemnify and hold harmless, DECCAN from any and against any liability arising out of any bodily injury, and / or death. damage or loss that I may suffer/ experience and also from any damages, payments, expenses, face and cost which DECCAN may incur directly or indirectly as a result of accepting me on its Flight No. .........from ....... to ...... on date.....
I hereby further indemnify DECCAN from any payments that DECCAN makes to meet any of my expenses towards damages, loss etc for the said purpose."
Firstly, I personally feel that it is the duty of all the airlines to protect the safety of all passengers. But by signing the above form - the airline is not taking the responsibility to ensure the safety of passenger like me who use the wheelchair.
Secondly, the airline should make appropriate changes in the systems and built environment so that we can use our personal wheelchair (as much as possible) till we transfer to the seat of the aircraft. This procedure will assist us to be comfortably seated in our own wheelchair instead of sitting on the very small and uncomfortable chairs provided by the airlines for more than an hour.
Thirdly, passenger using wheelchairs should be give permission to use the aerobridge facility where available. These change will prevent the ground staff of the airline ground from physically lifting us up and down the flight of stairs to the aircraft. The practice that is both humiliating and extremely dangerous especially for the person who is being lifted.
Fourthly, in recent times DGCA has issued a new Guidelines on "Carriage by Air of Disabled Persons or Persons with Reduced Mobility" that is going to come into effect from 1st Jan 2008 and has taken into account some of the issues mentioned by me in my letter. However, I am not aware if any strategy for dissemenation/ training has been planned for all the ground staff of the different airlines at the airports on the need to "Respect the Rights and Dignity of Passengers with Disabilities".
Therefore, it my sincere appeal to your esteemed office to initiate appropriate steps to prevent this discriminatory and humiliating practice adopted by the airlines towards passengers with limited mobility.
Looking forward for your kind reply.
With kind regards
C. Mahesh
--
C. Mahesh
Advocacy Coordinator
CBR Forum
14, CK Garden
Wheeler Road Extension
Bangalore - 560 084
Tel - 080- 2549 7387 or 2549 7388
advocacy.cbrforum@gmail.com
cbrforum@blr.vsnl.net.in
cbrforum@gmail.com
www.cbrforum.in
Design For All Institute of India and EIDD-Design For All Europe are jointly publishing December2007 Vol-2, No-12 issue of the Design for All Newsletter. From the editor, Dr. Sunil Bhatia:
Different eminent designers from different countries and those are the members of EIDD under the guidance of Mr. Pete Kercher have contributed the articles and our current issue is in front of your computer screen. Our December issue is very special and historic, reason is, we are celebrating completion of our two years of publication of newsletter. We have started a new section of CASE study for benefits of our readers. We have loaded a movie and those who wish to see the movie they can click the below given link
Kindly visit our web site www.designforall.in for our current as well as past publication of our monthly newsletter or click this link
http://www.designforall.in/newsletter_dec_2007.pdf (For Newsletter)
The download link for mechanical elevator
http://www.designforall.in/mechanicalelevator.zip
First unzip it by using winzip
The Department for Transport (DfT) has published a report that examines the travel needs, behaviour and aspirations of people as they approach retirement age. The report, entitled Understanding the travel needs, behaviour and aspirations of people in later life, was based on qualitative interviews carried out with 68 people recruited from four age groups over 50.
The objectives of the research were to:
• describe older people’s current transport needs and behaviour
• discuss older people’s experiences of using transport
• explore the transition into retirement and the attitudes that inform older people’s transport behaviour now and in the past
• examine the transport aspirations of older people
The report analyses the findings in depth, and goes on to suggest a number of implications for policies directed towards transport provision for older people. The entire report can be downloaded from the DfT website www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/scienceresearch/social/olderaspirations
Source:
Access Newsletter, December 2007, Centre for Accessible Environments
Thanks to Antika Sawadsri for submitting this item.
"Practice makes perfect!"
If you want to master the skills you need to be good at singing, or cricket, or NASCAR racing there is one thing you must do. Practice!
In the Disability Rights Movement we say we have been "practicing for getting old." The skills and knowledge we have generated in the process is collected in what is called Universal Design. Now, with 78 million Americans getting old - but without having spent all those years practicing - some are developing workout routines that involve caring for an older parent. Predictably, they are adopting one of the key inventions of the disability community, Universal Design.
n estimated half million people in Arizona are informal caregivers for a family member or friend, and a majority of those are caring for aging parents.
Whether those parents are staying in their own home or have moved in with you, it can be confounding dealing with their diminished physical and mental capabilities and their often heightened determination to stay independent.
advertisement
This month, the non-profit Foundation for Senior Living opened the FSL Caregiver House to give adult children and their aging parents a hands-on place to see how to adapt their own homes to make life easier and safer or determine what to include in a future home.
Part model home and part resource center, the FSL Caregiver House demonstrates practical solutions to everyday issues confronted by aging adults and the family and friends caring for them.
One side of the home is a typical Valley ranch house - doorways, hallways, kitchens and bathrooms that can be hard to navigate for older people. This side features the latest in adaptive equipment designed to make life easier and safer for the elderly and those caring for them.
On the other side of this home are a kitchen, bathroom and bedroom created with universal design elements that the aging 78 million baby boomers may want to add to a new home to prepare for their future.
"Over our lifetime, all of us will have a caregiver role that we didn't plan and now find we need support and service," says Steve Hastings, director of real estate for the FSL.
Outfitting a home for a parent who has lost the spring in his step but wants to remain independent in his own home, or yours, requires more than grab bars and ramps, Hastings says.
In fact, most grab bars are placed in the wrong location, says Jodi Stanley, with the FSL's Community Connections program.
Shown in the Caregiver House bathrooms, for instance, are various adaptive aids, including a floor-to-ceiling "grab-bar pole" that can be moved from room to room; a sliding bathtub-transfer chair; and a Roman-tile walk-in shower that eliminates stepping up and over the side of a bathtub. (But if that's required, there's a tub side handle to assist moving in and out.)
"Most people don't even know what they need," Stanley says.
In the kitchen you'll find a raised dishwasher that eliminates bending over and a microwave that's in a drawer under the stovetop to ensure easy access. The island is wheelchair height, and a variety of floor surfaces illustrates the availability of floor coverings.
When visitors to the Caregiver House see features such as the waist-high microwave drawer or lever-type door handles, as opposed to knobs, ideas are triggered for possible solutions in their home or their parents', Stanley says.
Moreover, universal design elements, such as wider hallways and doorways, seamless thresholds and smooth walking surfaces, are as practical for young families as for aging boomers and their parents.
"What is good for a stroller is also good for a walker," Hastings says.
Quality of life often is overlooked when it comes to trying to make a home safe and adaptable for aging people.
The Caregiver House has put as much thought into the outdoors as the indoors and in providing for the caregiver as for the aging person.
Walkways are extended and widened to accommodate walkers and wheelchairs. Different surfaces are used to give people an idea of which works best before they invest in one for their own home. Areas are widened with rows of bricks to allow for turning around a wheelchair. Flower beds are raised to let gardeners care for plants without having to bend over or crouch down. And there are seating areas to just relax and enjoy the outdoors.
The Caregiver House demonstrates that homes don't have to look institutional because they contain a hospital bed, grab bars and portable toilets in a bedroom. Caregiver House also features touch-screen computer terminals to access information, and experts who can help solve individual problems and steer people to resources or adaptive equipment.
"A lot of people don't identify with the term 'caregiver,' " Hastings says. "They say, 'It's just taking care of my dad. I'm not a caregiver.' "
It's for them that this one-stop resource center was created.
O Ensino da Hotelaria no Brasil
Coluna de Bayard Boiteux
Um dos maiores desafios da educação superior brasileira é preparar quadros,para os meios de hospedagem,hospitais ,colônias de férias e clubes de serviços.Trata-se de uma prioridade,sobretudo ,quando se vislumbra a possibilidade do país ganhar nos próximos 5 anos,600 novos meios de hospedagem,sendo que 40% deverá se concentrar nas regiões sul e sudeste,que representam a maior fatia do turismo brasileiro,notadamente o receptivo.
A administração e operação de novos equipamentos hoteleiros e a tendência ,cada vez maior, da hotelaria hospitalar demandam a capacitação de recursos humanos voltados para nossa realidade.Trazer para o Brasil,a Escola de Glion não é seguramente a resposta para nossos problemas,sobretudo porque a realidade européia é totalmente diferente da nossa.Caímos no ridículo,quando alunos são obrigados a comparecerem as faculdades em tailleur ou terno,uniformes criados para outras relações de ensino-aprendizagem.
Em nenhum momento, queremos desprezar o estudo de casos de sucesso internacionais, mas os mesmos devem apenas figurar nas grades, como uma forma de se entender melhor a globalização e sobretudo a busca de intercâmbio de experiências mas a formação é no Brasil e não na Suíça ou na Espanha.
A qualificação dos novos empreendedores tem como objetivo, num primeiro momento fortalecer a flexibilidade cultural e administrativa, que norteia tal segmento. O consumidor hoje precisa ser entendido como alguém que nos ajuda a desvendar as necessidades de um novo mundo,que muda diariamente e que de certa forma produz efeitos perceptíveis nas relações de consumo.
O mercado vai buscar pessoas que gostem das outras, ou seja, alguém que resolveu que a prestação de serviço deve superar as expectativas do consumidor mas sobretudo dotado de uma forte cultura geral,ancorada na história,na geografia,na sociologia e recheado de curiosidades contínuas.
A hotelaria envolve todos os colaboradores na gestão e eles devem usufruir de todos os serviços de suas empresas, como pernoitar nas suítes, comer nos restaurantes ou usufruir das áreas de lazer, para que se tornem embaixadores de seus produtos. O funcionário tem que estar ciente de todas as novas tendências do mercado e ser constantemente reciclado.Ele precisa ser olhado,como alguém que pode,através de uma idéia ou sugestão,melhorar o modus operandi gerencial.
O Brasil deverá ultrapassar a marca de 1% dos turistas que viajam pelo mundo nos próximos 4 anos. A Hotelaria tem se profissionalizado mas nascem inúmeras pousadas administradas por estrangeiros no interior do país,que não sofrem nenhuma supervisão de qualidade e que podem ser um empecilho para uma verdadeira profissionalização.
Avançamos, devagar, no sentido de buscar um novo profissional brasileiro, calcado no pacto de qualidade, que nosso país exala e que precisa ser a mola mestre de nossa hotelaria: a brasilidade, na verdadeira aceitação da palavra e na oferta diferencial do produto Brasil.
Bayard Do Custo Boiteux é diretor da Escola de Turismo e Hotelaria da UniverCidade e palestrante. (www.bayardboiteux.pro.br)
Almost all UK tourism websites are failing to meet basic acceptable
standards of accessibility, according to a new report from technology
access charity AbilityNet.The report, the latest in a series of 'State of the eNation' surveys by the
charity, assessed ten websites at random from a list of the most popular
UK visitor attractions. The sites were rated using a five star scale from
'very inaccessible' (one star) to 'very accessible' (five stars), with
three stars representing an 'adequate' level of accessibility.Only one of the ten sites examined - the Glasgow Science Centre - met
or exceeded this 'adequate' threshold. The centre's site
(http://www.glasgowsciencecentre.org ) has been improved in the past
year with accessibility in mind and as a result achieved four stars.Of the other sites assessed, four achieved two stars (the Eden Project,
The Giant's Causeway, National Waterfront Museum and Portmeirion)
and five were deemed very inaccessible, receiving only one star
(Belfast Zoo, The Burns Heritage Museum, Edinburgh Castle, Kew
Gardens and the London Eye).Sites which fail to meet the three-star level may be falling short of
service access requirements set out in the UK's Disability
Discrimination Act, AbilityNet says.The report took into account sites' compliance with the international
World Wide Web Consortium's Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines, as well as the practical difficulties that visitors with a range
of disabilities may experience. Among the features that cause problems
are small text that cannot be resized; unnecessary complexity; closely
clustered buttons; unlabeled images and over-reliance on visual clues.
Since the audit was taken at least three of the single-star-rated
attractions have expressed a commitment to improving the accessibility
of their websites.
Source:
E-access Bulletin, Headstar, Issue 96
Copyright 2007 Headstar Ltd http://www.headstar.com .
The Bulletin may be reproduced as long as all parts including this
copyright notice are included, and as long as people are always
encouraged to subscribe with us individually by email. Please also
inform the editor when you are reproducing our content. Sections of
the bulletin may be quoted as long as they are clearly sourced as 'taken
from e-access bulletin, a free monthly email newsletter', and our web
site address:
http://www.headstar.com/eab
is also cited.
+Personnel:
Editor - Dan Jellinek
Reporter: Majeed Saleh
Editorial advisor - Kevin Carey
Marketing Executive - Claire Clinton
Sales and Marketing - Jo Knell, Will Knox.
ISSN 1476-6337
Gordon Rattray of Able Travel is first out of the gate in publishing a new type of resource for hoteliers. The document, Making Your Property More Inclusive: Basic Guidelines for African Safaris, is only one example of a new generation of results-oriented advice flowing from the kind of thinking evident at the Second International Conference on Accessible Tourism held at the UN campus in Bangkok, Thailand.
The core concepts are "Social Inclusion" and "Visitability."
While mere accessibility addresses usability of basic infrastructure by all, social inclusion (or simply "inclusion") refers to the availability of the activities and social interaction taking place in any space. Inclusion is the more powerful and adaptive concept. In terms of the tourism industry "accessibility" is equivalent to a building having indoor plumbing and running water -- so basic as to be a non-issue -- unless it is absent!
Visitability is a specific application of the seven principles of Universal Design to the minimum requirements for usability of the built environment by persons with mobility impairments. The concept of Visitability has been developed by Eleanor Smith and, until now, exclusively applied to private residences.
However, we know that concepts of "home" and "hominess" migrate into the hospitality industry at a rapid pace. Visitability as a hotel design trend is arising simultaneously in Europe, South America, Africa, and Asia. It will be a topic of hallway discussions at the ASEAN Tourism Forum (ATF-2008) in Bankok next month.
Gordon is writing a safari guide for Pw. If you would like to contribute, he is looking for anybody with experience of Africa or adventure travel in general for this market. See his site: http://www.able-travel.com/contact.php
The secretariat of the European Disability Forum is launching its new traineeship scheme for a young disabled activist for a 5 month period. Please disseminate this call as widely as possible to any interested person and among your contacts.
The aims of the traineeship are three-fold:
- to provide a unique training opportunity for disabled persons within the EDF Secretariat and to provide the trainee with practical experience in the development and operation of EU disability policy and EU decision-making.
- to provide the Trainee with hands-on experience of working at EU level with the EU institutions, in particular the European Parliament, and with European NGOs and stakeholders.
- to provide EDF secretariat with invaluable support and added value that a young disabled person can bring
Essential skills and requirements:
- The applicant must be a disabled person
- The applicant must be undertaking a college or university education
- Commitment to disability rights and interest in working for a European NGO
- Good level of computer knowledge
- Good written and spoken English language skills, the knowledge of French will be an asset
Deadline for the submission of applications : 15 January 2008
Start of traineeship : 15 February 2008
How to apply : CV and cover letter to be sent to Ms Janina Arsenjeva at the EDF secretariat, Email: janina.arsenjeva@edf-feph.org, Tel+ 322 282 46 02
The job description, the person’s specification and application procedures are available on EDF website : http://www.edf-feph.org/Page_Generale.asp?DocID=13854&thebloc=15893
On Thursday, December 06, 2007 Chloe Berman wrote, "Travel agencies warned over needs of disabled travellers":
Travel agencies could face a fine of up to £5,000 if they fail to communicate the needs of disabled passengers to air carriers, following the introduction of new EU laws in July next year.Agents must take "all necessary measures" to notify the airline, for example
making a phone call, emailing, or filling in a box on the tour operator's
website at least 48 hours before the flight. Travel agents may waive this
responsibility if they book a package holiday with a tour operator. However,
if they book a flight-only or dynamic package, they must fulfil the
requirement.Speaking at a Travel and Tourism Lawyers Association seminar, 1 Chancery
Lane lawyer Jack Harding said: "This is a complete change of the legal
landscape. Tour operators and travel agents will have to examine what
they're doing very carefully.
"It will no longer be appropriate to take a passive stance and wait for the disabled passenger to inform the operator of his special requests."If agents fail to provide information, they are potentially guilty of a
criminal offence and could face a fine of up to £5,000.Greece and Cyprus Travel Centre director Anna Mavroulakis said she was
unaware of the new regulation. "If the client tells us they're disabled we
will make a request on Galileo or advise the tour operator. The new law
should not make too much difference to us but it's something agents should
definitely read up on."Meanwhile, the first part of the new laws, which came into force in July
this year, prohibits agents, tour operators and airlines from refusing a
booking because of a disability. The only exception to this is on the
grounds of health and safety requirements or if it is physically impossible.
ABTA legal advisor Paula Macfarlane said: "These laws could have a big
impact on agents." At the moment, ABTA provides a checklist for agents
booking disabled passengers but no legislation governs the process.Make travel websites usable to all
Travel agents and tour operators must ensure their websites are suitable for
the visually impaired.Partner at legal firm Wragge and Co David Lowe warned agents that websites
had the potential to be discriminatory.About 81% of websites do not meet the requirements of Disability
Discrimination Act's lowest accessibility standard and levels of adjustments
required by law could be more significant than anticipated, said Lowe."Damages are available for injury to feeling and economic loss if website
owners fail to make reasonable adjustments to their websites. It's
worthwhile, as disabled adults in the UK have spending power of £80
billion," said Lowe.Companies are at more risk if people can only book online or receive a
special online discount, he added.Source:
Steve Creedy, Aviation writer for the Australian reports [Editor's note, Article 9 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities establishes access to transportation as a right. And Graeme Innes rocks!]:
LOW-COST carriers have been warned not to attempt to cut costs by discriminating against the disabled after two airlines recently sought exemptions from laws designed to grant handicapped travellers equal access to transport.Singapore-backed Tiger Airways has applied to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission for an exemption to the Disability Act so it can temporarily refuse to carry some passengers with limited mobility.
It says it needs to do this because it does not have the equipment to get wheelchair-bound [sic] people safely on to its Airbus A320 jets.
Disability groups are also fighting a move by Australia's biggest independent regional carrier, Regional Express (Rex), to introduce restrictions they say will make flying harder for disabled people in the bush.
The Public Interest Advocacy Centre is pursuing court action against Virgin Blue to head off moves to require some people with disabilities to buy a second ticket for a carer if they want to travel.
"It's fine for low-cost or budget airlines to reduce services," human rights commissioner Graeme Innes said yesterday. "But not carrying passengers with disabilities can't be part of those reductions and to do so is against the law."As commissioner, I intend to ensure wherever I can that airlines meet their obligations to all passengers, not just passengers without disabilities."
Tiger is offering affected passengers a full refund and says the problem stems from the inability of its third-party ground handler to obtain special hydraulic devices capable of lifting wheelchairs on to planes. It did not expect the lifters to be available at all destinations until the end of February.Tiger's application comes as a report, due to be released this week by the PIAC, says an analysis of the experiences of 110 airline passengers demonstrates a systemic failure of legislation introduced in 2002 to set standards for disabled access to public transport.
The report finds recent development and application of airline policy, and changes to baggage handling, have made disabled access more difficult, particularly for people with motorised or bigger wheelchairs.
"Some passengers who travelled independently for many years now find themselves barred from travel or facing the imposition of unreasonable conditions," it says.
Source:
The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22903033-23349,00.html
A Secretaria de Turismo da Bahia (Setur) e a Bahiatursa querem mostrar que o turismo só tem a ganhar com a aplicabilidade de normas relativas à acessibilidade dos espaços, equipamentos, serviços e informações turísticas. Neste sentido, realizam o Seminário sobre Turismo e Acessibilidade, na próxima quinta-feira (13/12), das 08 às 18 horas, no Salão Xangô do Centro de Convenções da Bahia.
O evento pretende sensibilizar e conscientizar os profissionais do turismo e a sociedade sobre a importância de ações voltadas a pessoas com deficiências, principalmente porque este é um diferencial que pode transformar a Bahia num destino turístico preparado para receber visitantes com os variados tipos e graus de deficiência física.
O seminário é direcionado a profissionais do poder público, do trade turístico e a estudantes das áreas de turismo, educação, comunicação e serviço social, interessados em discutir e compartilhar experiências em turismo inclusivo. Irá trazer ao conhecimento dos participantes práticas de turismo inclusivo que buscam a democratização de acesso aos indivíduos, respeitando suas limitações e dificuldades, integrando-os de forma agradável e sadia em equipamentos e localidades turísticas.
O programa vai abranger a legislação e as ações que devem ser implementadas para a melhoria do atendimento a esse público, focando os problemas que condicionam os cidadãos portadores de deficiência na utilização dos serviços turísticos. Também irá discutir a criação de roteiros turísticos especiais, e a qualificação dos profissionais envolvidos no turismo receptivo, capacitando-os para oferecer um tratamento diferenciado a esta clientela.
Fonte: Cely Barbosa - Decom Redação
Michael Guy, Disability Information Manager, Handicap International informed us about a "teaching kit" on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
For more details...
http://www.handicap-international.fr/kit-pedagogique/indexen.html
Following hot on the heels of the European Network for Accessible Tourism (ENAT)
conference, the European Parliament is registering some action on behalf of travelers with disabilities. Note in particular the emergence of an EC "Tourism for All" label at the same time we are writing the ASEAN standards in Thailand following ICAT 2007.
I was unaware how quickly the Inclusive Tourism scene would mature s I closed my presentation at UNESCAP last week with the following:
The next two years will be a surprise to those in the industry who have not yet prepared their profit-based approach to disability. Some will be asking you to help. You have an opportunity to contribute and to shape the travel industry. That may be with the rights-based emphasis through government, education, or policy. It may on the profit-based side through invention, construction, marketing, or business creation.Whatever opportunity you choose, take your pride - and your money - on the road. Travel. Teach the industry and level the path for the ones who come after you!
For immediate release:
European Parliament Puts Accessible Tourism on EU Agenda
On 29 November 2007, European Members of Parliament passed a resolution on
a renewed EU Tourism Policy: "Towards a stronger partnership for European
Tourism", calling for Member States to make a united effort to support
Accessible Tourism.
MEPs gave their backing to Italian MEP Paola Costa, who provided a
wide-ranging report on the challenges faced by the European Tourism
sector, and a set of 22 concrete proposals for renewed action.
The keyword which runs throughout the report is "partnership" - for only
by working together, says Paolo Costa, can EU Member States tackle the
fragmented policies and practices which currently frustrate efforts in
the tourism sector.
Accessible Tourism
Actions for the future of accessible tourism in Europe are called for in
six specific paragraphs, declaring that the European Parliament:
"...Welcomes initiatives to coordinate at European level the information
on accessible tourism that would allow tourists with reduced mobility and
their families to find information about the accessibility of tourist
destinations; calls on all Member States, tourism providers and national
and local tourist organisations to join and/or to support this kind of
initiative;
- At the same time, calls on the Commission and the Member States to
consider the feasibility of drawing up a charter of the rights and
obligations of European tourists, in view of the riotous and violent
incidents caused by European tourists in European tourist destinations ,
and also a European code of conduct for tourist businesses;
- Calls on the Commission and the Member States to initialise an "Access
for all " EC label that would guarantee core accessibility facilities for
tourists with reduced mobility and would cover offers such as
accommodation, restaurants, leisure and natural sites, auditoriums,
monuments, museums, etc.;
- Stresses, furthermore, the need to protect, conserve and restore the
European cultural heritage; and calls for more stringent management of
such sites and of the conditions under which they are visited, and for
greater efforts to improve access for people with disabilities, growing
numbers of whom now travel for leisure purposes;
- Calls on the Commission to draft a Communication with an action plan on
the enhancement of such a label based on the work it has already carried
out , on experiences and best practices at national and local level and
taking stock of what has been achieved at EU level in the transport field;
- Notes that the accessibility of tourist destinations is a matter that
also has to do with the transport services provided or available; calls,
therefore, on the Commission, for the purposes of the new European tourism
policy and of developing European transport policy, to take due account of
the accessibility handicap affecting regions with specific natural or
geographical characteristics, such as the outermost regions, island and
mountain regions, and the sparsely populated northernmost regions..."
Moreover, the Parliamentary Report presents no less than twenty-two
suggestions for actions by the Members States, Regional and Local
authorities, including the need to:
"... protect, preserve and restore European cultural heritage assets and
[calls for] more rigorous management of cultural sites and their visiting
arrangements, as well as for greater efforts to improve access for
disabled people, an increasing number of whom are travelling for tourist
purposes..."
Responding to the Tourism Report on the European Day of People with
Disabilities, ENAT Coordinator Ivor Ambrose stated: "We welcome this firm
and forward-looking resolution by the Members of the European Parliament,
as it gives a timely and much-needed message for public authorities and
the tourism industry.
"All parties must work together across national and regional borders to
make accessible tourism a reality, both for European consumers and
international visitors. ENAT's members are ready to play their part in
fulfilling the ambitions that are contained in this resolution."
--
Ivor Ambrose, Coordinator
European Network for Accessible Tourism
c/o EWORX S.A.,
Rodou St., 22
GR-15122 Marousi, Athens
Greece.
Tel. 0030 210 614 8380
Fax. 0030 210 614 8381
E-mail: enat@accessibletourism.org
Web: http://www.accessibletourism.org
SKYPE name: ambroiv
ENAT: The European Network for Accessible Tourism is
a voluntary association of organisations and individuals
from the private, public and NGO sectors. Our mission is
to make European tourism destinations, products and
services accessible to all visitors.
>From December 2007 ENAT will be established as an
international NGO with its head office in Brussels.
As Universal Design moves from the Disability Rights Movement to home design and fashion shoes we find ourselves confronted with a delightful dilemma -- competing UD solutions for the same problem. Who would have imagined UD would create such a new "problem?"
Dr. Jeanne Beckman has a common-sense solution that she applies to adaptive equipment in learning environment with. Literally she asks, "Does it make sense?"
You will find her book at Virtual Bookworm and her blog at Dr. Beckman's Family-Friendly DIMS Approach
Below is the text of the opening keynote of Presentation to ICAT 2007 held at the UN in Bangkok, Thailand. My appreciation to the various ministries of the Thai government, UNESCAP, and several disabled peoples' organizations (DPOs) including Disabled Peoples International - Asia Pacific (DPI-AP) and the Asia Pacific Disability Forum (APDF).
Dedication
Before I begin I would like to dedicate my comments today to my friend Topong Kulkanchit. I met Topong in 2005. We decided to work together to see that a conference was held in 2007. Mostly through his hard work early preparations were made so that Saowalak Thongkuay and Sawang Srisom their team could make this event a success. Thank you. I look forward to our next gathering in Singapore in 2009. I challenge everyone here to continue the work that Topong poured his life into.
Inclusive Tourism: A New Strategic Alliance for the Disability Rights Movement
by Dr. Scott Rains
srains@oco.net
Models of Disability
We are here to do some thinking on a global scale. That’s a big task.
Big thinkers like to give names to the boundaries they put around ideas – handles to make them easier to grasp. When we talk about disability we usually talk about these “idea packages” as models of disability. The Charity Model, the Medical Model, and the Social Model are the names we usually use.
The first two present people with disabilities as recipients rather than as sources of action. The Charity Model places people with disabilities as recipients of the moral responsibility of others to care for them. The Medical Model further limits responsibility to those with professional medical knowledge. Both models define the limits of the world that a person with a disability “really” belongs to: The world of family or its extensions of church or service organizations in the Charity Model and the world of the doctor or their delegate in the Medical Model on the assumption that the disabled person’s highest and constant concern in life is to be “cured.” Both models prevent people with disabilities from political expression and economic participation as adults because both models assume worlds that are too small for real people.
After an introduction like that it is obvious that I am going to endorse the Social Model. It claims that the world where people with disabilities “really” belong is the real world, the whole world – like everybody else! That’s a big world.
Universal Design is what lets us live at home in this world. Wheelchair user and architect Ron Mace, with his colleagues, set the foundation for everything we do at this conference by creating Universal Design more than 30 years ago. These thinkers in the Disability Rights Movement understood that our desire to be full participants in society required us to develop a simple elegant solution to achieve accessibility.
The seven principles defining Universal Design start from the reality that not every individual has the same stature, strength, or range of abilities. Diversity between individuals is the “normal” in any collection of human beings – change in ability is the defining characteristic of each individual over time. Accessibility in tourism improves quality for the growing senior population too. Universal Design is a framework for the design of places, things, information, communication and policy to be usable by the widest range of people operating in the widest range of situations without special or separate design. Most simply, Universal Design is human-centered design of everything with everyone in mind.
Trend 1: Creation of a Market
I said we’re here to think but to be more complete I should add that we’re here also to dream. Imagination becomes alive in every person’s life when the limits of their world go from family to some larger institution and finally on to the limitlessness of free participation in the whole world. Dreaming is the first step in thinking on that global scale – and everyone who works in the global travel industry knows what we do. We sell dreams and we make them real. As the disability community around the world acts on this dream of global participation the travel industry is here providing for them as what they have become – a market.
I have been invited here to talk about global trends in accessible travel. I have just told you the first trend. A group of people with disabilities have gathered. They are the actors. They are the political and economic force. They, we, came here to say that we have a dream. That dream is the freedom to travel. They have become a market and they have their own voice.
As we gather for two days in Asia another group of people from all over Europe are going home. They have just finished two days of meeting on accessible travel at the European Network for Accessible Tourism – ENAT run by Ivor Ambrose. This trend – this dream – is global among people with disabilities.
Now let’s think together.
Trend Two: The Rights-Based and Profit-Based Approach to Disability
the second trend we see is that a “profit-based approach to disability” is inseparable from our conference theme of “a rights-based approach to disability.” Aiko Akiyama of UNESCAP will speak to us later about the Biwako Millennium Goals where rights and development converge in tourism. Is there a profit-based approach to disability for the travel industry?
Research done by Eric Lipp and Laurel van Horn of the Open Doors Organization have taught us that American adults with disabilities or reduced mobility currently spend an average of $13.6 billion U.S. a year on tourism. In 2002, these individuals made 32 million trips and spent $4.2 billion on hotels, $3.3 billion on airline tickets, and $2.7 billion on food and beverages while traveling.
In the UK 10 million adults with disabilities have an annual purchasing power of 80 billion pounds sterling. In 2001 economically active Canadians with disabilities had $25 billion Canadian dollars available. Americans with disabilities or reduced mobility have $175 billion in purchasing/consumer power.
Cruise lines know from research that people with disabilities favor cruise vacations at 12% compared to 8% of the general population. Studies also show that people with disabilities are loyal customers: 59% report that they plan to take another cruise. Creating accessible cruise ships, accessible ship terminals, accessible ground transportation, and accessible tourist destinations in port cities is not charity. It is good business! In a few minutes I will tell you how stakeholders in North & South America are working together to build that business.
Trend Three: Standardization in the Years Ahead
Two years ago a group of us got together in Taipei and began to plan for today. Then it was easy to report on trends in accessible tourism. The pattern was clear. The trend in 2005 was experimentation and local standardization in controlled regional environments.
New "islands of innovation" were evident around the world. In fact, in most cases they were either actual islands like Crete, Hawai'i, Tenerife, Japan, St. John's Virgin Islands, and Tasmania or they were geographically isolated regions like Western Australia.
The trend in 2007 is less about new invention and more about standardization across larger areas and on an international level. It is a new stage of maturity but it will be over in about two years when we meet next in Singapore – this time with our European friends. For these next two years the main trend around the world will continue to be establishing common practices and agreeing on standards.
Sometimes it will feel like a tug-of-war; pulling in two opposite directions: one direction pulls toward a rights-based approach to standards and the other a profit-based approach. The first starts with persons with disabilities as citizens; the second as customers. The first approach speaks in the language of governments; the second the language of business. Effective standards result when people with disabilities are active in defining both approaches.
In fact, that is what this organization is about. It is a voice of people with disabilities in conversation with government and business to serve the interests of all three groups regarding travel and hospitality.
Let me anticipate 2009 with a grandiose statement about the historic importance of today: The tourism industry has become a vehicle for social good. Industry practices increasingly honor green design and ecologically responsible practices. With Universal Design tourism has also become a vehicle for what the Disability Rights Movement has fought so hard to articulate and to achieve for more than 30 years. So here today we set the Disability Rights Movement on a new path accompanied by partners from business and government. That path of promoting accessible travel will pass through every country in Asia.
The trend when we meet again in Singapore in 2009, this time with our colleagues in ENAT from Europe, will be the emergence of Centers of Excellence that strategically disseminate sustainable innovations, grounded in standards, and fluent in customer service respecting the rights and dignity of people with disabilities.
After ICAT 2007 I will spend time consulting with government and industry leaders in Pattaya to see if we can make Thailand one of the first of those Centers. I will assist UNESCAP create a set of guidelines
From my work around the world I have three cases that illustrate the current trend toward creating standards of good practice: one example in South America, one in North America, and one in Africa. South America brings four countries together with the cruise industry around accessibility. North American national park officials draw in a business partner and showcase accessible cultural tourism. Africa is shaping a continental accessible tourism market through the research and advocacy of an entrepreneur with a disability who promotes safaris.
Three Cases
Example 1: South America
The Inter-American Institute on Disability and Inclusive Development has formed a network to develop accessibility along the cruise corridor from northern Brazil to Tierra del Fuego at the southern tip of Argentina. In 2007 disability advocates and organizations, government, academics, cruise lines, and the land-based tourism industry joined together as stakeholders to begin to adopt standards, infrastructures, and practices that guarantee a consistent quality of travel experience between Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina for seniors and others with disabilities. The major activity at this stage is in Brazil which will host an international conference on Accessible Tourism in May 2008.
Individuals in the South American network have begun to appear in the media, speak at tourism conferences, and write articles on the value of this market of travelers with disabilities. Data is being collected on the number of people with disabilities and their purchasing power. One of the most rewarding things I do now is work with university students and young professionals in South America guiding their research, their career choices, and their businesses.
At the same time accomplished architects like Veronica Camisão are drawing up plans for improved ship terminals. Wheelchair-using Brazilian architect Silvana Cambiaghi has published Brazil's first full-length book on Universal Design. Museum specialists like Viviane Panelli Sarraf simultaneously provide attractions of interest to international and domestic tourists with disabilities by making museums and other cultural sites accessible. Dada Morreira, Ricardo Shimosakai, and others with disabilities sell accessible land-based excursions that include whitewater rafting, jungle off-road treks, multi-sensory walks, parasailing, and exhilarating treetop tours. In addition to this explosion of new businesses by people with disabilities, this group has written new regulation on maritime access to standardize accessibility in cruise ship terminals and on passenger ships serving Brazil. Industry and government, led by professionals, advocates, and business owners with disabilities have identified an underserved market and are building a strategy together to serve it.
Research shows that the more cruises a person takes the more likely he or she is to disembark in port and buy a land-based excursion. We know that more people with disabilities are cruising. We also know that they tend to take repeat cruises more often than the general public. They will grow disproportionately as a market inclined to take land excursions. Argentina has planned ahead for this trend. It is holding its first rural workshop on serving people with disabilities for the rural tourism industry that will see some of these cruise passengers on land excursions. Keep in mind that disability accompanies aging. The Open Doors Organization recorded that about 50% more of the existing group of Americans traveled between their 2002 and 2005 studies – even though it the travel industry had not done anything to make it significantly easier to do so. That group of people with disabilities and the leisure to travel is about to expand as the huge post-WWII generation ages. This market is big and travelers will reward those who build welcoming environments to accommodate them.
Take the example of the United States.
Example 2: North America
In the United States this global trend toward standardization on best practices by government, industry, and people with disabilities takes place on Alcatraz Island. Many people know this steep rocky island near from San Francisco from movies about its time as a maximum security prison. As the saying goes, "Break the rules and you go to prison. Break the prison rules and you go to Alcatraz."
Today the island is a National Park run by some of the most passionate supporters of disability rights in the US Park Service. Early in November I had the opportunity to inspect the island with the National Accessibility Center from Indiana University. The park is a model for the entire world and continuously hosts international park and government officials. The practices used at Alcatraz are further disseminated because one out of four visitors comes from outside the US and brings their experience home.
The message of accessible tourism is not only coming from conference like our or ENAT in Europe or the one this May in Brazil. Every day people from Asia are seeing accessibility in action at Alcatraz.
Physical access for the mobility impaired was one of the first barriers to be addressed on the island. More than a decade ago National Park Rangers, including James Adams and Rich Weiderman, invented a tram system for the island that anticipated current trends calling for green and sustainable development in tourism. Using an electric motor designed for the tractors that pull jet airliners at airports they applied Universal Design principles to manufacture this uniquely powerful but non-polluting tram. It was estimated that it would serve 15,000 park visitors in its first year. Everyone was surprised to find that 30,000 used it. Today it averages 70,000 to 80,000 users annually. Keep in mind that about 25% of these users are people who bring the expectation of such accessible and eco-sensitive service back to their home park systems.
The island can only be reached by boat and only one company, Alcatraz Cruises, serves the island. Early in their contract the cruise line saw that they needed to invent a new type of dock and ramp system. Doing so made them the only cruise facility on the West Coast of the USA able to accommodate passengers 365 days a year in all extremes of weather and tides. I, for example, had no difficulty getting off the island the day 580,000 gallons of tanker fuel spilled in the Bay near the island and the park was systematically being shut down for the emergency.
Standardizing on the dock design and evacuation practices perfected at Alcatraz National Park disseminates good physical design and safety policy. It also affirms a profitable collaboration between business and government where innovation to achieve accessibility resulted in better service for those with no disability.
Program accessibility, or accessibility to all the services and benefits offered by the park beyond simple physical access, is another area where Alcatraz first set the standard and then became the living university teaching by example. Alcatraz was the first park to adopt audio walking tours narrated in the first person voices of rangers, former prisoners, and guards. The approach was so successful that the tiny recording company that produced the first tours became the largest in the world in that field and was just recently purchased by a television channel. Once again, accessibility proved to be profitable and trend-setting.
Example 3: Africa
The final example, Africa, represents something different. One of Africa's most popular forms of tourism is the safari. It operates in isolated areas. That isolation means the safari industry has less structure for formalizing best practices. In this case, the significant current trend is the result of the vision of a European entrepreneur who, with a vision and his sturdy wheelchair, has just completed visits to over 130 hotels and tourism destinations throughout the continent. Gordon Rattray runs Able Travel. On his research tours he is able to spread standards through his individual consultations.
Here neither government nor industry are in the lead. Leadership comes from within the disability community itself. The end result of Gordon’s accessibility audits throughout Africa will be a published tour guide, "African Safaris for People with Limited Mobility". In that way his work promotes adoption of standard practices much as US author Candy Harrington does through her magazine Emerging Horizons and her various books, "101 Accessible Vacations," "There is Room at the Inn," and "Barrier-Free Travels." Bruce Cameron has taken a similar approach to standards promotion through his book "Easy Access Australia" and frequently contributes to academic and policy work with Australian academics like Dr. Simon Darcy and Dr. Tanya Packer. Mary Chen in Malaysia will launch the disability lifestyle magazine, Challenges, in Malaysia in January where I will write on travel. I have been asked to edit a special issue on travel and disability for the academic journal, Review of Disability Studies published by the University of Hawaii. Dr. Sunil Bhatia has also invited academics to contribute articles specifically about Thailand to the journal of the Design for All Institute of India. I invite any of you here today who would like to submit an article or discuss an idea for an article to talk to me during the conference.
Gordon Rattray's work in Africa is a "profit-based approach to disability" where he establishes himself, a person with a disability, as the expert on an entire continent. As an individual consultant he brokers and disseminates standards in a region where only a sparse business and social network serves the accessible tourism market. In contrast, the Inter-American Institute on Disability and Inclusive Development takes a "rights-based approach to disability."
South America is a heavily networked environment that produced the important accessible tourism document in 2004 known as the Rio Charter: Universal Design for Sustainable and Inclusive Development. It is further linked by a flourishing route of cruise ship destinations sharing similar needs. The orientation to disability rights of the Institute emphasizes the experience of the organization's founder, Rosangela Berman-Bieler, who worked with Judy Heumann to establish the Disability & Development program of the World Bank. Both women are wheelchair users and professionals in international development.
In the United States with Alcatraz National Park we see yet another model. Here the key professionals working in the National Park System and the contracted cruise line do not have disabilities themselves. There has been a systemic adoption of disability rights values by this government agency and this business -- although only through the sustained pressure of these professionals from within and sometimes with the addition of pressure such as lawsuits from without. Here professionals lacking disabilities guide the institutions through their own sense of justice, legal obligation, and business opportunity. As a prominent international tourism destination what they have created becomes a school of Accessible Tourism for any visitor who cares to learn from it.
Tourism ministries, and the industry they support, have begun to apply results from studies about our travel behavior and purchasing power. Facility construction and business practices based on Universal Design that were once considered innovations and were known only locally are now better known and adopted worldwide. There is increasing consensus on what are proper - and profitable - ways to attract us as a market. The fact that this conference takes place today through the generous sponsorship of the Thai government with support from the tourism industry is one world-class demonstration that thoughtful leadership has recognized the value of the full participation of all its citizens and how concrete action to include citizens with disabilities creates the environment of hospitality that attracts tourists from around the world.
Review
Let me end by speaking in sequence to the three groups that will make accessible tourism possible: governments, businesses, and the disability community.
Government
Governments, when we promote a rights-based approach to disability we commit ourselves to a tradition that affirms the dignity and worth of every individual human being. We raise the individual beyond the context of the body and its functions or limits; beyond, family, race, or nationality. We state that we support the rule of law and hold our governments accountable for protecting the freedoms that we believe are due to all human beings.
By promoting the UN Declaration on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities we are actually holding more than our own national government to this standard. We are claiming that all governments of all nations must unequivocally promote and protect the right to full social inclusion of all people with disabilities throughout their lifespan. A rights-based approach to tourism claims that there must be equal opportunity of access for people with disabilities allowing them to enjoy the benefits of travel and hospitality whether for business or for leisure. That access must be physical as with the design and construction of buildings or transportation systems. That access must also be to the non-physical benefits available to travelers without disabilities. This could be as simple as receiving the same respect offered to other customers during a transaction. It could be as complex as comprehensively planning safety and evacuation procedures appropriate to people with various sensory, intellectual, and mobility capacities.
Business
Businesses, when we promote a profit-based approach to disability we acknowledge that a business must pay attention to its profitability - once it has met the minimum standards set by law and by best practices. We expect to see variation between the products offered by different businesses. We expect to see accessible tourism products both inexpensive and extravagant because our community includes members who can afford both. In fact, we count on businesses to take the lead in innovation. We trust them to do their work so well that, like moths to flame, we will want to experience the products that they have developed to entice us. So let me offer to the industry this cheeky invitation from Jesús Hernández, accessibility director of Spain's ONCE Foundation, first in its original Spanish:
"No te preocupes de mis derechos, preocúpate de mi cartera"! [Spanish]
"Don't overly concern yourself about my rights, pay attention to my wallet!"
Businesses do what you do well! We want to spend our money!
Studies show that people with disabilities have that legendary trio of characteristics that all travel agents look for: the desire to travel, the means, to travel, and the freedom to travel. In fact, the study I quoted earlier from the Open Doors Organization predicted that those billions of dollars spent on travel by Americans with disabilities could easily double with the creation of appropriate travel products. Now that’s a bold prediction!
People with Disabilities
People with Disabilities, when we travel we represent more than ourselves because we are part of a community. As a person with a disability you carry two items of unusual value -- especially in combination. Both tend to surprise those you meet as you travel. The two items are money and pride. By money I mean more than the change in your pocket. By pride I mean that confident self-determination of knowing who you are beyond any economic measures of worth.
The very fact that you have a disability and travel suggests something about your economic condition. It indicates that you have credit, savings, education, maybe a profession that requires travel. It demonstrates more importantly that you have the ability to make decisions about the course of your life for yourself. That combination of means and dignity are potent tools of social transformation.
Travel the world today and you will find that there is a hunger for community and solidarity among people with disabilities. As an exchange student, backpacker, business or vacation traveler, your identity as a person with a disability gives you access to faces of the tourism industry that others may not have. Some are positive. Some need improvement.
The next two years will be a surprise to those in the industry who have not yet prepared their profit-based approach to disability. Some will be asking you to help. You have an opportunity to contribute and to shape the travel industry. That may be with the rights-based emphasis through government, education, or policy. It may on the profit-based side through invention, construction, marketing, or business creation.
Whatever opportunity you choose, take your pride - and your money - on the road. Travel. Teach the industry and level the path for the ones who come after you!
*************
Scott Rains, D. Min. writes daily on travel and issues of interest to people with disabilities occurring in the tourism industry at www.RollingRains.com His research on the topic of Universal Design and the travel and hospitality industry has included appointment as Resident Scholar at the Center for Cultural Studies of the University of California Santa Cruz (2004-05). He consultants globally on accessible travel & hospitality. He can be reached at srains@oco.net
In 2005 Lex Frieden wrote a review of lessons learned in the Independent Living Movement in the United States. Speaking at the time as Chairman of the National Council on Disability his paper sought to:
• outline key concepts central to the understanding of living independently and in the community as expressed by the American disability community;
• identify the principal barriers that impede the enjoyment of living independently and in the community by people with disabilities;
• provide a summary overview of the existing international legal framework that promotes living independently and in the community;
• identify examples drawn from the American law and policy context that advance living independently and in the community; and
• provide a tool for assessing implementation of these rights in anticipation that they will be given full expression in the drafting of a convention on the rights of people with disabilities.
As a precursor to a focused campaign on access to recreation and travel Frieden's study provides helpful background to place current work on developing Inclusive Tourism in historic context.
The full article is available at:
http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2005/livingindependently.htm
Tuesday, November 27, The Universityhouse Channel will show Episode
138 of "Perils For Pedestrians" -- "The ADA and Sidewalks".
Contents of Episode 138 (2007):
--The Coordinator of Research at the US Access Board explains how the
Americans With Disabilities Act applies to sidewalks.
--A lawyer in Barden v. Sacramento discusses the lawsuit, which
determined that sidewalks are a government program covered by the ADA.
--A plaintiff in Barden v. Sacramento describes the negotiations that
led to the settlement.
DISH Network Channel 9411 -- The Universityhouse Channel
Tuesday -- 9:30 PM Eastern, 6:30 Pacific
Episode 138 is also available on Google Video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6783218059010695745
Even if Universal Design has not spread uniformly through the consumer product lineup yet we can take heart that it is getting a marketing push with arguments like this one for a Canadian design conference:
Are your designs excluding 20% of the market? According to Health Canada, one in five Canadians will have reached the age of 65 by 2026. Find out what essential factors you should take into consideration when making decisions, designing products, and looking at spaces to accommodate our rapidly aging population.
Source:
http://www.canadianarchitect.com/issues/ISArticle.asp?id=75963&issue=10312007
There is an interplay between progress on social inclusion for citizens and Inclusive Destination development. As the general level of accessibility for people with disabilities increases so can the desirability of a location as a destination of choice for the disability community. The influx of tourism dollars can provide for the continued improvement of barrier-free infrastructure.
Below is a paper written by Mojalefa Zacharia Ntlatlapa on the evolving scene in Lesotho in regard to the infrastructure of basic services for people with disabilities there.
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTRE – LESOTHO AND TRADITIONAL DISABILITY PARADIGMS
By Mojalefa Zacharia Ntlatlapa (B.Phil; B.S.Th; MDisSt.)
Abstract
The Independent Living Centre - Lesotho (ILC Lesotho) is a leader in the application of the socio-political approach to disability services in Lesotho. The philosophical foundation for ILC Lesotho’s very first strategic plan 2007-2011, “Facilitating Independence” is based on consumer choice and control, independence, personal autonomy, self-direction, barrier-free environments, non-dependency services, and consumer leadership.
This article serves to highlight the difference between the Independent Living Centre approach and the previously existing disability services in Lesotho by demonstrating the contrast in approach between its consumer-driven, socio-political paradigm and the medical, charity and/or vocational rehabilitation traditional approaches that have hitherto been used within the Lesotho disability sector.
Guided by the “Draft National Policy on the Inclusion of People with Disabilities into Society”, ILC Lesotho recognises that there are limited allied health services available to people living with disabilities. As consequence among its future development areas, ILC will strive to work with the disability sector to: improve the range and quality of assistive technology available to the Lesotho community of PWDs; develop an outreach service to the rural communities of Lesotho; source out local and overseas opportunities for ILC staff and for the Lesotho disability sector as a whole; as well as to establish a research demonstration, dissemination, and utilisation centre, in order to promote access to information for PWDs, DPOs, other independent living related service providers.
Table of contentsAbstract 1
Introduction 3
Background 3
ILC Lesotho Programmes 4
The Options Coordination Service 4
The Client Therapy Service (CTS) 6
The Independent Living Equipment Programme (ILEP) 7
Respite Services 8
Paradigms/Models of Disability 9
The Socio-political (Independent Living) and Traditional Paradigms 10
Independent Living and the National Policy 11
Future Directions for the Independent Living Centre - Lesotho 14
Development Areas 16
Conclusion 16
Values 17
We value our clients 17
We value our staff 17
We value our relationships and partnerships 17
We value prudent management 17
Introduction
The concept of the Independent Living Centre – Lesotho (ILC Lesotho) has been in existence since 2006 and has been incubating at its current location at the Maseru Industrial Area since then. ILC Lesotho was legally registered under the Societies Act of 1966, in March 2007, as a non-profit making, non-governmental organisation whose ultimate end is to build a vibrant and responsible community that takes care of marginalised severely disabled individuals and families of People with severe and/or multiple disabilities including those who are either infected or affected by the HIV/AIDS pandemic within their communities of origin throughout the Kingdom of Lesotho.The ultimate vision of ILC Lesotho is to provide equipment, home modifications, client therapy and respite services for people with disabilities who are eligible under the Options Coordination Programme, as well as information for the general community. As a registered organisation, the ILC Lesotho has a constitution and is governed by a Board of Directors made up of people with a wide range of professional skills and backgrounds.
The Independent Living Centre is a leader in the national Independent Living services in Lesotho. The ILC Lesotho will assist with database development and facilitate the development of the IL website. The ILC Lesotho website will run a home page for IL information and advice service, research demonstration, dissemination, and utilisation centre, and collate detailed information about the equipment and aids available in Lesotho and the neighbouring cities of South Africa. The ILC intends to work with the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare to implement its strategic agenda (2007-2011) for Families and Communities. The “Draft National Policy on the Inclusion of People with Disabilities into Society” has also guided the development of this organisation.
Background
The Independent Living Centre – Lesotho is a vibrant, client focused organisation that intends to assist people living with disabilities, including the frail age, to achieve greater independence. Our strongest knowledge base is assistive technology – aids and equipment - which assist people living with disabilities and their carers to remain safe and independent in the community. Our staff will be composed of a multidisciplinary team, consisting of Occupational Therapists, Physiotherapists, Registered Nurses, Speech Pathologists, Special Needs Educators, Social workers and other Therapy Aids.We intend to build up a flexible and responsive administrative team and a Management Group who work with the Board, staff, clients and stakeholders to achieve positive organisational outcomes. Our aim is to pride ourselves on our productivity which will be achieved through the effective use of technology, staff using their time efficiently and managers, staff and stakeholders working together to identify innovative approaches.
The philosophical foundation for our very first strategic plan 2007-2011, “Facilitating Independence” is based on consumer choice and control, independence, personal autonomy, self-direction, barrier-free environments, non-dependency services, and consumer leadership. In conformity with these philosophical principles, the Board of the Independent Living Centre strives to work with the Management and potential service users to implement this plan. There have been several discussions with other stakeholders to ensure that this plan fits with other developments and changes occurring within the disability sector and other health sectors in Lesotho.
ILC Lesotho Programmes
The centre plans to kick-start its services with the establishment of four programmes. These will include:
• The Options Coordination Service,
• the Client Therapy Service (CTS),
• the Independent Living Equipment Programme (ILEP) and
• Respite Services
The Options Coordination Service
This programme will coordinate the allied health assessments for Clients with Physical, Neurological, Sensory, Intellectual disabilities and Traumatic Brain Injuries. The Options Coordination Service will contribute to planning and to the development of community-based services and informal support networks to ensure that individuals with disability are able to achieve their full potential and attain a quality lifestyle within the community of their choice.The Options Coordination Service will to provide specialist knowledge and expertise through the following programmes:
• Options Coordination - for children who have physical and neurological disability or brain injury
• Options Coordination - for adults who have a physical and/or neurological disability
• Options Coordination - for adults who have acquired brain injury
• Options Coordination – for people who have intellectual disability and/or autism.
• Sensory Directions - for people who have sensory disability such as hearing and vision impairmentsWe believe that access to information assists people to make an informed choice in relation to their specific needs. Information is collected on all aspects of living with a disability and shared with anybody who asks. The Options coordination service will contribute to the planning, provision and evaluation of direct services to people with disability and their families inter alia by:
• Providing information
o Printed information will be available for all visitors to the Centre including product description, product suppliers and approximate cost;
o An extensive database will be maintained on availability of equipment, manufacturers and suppliers within Lesotho and South Africa;
o A directory of organisations and services offering assistance to people with disabilities;
o Details on design and access and the relevant Australian Standards.
• Displaying equipment
o A large range of aids and equipment is on display. Items can be demonstrated or visitors can try out products to determine which equipment best suits their needs.
The Client Therapy Service (CTS)
CTS will provide therapy, training and equipment prescription for, and together with, persons with disabilities in the community. CTS may provide services in the client’s home, work or educational environment, day service and/or at the ILC. Assessments for equipment such as wheelchairs may need to take place at the CTS office. CTS Occupational therapists will be highly trained in the assessment, prescription and training for accessing systems, which will enable people with disabilities to undertake daily tasks with greater independence. Under the CTS therapists will provide particular services for people with different types of impairments. These will include:
1. Communication
Here Speech Pathologists can provide:
• Communication, speech and language assessment and therapy programs,
• Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) system prescription, support and training, for those with little or no verbal communication.
• Training for parents, care-givers, community staff, teachers and relevant others within the community to help support those with communication difficulties.
2. Mealtimes
Speech Pathologists can provide:
• Assessment and management recommendations for swallowing and mealtime difficulties
• Written documentation (mealtime guidelines) and training for carers, outlining how to safely assist clients with swallowing.
3. Mobility
CTS therapists will be able to:
• Prescribe suitable wheelchairs, seating and modifications to mobility equipment, and advise on and prescribe standing or walking frames
• Develop chest care and hydrotherapy programs.
4. Manual Handling
CTS therapists are able to:
• Provide manual handling plans for carers to assist with safely transferring clients
• Provide advice and suggestions for manual handling equipment.
• Provide training to care-givers on lifting and handling methods for individual clients.
5. Activities of Daily living
ATS Occupational Therapists will provide expert advice, assessment and training in supporting clients with disabilities to undertake day-to-day activities. These may include:
• Advice and suggestions on home modifications, including bathroom equipment
• Splints, wheelchair trays and customised beds
• Mechanical and electrically operated hoists.
• Wheelchair driver training.
The Independent Living Equipment Programme (ILEP)
ILEP will cater for people who have permanent disabilities and are clients of Options Coordination. The role of the ILEP is to assist people with disabilities to remain living safely and independently within their homes and the community by providing them with assistive technological equipment.ILEP will provide the more complex types of equipment designed for use by people with disabilities. The types of equipment available from ILEP will include (Please refer to the ILEP policy for full details):
• Bedding: Electric Beds, Pressure Management Overlay Communication Devices
• Home Modifications: Ramps, Bathrooms, Kitchens, Doorways
• Mobility Devices: Specialised Footwear, Children?s Walking Frames, Adult walking frames, Manual Wheelchairs, Powered Scooters, Powered wheelchairs, Children?s Buggy Pusher, Children?s Manual Tricycle, Children?s Manual Castor Cart, Children?s Powered Castor Cart
• Orthosis and Prosthetics: Orthosis, Mammary Prosthesis, Wig
• Bathing and Toileting: Mobile commode chair, Static shower chair: customised, Static toilet chair: customised, Change Table, Children’s Toilet Chair, Children’s Bath Insert and Continence Aids (reusable only)
• Seating: Adult Postural Chairs, Children’s Postural Equipment, Electric Recliner Chairs
• Manual Wheelchair Transport: Portable ramps for wheelchair transport, Tow bar mounted manual wheelchair carrier,
• Hoists: Mobile Hoist, Ceiling Hoist, Portable Bath Hoist, Car hoist for a person, Roof mounted manual wheelchair hoist.
Respite Services
Respite Services will lead in developing a countrywide, comprehensive, and integrated home and community-based service system that supports dignity, diversity, and choice for persons with disabilities, their caregivers, and families.Providing full-time care for someone with severe or multiple disabilities that involve health problems such as HIV/AIDS, in our case, can be fulfilling, but it can also be hard work and leave a carer feeling exhausted and isolated. This is where respite services come in. Taking a break from the pressure of supporting someone who depends on someone's care, can prevent the care-giver from becoming over-tired, stressed, resentful or depressed.
Respite care will help both carers and the people they support to gain confidence and independence, and build new relationships. Using respite services on a regular basis – however happy the caregiver is to be a carer – can re-energise him/her and enable him/her to look after the person they care for more effectively. The key goals of ILC Lesotho's respite services are:
• Public policy will reflect the priorities of ILC's respite services and its advocacy partners;
• All members of ILC's respite services will have access to the information, resources, and peer support necessary to fulfil their leadership role;
• The organisation will have the financial resources to attain its Mission;
• The organisation will have successful working relationships with all partners in the home and community-based services network; and
• Educate and enlist the support of the public in furthering the priorities of ILC's respite services and its advocacy partners.Our services will provide support in the home to give the caregiver regular, planned breaks. A Community Support Worker (usually the same person every time) will visit each week and look after the person who needs support, freeing the caregiver to do other things and have some time to herself/himself. We will offer:
• someone to talk to about the caregiver’s caring routines and responsibilities who can offer practical advice and support
• care that the client's caregiver can be confident in – we will engage professionals who have both disability and mental health expertise, and our staff will respect both the needs of the caregiver and those of the person s/he supports
• information on how to deal with things like social benefits
• a plan of support – drawn up with the agreement of both of the caregiver and the client – so that they can make the most of our services
• flexibility – we aim to give service users the support they need when they most want it, and can also help with emergency, illness or holiday cover
• Consistency – we aim to make sure that service users are supported by the same person week to week, so that they can build a relationship with them.Most respite-care services provide support for as long as it is needed. The maximum amount of time each person can get will vary between about four and ten hours a week. The amount of support the service user will receive will be reviewed regularly.
The service can be withdrawn if our Community Support Worker experiences mistreatment such as insulting or discriminatory behaviour, threats or physical violence from either the carer or the person being cared for.
Paradigms/Models of Disability
Prior to 1970's disability policies revolved around a "Segregation Model". This involved:
• legally sanctioned segregation and exclusion based on widespread fears, myths and stereotypes
• segregated schools
• Institutions without options for integration often referred to a "special"
• why 'special' is not a popular word among disability advocates
• 'Special' often connotes unequal and separate!In the 1970's Rehabilitation/Charity/Medical Models emerged. According to these models, the burden of dealing with consequences of disability rested with person. Attempts were made to medically and vocationally rehabilitate people with disabilities but society had no responsibility to remove barriers. For example:
• For a wheelchair user: no accessible parking spaces – hence a disabled person would have negotiate long distances to get to work site from his/her vehicle;
• At a work-site, he/she would have to negotiate two sets of steps, to get to job on third floor of a non-elevator building;
• A person using braces and crutches, who is forced to laboriously make way up steps, takes 20 minutes to get to worksite instead of two.As a result of the awareness about the impact of institutional barriers imposed by society on people with disabilities, gradually disability policy models began to move to a Socio-political rather than the traditional Rehabilitation/charity/medical models.
The Socio-political (Independent Living) and Traditional Paradigms
The Independent Living Centre – Lesotho (ILC Lesotho) advocates the socio-political paradigm or approach to disability. The chart below compares traditional paradigms such as the medical, vocational rehabilitation and charity models with the consumer-driven, socio-political paradigm.
MEDICAL, CHARITY &
REHABILITATION
PARADIGMS INDEPENDENT LIVING OR SOCIO-POLITICAL PARADIGM
Definition of problem Physical or mental impairment; lack of vocational skill (in the VR system); lack of abilities to think, walk, see or hear (Medical system); lack of ability for independent living skills (charity system). Dependence upon professionals, family members & others is rooted in social attitudes & environments that are hostile. These are the elements that need to be fixed not the person with a disability.
Locus of problem The problem is perceived to rest in the individual who is seen to be sick or incapacitated and needs to be "fixed" in order to become normal. Disability is a common part of the human condition. Some people are born with disabilities while many others acquire disabilities due to common mishaps in real life.
In the medical/charity and/or rehabilitation processes disability is treated as if it is not a strange human factor.
Solution to the problem Professional intervention; treatment (fixing). 1. civil rights & advocacy
2. barrier removal
3. self-help
4. peer role models & peer support
5. consumer control over options & services
Social role The individual with a disability is a "patient" or "client". He/she becomes the object of pity. The individual with a disability is a "consumer," "customer" or "user" of services and products.
Who controls Professionals in Medicine, welfare officers or vocational trainers choose the best intention mechanisms for their helpless patients or clients. The consumer or individual with a disability is the main stakeholder with a right to choose the most appropriate service.
Desired outcomes Palliative care or activities of daily living (in medical system);
Gainful employment (in VR system) or
Hand outs/ disability grand (in charity system). Independent Living through control over ACCEPTABLE options for every day living in an integrated community and/or personal support depending on gravity of the impairment.
Independent Living and the National Policy
Around the globe disabled persons started organising themselves to engage society on the question of their fundamental human rights and basic freedoms. The United Nations has in turn issued a number of documents to this effect. These include:
• The Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons (1971),
• The Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons (1975),
• The World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons (1982),
• The United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons (1983-1992),
• The United Nations Standard Rules for the Equalisation of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities (1993), and
• The Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (2006).Lesotho as a member of the United Nations system and other international and sub-regional bodies, such as the Southern African Development Community (SADC), has acceded to several international and sub-regional agreements, declarations, protocols and instruments that commit it to implement and follow certain actions and norms for promoting and respecting the rights of persons with disabilities in the country. United Nations (UN) has put in place the principles of participation, integration and equalisation of opportunities in the World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons. It also set the UN Standard Rules for the Equalisation of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities.
In addition, Article 2 of the ILO Convention No. 159 on the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment of Disabled Persons states that “each member shall in accordance with national conditions, practice and possibilities, formulate, implement and periodically review a national policy on vocational rehabilitation and employment of disabled persons.” The UN Standard Rules that recognize the necessity of addressing both the individual needs of persons with disabilities and the shortcomings of society provided a very useful tool in the development of the Kingdom of Lesotho’s up-coming “National Policy on the Inclusion of People with disabilities into Society”.
This policy has been inspired by the Constitution of Lesotho and other national policies, such as, Vision 2020 and the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS). The constitution provides for support to persons with disabilities as a principle of national policy through, Part II and Part III of the Constitution of Lesotho 1993 that provide for the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights and Principles of State Policy respectively. These documents call for extensive changes in the environment to accommodate the diverse needs of disabled persons in society. The emphasis is on a fundamental shift from the unfortunate situation that has imposed environmental, institutional, attitudinal and economic barriers between people with disabilities and the mainstream society.
Prior to the drafting of this policy, other national legal instruments that enhance the protection of a person with a disability had already been in existence though without much enforcements mechanisms. These include the following promulgated laws:
• Section 19 (1) and (2) of the Building Control Act 1995 which provides for the Identification of draughtsman of plans, specifications, documents and diagrams to the extent that “plans… shall provide for the physical access to the proposed building to persons of different categories of disabilities.”
• Section 3 of the Education Act 1995 provides for Access to education of children with disabilities;
• Section 5(1) and (2) of the Local Government Act of 1997 which for Powers of the Local Authority;
• Criminal Procedure and Evidence (Amendment) Act 2000 has some protection clauses under non-bailable offences;
• Section 3 of the National Assembly (Amendment) Act 2001 provides for Disability, gender and Youth, in that PWDs should participate in politics for development;
• Section 15(1) and (2) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 provides for sexual offences against disabled persons;
• Clause 12 of the Children’s Protection and Welfare Bill 2005 provides for the protection of children with Disabilities.These documents generally prohibit discrimination in areas such as:
• Employment opportunities;
• Public accommodations (museums, theatres, malls, grocery stores, doctors offices, schools, hotels, restaurants, etc.);
• Social activities at both central and local government;
• Transportation;
• Telecommunications and so on.With the advancement of the Socio-political model for the first time, national and international legal structures recognized that people with disabilities are also worthy citizens, regardless of which disability they have. The model acknowledges that everyone citizen has equal rights in society and no one deserves to experience discrimination based on biological impairments. This attitude is a predisposition to a major shift in public policy regarding the promotion and protection of the rights of people with disabilities. The discrimination based on biological or medically diagnosed impairment was recognized as root cause for the isolation, segregation and second-class citizenship of PWDs. The shift marked a significant shift in the way the society looks at biological impairments. The burden of impairment shifted from the individual to the society. Referring back to those steps, mentioned above, the model recognises, inter alia, that people with disabilities have as a civil right, the right to enter a building, to work, and do not deserve to be discriminated against by environmental barriers.
Future Directions for the Independent Living Centre - Lesotho
The current situation analysis shows that there are a number of stakeholders trying to address disability issues in Lesotho. Their efforts are aimed at ensuring that persons with disabilities can lead decent lives. These stakeholders face various challenges. The institutional arrangements for dealing with issues of disability need to be examined to ensure capacity building and effective utilisation of the scarce resources.One of the weaknesses of the country’s institutional set-up has for a long time been the absence of a national policy that clearly sets up the vision for provision of services within and outside the disability sector. This has resulted in the lack of sound direction for all stakeholders. Thus, the development of the up-coming National Policy referred to above, is a milestone in government’s efforts to mainstream disability issues. An Act of Parliament to provide the legal basis for this Policy would be significant in effectively addressing the issues and problems that affect persons with disabilities.
The situation analysis of the status of persons with disabilities that lead to the formulation of this policy helped to identify challenges and key policy areas to be followed up by appropriate programmes. The identified policy areas include disability prevention, early identification and intervention; rehabilitation; accessibility (which includes access to physical environment, transport, information and communication); Capacity building (which includes: education and training and economic empowerment); quality and essential healthcare (including HIV/AIDS); social protection (including social welfare and Housing); self representation and participation; sports, recreation and entertainment; research and appropriate technology; and legal protection of PWDs. The need for capacity building and wide public education is also highlighted. The policy has developed objectives and strategies for each of these areas.
As a follow-up to the policy formulation process, the Independent Living Centre has been established in order to enhance the quality of access to information and advice on services for PWDs in the country. During the life of its current strategic plan (2007-2011) there will be particular emphasis on providing services to the rural communities. ILC Lesotho intends to establish a mobile service that will continue to visit all districts of the country at least once a year and the ILEP and CTS teams will coordinate with the Options Coordination Services to improve the access of rural community clients to ILC services.
The staff of the Independent Living Centre will be given more opportunities to expand their skills and expertise with a more systematic staff development program, included as part of staff meetings. A whole of agency staff development plan, which will be based on the outcomes of the staff performance management system, will be developed. Staff will be linked to overseas opportunities, by being encouraged to register as volunteers with Business Volunteers Abroad. ILC Lesotho is ensuring there is greater understanding of the Disability Services as well as the training opportunities that may be available for Lesotho organisations in overseas countries.
The Independent Living Equipment Program (ILEP) has been streamlined so that the path for clients is simpler and the relative priority of need can be ascertained. The Independent Living Centre believes that the new system works very well but requires more recurrent funding to match the growing needs of the community. ILC Lesotho recognises that there are limited allied health services available to people living with disabilities. The Centre will work collaboratively with other agencies in the disability sector to ensure adequate availability of allied health services.
The ILC Lesotho Board of Directors will continue to monitor and improve its own performance and the performance of the Executive Director so that the Independent Living Centre remains a highly successful, dynamic and client focussed organisation, in accordance with the philosophical foundation of consumer choice and control, independence, personal autonomy, self-direction, barrier-free environments, non-dependency services, and consumer leadership.
Development Areas
• Seeking adequate recurrent funding for the ILEP program
• Providing a broader range and more coordinated training and development programs for individuals and outside organisations
• Collaborating with other disability and health agencies to expand the availability and coordination of allied therapy services
• Working with the disability sector to improve the range and quality of assistive technology available to the Lesotho community
• developing an outreach service to the rural communities of Lesotho
• Developing local and overseas opportunities for ILC staff and for the Lesotho disability sector as a whole
• Establishing a research demonstration, dissemination, and utilisation centre, the Technology & Research Information Centre (TRIC)Conclusion
The mission of ILC Lesotho is, henceforth, to enhance the power of people with disabilities and/or their families especially those who are either infected or affected by the HIV/AIDS pandemic, to be independent and safe, to make their own informed choices, through increasing access to information, therapy services and to life opportunities. ILC Lesotho’s ultimate vision, therefore, is to ensure that people with disabilities have access to information, advice and provision of appropriate therapy, technology and design to enhance daily living.
Values
We value our clients
• by ensuring easy and equitable access to information and services
• by providing effective and responsive services
• by respecting our clients’ dignity, valuing their opinions and participation
• by developing flexible systems to support clients, carers and their safety
We value our staff
• by ensuring their safety
• by providing excellence in leadership and management
• by facilitating their growth and professional development
• by respecting their individual and family responsibilities
• by providing flexible work arrangements
We value our relationships and partnerships
• by committing ourselves to developing collaborative relationships with other agencies and groups
• by communicating information and concerns
We value prudent management
• by maximising the potential of our available resources
Event announcement:
CFP: Disability Studies Meets Sociology in Research, Teaching and Activism
Session organized by the Disability Division,
Society for the Studies of Social Problems (SSSP),
July 31- August 2, 2008,
Boston, MA
(more on the conference and SSSP at http://www.sssp1.org/index.cfm/m/293).
This is an open session that invites scholars from sociology and disability studies to engage in meaningful dialogue about the connections, affinities and possible tensions between sociological thinking, teaching and activism and the understanding informed by disability studies work and activism.
This is a wonderful opportunity to engage with the intersection of social science based research and practice from a critical disability angle, and vice versa; a connection that is currently invisible in contemporary works in both fields.
If you have done work that scholarly engages with these themes, please consider presenting it at SSSP. For submission guidelines and extended call for papers go to http://www.sssp1.org/index.cfm/m/293. All papers or extended abstracts have to be submitted electronically by January 31, 2008 at http://www.sssp1.org/index.cfm/pageId/591.
For more inquiries, please contac<
Liat Ben-Moshe
Sociology & Disability Studies
302 Maxwell Hall
Syracuse University
Syracuse, NY 13244
lbenmosh@maxwell.syr.edu
Ustadha Zaynab Ansari responds to a question posed by the mother of two children with autism. The compassionate answer outlines seven points and ends:
And, above all, there is love. Love your children. Don’t let them see you or anyone else get angry or resentful because this will hurt them and they will blame themselves. Even if they can’t articulate it, they know when people are upset. And it affects them. Deeply. Laugh with them, smile, kiss them, hug them and let them know how loved they are. And they will respond. Don’t buy into that myth that autistic children cannot show affection. That is a lie. They love you more than you’ll ever know.
As we build a world where inclusion is commonplace and Universal Design is ubiquitous it is always good to revisit foundational values.
Teri Adams presents brief reviews of the various theoretical models of social response to disability while personalizing them with her own experience. Read "Moloka'i: Disability History in Microcosm?" over at Crip Chronicles. Referring to the currently dominant models aligned around the concepts of "culture" and 'civil rights" she rights:
I reject the moniker of "cultural" model as being unworkable. The non-disabled public does not embrace disability culture as another culture to be recognized, like African or Hispanic culture....I'll Take The Civil Rights Model
Born in the 1970's, with the Independent Living Movement, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, all the way to the coming of age in 1990 with the Americans With Disabilities Act, American society is saying that persons with disabilities are entitled to the same civil rights as citizens who are not [presently] disabled.
I wonder. Is there a model that is emerging beyond these that we traditionally have named?
When does travel - moving from point A to point B - become tourism?
Webster says that tourism is:
Function: noun
1 : the practice of traveling for recreation
2 : the guidance or management of tourists
3 a : the promotion or encouragement of touring b : the accommodation of tourists
(Source: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=tourism)
Wikipedia elaborates with:
Tourism can be defined as the act of travel for the purpose of recreation, and the provision of services for this act. A tourist is someone who travels at least fifty miles from home, as defined by the World Tourism Organization (a United Nations body).
A more comprehensive definition would be that tourism is a service industry, comprising a number of tangible and intangible components. The tangible elements include transport systems - air, rail, road, water and now, space; hospitality services - accommodation, foods and beverages, tours, souvenirs; and related services such as banking, insurance and safety & security.
The intangible elements include: rest and relaxation, culture, escape, adventure, new and different experiences.
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism)
Bottom line? Tourism is when you find yourself 50 miles or more away from home - for the right reasons.
Travel & Disability at Suite 101 concerns itself with "Inclusive Tourism" and the means to achieving it, "Inclusive Destination Development."
In this case "inclusive" refers to accommodating a broad range of tourists not to a particular payment scheme for the travel product. There can be confusion because "all inclusive" is also used by the travel industry to describe self-contained resorts and/or packaged tours where all expenses and amenities are included in the initial price.
Rather "inclusive" is used in the sense that it is used by the World Bank in its promotion of "Inclusive Development."
The World Bank promotes "Inclusive Development" as economic and regional development that allows for full social participation of people with disabilities. "Destination Development" is the phrase used by the tourism industry to describe the strategic application of planning, development, and marketing resources to enhance a location as a desired destination for travelers.
"Inclusive Destination Development" uses the word "inclusive", in the sense it is used by the World Bank, to mean "allowing for the full social participation of people with disabilities." Thus, Inclusive Destination Development is "the systematic and strategic application of resources to render a location a destination of choice for persons with disabilities."
The goal of Inclusive Tourism is to accommodate the broadest range of tourists possible without stigma or the need for special accommodation
Inclusive Tourism is one important means through which persons with disabilities participate in society at a distance from their homes. At the same time, the presence of these tourists provides a model - and source of funding - for the inclusive practices and infrastructure necessary for their presence. Inclusive Tourism partially funds Inclusive Destination Development. Inclusive tourism is an example of democratization and the dissemination of human rights through a market-driven mechanism.
Known by various names in various places such as, accessible tourism or tourism for all, inclusive tourism is made possible by the widespread adoption of the Seven Principles of Universal Design:
1. Equitable Use: The design does not disadvantage or stigmatize any group of users.
2. Flexibility in Use: The design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities.
3. Simple, Intuitive Use: Use of the design is easy to understand, regardless of the user's experience, knowledge, language skills, or current concentration level.
4. Perceptible Information: The design communicates necessary information effectively to the user, regardless of ambient conditions or the user's sensory abilities.
5. Tolerance for Error: The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or unintended actions.
6. Low Physical Effort: The design can be used efficiently and comfortably, and with a minimum of fatigue.
7. Size and Space for Approach & Use: Appropriate size and space is provided for approach, reach, manipulation, and use, regardless of the user's body size, posture, or mobility. *
Related to Universal Design is the concept "Visitability." Visitability refers to private homes and a certain minimum set of standards that make them hospitable to one subgroup of those with disabiities - guests using wheelchairs:
While the concept of Visitability is very simple, the definition has several interactive layers: The spirit of Visitability is as important as the list of features.
That spirit says, it's not just unwise, but unacceptable that new homes continue to be built with basic barriers... These barriers cause daily, draining drudgery; physically unsafe conditions; social isolation; and undesired institutionalization... The features list must be partly rigid and partly flexible. The inflexible Visitability features are:
* Wide passage doors
* At least a half bath/powder room on the main floor
* At least one zero-step entrance
(source: http://www.concretechange.org/Definition_of_Visitability.htm)
Visitability is not directly relevant to the hospitality industry, and thus tourism, as it only seeks address the construction of new private homes. However, as the concepts of Universal Design and Visitability redefine the housing market, hotel and resort guests will come to expect non-exclusionary architecture in order to recreate the familiar sense of home and socialize with their disabled travel companions.
Resources:
The World Tourism Organization http://www.world-tourism.org
Concrete Change http://www.concretechange.org
The Rolling Rains Report http://www.RollingRains.com
* Compiled by advocates of universal design, listed in alphabetical order: Bettye Rose Connell, Mike Jones, Ron Mace, Jim Mueller, Abir Mullick, Elaine Ostroff, Jon Sanford, Ed Steinfeld, Molly Story, Gregg Vanderheiden
Marco Nicoli, Executive Director of Lextracon – Language Solutions and Consulting has just announced a new social entrepreneurial initiative:
Lextracon LLC, a US-based company specializing in legal and financial language services, is launching a corporate social responsibility initiative called "Disability Focus."Disability Focus has the goal of creating working opportunities for persons with disabilities, while providing disability-specialized translation services that are expected to be in demand during the process of implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The idea combines a response to a market-driven demand with a social initiative. The social initiative consists of creating a worldwide network of persons with disabilities with advanced language skills, familiar with culturally sensitive terminology in the field of disability, and with a basic knowledge of computer (use of emails, word processors, scanners, handling of PDF files).While the long-term goal is to create an e-network of certified translators, the short-term objective is to create on-line specialized translation opportunities that will be complemented with continuing vocational training, allowing the members of the network to gradually reach national accreditation as professional translators.
If you believe that you have the above-mentioned requisites, and you are interested in this challenge, please send your resume with details on translation and computing skills to: marco.nicoli@lextracon.com, referencing "Disability Focus Initiative." Please indicate also if you are interested in being considered for more extended opportunities in legal / financial translations and what your qualifications are.Posted by rollingrains at 01:31 AM
Del Heraldo.es viene:
El 45% de los hoteles de tres y cuatro estrellas no cumple ningún estándar de accesibilidad, y sólo el 0,7% alcanza niveles óptimos. Hay leyes suficientes, pero falta formación específica en la Universidad y sobran "barreras mentales" en las empresas turísticas.
COLPISA. Madrid | El "turismo para todos" que garantice ese "bien social" a los 3,5 millones de españoles con discapacidad sigue siendo una asignatura pendiente, y "lo que más está costando es romper la barrera mental, sobre todo de los empresarios". Lo subraya Jesús Hernández, director de Accesibilidad de la Fundación ONCE, convencido de que, "si se aplicara, el material legislativo sería suficiente para poder avanzar" y de que, por tanto, hay que buscar la solución en otro sitio, como la formación universitaria especializada o la información adecuada a ese sector clave de la economía.
Al presentar el II Congreso Internacional Turismo para Todos ENAT que reunirá a una veintena de países en la Comunidad Valenciana del 21 al 23 de noviembre, Hernández apostó por convencer a las empresas con argumentos financieros, "a través de la cuenta de resultados". Y recalcó su invitación a "que vean en las personas con discapacidad un mercado potencial" con un punto de ironía: "No te preocupes de mis derechos, preocúpate de mi cartera".
Pasión viajera
No hay duda alguna sobre la pasión viajera de ese colectivo, cuyo 60% de movilidad turística anual supera al 53% de la población española, y podría hacerlo más: casi el 84% de las personas con discapacidad física asegura que le gusta viajar, y al 54% le sobra tiempo para ello. Si no salen, remachó Hernández, "no es por ganas, sino porque es toda una aventura". O tres. Una aventura económica, porque la mayor accesibilidad suele coincidir con la mayor categoría y precio de los alojamientos. Otra física, porque los transportes, hoteles y lugares de ocio componen una generalizada carrera de obstáculos. Y una tercera profesional, porque sigue fallando la atención del personal turístico. .
Basten, como reflejo de esos problemas, unas pocas cifras. En el ámbito hotelero, el Plan Nacional de Accesibilidad dibuja una realidad desoladora en los establecimientos de 3 y 4 estrellas: de los 431 analizados, sólo el 0,7% alcanza niveles óptimos, y la oferta para usuarios de sillas de rueda apenas llega al 8%; peor aún, el 45% no cumple ningún estándar de accesibilidad, y ni siquiera permite un acceso aceptable a personas con muletas. En cuanto al trato recibido, el 72% de clientes con discapacidad señala que el personal conoce poco o nada sus necesidades concretas.
Ejemplos a seguir
Estos datos ayudan a perfilar las posibles soluciones, que van más allá de la imprescindible eliminación de barreras arquitectónicas, urbanísticas y de transporte. Y un ámbito clave debe ser la Universidad, enfatiza Hernández, que echa en falta "formación para hacer el turismo accesible y de diseño para todos" en las carreras de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Turismo. Ese vacío se está tapando parcialmente con "cursos de posgrado y asignaturas de libre configuración, pero no con asignaturas troncales ni de forma estructurada". Además, hay que pensar en la atención integral al colectivo desde todos los ámbitos del ocio, lo que exige, por ejemplo, guías turísticos preparados para dar explicaciones a una persona ciega o personal de una recepción hotelera que conozca y sepa tratar a su clientela con discapacidad.
El II Congreso Internacional Turismo para Todos ENAT, siglas en inglés de la Red Europea para el Turismo Accesible que lo avala, examinará a fondo esos problemas y será escaparate de las experiencias más exitosas en ocio y discapacidad. Frente a las barreras mentales que perduran en la sociedad y en ese sector económico, el encuentro incidirá en las oportunidades de futuro, tanto para la "mejora del modelo de negocio" empresarial como, en palabras de Mercé Luz, directora de Cultura y Ocio de la Fundación ONCE, para "beneficiar a toda la población", porque los "lugares accesibles pueden servir también para familias con niños pequeños en carritos" y para personas mayores.
Fuente:
Suspenso en "turismo para todos"
http://www.heraldo.es/heraldo.html?noticia=%20212251

O kit Vida em Movimento visa estimular e contribuir para promover a inclusão
de crianças e jovens com deficiência na Educação, no Trabalho e em todas as atividades da vida social.
Com orientações e recursos de acessibilidade para mostrar ações com foco na inclusão da pessoa com deficiência nos esportes e nas atividades diárias.
O kit Vida em Movimento visa estimular e contribuir para promover a inclusão
de crianças e jovens com deficiência na Educação, no Trabalho e em todas as atividades da vida social. O movimento, a brincadeira, o jogo, práticas esportivas e atividades físicas são o ponto de partida que mostra que Inclusão é Vida e que Vida é Movimento. O kit se compõe de 4 DVDs uma publicação em forma de encarte que, além de textos complementares aos temas dos vídeos, apresenta um guia criteriosamente elaborado com indicações de sites, para saber mais. Destina-se a professores, profissionais especializados, familiares, pessoas com deficiência, profissionais de Recursos Humanos e a todos aqueles que convivem e trabalham com a temática da Deficiência, que se queixam da falta de materiais que auxiliem sua prática.
O projeto é uma realização do Amankay Instituto de Estudos e Pesquisas e do Departamento Nacional do SESI - Serviço Social da Indústria e conta com as parcerias do Instituto Vivo, Laramara - Associação Brasileira de Assistência ao Deficiente Visual, SEPED – Secretaria da Pessoa com Deficiência e Mobilidade Reduzida e Portal Planeta Educação.
O patrocínio desta tiragem é do Instituto Vivo.
A distribuição do Kit é gratuita Para obtê-lo, solicitamos o preenchimento da ficha cadastral abaixo. É muito importante conhecer o perfil das pessoas interessadas. A ficha deve ser enviada para martaalmeidagil@gmail.com
A postagem é por conta do interessado. Quando a ficha for recebida, calculamos o custo do envio por Sedex e avisamos ao interessado, para que faça o depósito correspondente.
Kit Vida em Movimento
Ficha cadastral
Nome, Endereço, Bairro, CEP, Cidade, UF, E-mail, Site, Nome do Contato, Área de atuação, Trabalha na área da Deficiência - Sim ( ) Não (...)
Razão do interesse pelo kit Vida em Movimento
Conteúdo
Os 25 vídeos estão distribuídos em quatro dvds e têm duração entre cinco a oito minutos.
Os programas têm uma linguagem descontraída e seguem o lema do movimento das pessoas com deficiência – nada sobre
nós, sem nós. Assim, o apresentador selecionado dentre vários candidatos foi um jovem cadeirante muito comunicativo.
A série está organizada em três grandes blocos temáticos:
Gerais: são 6 programas, de 8 minutos cada, com depoimentos sobre conquistas, aspirações e situações inclusivas sobre família, trabalho, relações afetivas, além de mostrar a importância do acesso a tecnologias assistivas e da saudável resistência a posturas discriminatórias.
Pessoais: são 4 programas, de 8 minutos cada, que apresentam o dia-a-dia e os testemunhos de quatro rapazes: um com paraplegia, um com síndrome de Down, um surdo e um cego.
Específicos: são 15 programas, de 5 minutos cada, que mostram crianças e jovens com deficiência praticando diferentes modalidades de esportes, atividades físicas, jogos e brincadeiras; mostram ainda professores de Educação Física e profissionais de diversas áreas que utilizam com sucesso alternativas e recursos pedagógicos que permitem a inclusão e a convivência entre pessoas com e sem deficiência.
Recursos de acessibilidade
Os quatro dvds têm etiqueta em braile, assim como a embalagem; cada DVD abre com um menu com quatro opções de acessibilidade: somente vídeo; Libras (língua brasileira de sinais) e/ou legendas, somente Libras e áudio descrição; este último é um recurso específico para pessoas com deficiência visual e ainda pouco conhecido e utilizado no Brasil.
O encarte, também em papel reciclado, tem versão em áudio no DVD 1 da série, gravada por locutores profissionais e alterna voz feminina e masculina. O arquivo está dividido em faixas, para facilitar a busca.
Saiba mais: www.amankay.org.br
Abraham Maslow postulated a hierarchy of human needs in his 1943 paper “A Theory of Human Motivation.” He further refined the idea through his lifetime.
Just where does tourism intersect with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs? Maybe not where you think.
Often represented as a pyramid with the base being physiological needs Maslow observed an impulse toward satisfying ever higher needs. Deficit Needs were his name for the first four needs: physiological, safety, belonging, and esteem. The remainder which he called Growth Needs. He noted that Deficit Needs were so fundamental that each prior need must be satisfied in order for a person to progress to the next.
Let's review his list of needs:
1. Physiological needs
2. Safety needs
3. Belonging needs
4. Esteem needs
5. The need to know and understand
6. Aesthetic needs
7. Self-actualization needs
8. Transcendence
Now walk with me by stages through encounters with destination marketing. Assuming that one would not have the leisure to pursue the growth experiences promised by tourism if they had not surmounted the deficit stages of physiological, safety, belonging, and esteem needs we start at level five with curiosity.
The need to know and understand a place, a people, or a piece of history, figures prominently into my destination selection process. It sustains me through a drawn out dreaming stage where I speak to friends and travel agents while scouring the web or reading tour books, magazines, and marketing materials. During my research I can always count on marketing materials to persuade me with ample real – or Photoshopped – evidence that my target destination will raise me to level six by satisfying my Aesthetic needs. Add-on adventure packages, classes, or more personalized services promise level seven’s Self-actualization. My trip does not need to take me to literal mountaintops to offer peak experiences of Transcendence. Volunteer opportunities providing meaning, breathtaking beauty in unexpected places, or life-changing experiences of depth with strangers along the way are common enough travel experiences to need only be suggested or attested by sidebar quotes rather than hyped in marketing.
But what if you heard $13.6 US billion saying, “Find the error in this marketing approach and I might find my way into your bank account?”
The ignored data is that travel thrusts all who engage in it into deficiency mode. Examine exaggerated cases for evidence. Look up industry bottom lines during the SARS epidemic (physiological needs), or after the 9-11 attacks (safety needs), or where you as an individual are palpably unwelcome for reasons of race, nationality, or income (belonging and esteem needs.)
The oversight is predictable. Most places, products, and policies are designed to accommodate a significant portion of the travel market.
Uniformity in the infrastructure providing basic needs like access to water to drink, air to breather, food to eat, and locations to rest, wash, or relieve oneself lend the predictability to assure one that the deficits encountered during travel are temporary and easily surmountable. That assurance allows these travelers an experience open to the higher levels of Maslow’s hierarchy. It makes possible what travel marketing sells.
The oversight is also predictable because it extends even to those who create the infrastructure for these basic needs – and precedent, even bad precedent, teaches.
This is the open secret within the – within our – community: travelers with disabilities consciously risk immersion in situations of Deficit Need whenever they travel. Even so, we studies document that we continue to travel in greater numbers each year. We, the 42 million US citizens with disabilities spending an average of $13.6 billion on travel annually, look for things not typically included in marketing messages. The absence of reliable information about the application of Universal Design at every level of the travel experience deters us from traveling. As our ranks are swelled by the normal diminishment in function that accompanies aging the number of – and potential profit from – by baby Boomers entering this underserved niche do you see an opportunity on the horizon?
Some are exercising creativity creating web directories, blogs, e-zines, print magazine, and books to get the word out about accessibility for travelers. Astute hospitality marketers would be rewarded with new customers by learning from their example.
Others take on the task of remodeling the industry level by need level. To list only the Deficit Needs:
• Physiology: A young woman named Rasha now has 13,000 signers on her petition for airborne bathroom accessibility.
• Safety: The Service Employees International Union (SEIU), together with the disability rights movement, is supporting a complaint to the U.S. Department of Transportation that employees charged with assisting passengers to safely board and deplane are not provided adequate training or safe equipment.
• Belonging: Bonnie Lewkowicz and Judith Smith have filed a lawsuit against Hotels.com and Spector, et al has won a Supreme Court case against Norwegian Cruise Lines for policies resulting in the exclusion of travelers with disabilities.
• Esteem: Disability groups as far-flung as India, Singapore, Australia, Japan, Argentina, South Africa, Norway, and France offer excursions ranging from bowling to skiing, tennis to whitewater rafting, fishing to cooking classes all in a manner that values the differing abilities of each participant
I will illustrate with one autobiographical case study.
For several years I have corresponded with salespeople, designers, and other professionals in the timeshare, condotel, or “vacation ownership” market. Recently I was invited by Marriott to examine their Newport Coast Villas in southern California. At roughly $100,000 for the package that we had in mind the price point was not unreasonable for the strong Marriott brand and their dominant international network of options. Quality of materials, aesthetics of design, and pride in workmanship were evident inside and out. The “buy now” incentives we enticing. Still I declined.
Maybe you could say that, along with so many other things that I successfully do differently because of my disability, I did the math differently as well.
Imagine x number of people competing for 700 units at Newport Coast Villas during the peak season. Now keep x constant but decrease the number of units by 90% to 70 units. It doesn’t take a degree in mathematics to intuit that something important just happened to the demand/supply ratio.
Recalculate over time to account for the fact that x is not constant. It increases. Oops, supply-side problems on steroids.
Just for fun – or rather, just to match the actual case – let’s factor in that roughly two dozen of those 70 units will not be available for another 36 months. Oh yes, and of the two units that you inspected in that group that will someday number the resort’s 70 wheelchair accessible vacation units none had roll-in showers or independently accessible bathtubs, cutaways for wheelchairs under cabinets, counters or sinks, stoves with controls in the front, furniture selected for ease of transfer, or washer/dryer accessible from a wheelchair – and community covenants allow for no changes, not even replacing the artwork on the walls.
Shopping from a supplier with a well-honed reputation for customer service for a product within my means and one that I had been attracted to enough to track over several years I was offered the option to buy into a situation of permanent Deficit Need.
Infrastructure design errors created physiology and safety problems. The total lack of wheelchair access to some buildings results in the inability to socialize with other guests in their homes and prohibits achievement of belonging. If 10% of the bathrooms are usable then Visitability is not achieved in 90% of the units. The end product weighs as quite an assault on self esteem.
Over time the owner base will age. With age comes disability. With a greater number of owners (and their guests) having disabilities the inadequately designed set-aside 10% will be the only universe of options for more people.
Design that accounted for lifespan use – not simply lifestyle glitz – probably would have made the salesman we spoke to a little closer to his monthly goal.
And then there would have been the word-of-mouth referrals and sales from the pass along value of this article.
It is expensive not to use Universal Design. As the old guard leadership of the Disability Rights Movement – all Baby Boomers – ages daily into the market, the cost of not meeting our needs increases exponentially.

The Gwangju Design Biennale 2007 is one more sign of Korea's leadership in Universal Design. Pre-conference publicity describes the event:
The international design conference is to provide the scientific background for the motto of this year's design biennale, "Light" (Life, Identity, Green, Human, Technology).The conference will deal with the industrial value of design as well as design's new orientation towards convergence and communication in the era of U-Design and the new roles, which designers will play in it.
The term "U-Design" refers to universal design, design for everyone.
In his lecture “U-Design: Design for the People” Prof. Dr. Zec will talk about Life Science Design. As the term already indicates, Life Science Design is a combination of design and biological sciences such as medical technology, biology, bionics, genetics and nanotechnology. The most important focus of Life Science Design, however, is the human being.“Life Science Design concentrates on a new quality of life as well as new product quality. It can function as a kind of translator of complex machines; it can make the life of handicapped people more comfortable and simplify medical processes – in other words, it opens up completely new perspectives,” Professor Dr. Zec explains the significance of Life Science Design.
Since design was increasingly becoming an essential part of our life, good design was no longer inspired by the idea of creating a new product for market success, but rather by meeting people’s needs. “‘Universal Design’ is the term of the future,” resumes Zec.
Sources & Further Information:
http://www.dexigner.com/product/news-g12284.html
http://www.design-biennale.org/2007gb/
http://en.red-dot.org/2398.html
The European Union Committee of Ministers played an important role in the promotion of Universal Design with the following resolution in 2001.
Resolution ResAP(2001)1 on the introduction of the principles of universal design into the curricula of all occupations working on the built environment(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers
on 15 February 2001,
at the 742nd meeting of the Ministers Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, in its composition restricted to the Representatives of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, member states of the Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field,
Recalling Resolution (59) 23 of 16 November 1959, concerning the extension of the activities of the Council of Europe in the social and cultural fields;
Having regard to Resolution (96) 35 of 2 October 1996, whereby it revised the structures of the Partial Agreement and resolved to continue, on the basis of revised rules replacing those set out in Resolution (59) 23, the activities hitherto carried out and developed by virtue of that resolution; these being in particular aimed at:
a. raising the level of health protection of consumers in its widest sense, including a constant contribution to harmonising – in the field of products having a direct or indirect impact on the human food chain as well as in the field of pesticides, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, legislation, regulations and practice governing, on the one hand, quality, efficiency and safety controls for products; and, on the other hand, the safe use of toxic or noxious products;
b. integrating people with disabilities into the community; defining – and contributing to the implementation at European level – of a model of coherent policy for people with disabilities, which takes account simultaneously of the principles of full citizenship and independent living; contributing to the elimination of barriers to integration, whatever their nature, whether psychological, educational, family-related, cultural, social, professional, financial or architectural.
Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is to achieve a greater unity between its members for the purpose of facilitating their economic and social progress;
Bearing in mind the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and in particular the freedom of movement (Article 2 of Protocol No. 4);
Bearing in mind the principles embodied in the revised European Social Charter, namely the right of persons with disabilities to independence, social integration and participation in the life of the community, in particular through measures aiming to overcome barriers to communication and mobility and enabling access to transport, housing, cultural activities and leisure (Article 15, paragraph 3);
Bearing in mind Recommendation No. R (86) 18 on the “European Charter on Sport for all: disabled persons”;
Bearing in mind Recommendation No. R (92) 6 on a coherent policy for people with disabilities;
Bearing in mind Recommendation 1185 (1992) of the Parliamentary Assembly on rehabilitation policies for the disabled;
Bearing in mind Recommendation N° R (98) 3 on access to higher education;
Bearing in mind the United Nations Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities;
Having regard to the Council Directive 85/384/EEC of 10 June 1985 on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services;
Having regard to the Resolution of the Council of the European Union and of the representatives of the governments of the member states meeting within the Council of 20 December 1996 on equality of opportunity for people with disabilities;
Having regard to the European Concept for Accessibility, March 1996, elaborated by the Central Co-ordinating Commission for the Promotion of Accessibility (CCPT);
Having regard to the Barcelona Declaration: The City and the Disabled of 24 March 1995, signed by 150 European cities following the Congress on The City and the Disabled, Barcelona, 23 and 24 March 1995;
Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe can be pursued, inter alia, by the adoption of common legislation and practice conducive to the creation of a society for all;
Considering that failure to promote the rights of citizens with disabilities and ensure equality of opportunities is a violation of human dignity;
Considering that equal opportunities for members of all groups in society can contribute to securing democracy and social cohesion;
Emphasising the almost total lack of compulsory training programmes with a universal design dimension for all occupations working on the built environment;
Acknowledging the work carried out in the field of accessibility policies by the Council of Europe's Committee on the Rehabilitation and Integration of People with disabilities and its subordinate body, the Committee of Experts on the Training of Personnel other than Health Care Personnel concerned with Rehabilitation (Architects and Town Planners), and considering the urgent need for such training;
Convinced that universal design and accessibility have a key role to play in the promotion of human rights and fundamental freedoms and should therefore be incorporated into all levels of the education and training programmes of all occupations working on the built environment,
Recommends that the governments of the member states of the Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field, having due regard to their specific constitutional structures, and national, regional or local circumstances, as well as education systems:
a. when formulating national policy, take into account the principles of universal design and measures to improve accessibility, in the widest sense of the term, as set out in the appendix to this resolution in so far as they concern curricula and other matters of education, training and awareness-raising for which governments are directly responsible according to the allocation of responsibilities in each country;
b. take such steps as they consider appropriate towards the application of the principles and measures contained in the appendix in fields where these are not the direct responsibility of governments, but where public authorities have a certain power or play a role;
c. promote implementation of these measures by universities and institutions responsible for higher and further education, as well as vocational training;
d. ensure the widest possible dissemination of this resolution among all interested parties, particularly those concerned with education and training, as well as the users.
Appendix to Resolution ResAP(2001)1
1. General principles
The right of all individuals, including persons with disabilities, to full participation in the life of the community involves the right to access to and use and understanding of the built environment.
It is the responsibility and duty of society, and in particular of all occupations working on the built environment, to make it universally accessible to everyone, including persons with disabilities.
A coherent and global policy in favour of people with disabilities or who are in danger of acquiring them should aim at, inter alia, guaranteeing full citizenship, equality of opportunity, independent living and active participation in all areas of community life.
To implement this policy states should take steps to, inter alia, avoid and remove, wherever possible, all obstacles in the built environment and to improve the information of all policy makers and other stakeholders whose decisions concerning the manmade environment affect the quality of life of people with disabilities.
Such policy includes the education and training of key players in this process.
Through a co-ordinated set of measures introducing the concept of universal design into the curricula of all occupations working on the built environment, people of all ages, sizes and abilities should be enabled to have as much mobility and access to buildings, as well as means of transport, as possible, so that they can play a full role in society and take part in economic, social, cultural, leisure, and recreational activities.
2. Definitions
“Universal design” is a strategy, which aims to make the design and composition of different environments and products accessible and understandable to, as well as usable by, everyone, to the greatest extent in the most independent and natural manner possible, without the need for adaptation or specialised design solutions.
The intent of the universal design concept is to simplify life for everyone by making the built environment, products, and communications equally accessible, usable and understandable at little or no extra cost. The universal design concept promotes a shift to more emphasis on user-centred design by following a holistic approach and aiming to accommodate the needs of people of all ages, sizes and abilities, including the changes that people experience over their lifespan. Consequently, universal design is a concept that extends beyond the issues of mere accessibility of buildings for people with disabilities and should become an integrated part of architecture, design and planning of the environment.
For the purpose of this resolution the terms “integral accessibility”, “design for all” and “inclusive design” are understood to have the same meaning as the term “universal design”, which is used in this text.
The term “everyone” means that no difference will be imposed by the environment upon individuals regardless of their age, size or other physical features, abilities or disabilities.
The term “independent” means the ability to act without having to rely on outside help, thus avoiding dependency.
The term “natural” stresses the integral aspect of the definition. It implies that provisions for access and usability are perceived as normal.
The term "built environment” means all buildings, traffic provisions and places or spaces open to the public.
3. Aims, objectives, and strategies
To ensure equal chances of participation in economic, social, cultural, leisure and recreational activities, everyone of whatever age, size and ability must be able to access, use and understand any part of the environment as independently and as equally as possible.
Education and training of all occupations working on the built environment should be inspired by the principles of universal design.
For the purpose of taking early action to promote a coherent policy to improve accessibility, the concept of universal design should be an integral and compulsory part of the mainstream initial training of all occupations working on the built environment, at all levels and in all sectors.
Adequate further training should be made available for active professionals, such as architects, engineers, designers and town planners. Their attendance should be strongly encouraged.
Curricula should be developed with the co-operation of users, including organisations of and for people with disabilities.
The concept of universal design should be brought into focus for other professions working with the built environment, such as regional planners, property developers, estate agents, landscape architects and landscape gardeners, as well as interior designers. It should also be brought to the attention of users, customers and clients, including organisations and bodies representing them.
Awareness of the difficulties people with disabilities encounter in the built environment should be raised as early as possible.
Education, training and awareness-raising should provide everyone dealing with the built environment with the necessary understanding, knowledge, skills and values to instil new attitudes and behaviour towards achieving a built environment that is universally accessible.
4. Higher education
Curricula of architects, engineers, designers, and town planners at under-graduate and post-graduate level should develop the following skills:
– that of perceiving the relationship between human beings and their constructural creations and between the latter and their environment,
– that of understanding the need to accord constructural creations and space in compliance with human needs,
– that of mastering problem-solving techniques in order to increase the usability of all their constructural creations, taking into account human diversity.
Public authorities, educational institutions, the bodies for the professions concerned and the organisations representing those professions should review education and training in architecture, engineering, design, and town planning in order to ensure that it enshrines the universal design concept as an integral part, including appropriate examinations on the subject.
Moreover, they should take steps to ensure that continuing education based on the universal design concept be organised, encouraged and followed by architects, engineers, designers, and town planners.
Governments may examine appropriate ways of creating incentives, such as student grants, scholarships and awards, to stimulate such innovation in design that will lead to the creation of environments and products that incorporate universal design principles.
5. Further education and vocational training
Universal design issues should be included in all types and levels of education influencing our physical environment. Achieving a universally designed environment requires competence and skills in all parts of the production and construction process. Since architects and engineers are not involved in all building projects, as many are carried out by craftsmen, such as bricklayers, carpenters, plumbers, and electricians, the initial vocational training of all professions concerned should include universal design principles.
The new inclusive perspectives of universal design should become a compulsory part of the education and training for everyone working on the built environment.
Governments may examine appropriate ways of creating incentives, such as prizes, to stimulate practical solutions to design questions that incorporate universal design principles.
6. Teaching methods and materials
Education and training should take an interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approach, covering all disciplines relevant to the built environment. Linkages to other courses should offset the problem of isolating the subject in the curriculum.
Learners of all ages should be given the possibility to personally experience the difficulties encountered by people with disabilities in the environment, using appropriate interactive, participatory and collaborative methods, such as field trips, on-site observations, case studies, direct and personal contact with people with disabilities and people across the age span, as well as simulation of certain impairments.
Theoretical and cognitive-intellectual learning should be complemented by practical and emotional learning.
The perception of “normality” and “difference” should be studied; stereotypes and prejudices should be examined.
Teaching and learning through projects should be encouraged and developed. A real-life supervised project could be an appropriate completion of a training period.
Positive attitudes towards people with disabilities should be created as early as possible to overcome psychological barriers to their active participation and to lay the foundations for the removal of physical barriers.
The new curricula should be accompanied by appropriate teaching methods and materials adapted to the various educational needs, paying particular attention to audio-visual material and new technologies, notably information technology and computer-based training and simulations.
Every member state should appoint or set up a governmental body, promote the creation of a professional centre of expertise or use other bodies with competence to disseminate information and documentation as well as to give advice, assistance and support.
7. Training of trainers
Since the awareness of lecturers, teachers and trainers is crucial to all action in this field, basic and further training in the concepts of universal design should be provided to those who are required to implement provisions under chapters 4 to 6, as well as this one.
Staff development programmes to raise awareness and support universal design issues should be encouraged, as should full staff involvement in the development and delivery of universal design strategies.
Special attention should also be paid to the training of non-teaching staff, such as school heads and administrators.
8. User participation
Curricula should be developed with the co-operation of users across the age span, including people with disabilities. Curriculum developers should draw on their expertise. They should be considered as a source of information, first-hand experience and professional competence. User participation should take place as early as possible.
9. Evaluating teaching effectiveness
Since the effectiveness of teaching measures cannot be determined without systematic analysis, the degree of success of each measure should be considered and emerging problems identified.
Institutional evaluation of teaching effectiveness should be seen as an integral part of curriculum development or revision and as a key professional tool for management and planning.
10. International exchange of information and good practice
Member states should exchange information and research findings on the strategy of universal design and the standards of accessibility achieved.
Governments should promote and/or facilitate co-operation across borders and foster contacts between professionals in this field. These activities should include co-operation between universities and other educational or training institutions, the exchange of lecturers, teachers and trainers, as well as study visits of teaching staff and students/trainees.
The bodies referred to in chapter 6, paragraph 8, should be called upon to communicate with corresponding bodies and institutions in other states.
An international exchange of good practice should be developed to illustrate the major themes of the resolution with practical examples in some detail, making the best possible use of new information technologies, such as the Internet.
The examples, although set in specific contexts, should be sufficiently transferable to demonstrate that solutions and good practice can be shared. They should inspire creative imitation in the spirit of the resolution.
The examples should include action by the member states to revise curricula of the different educational institutions and to enhance the work of the bodies referred to in chapter 6, paragraph 8. It should also include action by the different educational and training institutions as well as professional and vocational groups
Discussions about visual communication of accessibility, icons, and iconographers have appeared here occasionally. Liat Ben-Moshe and Justin J.W. Powell have recently published a scholarly paper on the subject entitled, "Sign of our times? Revis(it)ing the International Symbol of Access." The abstract is available here.
If MIUSA (Mobility International USA) had existed when I was a student -- well, during the first couple decades that I was a student anyway -- my life as an exchange student (all three times) would have been much easier. I certainly would have been able to find the mentor that was nowhere to be found at that time in the fields of student services, student exchange, or international development. That is why I am always pleased to support the excellent work of MIUSA and have spent much of my career assisting the students they serve.
They have made changes to their web site at http://www.miusa.org/miusa-exchange-programs
Check out their student exchange program to Bahrain. Hurry. Application deadline is November 19, 2007.
UPCOMING MIUSA EVENTS:
FREE! Foreign Language and Disability TeleTraining
November 5, 2007
2:00 pm 3:30 pm Eastern Standard Time
1:00 pm 2:30 pm Central Standard Time
12:00 pm 1:30 pm Mountain Standard Time
11:00 am 12:30 pm Pacific Standard Time
Interested people must register online at
http://www.miusa.org/ncde/spotlight/foreignlanguage/teletraining to
participate
Mobility International USA
National Clearinghouse on Disability and Exchange
(541) 343-1284 ext. 21
www.miusa.org
Mobility International USA empowering people with disabilities around the
world to achieve their human rights through international exchange and
international development for 25 years.

The WHO book on active aging for has now been released. It is available from WHO Press here.
Population ageing and urbanization are two global trends that together comprise major forces shaping the 21st century. At the same time as cities are growing, their share of residents aged 60 years and more is increasing. Older people are a resource for their families, communities and economies in supportive and enabling living environments. WHO regards active ageing as a lifelong process shaped by several factors that, alone and acting together, favour health, participation and security in older adult life. Informed by WHO's approach to active ageing, the purpose of this Guide is to engage cities to become more age-friendly so as to tap the potential that older people represent for humanity.By working with groups in 33 cities in all WHO regions, WHO has asked older people in focus groups to describe the advantages and barriers they experience in eight areas of city living. In most cities, the reports from older people were complemented by evidence from focus groups of caregivers and service providers in the public, voluntary and private sectors. The results from the focus groups led to the development of a set of age-friendly city checklists presented in this guide.
With an estimated one million people worldwide turning 60 every month, global cities face the daunting challenge of redesigning their services and facilities to cater to the needs of the aged and the ageing. A checklist of views from elderly people in many cities worldwide has been compiled into a new guidebook that could prove of extensive help for hotels, airports, airlines and others catering to this growing market.According to United Nations estimates, the number of older persons (60+) will double from the current 600 million to 1.2 billion by 2025, and again, to 2 billion by 2050. The vast majority of older people live in their homes and communities, but in environments that have not been designed with their needs and capacities in mind.
To support Governments in developing and strengthening health and social policies in an ageing world, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a Policy Framework on Active Ageing in 2002. Active ageing policy is defined as “optimizing opportunities for health, participation and security in order to enhance quality of life as people age.” The active ageing approach is grounded in the UN-recognized principles of independence, participation, dignity, care and self-fulfilment. It acknowledges the importance of gender, earlier life experiences, and culture on how individuals age. It takes into account the biological, psychological, behavioural, economic, social and environmental factors that operate over the course of a person’s life to determine health and well-being in later years.
Active ageing age-friendly community
Participation
* Positive images of older persons
* Accessible and useful information
* Accessible public and private transportation
* Inclusive opportunities for civic, cultural, educational and voluntary engagement
* Barrier-free and enabling interior and exterior spacesHealth
* Places and programs for active leisure and socialization
* Activities, programs and information to promote health, social and spiritual well-being
* Social support and outreach
* Accessible and appropriate health services
* Good air/water qualitySecurity and independence
* Appropriate, accessible, affordable housing
* Accessible home-safety designs and products
* Hazard-free streets and buildings
* Safe roadways and signage for drivers and pedestrians
* Safe, accessible and affordable public transportation
* Services to assist with household chores and home maintenance
* Supports for caregivers
* Accessible stores, banks and professional services
* Supportive neighbourhoods
* Safety from abuse and criminal victimization
* Public information and appropriate training
* Emergency plans and disaster recovery
* Appropriate and accessible employment opportunities
* Flexible work practices
Compiled from various sources.
More on Active Aging and Age-Friendly Cities:
CARP Endorsement
http://www.carp.ca/display.cfm?DocumentID=2038&cabinetID=263&libraryID=70
Neighborhoods Fit for People
http://www.adaptiveenvironments.org/index.php?option=Project&Itemid=36
Age-friendly primary health care
http://www.who.int/ageing/projects/age_friendly_standards/en/index.html
Saanich, BC Contribution
http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2005-2009/2007HEALTH0111-001220.htm
Making Communities More Age-Friendly
http://myuminfo.umanitoba.ca/index.asp?sec=7&too=100&dat=3/21/2007&sta=2&wee=4&eve=8&npa=12470

I have not spoken to the instructor, Leslie Robinson, at the Tourism Train the Trainer Institute at the University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada but I like her approach. It would seem inevtitably to lead to open-mindedness about Inclusive Tourism:
We teach tourism differentlyWe use simulations and experiential learning to engage participants. We keep them doing, thinking, feeling, smelling, tasting, and hearing tourism while still in the classroom.
Our curriculum activates sound learning theory and national occupational standards stimulating learning while having fun…all in easy to use formats… at reasonable rates…
Energize your classes!
More information:
http://www.uvcs.uvic.ca/csie/course-text.aspx?courseCode=edpd140
How do we market to the Baby Boomer generation as it moves into its prime leisure travel years? The first step is to know the generation intimately enough to craft a message that speaks to them uniquely.
Even with my own participant-observer status from inside the generation I find myself drawn to writers exploring the topic.
Leonard Steinhorn writes a history of the cohort in The Greater Generation: In Defense of the Baby Boom Legacy. He writes about the distinguishing characteristics of Boomers and the preceding Greatest Generation:
Greatness can be measured not only by the decisions we must make, but by the decisions we choose to make… The Greatest generation deserves every bit of credit for protecting democracy when it was threatened; but baby Boomers deserve even more credit for enriching democracy and fulfilling its promise when neither war nor catastrophe nor necessity compelled them to do it.
Later, discussing the generational principles of asserting diversity as a moral value, he adds,
Perhaps the most noble example of diversity in action is the disability rights movement, which is based on the idea that even those with the most crippling handicap can contribute equally to society if given the chance, and that because of their disability they have a unique perspective from which we all can learn.
While from inside, as a person with a disability, the characterization of disability culture as “noble” rankles as observation from a patronizing distance uninformed by immersion in it or conviviality with its “natives.” Still, Steinhorn is correct to imply that people with disabilities enrich democratic society by inextricably – and literally – embodying a different perspective.
What Susan Wendell, author of The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability, has said about insight into the body can just as easily be applied to insight about the collective body known as society:
Not only do physically disabled people have experiences which are not available to the able-bodied, they are in a better position to transcend cultural mythologies about the body, because they cannot do things the able-bodied feel they must do in order to be happy, 'normal,' and sane....If disabled people were truly heard, an explosion of knowledge of the human body and psyche would take place.
For the past two years I have had the privilege of working in Mary Furlong's first entrepreneurial venture, SeniorNet. There I directed curriculum development and assisted in the opening of new centers designed to allow seniors to master technology skills in a peer-educator environment. As we all watched firsthand the emerging cross-fertilization between Greatest and Boomer generations it was not until this year when she published her book on marketing to Boomers, Turning Silver into Gold, that I learned we had another common interest – the transformation of the travel industry and its unique meaning for Boomers:
Travel is the one business category that covers all the themes outlined in this book. It is a global business; it benefits from increases in longevity, health, and wellness; it caters to the boomer's hunger for family and community; it is being transformed by online services and other technology; it is a purchase that often accompanies life transitions; it offers learning and enhances creativity, and it feeds a hunger for spirituality and service.
You will need to read the book yourself to unpack her insights but I want to tie all these quotes together with an observation about Boomers and the Disability Rights Movement.
The modern Disability Rights Movement was born in the 1950’s. It came of age in the 1970’s. It exerted mature influence on society in the 1980’s, 1990’s, and continues to do so today.
The Disability Rights Movement is a Boomer phenomenon. Its founding leadership is Boomers. They fought for – and won – the social recognition, political influence, and consumer clout that are now taken for granted by an entire feisty generation now moving into the even feistier stage known as old age.
To market travel successfully to Boomers it is necessary to is to know Disability Rights Movement values, history, and culture intimately enough to craft a message that speaks to them uniquely. They are not two entities. We, with our disabilities earned earlier in life, have just been running beta tests on aging day in and day out for a generation while we waited for our Boomer peers to catch up.
Now we’re ready to travel in style!
The figures are almost unbelievable. That’s why I rarely quote them in print:
American adults with disabilities or reduced mobility currently spend an average of 13.6 billion U.S. dollars a year on tourism. In 2002, these individuals made 32 million trips and spent 4.2 billion dollars on hotels, 3.3 billion on airline tickets, 2.7 billion on food and beverages, and 3.4 billion on trade, transportation, and other activities. The most popular international destinations for this tourist segment are: (1) Canada; (2) Mexico; (3) Europe; and (4) the Caribbean, in that order.
More remarkable, from my perspective as someone who has traveled extensively in the 35 years since I began to use a wheelchair, is that the travel behavior of people with disabilities has entered into the thinking of mainstream industry professionals.
Responding to the business opportunity – because building codes and social custom often do not mandate the level of accommodation expected by senior or disabled travelers - sites and suppliers subscribe to the core value sets of Inclusive Tourism and Inclusive Destination Development as part of their business sustainability strategy. These inclusion practices arise from the application of the seven principles of Universal Design developed by the Disability Rights Movement. Inclusion itself is one of the principles of the tourism industry’s Integrated Quality Management (IQM) philosophy. Slowly a coherent industry perspective is evolving. Principles for managing the tourism experience of disabled and senior tourists have emerged from sustained observation of the travel behavior of this niche and from dialogue within the communities themselves.
At the same time the disposable income of this demographic is being recognized, the group is growing rapidly in size. In countries with population inversions seniors outnumber youth. There governments have become innovative. Paying for tourism infrastructure with an income stream generated by these visitors has become a new means of upgrading services for their own aging citizens. Attracting this underserved travel niche becomes a marketing imperative. Studies of the travel behavior of this niche are receiving increasing attention because crafting a persuasive story requires understanding the hospitality needs of these travelers with the range of sensory functions, stamina, or mobility options that come with aging and disability. Communicating that message then requires attention to the accessibility (usability) of the media selected.
Australia has long been a leader in Inclusive Tourism through the scholarship of academics like Dr. Simon Darcy and Dr. Tanya Packer as well as the market-creating work of Bruce Cameron. National tourism policy has been reviewed and amended to raise inclusion as a priority. With a whole government approach to this goal and aided by dialogue within the national tourism industry on its value the groundwork has been laid for the entire country to be marketed as a destination of choice for persons with disabilities.
Grasping the market potential the Convention Bureau of Perth, Western Australia initiated a rebate program for venues that actively pursue development of accessibility and agree to reinvest the rebate in further infrastructure development. Major tourist attraction in Sydney have collaborated in a co-marketing strategy to provide online stories of “quintessential experiences” of travelers with various disabilities visiting the cities’ most prominent destinations.
This human-centered design approach to tourism product development has begun to converge with an eco-sensitive ethic and a responsible tourism approach. The resulting sustainable Universal Design philosophy appears in consensus documents such as the Rio Charter: Universal Design for Sustainable and Inclusive Development. It surfaced as a theme in Australia’s NICAN conference on Inclusive Tourism in 2004 and in Taiwan’s first International Accessible Tourism Conference in 2005 and the International Conference on Accessible Tourism in Bangkok in 2007. It will be the focus of a similar conference in Singapore in 2009 and of the Turismo Para Todos Conference scheduled for May 2008 in Brazil.
Stories of systemic inclusion at this level travel through both the industry and the consumer market. They are triggering imitation and bringing out visitors. Destinations that adopt an integrated approach to the management of the experience of senior and disabled travelers stand to benefit from a market that studies report is underserved and eager to travel.

O nosso segredo ja não é segredo:
Estimativa da Febraban mostra que o mercado de pessoas com deficiência movimenta cerca de R$ 100 bilhões por ano.
A guia IBDD e bom para pesquisar onde gastar nosso dineiro:
A idéia de um guia de acessibilidade para o Rio de Janeiro não é nova no meio das pessoas com deficiência e muito menos no IBDD. O que torna esta iniciativa de agora diferente é que idealizamos uma publicação para prestar um serviço da maneira mais direta possível, sem academicismos. Além disso, atribuindo-lhe total objetividade e, ao mesmo tempo, valorizando o que esteja de acordo com as normas de acessibilidade, só entrou no guia o que é acessível. O que não é acessível, obviamente não interessa às pessoas com deficiência.
Outra obviedade que caracteriza este guia é que não procuramos “reinventar a roda” e assumimos os modelos de texto consagrados por guias de turismo e páginas de programação cultural e de lazer dos jornais e revistas. Acreditamos que isso facilitará a assimilação das informações da nossa publicação. A estes padrões acrescentamos apenas informações pertinentes às pessoas com deficiência e o uso do símbolo internacional de acessibilidade, à semelhança das estrelas usadas para categorizar hotéis.
Guia IBDD do Rio Acessível em PDF:
Página 1
Página 2
Página 3
Páginas 4 e 5
Página 6
Página 7
Página 8
We will discuss Inclusive Tourism within a rights-based framework at Asia's second international conference promoting Inclusive Tourism in Bangkok November 21-24, 2007. The following was the Opening Keynote for the 2005 International Conference on Accessible Tourism in Taipei, Taiwan.
Below is the text of my opening keynote presentation at the 2005 International Conference on Accessible Tourism in Taipei, Taiwan.
In March of this year Steve Fossett made history when he took off from Salina, Kansas in the USA and flew his airplane, the GlobalFlyer, for 67 hours nonstop in a solo around-the-world flight. I have only one half hour to take you all the way around the world and tell you about accessible tourism. Fasten your seatbelts. This will be a very quick flight!The story of accessible tourism as a growing part of the tourism industry could begin at many different points. Soon the first history of accessible tourism will be published in the Review of Disability Studies. The authors Laurel van Horn and Jose Isola explain how improvements in medicine have allowed disabled people to live longer; improvements in equipment such as wheelchairs, hearing aids, or computers that speak for us allow us to be more active; entrepreneurs and other risk-takers with disabilities have started travel agencies, sports leagues, and outdoor expeditions expanding our imaginations and challenging us to ever larger goals.
And always, there is the fact that year-by-year the Baby Boomers � who love to travel � become older and more become disabled. They will become the main characters in the next chapter of the history of accessible travel. Even before that, even now, this story about how we got to where we are today is full of enough heroes and villains for me to entertain you for a long time.
But we are taking the quick tour. I will let you read the article for yourselves when we publish it.
For today, let's start this tour of accessible tourism by looking a moment more at commercial aviation.
The airline industry now has mature airplane technology, well-tested airport design and a very large and growing customer base. It was not always that way.
Taiwan has two international airports served by numerous airlines and receiving thousands of passengers annually. Air links to the world are essential to Taiwan's economic health. For many people, air travel has become as common as travel by bus, subway, or taxi. This is because the transition from propeller to jet engine airplanes made it possible for these large numbers of people to move across great distances rapidly and in comfort. Comfort may include pressurized cabins with oxygenated air for someone with compromised lungs, attendants to assist with boarding for those unstable on their legs, and space for equipment like a wheelchair or a companion animal for someone who is blind. Unfortunately, sometimes, the airlines are tempted to define comfort so that it serves only the few.
How does an industry innovate to survive once it becomes as large and taken for granted as the airlines? It looks ways to increase income from its current customers and looks to attract new ones.
When businesses realized that they must compete for our business or lose us - that is when the story got interesting to me.
I believe that the travel industry, not governments or social entrepreneurial agencies will make the next revolutionary contribution to the rights of people with disabilities.
The travel industry will become promoters of our human rights because we have spent more than 30 years tirelessly forcing governments to treat us as real human beings and have created social and non-profit agencies to work for us. These laws and educational resources make it possible for something new to happen. The travel industry will find partners in government because tourism by people with disabilities can partially pay for the infrastructure changes needed to treat disabled citizens justly - and meet the coming challenge of our aging populations. The travel industry will do this - and is already doing this - because it can profit from us.
As air travel expanded in the last 15 - 20 years there were also strong movements for the rights of people with disabilities around the world. You probably have all heard of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the ADA. It protects the civil rights of people with disabilities in the USA and allows them to participate freely in society. In the air however it is the Air Carrier Access Act, the ACAA, that regulates the industry and makes accessible tourism possible. In the airport and in hotels it is the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG). These regulations are made concrete through the work of designers like Coco Raynes and researchers like Kate Hunter-Zaworski who evaluates airline seating or Harry Wolfe who advises airport managers on the needs of older travelers. These pioneers use a design philosophy called Universal Design that seeks to include people with the broadest range of capacities and abilities in everything that it built.
So, what history teaches us when we start the story of accessible tourism from the airline industry, is that at a certain point the industry needed new customers. It was pressured by law to allow people with disabilities to become customers and it found technically competent individuals who understood the physical needs of people with disabilities. These technically competent individuals used Universal Design to make human rights real in our day-to-day life. They opened up new parts of the world to travelers with disabilities. Finally, we became treated as customers not patients or obstacles.
Today excellent studies exist on the tourism potential of people with disabilities. Some studies were done by the United Nations UNESCAP, by Keroul of Canada, and by the European Union but it was pioneers like Simon Darcy in Australia and Eric Lipp in the USA who gave tourism professionals the business tools they could use to act - and to make money.
I encourage you to read "From Anxiety to Access" by Simon and the "Travel Behavior Surveys" by Eric. In fact, I would even suggest that someone here today take on the task of translating them into Chinese. I say this, not only because they are historic documents that launched the current phase of accessible tourism, but because we would all like to see similar studies on Taiwan shape the future of accessible travel in the Asia Pacific region.
Eric's study found that:
The 42 million disabled travelers in the USA take 31.7 million trips per year, and spend $13.6 billion annually. Major areas of spending include $3.3 billion on airfare, $4.2 billion on hotel accommodations, and $2.7 billion on food and beverage. In addition, adults with disabilities patronize restaurants about once a week, and they account for $35 billion in annual revenue for restaurants.
Simon's study found that:
On average 80-90% of all travel by people with a physical disability is with a partner/caregiver, family or friends who do not have a disability. Of those who undertook travel with other people with a disability most traveled with 1-2 other people with a disability.
That is a lot of people with a lot of money to spend - and those are only consumer numbers from the USA.
It was the ocean cruise ship industry, not the airlines, who first learned how to turn those words into profit. When they created their successful business models they made accessible tourism sustainable. Part of their success came from understanding a simple concept that people with mobility difficulties know as "the path of travel."
Cruise ships are compact universes. If you can conveniently locate a tourist's necessities - and guarantee that the tourist can get to them with minimal effort - then you have a formula for success. In other words, do not just make a table in a restaurant accessible. Make a destination, like a restaurant, accessible from every possible starting point in the ship, or resort, or city. Create an accessible "path of travel" to an accessible destination and then you have an accessible product not just one special accessible item. You have a reason for tourists not only to pass through but to stay.
Today, whole regions, states, and countries are learning these simple facts. I want to tell you about some on our quick trip around the world. I hope that you will tell me about many more while we are together here.
To the south of us, Australia takes accessible tourism quite seriously for both domestic and international tourists. The Convention Bureau there in Perth, Western Australia has a program called "Beyond Accessibility." It requires the hotels to use from 10% to 15% of the profit they make from the conventions brought to them by the Convention Bureau for upgrading the hotel's accerssibility.
In Australia's state of Tasmania, the Devil's Playground does something unique in the entire world with the concept of "paths of travel." Kerry & Jane Winberg have purchased several properties throughout the seven tourist regions of the island. Each location is fully wheelchair accessible. In addition, they have purchased their own bus with a lift. Thus, any place in the entire state can be visited in a comfortable day trip. As a result, the entire island is open to travelers with disabilities. I traveled around Tasmania as one of their first guests last September. We taught shopkeepers and tourist site managers about the potential of this market and what they could do to improve their appeal to travelers with disabilities. Now, my colleague Neil Robinson is doing an economic feasibility study to see if this model can be applied in Western Australia.
In the Atlantic Ocean, one of the Canary Islands known as Tenerife lies sixty miles off the coast of North Africa. There lives one of the pioneers of the European Tourism for All movement, Jose Ignacio Delgado. His work has strengthened the legal rights of Europeans with disabilities. He has promoted the civil rights and improved access to services for Canary Island residents with disabilities. He consults with the tourism industry and his accessibility directory for Tenerife is a model sophisticated online resource offering tourism information for travelers with disabilities.
Farther north in the Atlantic, the United Kingdom is developing accessible tourism very rapidly since their anti- discrimination act has come into force. One especially well-done project is the online travel agency and accessible destination datable known as the "Good Access Guide" by Richard Thompson. Richard is one of the 92 colleagues from around the world who I asked to help me research this talk and who have contributed to the online discussions we have going in Brazil, Canada, and the United States on the five themes we will discuss in our Breakout Sessions at this conference.
Also at this conference, we will learn about Japan's leadership in accessible travel. Takayama city is only one example of the way Japan is teaching the rest of the world how to live with a spirit of inclusion. Their unique contribution is to recognize that older citizens benefit from the accessibility that makes a place livable and attractive to tourists with disabilities.
Architects, and their students, from the Rhode Island School of Design take a different approach. They are linking environmentally sensitive -"green" - construction methods and building materials with accessibility. They are creating an accessible eco-lodge at St. John's in the US Virgin Islands This resort, known as Concordia Estates, allows people with disabilities close access to unspoiled nature.
The tourist hotels in Hawai'i have gone beyond simple compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. They can provide guests with comfortable accessible rooms, advise them on accessible places for food and entertainment, or arrange for things such as a specialized beach wheelchair to rent that will set mobility disabled visitors loose on the beach.
All these tourist destinations have learned the cruise ship secret of success. Disabled tourists will come when they find variety, value, service, and accessibility woven together seamlessly. They are learning to include people with disabilities as free and equal participants in leisure activities.
Now, notice something about these examples. Hawai'i, St. John's, Japan, te United Kingdom, Tenerife, and Tasmania are all islands. It seems that innovation in accessible tourism, at this point in history, is flourishing in places that are manageably small and administratively unified. Is it possible that an island like Taiwan will become a world-class example of accessible tourism? The fact that we are all gathered here for this conference makes me think that Taiwan plans to become just such a leader.
We have a name for the model that is developing in the areas that I just mentioned. We call it "Inclusive Destination Development." The phrase combines two other phrases "Inclusive Development" from economic development practice and "Destination Development" from the tourism industry.
The World Bank promotes "Inclusive Development" as economic and regional development that allows for full social participation of people with disabilities.
"Destination Development" is the phrase used by the tourism industry to describe the strategic application of planning, development, and marketing resources to enhance a location as a desired destination for travelers. Inclusive Destination Development uses the word "Inclusive", in the sense it is used by the World Bank, to mean "allowing for the full social participation of people with disabilities."
Thus, Inclusive Destination Development is "the systematic and strategic application of resources to make a location become a destination of choice for persons with disabilities."
The goal of Inclusive Tourism is to accommodate the broadest range of tourists possible without stigma or the need for special accommodation. Inclusive Destination Development is the primary means of establishing Inclusive, or as we will be calling it at this conference, "Accessible" Tourism.
Inclusive Tourism is one important means through which persons with disabilities participate in society at a distance from their homes. At the same time, the presence of these tourists provides a model - and source of funding - for the inclusive practices and infrastructure necessary for these human rights to be extended to local residents. Inclusive Tourism partially funds Inclusive Destination Development. Inclusive Tourism is an example of democratization and the dissemination of human rights through a market-driven mechanism.
Earlier I mentioned the concept "path of travel." When we design places so that people with disabilities can enter, participate in, and leave freely we also allow access for economic resources and the very concept of freedom.
At this conference we commit ourselves to building the Asian portion of this path. I look forward to building it with you. So do the millions of people around the world who will also come here to travel it.
This presentation also appeared as an article at Suiote 101.
Position Announcement
California University of Pennsylvania announces a position in Tourism Studies with a specialization in tourism geography and an emphasis on tourism planning and development. Here is an opportunity to further Inclusive Destination Development.
Rank and Salary
This is a tenure track faculty appointment. Salary is competitive and commensurate with academic preparation and experience. An excellent fringe benefits package is included.
Application
To be considered, applicants must submit in hard copy all of the following:
* Letter of application highlighting the applicants' qualifications in teaching, research, and service;
* A full curriculum vita;
* Official transcripts from all colleges and universities attended (unofficial transcripts are acceptable for review purposes);
* Names, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses of three professional references that have current knowledge of the applicants' abilities in teaching, research, and service.
Please submit via regular mail (please no email or faxed applications). Veterans should forward a copy of form DD214 to the Office of Social Equity, 250 University Ave, Box 9, California, Pennsylvania 15419.
Application Deadline October 19, 2007. Electronic submissions are permitted.
Send complete application except DD214 (if veteran) to:
Dr. Susan Ryan, Chair, Search Committee
Department of Earth Sciences
250 University Avenue, Box 55
California University of Pennsylvania
California, PA
15419
Phone: 724-938-4531
Fax: 724-938-5780
Email: ryan@cup.edu
www.cup.edu/employment
Integrity, Civility, and Responsibility are the official core values of California University of Pennsylvania, an affirmative action/ equal opportunity employer. Women, minorities, veterans and the physically challenged are encouraged to apply.
_________________________________________________________________
Susan Ryan, Ph.D. is Program Director of the Bachelor of Arts in Geography: Travel and Tourism Concentration
A World Tourism Organisation TedQual (Tourism Education Quality) Certified Program
Program Director of the 100% Online Master of Arts: Tourism Planning and Development
California University of Pennsylvania
250 University Ave California, Pennsylvania 15419
724-938-4531; 724-938-5780 (fax) ryan@cup.edu
www.cup.edu/go/tourism
The International Council for Building Research and Innovation (CIB) Working Commission 084 “Building Comfortable Environments for All” invites you to submit high quality research papers for the International Meeting in 2008 in USA.
“Building Comfortable and Liveable Environments for All”
May 15- 16, 2008, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA
Topic Areas:
The principal topics were decided during the Technical Meeting of the WC in Cape Town, South Africa, last May. After a long discussion there and a further revision with the WC Members not attendant in May these are the subjects:
Costs of accessibility
Harmonisation of legislation and standards
Sports, Recreation and Accessible Environments
Education and Training
Universal Design at the urban scale
Technological tools supporting the accessible environment
Challenges in developing countries
The timetable for processing abstracts and papers is as follows:
Submission of abstract
15th December 2007
Notification of acceptance of abstract
20th January 2008
Submission of first draft of paper
1st March 2008
Refereeing decision
31st March 2008
Submission of final paper
20th April 2008
Submission of abstracts
Abstracts (approximately 150-200 words) should be submitted, by email. Please include your correct email and postal address with the abstract. Submission for publication of papers should be submitted in the same way. They must not exceed 10 sides of A4 and must follow the standard template to be provided with further notice.
Abstracts must be sent by email to:
l.biocca@itc.cnr.it or
Organizers
CIB International Council for Research and Innovation in Building, National Research Council, the Construction Technologies Institute and the Georgia Institute of Technology Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access/College of Architecture.
Background And Scope
The demand for comfortable, livable built environments for all is continuously creating new challenges in design. The need to accommodate the diversities of all cultures in personal requirements and lifestyles and to enable all individuals to participate in local and global society has opened the door for researchers and designers to meet the demand. The international goal is to meet the widest range of needs to the majority of our global population regardless of age, abilities and culture in both developed and developing countries.
This meeting will join people from different countries to discuss these issues and propose ways to address them. It will be an opportunity to exchange both unique and common experiences, knowledge and ideas, bringing to the table new perspectives and hopefully encourage research initiatives that would address the demand we are all experiencing.
Objectives
The objectives of the CIB WG084/2008 Meeting are as follows:
- To explore and discuss challenges, issues and priorities that concern creating a built environment for all.
- To explore and discuss how developing countries can address these challenges, what may be learned and adapted from developed countries, and how we can all join together to meet the international goal of creating a built environment for all.
- To present and demonstrate how research and innovation can be used to help all countries address current and future demands of building inclusive environments for all.
Who should attend the Meeting?
The CIB WG084/2008 Meeting is a major event for practitioners, public administrations and researchers from developing and developed countries in the areas of design, education, accessibility and usability of facilities, support of home technologies and daily life independence.
It is a significant event for accessing recent research results from different countries, to share knowledge and to network globally with experts around the world. The meeting will bring together an international audience mostly of academics, researchers, educators and policy-makers.
Language
The official language of the Meeting is English.
Organising Bodies
CIB is the world’s foremost organization for construction researchers and practitioners. With its headquarters in Rotterdam, CIB is an international body dedicated to the research and documentation of the building industry. It brings together professionals from a broad spectrum of building organizations worldwide. The unrivalled collection of expertise of the more than 600 members is organized through a network of working commissions whose subject matter extends over every area of building and construction. Web: www.cibworld.nl
CNR (National Research Council, Italy) was founded in 1923, while the Construction Technologies Institute started its building research activities in 1962, inclusive of most key-areas of the construction sector, from materials to components, to whole systems. The Unit of Rome is long involved in the topics of Design for All and Home technologies; it is also the Coordinator of this CIB Working Commission 084. Web: www.roma.itc.cnr.it
The Georgia Institute of Technology is one of the nation's top research universities, distinguished by its commitment to improving the human condition through advanced science and technology. Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), the Institute offers many nationally recognized, top-ranked programs. Web: www.gatech.edu
*****************************
More information on Livable Communities:
National Council on Disabilities Report
http://www.smco-cod.org/vgn/images/portal/cit_609/5/33/610395300livablecommunities.pdf
C. Mahesh, Advocacy Coordinator for the CBR Forum has provided the following analysis of India's Civil Aviation regulations.
Sub: Issuance of Civil Aviation Requirements, Section 3, Series M, Part I on Carriage by Air of Disabled Passengers or Person with Reduced Mobility
With reference to your letter JDG/AT/2007, Dated: 30th Aug 2007
Firstly I would like to thank you and DGCA for considering our feedback and comments favorably for the above mentioned CAR and for your prompt actions.
As you have mentioned in the letter I noticed that there is substantial revision from the earlier CAR and we greatly regard and respect this action.
The following are my comments to the revised CAR.
1 Section 1.1 – It reads as if Persons with disabilities are now able to travel because of 'Low Cost and Low Frill' airlines. This is not true as persons with disabilities have been using air travel for a 'long long' time because it is convenient and one can avoid overnight journeys. The paragraph is 'Patronising' and reads like a favour is being done for 'Disabled Passengers or Person with Reduced Mobility'. Therefore I would suggest that section 1.1 stops at the line ending "….the common man with average income group to travel by air".
2 Section 1.1 - The line starting from "Whereas persons with disabilities…" should be a new paragraph and should be rewritten as "Whereas persons with disability or persons with reduced mobility like everyone else are increasingly given the possibility to travel by air….". In this way persons with disabilities are being considered as an equal to every other passenger.
3 Section 3.1 – Definitions – the issue that a disabled person is not able to travel independently is not only because of physical or any other limitation in the individual but it also to do with the physical structure of the airports and the imposed practices/ procedures. For example: Wheelchairs cannot enter the toilets designed for disabled passengers. There needs to be an additional line in the definition that acknowledges the barriers imposed by the facilities at the airport/ airline and the air plane that in fact disables a person. Therefore there need to be a change in the sentence to acknowledge this barrier "Disabled person or person with reduced mobility means any person whose mobility when using transport is reduced due to any physical disability……. or any other cause of disability, or age or due to the architectural barriers/ barriers caused by structural/ procedural requirements and whose situation needs appropriate attention…"
4 Section 3.2 – The use of the word 'abnormal' is inappropriate and dehumanizing. Who is considered 'normal?'. People for no apparent reason behave badly/ rudely do you consider them 'normal'? Therefore I suggest that the word abnormal should be deleted, the sentence "or from obvious abnormal physical or mental conditions" should be reframed as – "or from observations observed and reported by airline personnel"
5 Section 4.1, Sub Section b – The sentence starting from "Airlines should develop emergency evacuation procedures" should be a new paragraph and not clubbed with the previous line as they are two different points.
6 Section 4.4 is the most important welcome change that acknowledges that many persons with disabilities may not need an escort. Therefore the present Section 4.4 should re-ordered and should be 4.3.
7 Section 4.3 mentions about "No airlines should be refused to carry persons traveling…severe mobility impairments….if they are accompanied by an escort" should be re-ordered and should become 4.4
8 Section 4.5 mentions about "assistance booths/ counters" - this alone is not sufficient there should also be appropriate buses/ vehicles that must be available inside the airport for transfer from one terminal to another – For example in Mumbai airport they have a Volvo bus to transfer passengers from domestic to international terminal – however the buses has steep steps and one cannot lift the passenger with the wheelchair inside the bus – and the passenger with disability has to instead come out of the airport and take a private taxi cutting across traffic to reach the international terminal.
9 Section 6.3 – Other Assistive Devices – Passengers carrying 'spare calipers' or 'mobility aid' must be able to take the same as a hand baggage and the airline should not insist on checking-in this baggage as these devices could be prone to breakage. These assistive devices are essential for the mobility and independence of the disabled persons and in addition they are not ready-made products that can be replaced/ purchased to compensate the passenger.
10 Section 7.4 mentions about 'In Transit off loading' and Section 7.6 mentions about 'Transit Stations' – However there is no mention of appropriate bus/ transport service to ensure easy and safe transit of disabled passengers. This point needs to be added in the CAR.
11 There is no mention of handling baggage of checked in luggage of disabled passenger. As a rule practiced by all airlines - the passenger with disability or passenger with reduced mobility is the last to deplane. It takes 20-30 minutes for the assistance and wheelchair to arrive inside the airplane and passenger with disability is usually the last one to collect the checked-in baggage from the conveyor belt. Therefore I request DGCA to add a new section - that says - checked-in baggage of disabled passenger should be marked with a 'Priority Tag' and the ground staff at the baggage section should keep the baggage in a safe place till the passenger arrives.
Please do get back to me for any further information/ clarifications. In addition, I would be very happy if you could send me the copy of the finalized CAR.
With kind regards
Best wishes
C. Mahesh
Advocacy Coordinator
--
C. Mahesh
Advocacy Coordinator
CBR Forum
14, CK Garden
Wheeler Road Extension
Bangalore - 560 084
Tel - 080- 2549 7387 or 2549 7388
advocacy.cbrforum@gmail.com
cbrforum@blr.vsnl.net.in
cbrforum@gmail.com
Ananth Krishnan of the Hindu reports on positive developments for air travelers in and to India as theoretical distinctions made by disability scholars find their way into public and governmental discourse.
In the ongoing controversy over civil air regulations in India the definition of disability has been somewhat clarified. Distinguishing between permanent disability and illness, the regulations begin to extricate themselves from the Medical Model of Disability. In so doing they provide clarity for air transport providers while capturing distinctions in passenger functionality relevant to air travel.
Such campaigns for human rights as C. Mahesh, Rajiv Raman, the Community-Based Rehabilitation Forum and Vidyasagar are an ongoing necessity. Often they attract censure when they appear to raise the level of conflict beyond "polite" levels of acquiescence. Unjust regulations, inadequate infrastructure, preemptory expulsion from aircraft, or forced sedation will simply never be tolerated by the community of persons with disabilities.
However, the worldwide disability community now hopes that, with an inkling of the positive social benefit available in adopting the Social Model of Disability as a basis for policy, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation will affirmatively pursue policy that enables the airline industry to profit from the untapped financial resources of travelers with disabilities to the mutual benefit of that community and the tourism industry.
CHENNAI: Following objections from disabled rights groups, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has revised the civil aviation requirements for disabled passengers that were put into effect on August 15.Disabled rights organisations had voiced their protest against the implementation of the guidelines stating that they were not clear enough in their definition of disability. The requirements also made it necessary for disabled passengers to be accompanied by escorts. The disabled rights groups claimed this was discriminatory.
The revised requirements define a disabled person or a person with reduced disability as "any person whose mobility when using transport is reduced due to physical disability (sensory or locomotor, permanent or temporary), intellectual disability or impairment, or any other cause of disability, or age, and whose situation needs appropriate attention."
The requirements also state that airlines "shall not insist for the presence of an escort," acknowledging that "many persons with disabilities do not require constant assistance for their activities." If a passenger declares "independence in feeding, communication with reasonable accommodation, toileting and personal needs," he or she will not have to travel with an escort.
"Welcome relief"
"The revised guideline is a welcome relief," C. Mahesh, advocacy coordinator of the Community-Based Rehabilitation Forum told The Hindu on Thursday. "The earlier version was draconian and would have greatly hampered independent air travel for persons with disabilities."
Mr. Mahesh said that the earlier requirements had not made a distinction between disabled passengers and those with a medical condition.
"Thankfully, this has been done away with," he said. "This distinction is very important because not all disabled persons have a medical condition. Disability is not an illness but a condition that is more or less permanent in nature."
Mr. Mahesh added that the DGCA had written to the disabled rights groups for feedback on the revisions. The revised requirements will come into effect on October 1.The issue of aviation requirements for disabled passengers has come under the spotlight following the prevention of Rajiv Rajan, a cerebral palsy patient, from boarding an Air Sahara flight in Chennai on June 18 for failing to produce a medical certificate. Mr. Rajan was also forced to take a sedative pill before boarding a Jet Airways flight from Mumbai to Chennai two years ago.
According to the new requirements, airlines will no longer have the authority to take such steps.
Disabled passengers who require assistance only in embarking or disembarking, or needing "reasonable accommodation" in flights, cannot be asked by airlines to produce medical certificates.Right to travel
For the disabled rights groups, the revisions are a welcome measure. Mr. Rajan, also an activist with the disabled rights non-governmental organisation Vidyasagar, told The Hindu that the earlier requirements, in particular the
demand for escorts, infringed on a disabled person's right to travel."If the August 15 draft were to come into effect, it would affect my right to movement," he said.
"I travel at least three times a month, so it is very difficult for me to find an escort on my own. It is a violation of my right to be independent."
Source:
http://www.hindu.com/2007/09/07/stories/2007090761741500.htm
Further Readings on Disability Studies and Inclusive Tourism:
Defining the Market of Travelers with Disabilities
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/travel_with_disabilities/110781
Inclusive Tourism: Some Definitions
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/travel_with_disabilities/114773
"Specialness" & Scarcity: The Paternalism Syndrome
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/001674.html
ahistoricality: Progressive Engagement With Disability
http://ahistoricality.blogspot.com/2007/09/progressive-engagement-with-disability.html
Getting the Design Right: Inclusive Destination Development
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/travel_with_disabilities/115176
Os Regulamentos Técnicos da Qualidade referentes à acessibilidade no transporte rodoviário e aquaviário encontram-se em consulta pública por 60 dias, tendo os mesmos sido publicados hoje (04/09) no DO - Diário Oficial.
Estes podem ser acessados na íntegra, na página do Inmetro, no seguinte endereço: http://www.inmetro.gov.br , na margem direita da página, no item Produtos e serviços - consultas públicas ou da link:
http://www.inmetro.gov.br/rtac/resultado_pesquisa.asp?seq_classe=1&sel_categoria=21
Abaixo segue um extrato do título das Portarias que publicam os dois RTQs.
Portaria INMETRO / MDIC número 339 de 31/08/2007
Regulamento Técnico da Qualidade para Inspeção da Adaptação de Acessibilidade em Embarcações Utilizadas no Transporte Coletivo de Passageiros.
Portaria INMETRO / MDIC número 340 de 31/08/2007
Regulamento Técnico da Qualidade para Inspeção da Adaptação de Acessibilidade em Veículos de Características Rodoviárias para o Transporte Colet ivo de Passageiros

Announcing a free e-book for environmental designers, planners, and others
interested in universal design.
Jack L. Nasar, & Jennifer Evans-Cowley (Eds.) (2007). Universal Design and Visitability: From Accessibility to Zoning. Columbus, OH: John Glenn School
of Public Affairs. (Funded in part by the National Endowment for the Arts
Universal Design Leadership Initiative).
You can download the pdf file for free at:
https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24833
If you would prefer to have a paperback addition, you can order it
by sending a check made out to The Ohio State University for 34.99 ($ 29.99
+ 5.00 shipping U.S.)
to:
Jack Nasar
231 Knowlton Hall, 275 W. Woodruff Ave
The Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210
The book introduces the concepts of universal design and visitability. It
presents:
a paradigm for the future
rationale for studying it
design and planning examples
a discussion of design for individuals with vision loss,
planning barrier free transportation facilities
successful county-wide and national policy initiatives
the importance of education, and
considerations of certain cultural barriers to adoption of policies.
It aims to advance your understanding of this ever-widening movement; to
provide the information needed to teach the concept of universal design, and
to plan, design, and draft policy for making spaces comfortably accessible
to everyone.
Contents
Preface
Jack L. Nasar and Jennifer Evans-Cowley
Forward
Deborah Kendrick
The Seven Principles of Universal Design into Planning Practice
Wolfgang F. E. Preiser
Toward Inclusive Housing and Neighborhood Design: A Look at Visitability
Jordana L. Maisel
Universal Design, Architecture and Spatial Cognition without Sight
Shohreh Rashtian
Universal Design in Public Transportation: ³Segway² to the Future
Katharine Hunter-Zaworski
As Your County Gets Older. . . Planning for Senior Housing Needs in Howard
County, Maryland
Stephen Lafferty
Making Universal Design work in Zoning and Regional Planning: A Scandinavian
Approach
Olav Rand Bringa
Research and Teaching Of Accessibility and Universal Design In Brazil:
Hindrances and Challenges In a Developing Country
Cristiane Rose Duarte and Regina Cohen
Universal Design Guidelines to Accommodate Wheelchair Occupants in the Thai
Context
Antika Sawadsri
Universal Design in the Institutional Setting: Weaving a Philosophy into
Campus Planning

Hoje Projeto Viaja Mais Melhor Idade inicia vendas de pacotes. Veja www.viajamais.com.br
Os pacotes e o treinamento das agências participantes tomam conta da inclusão?
Na próxima segunda-feira (27/08) começam as vendas dos pacotes do Viaja Mais Melhor Idade, projeto do Ministério do Turismo (Mtur) para estimular e promover viagens de pessoas acima de 60 anos, aposentados e pensionistas. Para saber onde e como comprá-los, o público poderá acessar o site www.viajamais.com.br ou contatar a Central de Atendimento por meio do telefone 0800 77 07 202, que funciona todos os dias das 8 às 22 horas.Pelo endereço, o visitante terá informações sobre as agências participantes e os pacotes disponíveis. Assim, poderá fazer sua consulta dentre os 14 destinos do projeto e encaminhar sua solicitação a uma agência, ou se preferir, ir pessoalmente aos estabelecimentos credenciados. As primeiras saídas estão programadas para 13 de setembro.
Pela central de atendimento telefônico, também serão fornecidas informações gerais sobre o projeto. O serviço contará com 120 atendentes, treinados por uma equipe técnica da Associação Brasileira das Operadoras de Turismo (Braztoa) e do Mtur. Serão aceitas apenas ligações de telefones fixos.
No início de agosto, mais de 600 pessoas, entre operadores e agentes de viagens, receberam treinamento especial para conhecer as características dos produtos e dos consumidores da melhor idade. Os profissionais foram orientados também para o processo de comercialização dos pacotes. Atualmente no endereço www.queremosviajar.com.br está disponível a versão online, que dará capacitação e credenciamento necessários para aqueles que não fizeram o treinamento presencial.
Fonte: Mercado e Eventos
Do sitio:
O VAI BRASIL é um projeto criado pelo MTur – Ministério do Turismo, em parceria com a Associação Brasileira das Operadoras de Turismo - BRAZTOA e a Associação Brasileira das Agências de Viagem – ABAV com o intuito de fomentar a comercialização de pacotes turísticos em períodos de baixa ocupação nos diversos destinos do Brasil. Os serviços turísticos do VAI BRASIL são disponibilizados ao público, com condições especiais de preços, por meio do website http://www.vaibrasil.com.brOBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS
* aumentar a oferta e a procura para os períodos de baixa ocupação, a fim de minimizar os efeitos da sazonalidade
* aumentar a ocupação da oferta existente
* estimular a articulação entre as empresas do trade turístico e seu comprometimento com as ações do VAI BRASIL
* manter os empregos atuais, diminuir a rotatividade e ampliar a oferta de vagas
* fortalecer o papel do setor turístico como gerador de renda e de desenvolvimento social
* dar oportunidade a todos os integrantes da cadeia produtiva do turismo de divulgar seus produtos em escala nacional
FATORES DE SUCESSO
Pela primeira vez no Brasil um projeto conseguiu mobilizar toda a cadeia produtiva do turismo para dinamizar a produção e comercialização de produtos turísticos no país, por meio de uma estratégia que leva em consideração os interesses de todos os integrantes envolvidos no processo, sem alterar as relações de mercado. O VAI BRASIL privilegia o funcionamento da cadeia produtiva e, principalmente, gera novos clientes e cria oportunidades para a inserção de novos fornecedores e prestadores de serviços turísticos em escala nacional.
Ao reduzirem suas tarifas, os integrantes da cadeia produtiva do turismo ampliam suas oportunidades de negócios no período de baixa ocupação e permitem a uma maior parcela da população viajar pelo Brasil, aumentando assim seus lucros.
Outro fator de sucesso do VAI BRASIL é o apoio do Ministério do Turismo por meio do aporte financeiro para o desenvolvimento da ferramenta eletrônica – website – e sobretudo pela deflagração de uma campanha em todo o país que incentiva o acesso ao sites.
PARTICIPANTES DESTE PROJETO
Nesta fase do projeto podem participar as operadoras de turismo, agências de viagens, companhias aéreas, meios de hospedagem, empresas de receptivo, locadoras de veículos, parques de diversões e empresas de assistência de viagem. Para as fases seguintes, espera-se que outros parceiros, como instituições financeiras, administradoras de cartões de crédito, conventions & visitors bureau, empresas de transporte rodoviário, bares e restaurantes também venham a aderir ao projeto.
ATRIBUIÇÕES DO PARTICIPANTE NO VAI BRASIL
Os fornecedores e prestadores de serviços turísticos devem cadastrar e atualizar seus insumos no website VAI BRASIL, no ambiente B2B Agências de viagens devem fornecer aos clientes informações sobre as opções de pacotes recebidas pelo sistema e interagir com as operadoras para orçar o custo dos produtos e efetivar reservas e vendas Operadoras turísticas devem consultar as tarifas dos insumos cadastrados no ambiente B2B, formatar os pacotes turísticos, cadastrá-los para que sejam divulgados no website e atender às demandas geradas pelo projeto, por meio das agências de viagens
Adaptive Environments is a world-class resource on inclusive design. Their online book, Building a World Fit for People: Designers with Disabilities at Work, is just one example of their work.
From the book:
Taide Buenfil Garza has evolved her work as an architect in several private and public agencies, with increasing focus and passion for accessible design. In December 2000, the newly elected president of Mexico, Vicente Fox, appointed her to be director of citizens' projects in the Office of Representation for the Social Promotion and Inclusion of Disabled Persons. Taide explains, "This is the first time that we have had an office especially for disabled persons. Before this there were specialized but disconnected programs in the health department or social security, but not everywhere where we needed to be.""We have to explain accessibility to everyone, and how that must become the basis for universal design. This is the way to have the whole country working on the type of new society that we are trying to make, a society of inclusion."
- Taide Buenfil Garza
Maurizio Antoninetti is a designer whose passion is urban design, but until recently, he paid his bills working as an accessibility consultant. His interest in urban design began during his undergraduate years at Politecnico di Milano, Italy, where he earned a B. A. with honor in architecture with a major in urbanism in October 1991. The degree program emphasized urban design, social analysis, and geographic information systems (GIS). In the United States, Maurizio recently completed a master of city planning at San Diego State University, and he has just begun a Ph.D. program, also at San Diego State, where he will research human and urban geography."It can be frustrating when you are a consultant in a specialty that's not very well understood and where good design or universal design is condensed to mere accessibility and code compliance."
- Maurizio Antoninetti
Marcelo Guimaraes is an assistant professor at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and the director of ADAPTSE, the university's research lab on accessibility issues. He earned his bachelor's degree in architecture at this same university, in the School of Architecture and Urban Planning (EA-UFMG), in 1982, and a master's in architecture from the School of Architecture and Planning at the University at Buffalo, in 1991. He has recently begun his doctoral study at the College of Design, North Carolina State University (NCSU). The main focus of Marcelo's career is research and education. He aims at making Brazil a more inclusive society for people with disabilities."When I was younger, I accepted barriers almost as an inevitable part of the landscape. Now, even though I must cope with some steps and many attitudinal barriers, I challenge, politely, of course, any and all authorities that stand in the way of a barrier-free world."
- Marcelo Pinto Guimaraes
It's official. It's a megatrend! Universal Design, Visitability, lifespan architecture have broken the generational delimiters and surmounted the stigmas of age an disability. But don't believe me that, "Barrierefreies Leben ist nicht nur für ältere Menschen wichtig - auch Jüngere bevorzugen den Komfort, den diese Wohnungen bieten." Read the opinion of Thomas Beyerle, chief researcher at Allianz-Immobilientochter Degi, in the Financial Times Deutchland article, "Ohne Treppen und Schwellen".
Ebenso würden auch jüngere Menschen Badezimmer bevorzugen, in denen sie zum Duschen nicht erst über den hohen Rand einer Badewanne steigen müssen. Zudem denkt manch 30-Jähriger beim Kauf einer Eigentumswohnung vielleicht auch schon an sein Leben im Alter. Dass sich der neue Trend auch in Deutschland durchsetzen werde, davon ist Degi-Experte Beyerle überzeugt. "Wohnungen und Eigenheime, die nicht barrierefrei sind, werden in wenigen Jahren nur noch mit deutlichen Preisabschlägen vermiet- und veräußerbar sein."Wer heute ein Eigenheim oder eine Eigentumswohnung erwerben will, sollte deshalb unbedingt darauf achten, dass das Objekt entweder bereits barrierefrei ist oder leicht und kostengünstig umgebaut werden kann, rät der Degi-Chefresearcher. In Wohneigentumsanlagen sollte mit den Grundeigentümern schon heute darüber beraten werden, wie die Häuser entsprechend den Bedarfsanforderungen von morgen modernisiert werden können. "Wenn erst die Mieter ausziehen und die Leerstände steigen", sagt Beyerle, "kommen noch mehr Kosten auf die Eigentümer zu."
Ananth Krishnan reports in The Hindu on the questionable air travel policy and policy development procedure that is currently being challenged throughout India. On the positive side the regulation, specifies:
According to the new requirements, “no airline shall refuse to carry physically challenged or incapacitated persons or persons with disabilities,” as long as they “do not pose a threat” to the safety of other passengers or the evacuation procedure for the aircraft.Airlines will also not be permitted to limit the “number or types” of disabled passengers on a particular flight, except “where required for operational reasons.” The procedure for limiting disabled passengers will also be documented. Airlines will now also have to run “sensitisation and developing awareness” training programmes for staff.
Disability rights experts in transportation are providing their colleagues in India with curricula and resources to develop best-of-class trainings drawing from worldwide experience.
Those with training resources to share may send them to Mahesh Chandrasekar below.
On the negative side:
Dhanasekharan, a representative of Vidyasagar, told The Hindu that the August 15 deadline did not give disabled rights groups enough time to respond to the recommendations. “We were shocked to discover that the deadline was to day [August 15],” Mr. Dhanasekharan said. “By just putting it on the DGCA website, how can they expect all of us to be aware of it?” Vidyasagar has written to the DGCA asking it to extend the deadline for implementing the new requirements. “Before they put the requirements into effect, the DGCA has to have a consultation with disabled groups as after all we are the stake-holders,” Mr. Dhanasekharan said. “They clearly seem to not want any suggestions from us.”
Source:
http://www.hinduonnet.com/2007/08/16/stories/2007081660221000.htm
Send training materials to:
C. Mahesh
Advocacy Coordinator
CBR Forum
14, CK Garden
Wheeler Road Extension
Bangalore - 560 084
Tel - 080- 2549 7387 or 2549 7388
It is so encouraging to see the topic of Inclusive Travel breaking out beyond our specialized conferences , academic writing, and policy papers to broadcasting, narrowcasting, books, blog carnivals, and radio!
Jennifer Justice has a piece on Unsicht-Bar in Berlin over at the [with]TV blog. Curt & Chris's AttitudeTV interview with Bonnie Leukowicz is posted below as she works on a follow-up book to her "A Wheelchair Rider's Guide." Watch for Candy Harrington's upcoming book on inclusive travel destinations "101 Accessible Vacations" this October.
Connie Kuusisto, now Blog Master at the [with]tv blog, is taking leadership on a new Disability Blog Carnival on the heel's of Andrea's recent edition on travel.
Way off in the future I will appear on Atlanta AM radio 1620 with the Trip Chicks Wendy Swartzell and Ann Lombardi
eTurboNews reports:
The United States Court of Appeals upheld a lower Federal Court's ruling against American Airlines. The airline forced an elderly woman to check her bag along with necessary medical devices.
The airline lost her checked items.The court found that American Airlines was responsible for her subsequent death after losing the bag.
The lower court has held that American Airlines should pay $226,238.81 to the relatives of the woman because she died soon after her bag was lost.
For the story see, Airline Liable for Death from Lost Baggage
Drs. Tanya Packer and Jennie Small continue to pioneer the field of disability and travel. Their latest study, reported on below, examines the travel behavior of blind travelers and will result in training modules for the industry.
A Clearer Vision to Accessible Travel
Tourism appears to be off the agenda for many of Australia's 480,000 vision-impaired, with research showing they travel even less than other disability groups.
Concern over this low uptake of travel prompted Sustainable Tourism CRC researchers to explore the issue by examining the positive and negative holiday experiences of vision impaired tourists.
Project leader Professor Tanya Packer, Curtin University and chief investigator Dr Jennie Small, University of Technology Sydney, say preliminary findings from studies conducted in Western Australia and New South Wales indicate the quality of the tourist experience is a complex interplay of factors.
"These factors include access to accurate information combined with inclusive attitudes and practices on the part of the tourism industry and personal skill, courage and trust on the part of the traveller," said Professor Packer.
Dr. Margaret Crowley, Chief Executive Officer of the Association for the Blind of Western Australia says that people with vision impairment are like all Australians - they love to travel and enjoy holidays at home and abroad.
"This project will help to turn possibilities into realities for people with blindness and vision impairment, said Dr Crowley.
An outcome of project is the production of a set of Fact Sheets specific to sectors of the industry to facilitate inclusive management and customer service practices.
For further information contact Professor Tanya Packer: t.packer@curtin.edu.au
Information provided by:
Julia Schonharl - Program Coordinator / Communications
ECOT - www.ecotonline.org
9/1 Ratanakosin Rd. T. Watget
A. Muang. Chiang Mai 50000. THAILAND
Tel/Fax +66 53 240 026
M: +66 8 9435 1804
Laurel van Horn of the Open Doors Organization and co-author of "Toward a History of Inclusive Travel" presented the following paper at the 2007 TRANSED Conference. I share it here with gratitude for her permission to do so:
The purpose of this paper is to report and compare the salient findings of recent research on travel by Americans with disabilities. Until 2002, when Open Doors Organization (ODO) sponsored its first nationwide study on travel by adults with disabilities (ODO 2002), conducted by Harris Interactive, there had never been a major, statistically reliable survey on the US disability travel market. No one could say with any assurance what percentage of adults with disabilities were traveling, how frequently, what modes of public transportation they used or how much they spent. This meant that corporations in the travel industry had no data on which to base investment decisions and thus little incentive to do more than the minimum required under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.In 2002 the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) carried out its own Transportation Availability and Use Survey (BTS 2002 cited in BTS 2003) which explored not only travel by public transportation but also private vehicle. Its sample was divided evenly between disabled and non-disabled respondents of all ages. The motivation was the “critical lack of information...[on] transportation use by people with physical, mental or emotional disabilities,” but the goal in this case was “to create an information source for transportation planners and policy makers…” rather than the private sector (BTS 2003, p.3). While it focused primarily on local transportation, the BTS study also covered long distance travel. Findings from this survey have been released in several reports including Freedom to Travel (BTS 2003) and Travel Patterns of Older Americans with Disabilities (Sweeney 2004).
DISABILITY TRAVEL IN THE UNITED STATES:
RECENT RESEARCH AND FINDINGS
Van Horn, Laurel
Open Doors Organization, Chicago, IL, U.S.
laurel@opendoorsnfp.org
SUMMARY
Key Words: accessible travel, long distance, disability travel, air travel
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The purpose of this paper is to report and compare the salient findings of recent research on travel by Americans with disabilities. Until 2002, when Open Doors Organization (ODO) sponsored its first nationwide study on travel by adults with disabilities (ODO 2002), conducted by Harris Interactive, there had never been a major, statistically reliable survey on the US disability travel market. No one could say with any assurance what percentage of adults with disabilities were traveling, how frequently, what modes of public transportation they used or how much they spent. This meant that corporations in the travel industry had no data on which to base investment decisions and thus little incentive to do more than the minimum required under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
In 2002 the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) carried out its own Transportation Availability and Use Survey (BTS 2002 cited in BTS 2003) which explored not only travel by public transportation but also private vehicle. Its sample was divided evenly between disabled and non-disabled respondents of all ages. The motivation was the “critical lack of information...[on] transportation use by people with physical, mental or emotional disabilities,” but the goal in this case was “to create an information source for transportation planners and policy makers…” rather than the private sector (BTS 2003, p.3). While it focused primarily on local transportation, the BTS study also covered long distance travel. Findings from this survey have been released in several reports including Freedom to Travel (BTS 2003) and Travel Patterns of Older Americans with Disabilities (Sweeney 2004).
In 2005, ODO sponsored a second nationwide study which explored in greater depth the barriers facing travelers with disabilities, in airports and airplanes as well as hotels and restaurants (ODO 2005). The 2005 study also examined how these travelers planned and booked trips and identified which destinations, domestic and foreign, are most popular.
Further evidence of the difficulties facing air travelers with disabilities was revealed in September 2005 by the first Annual Report on Disability-Related Air Travel Complaints, presented to the US Congress by the Secretary of Transportation (US DOT 2005). The second such report followed in October 2006 (US DOT 2006). These annual reports, mandated under a federal law known as AIR-21, list complaints by both the disability of the complainant and the nature of the service failure. Since the data is reported in the aggregate for 1) all airlines serving the U.S. market, 2) foreign airlines and 3) domestic airlines, as well as for individual carriers, one can use the reports either to assess the performance of the industry overall or to make an informed decision on which carriers to select or avoid.
Taken together, these studies and reports corroborate and complement each other to provide a detailed portrait of the disability travel market in the US today, including the barriers which may restrict the frequency and types of long distance travel which individuals with disabilities are willing to undertake. Indeed, Open Doors Organization projected that the market could easily double if these problems with service and facilities were resolved (ODO 2002, p.68).
METHODOLOGY AND OBJECTIVES
1. 2002 and 2005 ODO Travel Market Studies
Both studies by the Open Doors Organization were carried out by Harris Interactive using the same methodology for each so as to make trending possible. ODO plans to sponsor its next travel study using identical methodology in 2008, with preliminary qualitative research to be conducted in 2007.
For the 2002 ODO Study, the total sample included 1,037 interviews with adults with disabilities: 534 interviews conducted online, using The Harris Poll Online Database, and 503 interviews conducted by telephone, using a prescreened sample of adults with disabilities from The Harris Poll. Interviewing took place between September 23 and October 9, 2002. The interviews were an average of 21 minutes in length, both online and by telephone. To develop the questionnaire, ODO held focus groups within the disability community in Chicago and also conducted telephone interviews with business leaders from across the US (ODO 2002, p.5).
Disability was defined as “having blindness, deafness or a condition that substantially limits one or more basic physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting or carrying” (ODO 2002, p.5). Respondents were screened based on these criteria using a variation of the 2000 Census question. Fifteen percent of the general adult population (or more than 31 million adults aged 18 and older) defines themselves as having one or more of these characteristics. This data on the incidence of adults with disabilities was obtained through The Harris Poll (The Harris Poll November 2002 cited in ODO 2002) and based on the 209,128,094 people aged 18 years and older in the US population, according to the 2000 US Census. The data was weighted to represent the populations with these disabilities aged 18 and older.
In 2005, the methodology used was identical to that of the earlier study (ODO 2005). The total sample consisted of 1,373 interviews among adults with disabilities, 871 online and 502 by phone. Interviewing took place between February 8 and 28, 2005. Interviews were an average of 21 minutes in length on the telephone and 16 minutes online. The data was weighted as in 2002, with the data on the incidence of adults with disabilities obtained by The Harris Poll (The Harris Poll November 2005 cited in ODO 2005) and based again on the 2000 US Census.
For the 2002 ODO Study, the key objectives were to: 1) “measure general travel behaviors including how often adults with disabilities are traveling, with whom, how much they spend, and on which sources of information they rely to make decisions;”
2) “gauge experiences with airlines, cruise lines, restaurants, and hotels;” 3) “determine how well the needs of adults with disabilities are being met by airlines and hotels;” 4) “quantify the top services/products that would encourage adults with disabilities to fly and stay in hotels more often;” and 5) “estimate the current and potential economic impact of the disability community” (ODO 2002, p.4).
For the 2005 ODO Study, the key objectives were to 1) “measure general travel behaviors including how often adults with disabilities are traveling, how much money they spend, and which sources of information they rely on to make decisions;” 2) “gauge experiences with airlines, airports, car rental agencies, hotels, and restaurants;”
3) “determine the obstacles that adults with disabilities encounter with airlines, airports, hotels, and restaurants;” 4) “estimate the current and potential economic impact of the disability community;” and 5) “compare 2005 findings to the 2002 study to uncover possible trends and differences over time” (ODO 2005, p.4).
2. BTS 2002 National Transportation Availability and Use Survey
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics study involved 5,019 interviews, 2,321 with individuals who self-identified as having a disability and 2,698 with non-disabled individuals. By surveying equal numbers of persons with and without disabilities, the BTS study sought “to compare the two groups and identify common transportation uses and problems as well as uses and problems unique to each group” (BTS 2003, p.14). Persons of any age, including children, were eligible although proxy interviews were used for those under 16, 16-17 year-olds living with adults, and those unable to complete the interview due to their disability (BTS 2003, p.13). The interviews took place between July 12, 2002 and September 29, 2002 (BTS 2003, p.14).
Because the methodology, sampling and weighting techniques used in the BTS survey are complex, readers are referred to the Freedom to Travel report (BTS 2003, p.12-16) for a full description. In brief, a nationally representative set of telephone numbers was first selected through list-assisted random-digit dialing techniques. A two-stage process of computer-assisted telephone interviewing was then used to select and survey the respondents. During the first screener interview, households who had someone with a disability were identified. In the second extended interview, the selected respondent was asked to confirm his or her disability status before answering the survey questions. In order to ensure full access, interviews were also conducted via TTY or TDD and the questionnaire was available by mail and Internet.
Survey respondents were asked to “self-identify disability according to several definitions, specifically: the Census 2000 definition, the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) definition, which considers disability as a ‘physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities;’ and if a child in the household received ‘special education services’” (BTS 2003, p.3). However, disability data presented in Freedom to Travel (BTS, 2003) and Travel Patterns of Older Americans with Disabilities (Sweeney, 2004) are only from respondents who self-identified using the Census 2000 disability definition in order to provide comparability with the Census.
Topics covered in the survey included: 1) “frequency of travel outside the home, including trip purpose, mode of transportation, frequency of use of different modes, need for assistance, and satisfaction with transportation services;” 2) “availability of paratransit (curb-to-curb service) and respondent use of paratransit;” 3) “motor vehicle ownership, use and safety issues, including vehicles modified for use by people with disabilities;” and 4) “experiences when using various modes of travel, including difficulties with public and private transportation” (BTS 2003, p.3). This paper will focus just on topics related to long distance travel and transportation.
3. US DOT Annual Reports on Disability Related Air Travel Complaints
In July 8, 2003, the US Department of Transportation published a final rule to implement the requirements of the Wendell H. For Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (Public Law 106-181), known as AIR-21. The rule requires all air carriers operating to, from or within the United States and using at least one aircraft having a designated seating for more than 60 passengers to report complaints of discrimination or lack of accessibility by passengers with disabilities (US DOT 2005, p.1). The Secretary of Transportation, in turn, must issue an annual report to the US Congress summarizing these complaints. Prior to AIR-21, the DOT had access to only those complaints sent directly to them, a fraction of the whole, which made it hard to judge how well the airlines serving the US market were abiding by the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986, which prohibits discriminatory treatment of persons with disabilities in air transportation.
To make the reporting process manageable, the airlines must use the DOT’s standardized categories for the passenger’s type of disability and the nature of their complaint, each numbering 13 in all. The aggregate results are presented in the form of grids which allows one to match type of disability with nature of complaint (US DOT 2005, 2006).
The first required report to Congress covered disability-related complaints received by the carriers during the calendar year 2004 and due to the DOT by January 25, 2005. The second report covers the calendar year 2005, with airline data due by January 30, 2006. In each case, a number of air carriers did not report and are currently under investigation (US DOT 2006).
RESULTS
1. 2002 Open Doors Organization Travel Market Study
The 2002 ODO Study found that 71% of adults with disabilities, or more than 22 million people, travel at least once in a two-year period. This includes 5.6 million business travelers, 21 million pleasure/leisure travelers and 5 million travelers who combine business and pleasure. Overall, adults with disabilities take about 2 trips every 2 years, or approximately 63 million total trips, the majority of which are for pleasure (ODO 2002, p.7). Each trip generally lasts 5 days. There is also a subgroup of more frequent travelers: 20% of all adults with disabilities travel at least 6 times every 2 years (see figure 1). “While traveling, the typical adult with a disability spends $430, which means travel expenditures among the disability population top $27 billion over the course of 2 years (ODO 2002, p.8). On an annual basis, adults with disabilities spend approximately $13.6 billion on travel.
Figure 1
Total Trips Taken In Past Two Years
[Source: Open Doors Organization, 2005, p.21]]
When planning a trip, the Internet is a key resource for adults with disabilities. Almost half of those who travel (46%) say they consult the Internet for accessibility information. One-third (33%) of those who travel book their trips most frequently online, which appears to be somewhat higher than the general population. According to the Travel Industry Association (TIA), 27% of travelers in 2002 used the Internet for actually booking something related to their travel during the past year (TIA cited in ODO 2002, p.9). Word of mouth is also an extremely important source of information for adults with disabilities: “85% of those who travel say they share their travel experiences with others, indicating a powerful network among travelers with disabilities” (ODO 2002, p.9).
Almost one-third (30%) of adults with disabilities, or 9.4 million air travelers in total, traveled by air in the previous 2 years. Air travelers typically take 2 flights every 2 years and spend $349 per flight, which equates to $3.3 billion per year for the entire airline industry. “Air travelers say they would take 2 more flights per year if airlines were to accommodate their needs as a person with a disability. This translates into 18.8 million more flights and means that air spending by the disability community could more than double if airlines were to make necessary accommodations.” The top features or services that airlines would need to offer to encourage more frequent travel would be: “1) more accommodating staff, 2) guaranteed preferred seating, and 3) a designated employee at check-in and arrival” (ODO 2002, p.10).
Over a 5-year period, 12% of adults with disabilities took a cruise. This appears to be somewhat higher than the general population since, according to the Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), only 8% of the U.S. general population took a cruise during the same 5-year period (CLIA 2002 Market Profile Study cited in ODO 2002, p.14). Among adults with disabilities, the repeat business for cruises may be particularly high: 59% of those who took a cruise in the previous five years say they plan to take another cruise within the next five years (ODO 2002, p.14).
.
2. 2005 Open Doors Organization Travel Market Study
In 2005, the percentage of adults with disabilities traveling and the number of trips taken remained roughly the same as in 2002. Sixty-nine percent of adults with disabilities, or more than 21 million people, traveled at least once in the prior two years. This includes 3.9 million business travelers, 20 million pleasure/leisure travelers and 4.4 million travelers who combine business and pleasure. They take 2 trips every two years, or approximately 63 million total trips, the majority of which are for pleasure (ODO 2005, p.7). As in 2002, there was a subgroup of more frequent travelers in the disability community—20% of all adults with disabilities travel at least 6 times every two years (see figure 1)
The Internet remains an important resource for adults with disabilities. Half of those who travel (51%) use the Internet to book their trips, which once again appears to exceed usage by the general population. “According to the Travel Industry Association, 40% of travelers in 2005 used the Internet for actually booking something related to their travel during the past year” (TIA cited in ODO 2005, p.9). Almost half (43%) of travelers in the ODO sample say they consult the Internet to support their disability-related travel needs. For these travelers, the top ways they use the Internet are: finding and/or booking accessible hotels (57%); finding accessibility information about airlines (47%); and finding accessible activities, tours, and attractions at their destination (47%) (ODO 2005, p.9).
Compared to 2002, the percentage of adults with disabilities traveling by air over the 2-year period stayed at approximately the same level: 31% or 9.6 million air travelers in total. Air travelers typically took 2 flights every two years, as they did in 2002, and they spent $302 on air travel per trip or $2.9 billion per year for the entire airline industry (ODO 2005,p.12).
However, the vast majority of air travelers (84%) stated that they “encounter obstacles when dealing with airlines” (ODO 2005, p.12). Topping the list were physical obstacles (67%), with cramped seating areas (52%) being the most common complaint. Problems with service/personnel were also prevalent (60%), with long lines (42%) and problems reserving their preferred seat (20%) predominating. Respondents also reported expense-related obstacles (37%) and difficulties with communication (28%) including difficulty hearing announcements (17%). Four out of five air travelers (82%) also experience obstacles when they are at the airport, the most common being long distances to or between gates (63%) and long lines (48%). More than one in four (27%) mentioned communication-related obstacles in the airports (ODO 2005, p.13).
Despite these obstacles, air travel was by far the most popular form of paid transportation. Only 11% of adults with disabilities had traveled by train or bus, making on average 1 such trip during the 2-year period. Twenty percent of adults with disabilities, or 6.2 million people in all, rented a car over the course of two years. Car renters typically rent a car on 1 trip every two years and spend about $40 per day (ODO 2005, p.14).
To encourage destinations, domestic and international, to improve access and marketing to travelers with disabilities, the 2005 ODO Study also asked online respondents to identify which cities and countries they had visited. Most popular in the continental US were New York City (47%), Washington, DC (45%), and Chicago (44%), edging out Orlando, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles (all tied at 42%). Other top ten destinations, in order, were San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas, and San Diego (ODO 2005, p.8).
Three out of five adults with disabilities (62%) who are online have traveled outside the continental United States at least once in their lifetime, the vast majority (85%) to other North American destinations including Canada (56%) and Mexico (52%). More than two out of five (44%) of those who have traveled outside the continental United States have been to Europe, most to Germany (28%), England (26%), and France (25%). Almost one out of three (31%) who have traveled outside the continental United States have visited the Caribbean. In the previous two years, 16% of online adults with disabilities traveled outside the continental United States. “The typical international traveler spent almost $1,600 on this travel, which means current international travel expenditures among the disability population top $7 billion over the course of two years” (ODO 2005, p.8).
Finally, as noted above, the 2005 ODO Study identified a segment of adults with disabilities who may be described as frequent or heavy travelers. One in five (20%) are frequent travelers, making 6 or trips in a 2-year period; 11% are heavy airline users, taking 3 or more flights over two years; 21% are heavy hotel users, staying in hotels 4 or more times in two years; 10% are heavy car renters, renting 2 or more cars in two years; and 7% are heavy international spenders, typically spending more than $1,000 on a trip outside of the continental U.S. in a two-year period (ODO 2005, p.8,35).
3. BTS 2002 National Transportation Availability and Use Survey
According to the Freedom to Travel report, the 2002 BTS Survey found that over a one-year period 60% of people with disabilities travel long distance (more than 100 miles one way) versus 76% of those without disabilities (BTS, 2003, p.9). Among both groups, the two most frequently used modes of transportation for long-distance travel are personal motor vehicles and commercial airlines. Among long-distance travelers, 31.5% with disabilities had taken a commercial flight, compared to 40% of those without disabilities. Other types of transportation were used much less frequently: only 5% or fewer of both disabled and non-disabled respondents used an intercity bus, private/chartered bus or Amtrak/intercity rail (BTS, 2003, p.9).
A significantly higher percentage of air travelers with disabilities experience problems at airports than do their non-disabled counterparts, 55% versus 45%. The most frequently cited problems for both groups are schedules not being kept and restrictive security measures. However, these general issues were mentioned less often by travelers with disabilities than by the non-disabled. One in four travelers with disabilities (25.39%) complained of schedules not being kept compared to more than one in three (37.66%) travelers with no disability. Restrictive security measures bothered one in three (34.12%) travelers with disabilities versus almost one in two (49.13) travelers with no disability (BTS 2003, p.9). Instead, those with disabilities complained more often of staff assistance/poor sensitivity, inadequate seating, too much walking and unavailable wheelchairs. More travelers with disabilities also experienced problems on airplanes, 32.91% versus 23.61% of those without disabilities. In each case, the biggest grievance was inadequate seating—68.61% among complainants with disabilities, 52.44% among those without (BTS 2003, p.36-37).
4. DOT 2005 and 2006 Annual Reports on Disability-Related Air Travel Complaints
The Secretary of Transportation’s Annual Reports to Congress provide both summary and detailed information on actual complaints filed by travelers with disabilities with the air carriers with whom they traveled. The 2005 Report, which covered the calendar year 2004, included complaint data submitted by 54 U.S. carriers and 97 foreign carriers. In all there were 11,519 complaints, 10,193 to domestic carriers, 1,326 to foreign air carriers (US DOT 2005, p.3). In 2006, 56 U.S. carriers and 100 foreign carriers submitted data for the calendar year 2005. In all there were 13,584 complaints, 12,194 to domestic carriers and 1,390 to foreign carriers (US DOT 2006, p.4). This represents an overall increase of over 17% from the previous year. Both reports note that “approximately 17 million persons with disabilities in the United States travel by air each year and the vast majority of them do not file a disability-related air travel complaint” (US DOT 2005, p.3; 2006, p.4).
In both calendar years, “more than half the complaints reported concerned the failure to provide adequate assistance to persons using wheelchairs” (US DOT 2006, p.4). For all types of disability, failure to provide adequate assistance made up 66.6% of total complaints in 2004 and 65.6% in 2005. Seating accommodations was the second most common problem, making up 11% of total complaints in 2004 and 9.5% in 2005. Damage to assistive devices, mostly wheelchairs, ranked third in both years with complaints in this category rising from 4.7% in 2004 to 6.5% in 2005 (US DOT 2005, 2006). While foreign air carriers have a higher percentage of complaints about wheelchair damage, their level of complaints in this category remained stable at slightly over 15%, while complaints to US carriers rose from 3.3% in 2004 to 5.5% in 2005. In general both the disability of complainants and the problems reported were remarkably stable from year to year. In both 2004 and 2005, 68% of those filing complaints with airlines identified themselves as wheelchair users. Other disabilities (not specific) was the second largest category at roughly 19-20%. Complainants with hearing or vision loss or both made up 3% or less of the total (US DOT, 2005, 2006).
DISCUSSION
As both the ODO Studies and BTS Survey show, the travel market among Americans with disabilities is sizeable. Although one cannot strictly compare their results since ODO excluded children and persons with mental/cognitive disabilities from its samples, both reveal that the majority of Americans with disabilities are making long distance trips. In the BTS survey, 60% of respondents traveled within a one-year period, while 71% of the ODO respondents in 2002 and 69% in 2005 had traveled over a two-year period, making on average 2 trips. By referencing a two-year period in its surveys, ODO explicitly seeks to include that part of the market that travels less frequently but nonetheless does make long distance trips. Respondents taking 1 trip in a two-year period totaled 11% in 2002 and 12% in 2005 (see figure 1).
Among those traveling long distance, 31.49% in the BTS Survey used a commercial airplane (BTS 2003, Table 29, p.350), which equates to 10.2 million air travelers with disabilities per year [not 17 million, as the DOT erroneously reported to Congress. Their mistake was to multiply 31.49% by the total number of Americans with disabilities (54 million), not the 59.9% (32.3 million) who had actually made long distance trips (see US DOT 2005, Footnote 3, p.3)]. In ODO’s 2002 and 2005 Studies, 30% (or 9.4 million) and 31% (or 9.6 million) of long distance travelers, respectively, had flown over a two-year period, making on average 2 flights each. Thus, the ODO and BTS estimates on air travel by persons with disabilities are very similar. So are their figures for long distance travel by bus and train. While BTS reports usage of 3.49% for intercity bus, 4.02% for private or chartered bus and 5.15% for Amtrak/intercity train (figures that may overlap) over a one-year period (BTS 2003, Table 28, p.34), ODO in 2005 found bus and train usage together to be 11% over two years. Paid ground transport is clearly a much less favored option compared to both airplanes and personal motor vehicles.
While the BTS and ODO studies both explore the problems facing long distance travelers with disabilities, the overall percentages and specific complaints vary significantly. In the 2005 ODO Study, 84% of air travelers experienced problems with airlines and 82% with airports. By comparison, 33% of air travelers in the BTS Survey experienced problems with airplanes and 55% with airports. As noted above, these percentages were significantly higher than for their non-disabled counterparts. In both ODO and BTS studies, problems with onboard seating topped the list of complaints against airlines. One should note that in the BTS Survey, “schedule not kept” somehow wound up in the airport rather than airline tally. The issue of long lines, a major complaint among ODO respondents, was not a choice in the BTS Survey (BTS 2003, Tables 30-31, pp. 33-37).
By standardizing the list of disability related complaints along with types of disability, The Secretary of Transportation’s Annual Reports to Congress (US DOT 2005, 2006) make comparisons of this new data from year to year a much easier task. Although, as the reports note, most air travelers with disabilities do not formally complain about the problems they face, this does not mean that these negative experiences do not affect their future travel plans and lead to less frequent trips or the decision to drive instead of fly. By taking the time to complain to the airlines, these travelers signal the extreme seriousness of the event to them. In both years of data available, we see that individuals using wheelchairs are the predominant complainants, with failure to provide assistance the most common complaint. A recent study by the Office of the Inspector General of the US DOT may point to the main reason behind these service failures: lack of compliance with federal requirements for training employees by both airlines and their contractors (OIG 2006, pp. 27-39). The Inspector General accordingly calls for both stricter requirements and enforcement.
CONCLUSION
If nothing else, this paper should have demonstrated that, thanks to the studies referenced, we now know much more about the American disability travel than we did prior to 2002. Rather than just a problem to be faced—although the above certainly indicates that many problems remain—travelers with disabilities now represent a real economic opportunity for the businesses who serve and market to them. Although the old stereotype was that people with disabilities were too poor or incapable to travel, in actuality they represent a broad spectrum of wealth and ability. Yes, many individuals are not traveling long distance and may even be housebound because of their disabilities or poverty. At the other end of the spectrum are a significant number of frequent or heavy travelers making multiple trips per year and even spending heavily overseas. Internet use among travelers with disabilities, both to plan and book travel, may exceed that of the general traveling public. So may the percentage of Americans with disabilities taking cruise vacations. As Baby Boomers age and become more prone to disability over the next several decades, this market will continue to expand. That trend alone should guarantee many more research studies to come, as businesses and governmental authorities demand yet more insight into this complex and interesting market.
REFERENCES
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, US Department of Transportation, 2002. Transportation Availability and Use Survey. [internet]. Available from: www.bts.gov [cited 31 Jan. 2007].
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. US Department of Transportation, 2003. Freedom to Travel, BTS03-08. [internet]. Available from: www.bts.gov/publications/freedom_to_travel [cited 31 Jan. 2007].
Office of the Inspector General, US Department of Transportation. 2006. Follow-Up Review: Performance of U.S. Airlines in Implementing Selected Provisions of the Airline Customer Service Commitment. [internet] Available from: http://www.oig.dot.gov/
StreamFile?file=/data/pdfdocs/ACSfinal11-21signed.pdf [cited 31 Jan. 2007].
Open Doors Organization. 2002. Research Among Adults With Disabilities: Travel and Hospitality. Chicago: Open Doors Organization.
Open Doors Organization. 2005. Research Among Adults With Disabilities: Travel and Hospitality. Chicago: Open Doors Organization.
Sweeney, Margaret, 2004. Travel Patterns of Older Americans with Disabilities, 2004-001-OAS [internet]. Available from: www.bts.gov/programs/bts_working_papers/
2004/paper_o1/ [cited 31 Jan. 2007].
US Department of Transportation. 2005. Annual Report on Disability-Related Air Travel Complaints. [internet]. Available from: http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/publications/
gateway.htm [cited 31 Jan. 2007].
US Department of Transportation. 2006. Annual Report on Disability-Related Air Travel Complaints. [internet] Available from: http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/publications/
gateway.htm [cited 31 Jan. 2007].
Recife is a beautiful city. Of course, you could probably guess that if I told you that one of the peripheral cities it has absorbed is called "Olinda!" ("Oh, how pretty!")
For several years I have known of Recife's efforts in accessibility, corresponding with local and regional leaders about their initiatives. So it was with great interest in this latest escalation of their work that I received the following notice of the Second Workshop on Accessibility. They have left no stone unturned here exploring social inclusion and Universal Design!
Topics include tourism, public transit, education, design, media, architecture, and attitudes.


The Travel section of the [with]tv blog has been launched -- after much procrastination on my part and good humored patience on the part of others.
Yesterday's post, "Welcome to Travel Programs at [with]tv" sets a theme of travel as transformation. Whether that is the intellectual transformation gained by such stellar programs as MIUSA's student exchanges, the personal transformation gained from a good vacation, or the systemic transformation of projects from disability & development organizations such as Rosangela Berman Bieler's Inter-American Institute on Disability & Inclusive Development (Instituto Interamericano sobre Discapacidad y Desarrollo Inclusivo) it is still true that travel transforms.
Today I am finishing an article for ECOT - the Ecumenical Coalition on Tourism on the topic "Tourism as a Tool in Peace Building" - a subject that will no doubt also find its way into the [with]tv blog. For someone with the skill, time, and interest there is a volunteer web master position open at [with]tv. It's not travel but being part of this new media outlet offers the promise of more than a little social transformation.
[with]tv, a start-up corporation devoted to providing television and Internet programming of, by, and for people with disabilities, is seeking a webmaster to maintain our on-line presence at www.with-tv.com.
The ideal candidate must be proficient in the use of HTML-based editing software and FTP protocol and will be responsible for:
• Editing the website on an ongoing basis as requested by [with]tv management
• The maintenance of our blog, including:
o Collecting articles from bi-weekly columnists
o Proofreading the articles and fixing grammatical and spelling errors
o Posting articles to the blog
o Posting messages and updates from [with]tv’s management to the blog
o Monitoring user comments for appropriateness and deleting any inappropriate entries that may appear
• Administering user e-mail accounts for [with]tv’s leadership on our server (setting up accounts, resetting passwords when asked, forwarding instructions to new users, etc.).
• Assisting with special projects related to the web site as they come up and time allows
Candidates may apply to:
Howard Renensland
CEO & Founder
[with]tv
P. O. Box 685
Wilton, CT06897
www.with-tv.com
hrenensland@with-tv.com

The new issue of Design for All from Dr. Sunil Bhatia's Design for All Institute of India has been released. This issue highlights Japanese UD efforts. The journal may be acquired through the contact below.
Design For All Institute of India
13,Lodhi Institutional Area,
Lodhi Road
New Delhi - 110 003
Telephone: +91-011-2785-3470
E-Mail: dr_subha@yahoo.com

I want to share something Scott told us when we were having dinner in Santa Cruz with other people that participated at the Day on the Beach. When Scott was younger he became a ski instructor, and not so long after he was paralyzed. And instead of being depressed because he wouldn’t be a instructor anymore, he said something like “A part of me still wants to live, and what is half of infinite opportunities that I have? It is still infinite, right?”
Let me tell you something about my experience in Santa Clara County. My name is Mariana Coelho, I’m from Brazil and I’m a senior university student in tourism back home.
A couple of years ago, I decided that Accessible Tourism would be an interesting theme for my final thesis. Since then, I’ve been developing my ideas and I also started paying more attention to accessible places and people with disabilities. One question that has always been in my mind is why I’m used to seeing so few people with disabilities outdoors in Brazil. What I am discovering is that, compared to California, we do not provide enough accessible infrastructure nor do we have a reliable healthcare system.
One reason that I am in the US is because the professor I’ve chosen to advise me in my final thesis encouraged me to come here and experience a different society to learn more about accessibility, tourism, universal design, inclusion and so on. That’s how I learned about Scott Rains’ work. We’ve been talking ever since. He told me about the Day on the Beach event, in Santa Cruz.
Basically, what first interested me in this area was the Day on the Beach, because I really wanted to experience it firsthand. One of the things I realized when I met Accessible Tourism expert Simon Darcy in Las Vegas, in June 2007 is that if I really want to help people with disabilities I have to at least try to understand their world and culture. And this is something that I believe that anyone should do when you want to develop anything: try to know and understand it.
Anyway, observing and being part of Scott’s life this weekend has already opened my eyes and my mind to a lot of details. It begun when I met him at San Jose’s bus station and started to learn how to set up a wheelchair (I’m starting to do a better job by now). Then I saw how hard it is to transfer and put a chair in your car on your own. What was also really nice to see an attractive accessible house.
Well, I could name many things I’ve noticed and places I’ve gone so far, but my point is that it is important for everyone to be able to go outdoors, have fun and experience the world, even if some special elements are required. I mean, who doesn’t need some special requirements to live and be happy? Everyone does. And that’s why I believe so much in tourism as an activity that deals with happiness, joy and fulfilling our lives.
International educational tourism is a booming niche in the travel industry. For some students moving way from home to go off to college can be a challenging adventure. As India works to implement inclusion at the university level a new national discussion is taking place. To foreign ears it is discordantly patronizing (i.e. "these special children") but worth monitoring because policy and practice developed on campuses will eventually have on broader infrastructure and the travel & hospitality industry.
A number of disability quota seats are going empty in DU? Why?This year too, Delhi University (DU) has not seen many applications for UG courses in the disability category. The officials are worried about the dwindling number of applications. And so, the colleges have now trying their bit to attract these students back to their colleges.
From constructing ramps, providing special softwares to assigning them key roles in the college in an effort to integrate them to the larger student community, the colleges are making sure that these special children see the college as their 'second home'. "On an average, DU receives around 325–350 applications each year for disability category. Although the total number of seats sanctioned for disabled candidates is well over a thousand, we have received about 330 applications this year," says SK Vij, dean, student's welfare.
From constructing ramps, providing special softwares to assigning them key roles in the college in an effort to integrate them to the larger student community, the colleges are making sure that these special children see the college as their 'second home'. "On an average, DU receives around 325–350 applications each year for disability category. Although the total number of seats sanctioned for disabled candidates is well over a thousand, we have received about 330 applications this year," says SK Vij, dean, student's welfare.College authorities are forced to leave most of the seats vacant due to the non–availability of suitable candidates. They hope that a few 'positive' steps to identify and solve the various problems of these students will help in reversing the trend in the coming years. Claims Kanika Khandelwal, media coordinator, LSR, "Our college has one of the largest number of disabled students in DU. All our seats that are reserved for disability category get filled up every year." She said that it was the college's policy to encourage these students. "We have constructed a new ramp for the students in the administrative block along with the existing ramp near in the academic building. We have also provided them with softwares like JAWS and SAFA. The students are given writers who are handpicked from NSS volunteers. These volunteers also help them in their studies in the college hostel," she adds.
LSR has also set examples of its inclusive policy by assigning major duties to these students. "We have stood by them and encouraged them. Three years ago, a visually impaired girl, Jyoti Magu, was popularly elected as the sports president of the college," elaborates Khandelwal.
SR Arora, principal, Hans Raj College says, "We generally manage to fill up all the disability quota seats." He says that his college takes special care of these students. "We have already installed four ramps in our college. We have provided Braille books and special softwares for the visually challenged students. In addition, apart from the NSS volunteers, we have a Blind Students' Club especially formed by Hans Raj College students to look after them. Our teachers can be personally approached, and wherever possible, we send step in to solve their problems."
According to Pratibha Jolly, principal, Miranda House, the resource centre of the college has been made disabled friendly. "Along with ramps, we have made sure that the special needs of these students are met in our state of the art resource centre," says she.
Source (via Disability News India):
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/City_Supplements/Delhi_Times
TIES (the International Ecotourism Society) has spent significant time and energy both researching and
recording the many university degree programs and courses dedicated
to ecotourism and sustainable tourism. As a part of TIES mission to
promote the principles of ecotourism and educate professionals, we
have made our global list available to the public.
TIES expects this
comprehensive list to be a valuable tool as it includes direct and
live hyperlinks. The list has been divided by region and is available
in PDF form below for viewing and printing.
If you, as a student or teacher, notice that your university-level
degree program is not included in our list, please send the program
information to education "at" ecotourism.org so we can continue to
keep this public resource up-to-date.
Africa
http://tinyurl.com/3y82uu
Asia and the Pacific
http://tinyurl.com/2ovnn3
Australia and New Zealand
http://tinyurl.com/2o8xbt
Europe and Central Asia
http://tinyurl.com/34v8ws
Latin America and the Caribbean
http://tinyurl.com/2r3rno
North Africa and the Middle East
http://tinyurl.com/355znk
North America
http://tinyurl.com/2uhtsw
Universal Design began as a design philosophy applied to the arrangement of space -- architecture, stage design, landscape design. It grew in parallel with a liberation philosophy of its era. That philosophy was radically interested in equity.
As Universal Design has evolved and been popularized it has come full circle as an encapsulated summary of the disability rights philosophy from which it sprang in the 1970's. Universal Design thinkers have been reinserting the concept in an ever widening circle of societal settings. Here Dede Leydorf of the World Institute on Disability presents
Integrating Universal Design Principles in Asset Building Programs
More:
http://www.wid.org/publications/integrating-universal-design-principles-in-asset-building-programs/
Sincere apologies are followed by acts of reconcilliation. Effective reconcilliation requires accurate knowledge of the aggrieved party.
To facilitate the effectiveness of Air Sahara's public apology the following list of training resources is offered. To delive them I recommend my capable Indian colleagues:
EuForMe Project
http://www.euforme.net/
EuForme Document Links
http://www.euforme.net/documents
Diada
http://apintech.com/diada/
Diada Documents
http://apintech.com/diada/public.html
Diada Portal (Accessible Tourism Learning Hub)
http://accessibletourism.learnhub.net/
If you are a young person in India who wants to pursue a career in tourism there are numerous courses available.
But what if you also have a disability and have a special interest in Inclusive Tourism?
The first question has a straightforward answer that involves a national Reservation (Affirmative Action) System. The availability of quality curriculum on inclusion in the travel & hospitality industry is less apparent -- which his probably not a hopeful sign.
If you have a disability and wish to prepare for a career in the tourism industry the following are the pertinent regulations:
Reservation for Physically Handicapped Candidates
Age Limit
For candidates from General and Physically Handicapped categories, only those whose date of birth falls on or after July 01,1984 are eligible. In the case of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates upper age limit is relaxable by 3 years. For these two categories (SC & ST) candidates, born on or after July 01, 1981 will be eligible. Date of birth as recorded in the Secondary Education Board/ Pre-University Certificate is the only authentic proof that will be accepted. At the time of counseling, this certificate must be produced in original as a proof of age, failing which the candidate will not be considered for provisional admission.
Disability
For Physically Handicapped (PH) candidates (including leprosy cured) as specified by the Government of India, 3% seats are reserved. Except for their admissible level of disability, such candidates should otherwise be fit to pursue the course.
(a) Orthopaedically Handicapped Candidates:
Only those Orthopaedically Handicapped candidates who have locomotion disability or cerebral palsy with locomotion impairment of minimum of 40% and maximum of 75% and fall in the following categories are eligible to apply.
B.L. – Both Legs affected but not arms.
O.A. – One Arm affected (R or L)
a. Impaired reach
b. Weakness of grip
c. Ataxia
O.L. – One Leg affected (R or L)
M.W. – Muscular Weakness and limited Physical endurance.
(b) Visually Handicapped Candidates:
Only those visually handicapped candidates who suffer from any one of the following conditions are eligible to apply.
i. Visual acuity not exceeding 6/60 or 20/200 (Swollen) in the better eye with correcting lenses.
ii. Limitation of the field of vision subtending an angle of 20 degree or worse.
(c) Hearing Impaired Candidates:
Only those Hearing impaired candidates having disability between 40% to 75% shall be eligible.
Medical Certificate issuing Authority for PH Candidates
At the time of submission of application, Physically Handicapped candidates will be required to necessarily attach the copy of Physically Handicapped Certificate issued by Chief Medical Officer(CMO) Central Govt./ State Govt./ Municipal Corporation run Hospitals. Such candidates are required to produce the original Medical Certificate both at the time of Counselling and at the time of Admission at the Institute.
Physical Fitness
All qualified candidates will have to submit a physical fitness certificate from a Registered Medical Practitioner in the prescribed format given in this Brochure at the time of admission.
Applications are invited for admission to the two-year intensive M.Sc. Hospitality Administration Program offered at the following Institutes of Hotel Management under the National Council in collaboration with Indira Gandhi National Open University:
• Institute of Hotel Management, Library Avenue, Pusa Complex, New Delhi – 110012 Fax : 011-25843177 (e-mail: ihmpusa@rediffmail.com)
• Dr.Ambedkar Institute of Hotel Management, Sector 42-D, Chandigarh – 160036 Fax: 0172-2611956 (e-mail: ihmchd@sify.com)
• * - 500007 Fax : 040-27427898 (e-mail: ihmhyderabad@rediffmail.com)
Further information:
http://www.successcds.net/2006/NCHMCT-JEE-2006-Hotel-Management.htm
Documentation of Inclusive Travel is catching on all over.
If you have not been therre recently, you may want to visit TransitionsAbroad.com for their section on Travel & Disability. Here's a catalog of their offerings:
Simon Says Teach Abroad by Melissa Mitchell
The Accessible Himalayas by Mary Ann Davis
18 Tips for International Travelers: Survival Strategies for Going Abroad: A Guide for People with Disabilities by Laura Hershey
Accessible Melbourne by Anne Vize
Disability Travel in Egypt by Lynn Atkinson
Accessibility Overseas: Is There a Way to Get There? by Sharon Gerlach
Adventures in Teaching from a Wheelchair in Venezuela by Marie Sharp
Young Adults with Disabilities Explore World by Pamela Houston
Study Abroad in Ireland by Johana Schwartz
Study Abroad with a Disability by Beth Ocrant
Abroad with a Disability: Prepare Yourself for the Unexpected by Jennifer Kettler
Resources for Study Abroad with a Disabilities in Europe by Tracy Scharn
Study Abroad and Accessibility: Overseas Experience leads to Activism at Home by Shannon Cun Lin Huy
Diversity in Study Abroad: Ways to Include Underrepresented Communities in Exchange Programs by Carole Patterson
Travel With a Purpose by Pamela Houston
Why Not Visit the U.K.? by J. E. Killick
Paris by Wheelchair by David W.E. Smith
Disability Travel Abroad Checklist by Barbara Ballard
Traveling with a Service Dog by Tracy Scharn
Source:
http://www.transitionsabroad.com/listings/travel/disability/index.shtml
El Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad es un organismo público adscrito al Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales que, entre otras actividades, promueve la aplicación de los ideales humanísticos, los conocimientos científicos y los desarrollos técnicos hacia el perfeccionamiento de las acciones públicas y privadas sobre discapacidad, prestando apoyos a organismos, entidades, especialistas y promotores en materia de estudios, investigación y desarrollo, información, documentación y formación.
En esta línea de actuación y con el trabajo de coordinación de Polibea Turismo, ha puesto a disposición de la Escuela Universitaria de Turismo de Lanzarote el desarrollo, en sus instalaciones de C/ Rafael Alberti, 50, en Tahíche (Lanzarote), de un Curso de Formación en Turismo Accesible que tendrá lugar los próximos días 5, 6 y 7 de Junio en horario de 16:00 a 19:00 horas.
La finalidad de este Curso es dotar a los estudiantes, futuros gestores de todos los eslabones de la cadena turística, de conocimientos y formación que potencien la equiparación de oportunidades en materia turística y que generen un incremento de la participación de las personas con discapacidad en todo tipo de actividades de ocio.
http://www.polibea.com/turismo/noticia1.htm
It is a fundamental of advocacy for Universal Design that the failure to implement UD puts travelers at disabilities at risk -- as well as those who serve us. It is very encouraging to read that the Service Employees International Union is ready to make common cause with us and work together for the growth on Inclusive Travel. I encourage you to take the action step requested by the union and contact Kevin Rudiger. I have.
The following notice comes via the Justice for All Network:
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) represents thousands of passenger service workers at airports around California. As you may know, these workers provide many important services, including wheelchair and aisle-chair services and other forms of assistance for passengers with disabilities.Many workers have long complained that they have not received
sufficient training to provide the levels of service expected.
The Union seeks support for providing assistance to passengers with
disabilities.
An SEIU survey indicates that many of these workers are not receiving
training that includes: how to safely operate a wheelchair; how to
provide services to persons with disabilities; how to distinguish
the different abilities of individuals with disabilities; and how
long a person can be kept waiting in a wheelchair unattended. That
is, at many airlines and airports, these training standards are
not being met. As such, workers are currently gathering
information for a possible complaint with the Department of
Transportation.
Action Step: You are encouraged to send your needs and
perspectives as a passenger with disabilities to SEIU. Please
contact Kevin Rudiger at (213)673-2246 or via email
rudigerk@seiulocal1877.org
In 2002, the National Association of Home Builders developed a certification program aimed at training contractors on the unique needs of the elderly and how to modify their homes to make them safe. In the five years since, more than 1,000 builders, architects, home remodelers and other professionals have signed up for NAHB's three-day aging-in-place course.Certified aging-in-place specialists, or CAPS, follow many of the principles of Universal Design, which aims to accommodate users of all sizes and abilities.
Read more in a series on Universal Design as a solution to aging-n-place at Moving On: With new products, renovations, seniors can stay home.

Um recurso por Silvia Morales publicado no sitio Lulu.com:
RECREAÇÃO E TURISMO PARA TODOS
http://www.lulu.com/content/849627
Veja os outros trablhos em turismo na loja dela aqui.
Over at her blog Data Design Canada author Therese Weel posts an entry "Digital Cities" that references the conference book from the 1999 Kyoto UD conference:
http://www.datadesigns.ca/DDW/2007/05/13/digital-city-projects/
Note an important new study on tourism accessibility. I encourage all Rolling Rains readers to complete it, or if it does not apply to you, to bring it to the attention of someone to whom who does. (Full disclosure: I've completed it myself.):
You are invited to take part in a research study conducted by the University of Technology Sydney on the tourism accommodation needs of people with mobility disabilities. The research aims to identify the room requirements and preferred information format for presenting accessible accommodation so that a person is able to make an informed decision for their needs.
Tourism Accommodation Requirements and Information Needs of People with Mobility Disabilities.
The questionnaire is designed for people with mobility disabilities to answer. However, we welcome carers/attendants, family or friends completing the survey based on the needs of those who require accessible accommodation that they travel with. For example, if you are a parent of a child with a disability you should answer the questionnaire based on the access needs of your child.
Your participation in this study is highly valued whether you travel frequently or not.
The questionnaire will take about 15 minutes to complete.
Please click on the link below to be directed to the questionnaire
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=63033650891
The research focuses on accessible rooms (sometimes referred to as 'disabled rooms') that accommodate people with mobility disabilities as designated under the Building Codes of Australia and the referenced Australian Standards for Access and Mobility (AS1428). This research does not exclude people with hearing, vision or other disabilities from completing the survey. However, other research is currently being conducted on the tourist experiences of people who are blind or vision impaired. In addition, the Hotel Motel Accommodation Association and the Deafness Forum announced in 2005 an industry agreement regarding the provision of accessible facilities for people who are Deaf or hearing impaired. We would welcome people with any disability completing the survey if they regularly use designated accessible rooms.
Alternative formats
If you require an alternative format or would like to complete this questionnaire by phone, please contact:
Dr. Simon Darcy
Faculty of Business
University of Technology, Sydney
Ph: 02 9514-5100 Email: simon.darcy@uts.edu.au
Ethics
All responses are anonymous and confidential. The project has been approved by the UTS Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref No. 2006-24A) and any ethical issues arising from the research can be discussed with the UTS Research Ethics Manager Ms Susanna Gorman on Ph: 02 9514-1279
Dr Simon Darcy | Associate Professor | School of Leisure, Sport and Tourism | Faculty of Business |
University of Technology Sydney | Kuring-gai Campus | PO Box 222, Lindfield NSW 2070 |
Ph: 61 2 9514-5100 | Fax: 61 2 9514-5195 | Email: Simon.Darcy@uts.edu.au |
http://datasearch.uts.edu.au/business/lst/staff/StaffDetails.cfm?UnitStaffId=209
A new report by Sandra Rhodda was today posted on the Tai Poutini Polytechnic website:
Tourism for Visitors to New Zealand with Mobility Problems: a West Coast Perspective
You can access the report here: http://www.taipoutini.ac.nz/taipoutini/report.asp
Summary:
Tourism is New Zealands primary export earner, and the West Coasts largest employer. There is a growing trend worldwide to cater to niche-tourism markets. People with disabilities represent a large and growing niche tourism market, one that New Zealand and the West Coast has not yet begun to fully exploit. This market has increasing discretionary funds and financial power, is articulate and web savvy, and very interested in travel. There is a significant opportunity for the West Coast to place itself as a region of excellence in tourism for people with disabilities. However, awareness of this market and the ability to cater for it is currently negligible. This report provides an overview of the access market, a preliminary examination of the provision of West Coast tourism services for people with disabilities, and suggests ways in which this large and growing market can be researched and developed.
For further information contact:
Sandra Rhodda
Research Manager
Tai Poutini Polytechnic
Private Bag 607
Greymouth
New Zealand
Ph: 02 769 9493
Freephone: 0-800-800-411
www.tpp.ac.nz
The UN World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) has announced a major initiative in eTD (electronic Tourism for
Development). The announcement did not specify the degree of accessibility to be designed into this tool.
News from the UN World Tourism Organization (UNWTO)UNWTO AND INDUSA GLOBAL AGREEMENT
STRENGTHENING SECURITY AND FACILITATION BY E-TOURISM
Madrid 12 April 2007 UNWTO has signed a collaboration agreement
with data management and e-security specialist Indusa Global to
advance the application of Information and Communication Technology
for the sustainable development of the Tourism Sector.The agreement will operate within the framework of UNWTO's long-term
Public-Private-Partnership with Microsoft, which has resulted in a
series of projects to help deliver secure, safe, quality tourism
experiences.It will involve close collaboration with Wisekey, another
UNWTO/Microsoft partner in the field of eTD (electronic Tourism for
Development), in projects such as SAFE (Security and Facilitation
Enhancement), WOA (Windows on Africa ), the Emergency Response System
http://www.sos.travel , and http://www.YouTourist.net , the social
network for responsible travellers.UNWTO Assistant Secretary-General Geoffrey Lipman says, "The priority
focus will be on consideration of border crossing and particularly e-
visa, with an emphasis on ensuring that the world's poorest countries
will be able to participate in this kind of programme. It enhances
UNWTO's commitment to create a secure and agreeable travel
environment for all tourists and underscores our commitment to
increase security while facilitating travel".Indusa Global is specialized in data management for Tourism, National
Security and Transport security and logistics and its software
solutions encompass e-visa and e-passports technologies to provide
secure, hassle-free travel. "We are looking forward to working
closely with UNWTO and Microsoft to promote secure ID and travel
reporting solutions that allow easy access in to countries, while
promoting security and border control", says Indusa Global CEO James
Ram.As a lead Microsoft Partner with primary interest in tourism and
border related solutions, Indusa Global has identified the tourism
sector as a major point of focus and is actively engaged in Tourism
projects in developing markets. It is currently operating border-flow-
systems for the Government of the Bahamas and working on a number of
similar international projects.
The Travel With A Purpose: Disability and International Educational
Educational Exchange (TWAP) Yahoo Group is a forum to discuss issues of
disability and international education, including study, work, volunteer,
research, intercultural, and intern abroad programs.
This group is moderated by the National Clearinghouse on Disability and
Exchange, a comprehensive resource for people with disabilities and
organizations interested in "travel with a purpose". The NCDE is a project
of Mobility International USA and is sponsored by the U.S. Department of
State.
The site is open to individuals with disabilities and international exchange and
disability organizations to join for discussions about choosing a
program, problem-solving disability-related questions, and sharing
information about international experiences.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Travel-With-A-Purpose/
--
Thanks to Lisa Hazell for notification on this resource!
Tourists love New Zealand. It should be no surprise that some of those tourists have disabilities.
So perhaps the Disability Research Placement Programme is a possible career-builder for a young researcher interested in disability and able to make a persuasive case for the study of tourism and disability in New Zealand.
. The Disability Research Placement Programme is designed to place disability research students with research teams in the health and disability sector.The key goal of the programme is to:
-train and support students in developing their own research proposals,
by placing them in research teams with the knowledge and experience of
publications and of securing research funding from the Health Research
Council.-provide better co-ordination and recruitment of students interested in
establishing careers in disability research.Applications for funding close on 28 May 2007.
For more information:
Moana Hadfield
Research Co-ordinator
Investment Process Group
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Phone: 09 303 5210
Email: mhadfield@hrc.govt.nz
http://www.hrc.govt.nz/root/pages_research_funding/Career_Development_Awards_Forms.html
These new publications are available from the World Bank and can be downloaded at
http://go.worldbank.org/L7EYWC6G40.

Measuring Disability Prevalence
Social Protection Discussion Paper
By Daniel Mont, World Bank
Social Analysis and Disability: A Guidance Note - Incorporating
Disability-Inclusive Development into Bank-Supported Projects
By Social Development Department and Disability and Development Team,
World Bank
Making Inclusion Operational
Law & Development Working Paper Series No.1
By Katherine Guernsey, Marco Nicoli, Alberto Ninio, World Bank

IBM is innovating in accessibility with projects such as their WAT collaboration with SeniorNet and Easy Web Browsing. The IBM Academic Accessibility Initiative provides a repository of best practices as a resource for professional development.
The project site offers a summary of the need:
The population of software users with some sort of physical impairment is larger than most people realize:* Almost 500 million people worldwide have some type of disability.
* According to the American Foundation for the Blind, approximately 1.5 million American computer users are blind or visually impaired.
* About 5.5% of the Web-surfing population is color blind, based on the proportion of the general public that is color blind.
* Approximately 420 million people worldwide are age 65 or older, and this number is expected to increase dramatically over the next two decades. Because vision and hearing decrease with time, older people often have technology needs similar to people with disabilities. This maturing population represents the first generation to have grown up with computers, who expect to continue to use computers in their daily lives.Businesses today recognize the need to offer accessible products to:
* Meet the needs of their disabled or older customers.
* Enable older workers to continue employment if they choose.
* Hire and keep disabled employees.
* Meet legislation and purchasing requirements.
Accessibility means enabling IT hardware, software and services to be used by people with physical limitations. Users affected by such limitations include people with disabilities, or the loss of hearing, eyesight or motor control due to aging.At IBM, accessibility means more than removing barriers. It means enabling human capabilities through innovation so that everyone regardless of age or ability can maximize their potential.
Unfortunately, most university students majoring in computer science, IT, software engineering, and similar fields graduate today without learning about designing software for people with disabilities or aging users.
Source:
http://www-304.ibm.com/jct09002c/us/en/university/scholars/skills/accessibility/index.html
The seed is here at Adaptive Environments:
Universal Design is also called Inclusive Design, Design-for-All and Lifespan Design. It is not a design style but an orientation to any design process that starts with a responsibility to the experience of the user. It has a parallel in the green design movement that also offers a framework for design problem solving based on the core value of environmental responsibility. Universal Design and green design are comfortably two sides of the same coin but at different evolutionary stages. Green design focuses on environmental sustainability, Universal Design on social sustainability.
Two expressions, growing out of Designing for the 21st Century in Rio de Janeiro, are the documents, The Rio Charter on Universal Design for Sustainable and Inclusive Development and 2004 Rio Declaration on Sustainable Social Development, Disability & Ageing.
Now it appears that the American public might almost be ready to hear the message. Living on Earth interviewed Professor Daniel Esty, director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy. A study undertaken by his center finds that, "A new survey shows that 63 percent of Americans are as concerned about climate change as they are about terrorism."
Some resources on the topic here at Rolling Rains:
The Rio Charter on Universal Design for Sustainable and Inclusive Development
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/000313.html
2004 Rio Declaration on Sustainable Social Development, Disability & Ageing
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/000285.html
A Major Endorsement of Visitability in US Housing
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/001457.html
A Major Endorsement of Universal Design in US Housing
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/001456.html
A Barrier-Free Resort: Inclusive Design at Work in the Virgin Islands
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/001517.html
The Universal Design "Twofer"
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/001380.html
What is Sustainable in Destination Development?
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/000654.html
Reflections on Universal Design & Justice
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/000769.html
International Best Practices in Universal Design: A Global Review
http://www.rollingrains.com/archives/001511.html
A 3ª Pesquisa Anual de Conjuntura Econômica do Turismo, divulgada nesta quinta-feira, 15 de março, pelo Ministério do Turismo, indica que o turismo registrou crescimento, em 2006, superior ao da economia nacional e, neste ano, deverá manter o mesmo desempenho positivo.
A expectativa é de que o faturamento das 80 maiores empresas do setor que, juntas, somam R$ 29,6 bilhões, alcance um aumento médio de 29,8%. E de que o impacto sobre o emprego seja de 14% sobre o quadro de pessoal dessas empresas que, em dezembro do ano passado, somava 81.331 pessoas. A pesquisa, que é uma iniciativa do Ministério do Turismo e Embratur em parceria com a Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV), por meio do Núcleo de Estudos Avançados em Turismo e Hotelaria da Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas (EBAPE), ouviu 80 empresários e principais executivos das maiores empresas de sete segmentos do turismo: agências de viagens, companhias aéreas, locadoras de automóveis, meios de hospedagem, operadoras de receptivo, operadoras de turismo e promotores de feiras e eventos.O diretor da Escola da FGV, Bianor Scelza Cavalcanti, explica que a pesquisa utiliza uma metodologia qualitativa que ´´capta a visão´´ desses executivos do turismo sobre faturamento, custos operacionais, preços e postos de trabalho. Por isso, acrescenta ele, a pesquisa é um ´´importante balizador para acompanhamento do setor turístico, auxiliando no processo decisório do empresariado brasileiro´´.
Desde 2004, o turismo mostra tendência de expansão, confirmada também no ano passado, quando o faturamento das principais empresas teve uma variação média de 29,3%. O maior impulso foi dado pelas agências de viagens, locadoras de automóveis, companhias aéreas e operadoras. Com esse crescimento, houve também ampliação no quadro de pessoal, da ordem de 21,6%. A expectativa de 86,2% dos pesquisados é de que a economia do turismo manterá seu ritmo de crescimento em 2007.
O otimismo maior é manifestado, em sua totalidade, pelas companhias aéreas e locadoras de automóveis. Por outro lado, eles prevêem um aumento médio de 7,1% sobre os custos operacionais e um repasse para os preços da ordem de 5,8%, em média. O desempenho positivo das empresas enquadra-se num cenário de expansão macroeconômica do turismo no país. Pelo quinto ano consecutivo, a receita cambial turística registrou crescimento histórico. Em 2006, os turistas estrangeiros gastaram no país US$ 4,3 bilhões, um aumento de 11,78% sobre a receita de 2005 (US$ 3,9 bilhões) e de 116,02% sobre o apurado em 2002 (US$ 2 bilhões), primeiro ano da série de crescimento.
O ministro do Turismo, Walfrido dos Mares Guia, avalia que os resultados alcançados no ano passado representam uma conquista, especialmente por causa da crise financeira e operacional da Varig, que provocou uma desistência de cerca de 400 mil turistas estrangeiros ao país. Os desembarques internacionais, que incluem brasileiros retornando do exterior, tiveram uma queda de 6,20% em relação a 2005, somando 6,3 milhões de passageiros. No entanto, os vôos charters, que transportam exclusivamente estrangeiros, aumentaram 20,72% em relação a 2005, trazendo ao país 423.514 turistas. Mesmo com a redução da oferta de assentos provocada pela crise da Varig, os desembarques nacionais tiveram crescimento de 7,54% sobre 2005, registrando um movimento de 46,3 milhões de passageiros nos aeroportos do país. O avanço do turismo reflete-se, também, no próprio orçamento do Ministério, que vem tendo significativos aumentos ano a ano, desde a sua criação em 2003. Em 2007, os recursos poderão chegar ao valor de R$ 1,8 bilhão para aplicação em promoção, infra-estrutura, qualificação e capacitação no setor.
Fonte: Hotel On Line
Today, in Buenos Aires, a meeting culminates the paradigm-shifting work that Rosangela Berman-Bieler has quietly accomplished during the past four weeks of shuttle-diplomacy in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. Watch for updates as Turismo para Todos reshapes tourism in the Southern Cone of South America. Parabems, Rosangela!
Here are some notes on Rosangela's organization, the Inter-American Institute on Disability and Inclusion (IID).
Some characteristics that differentiate the IID from other existing entities in the Region and demonstrate a real and concrete need for its existence are:* network linking individuals and grassroots organizations, providing direct and indirect services to people with disabilities;
* access to governments, universities, technical area, public politics;
* IID will provide a bridge between the actual demands of the disabled community, knowledge and resources, public and private initiatives;
* Based in the production and dissemination of information: Latin culture normally does not exercise the habit to withhold information or even to document its experiences;
* Promotion of empowerment: e.g., the concept of citizenship in the countries is not yet developed due to historical and political reasons;
* Cultural approach: cultural sensitivity for project development and management;
* Establishment of micro-credit programs for people with disabilities in the region.
Slide Show:
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DISABILITY/Resources/News---Events/463933-1163109717105/RBB_WCCD.pdf\
History of IID:
http://www.independentliving.org/docs6/berman-bieler.html
Multi: Design for People does excellent work. They are defining the field of sustainable Inclusive Destination Development.
Here's one more affirmation of that through their presentation posted at Slideshare.net
inclusive+travel accessible+travel barrier+free+travel inclusive+design rolling+rains travel
resorts
![]()
The Canadian Human Rights Commission has announced the publication of
INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL DESIGN: A GLOBAL REVIEW
A Global Review is a comprehensive research document comparing the latest accessibility standards for the built environment. It compares selected building codes and standards from developed and developing countries, those undergoing rebuilding and war torn countries. Included are codes and standards from Canada, Lebanon (UN), Mexico, Uruguay, Sweden, Ireland, Spain, USA, South Africa, Bangladesh, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, and Australia.
The document contains an extensive comparison of 31 essential design elements, presented in tabular form, along with photographic examples highlighting best practices in universal design.
For more information contact
Harvey Goldberg
613-943-9146
harvey.goldberg@chrc-ccdp.ca
To order a copy go to:
http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/pub_form_pub/bp_pe-en.asp
In partnership with:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Human Resources and Social Development Canada
Treasury Board of Canada
Swedish Agency for Disability Policy
National Disability Authority of Ireland
Rehabilitation International
There are some very articulate writers out there in the blogosphere who address disability issues. Here I try to keep the focus on travel and Universal Design. Occassionaly there are some especially noteworthy posts on broader disability issues worth highlighting.
In that category are various blog carnivals and this post by RighteousBabe at Daily Kos, "Not the Diary You Want to Read."
SlideShare transforms PowerPoint slide shows into Flash. That makes them small and fast for Web deployment but Flash is not screenreader friendly.
That's why the developer of SlideShare is to be congratulated for going the extra step. SlideShare generates a text file that while not visible on the page is accessible to programs like Jaws for Windows. The text file can then be read out loud by text-to-speech engines.
Here is a sample:
It is possible for the author to upload the original (non-Flash) slideshow for others to download and modify as was done in this case.
Here is the Portuguese version of the slideshow:
The U.S. Green Building Council has taken a major step in changing the face of the built residential market in the US with the "Universal Accessibility" designation for residential communities seeking LEED certification. Major, but still leaving an 80% inaccessible remainder for developers who take the minimalist approach.
LEED, a project of the U.S. Green Building Council, has achieved widespread success certifying commercial buildings as environmentally friendly when they meet specified requirements. Now LEED, with its new pilot program LEED-ND, has moved beyond commercial buildings to whole neighborhoods.Notably for people in the home access movement, LEED-ND awards a point
for developments that build single-family homes with basic access.
(Single family homes are the main building type still built by the
hundreds of thousands with no access features, continuing the age-old
barriers that impose drudgery and social isolation.) It is
encouraging that people are beginning to see that Visitability is
connected to green building practices. Basic access at the time of
construction decreases the waste of energy and materials necessitated
by retrofits, and makes neighborhoods more sustainable by enabling
social interaction, "aging in place," and disability inclusion.To receive the "Universal Accessibility" point, the builder includes,
in at least 20% of the single-family homes, the features required
by federal law in apartment buildings--a zero step entrance on an
accessible route, wide interior doors, maneuvering space in bathrooms
and kitchens, blocking in bathroom walls to allow future grab bars,
reachable electrical controls, and a step-free path of travel through
the first floor of the home.The application document reads in part:
Intent
Enable the widest spectrum of people, regardless of age or ability, to
more easily participate in their community life by increasing the
proportion of areas that are usable by people of diverse abilities.Requirements
For projects with residential components:
For each residential unit type developed, design 20% (and not less than
one) of each type to comply with the accessible design provisions of
the Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA) and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act (Rehabilitation Act), as applicable. Separate
residential unit types include: single-family, duplex, triplex,
multi-unit row or townhouses, and mixed-use buildings that include
residential units. (Compliance for multi-family buildings of 4 or more
units is already a regulatory requirement.)
---------------------------------------------------
Eleanor Smith of Concrete Change and Ed Steinfeld of the IDEA
Center at SUNY, Buffalo, were among those working on the committee to
bring this about. Not all their recommendations were followed, but
they welcome this early recognition that basic access is green.The LEED-ND initiative is a joint venture of the Congress for the New
Urbanism, the US Green Building Council, and the Natural Resources
Defense Council. To read the LEED-ND document, go to
http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2310
To read about the point awarded for houses with basic access, go to
page 83.
Attendees at the ASEAN Tourism Conference had the opportunity to hear Jim Dator of the Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies, Department of Political Science, University of Hawaii. His core message: “It may be equally misleading to assume that tourism will continue to grow as a world industry in the future as it has in the past.”
In this quote from Imtiaz Muqbil's Travel Impact Newswire he cites aging and energy shortages but he could easily have emphsaized that aging will bring Universal Design issues to the forefront of discussion:
He added, “There are very good reasons to believe that the global political-economic system that has dominated the world since the end of the Second World War may not continue much longer.” One driver will be global demographics, including the fact that in “more and more parts of the world, population is no longer growing” creating a “youth gap” in almost all developed countries even as the number and percentage of old people--and of very old people--is growing.”Among the nations of Southeast Asia, there is great variability. The youth bulge is over and aging is setting in for Singapore, Vietnam, Myanmar, Thailand, and Indonesia. It is expected to continue for another few years in Brunei and Cambodia. For Malaysia, the Philippines, and Laos, the youth bulge may extend even longer. The countries of South, Central, and Western Asia are still growing with a very substantial youth component.
Equally important, Prof Dator said, is the question of whether people of all age groups “will be able to continue to move around the globe as easily as many have been able to do in recent decades?” Here he pointed to the imminent end of the era of cheap and abundant oil.
One of the pleasures of this blog is to observe the steadily increasing impact of Universal Design on the tourism industry. Key to that is the stability of those entrpreneurs, advocates, and pioneering consumers who drive this market. Today I would like to once again highlight Polibea Turismo. They are a very important voice in the worldwide network of those making Inclusive Travel -- and especially Inclusive Destination Development - a reality.
From Polibea Turismo February 2007:
…give a look at disability twice, establish between the first and second look an intensive plan to learn to unlearn, to drain our absurd ideas on unknown emotions, to separate what we feel by experience from what we feel by tradition. A plan of tranquillity and silence, of getting rid of adjectives, of taking a distance from the known and gaining proximity to the unthought of, that will bring to this second look the authentic reality of what is being looked at.
José Félix Sanz Juez
La Segunda Mirada (Editorial Polibea)
…give a look at disability twice, establish between the first and second look an intensive plan to learn to unlearn, to drain our absurd ideas on unknown emotions, to separate what we feel by experience from what we feel by tradition. A plan of tranquillity and silence, of getting rid of adjectives, of taking a distance from the known and gaining proximity to the unthought of, that will bring to this second look the authentic reality of what is being looked at.
José Félix Sanz Juez
La Segunda Mirada (Editorial Polibea)
May this transitional edition (February 2007) of our e-bulletin show our most sincere gratitude to the Companies and Institutions who support our Web site. Their confidence and collaboration combined with our work will hopefully accelerate a process which, no doubt, will place us, rather sooner than later, in a scenario where terms like accessible, without barriers, universal, for all etc… won’t be in use any longer and we will just talk of Tourism of Quality, i. e.: offering an integral service suitable to each type of client regardless their particular conditions.While we are designing some changes in the format and presentation of Turismo @ Polibea for our March issue, the 2007 “Mobility and/or Communication Impaired Traveller's Guide to Spain” will be permanently available in our website. Therefore our proposal for you in this present e-magazine is to browse through the “Bulletin Archives” where you will be able to read all articles published since our very first number was launched (May 2004 for the Spanish version and October 2005 for the English one), to click on the “Guest Writer's” section and read through thoughts and reflections on what is called Accessible Tourism some personalities have been so generous as to share with us all. I’d like to recommend watching three interesting videos (two of them available in YouTube).
Finally I’d like too to thank you for the compliments we have received and the interest shown in our work (we have widely surpassed 12,000 visitors to our website in January) and I’d like to encourage you to contact us: your suggestions, opinions, reflections, remarks and criticism are always welcome. From them all we try to get the energy that will help us to perform better.
Santiago Salgado Balbellido
Director Polibea Turismo
Version en espanol:
http://www.polibea.com/turismo/index.htm
The Association of American Geographers has announced the 2007 AAG Disability Specialty Group Student Paper Competition.
Association of American Geographers Disability Specialty Group (DSG)
Student Paper Competition - 2007
Call for Papers
Students working on topics concerned with the complex and multifaceted geographies of disability and chronic illness are encouraged to submit a paper to the 2007 AAG Disability Specialty Group Student Paper Competition. The goals of the award are to encourage student participation in the specialty group and to recognize outstanding emerging scholarship in geographic research on chronic illness and disability. The successful student will receive a cash prize of $100 and a year's membership to the DSG. Students do not have to be a current member of the DSG or AAG nor must they plan to attend the 2007 AAG conference to submit a paper. International submissions are also invited.Eligibility criteria: Papers prepared for publication, conference presentation, and graduate or senior undergraduate courses, as well as entries written specifically for this competition, are eligible for submission. Each student may submit only one paper.
The paper should not exceed 25 double-spaced pages (including all notes, references, and figures). 12 point font is preferred along with standard margins.
A cover letter should accompany all entries and contain:
· Current title of the paper and a brief abstract (no more than 100 words).
· Academic affiliation
· Faculty advisor for the paper
· Names and affiliations of co-authors (if applicable)
· Information on where the paper was presented/submitted (or is to be presented/submitted)
· Mailing address
· E-mail address
· Phone number
All entries must be received by February 28th, 2007. Three hard copies of the paper should be mailed to:
Valorie Crooks
Chair, Disability Specialty Group
Department of Geography
Simon Fraser University
RCB 7123
8888 University Drive
Burnaby, British Columbia, CANADA
V5A 1S6
Students considering submitting are advised to contact Valorie by e-mail in advance at crooks@sfu.ca. She will also gladly address any questions or concerns regarding participation in this competition.
Reviewers will be secured and their recommendations will be sent to the DSG Board for the final award decision.
Award notification
The award recipient will be notified shortly after the 2007 AAG meeting in San Francisco. The cheque will be mailed to him/her shortly thereafter. Post-conference announcements will be found on the DSG website (http://isc.temple.edu/neighbor/service/disability&geography.html)
and the GEOGABLE listserv (http://isc.temple.edu/neighbor/service), as well as other appropriate venues.
One of the thoughtful people that Jill Chamberlain's New York Times article on Universal Design reached yesterday was Kel Smith.
Kel writes the blog Indirect Manipulation subtitled "{ thoughts about development, design, architecture and other stuff }" Always encouraging to find articulate practitioners of Universal Design here's a snippet:
The idea of universal design isn’t new. In his book The Art of Innovation, Tom Kelley discusses the importance of “barrier jumping” to increase the number of successful affordances. A more approachable idea, he feels, is one that extends its benefits to all types of users. Readers of this blog already know my appreciation for Joel Spolsky; he cites the OXO Good Grips line of kitchen products (developed with soft rubber handles for people with arthritis) as an example of universal design done right:
They are ergonomically designed to fit into human hands comfortably. The handles are made of a soft, black rubber called Santoprene, which means you don’t have to squeeze tightly to keep them from slipping; even a weak grasp is enough. One in seven people suffer some form of arthritis - that’s almost forty million people in the United States alone. Designing a line of products for just that market niche was likely to succeed. But their market is not just people with arthritis: everybody likes OXO products. They are simply more pleasant to use.As I’ve said over and over: designing for accessibility benefits all users. Perhaps a universal design principle can develop from the current standards movement, one that transcends the arguments supporting XHTML/CSS to encompass a more user-centric justification.
The World Health Organization is piloting a worldwide Liveable Communities program -- Age Friendly Cities. More information here: http://www.who.int/ageing/projects/age_friendly_cities/en/index.html
Catch up on a regional conference about accessible tourism at Darren Hill's blog -- Cyprus Hosts Accessible Tourism Conference
Cynthia Leibrock is an architect with a calling. The day after Christmas seems an appropriate time to profile the faith-inspired Universal Design work she undertakes including:
REHABITAT, INC. provides training in universal design, friendship evangelism, resource development, and needs assessment. We offer seed money and technical support for the retrofitting including a home assessment survey. Upon completion, the survey is analyzed by computer software. A customized report is then prepared for each client recommending building modifications for their home.
Further information:
http://www.agingbeautifully.org/volunteers.html
Imtiaz Muqbul publishes Travel Impact Newswire. His recent lead story celebrates the new UN convention on the rights of people with disabilities:
The implications [of the UN convention] for travel & tourism are significant across the board. Trade shows, conferences and seminars will emerge for buyers and sellers of holidays and travel opportunities for PwDs, along with new publications and marketing campaigns directed at them. Special awards are sure to be created. Opportunities for training and education also abound in what will clearly be a highly specialised field of travel. If legal issues emerge, the lawyers are waiting.ices, and, as far as possible, enjoy access to monuments and sites of national cultural importance.”Directly relevant to travel & tourism industry is Article 30 of the Convention which covers “Participation in cultural life, recreation, leisure and sport”. It requires countries to take all appropriate measures to ensure that PwDs “enjoy access to places for cultural performances or services, such as theatres, museums, cinemas, libraries and tourism serv
Another one, Article 20 guarantees their rights to personal mobility in the manner and at the time of their choice, and at affordable cost, with all the requisite “mobility aids, devices, assistive technologies and forms of live assistance and intermediaries”. Especially important are articles underwriting their rights to education, work and employment.
Source:
TRAVEL IMPACT NEWSWIRE -- Edition 77 -- Tuesday, 19 December 2006
===================
ABOUT TRAVEL IMPACT NEWSWIRE
Set up in August 1998, Travel Impact Newswire is the Asia-Pacific’s first email travel industry news feature and analysis service. Mission Statement: Dedicated to reporting with Integrity, Trust, Accuracy and Respect the issues that impact on the Asia-Pacific Travel & Tourism industry. Distributed every week to senior industry executives, consultants, academics and media globally.
Interested in sponsoring future editions of Newswire, the region’s only no-holds-barred travel industry information service? Please contact me at 24 Soi Chidlom, Bangkok, Thailand 10330. T: (66-2) 2551480, 2537590. Fax: 02 2544316. Email: imtiaz@travel-impact-newswire.com

Professional colleague and personal friend Harry Wolfe presented at the Airneth Conference, The Impact of Ageing on Aviation, held at the Hague, Netherlands on November 23.
Presentations are downloadable here.
Meeting the Needs of Older and Disabled Air Travellers
by Anne Frye
http://www.airneth.nl/documents/AnnFryefinal.pdf
Ageing and Air Transportation
by Harry Wolfe
http://www.airneth.nl/documents/HarryWolfefinal.pdf
Ageing and Travel Behaviour in the 21st Century
by Ton van Egmond
http://www.airneth.nl/documents/VanEgmondfinal.pdf
Ageing at Work in the Netherlands
by Rob Gründemann
http://www.airneth.nl/documents/Grundemann.pdf
Upcoming Airneth event:
Optimal Use of Airport Capacity: April 11-13, 2007
http://www.airneth.nl/activity.php?page=24
Universal Design continues to be the design approach of choice as lack of vision about the lifecycle of homeowners and the desire to allow Visitability spreads. here is a notice about a professional response in Canada:
Royal LePage Real Estate Services announced the launch of the Royal LePage Seniors Real Estate Specialist (SRES) Designation Program. The SRES designation is a North American real estate recognized designation, and Royal LePage will be the first organization in Canada to become a certified supplier, making it available to its Realtors in response to the changing housing needs, desires and options available to the 50-plus market.
Currently, 28% of Canadians that are now aged 50-plus intend to sell their home as part of their plans for making living arrangements in old age. Of this 28% who intend to sell their home, the following are the main reasons cited for selling: concerned that their house will be too hard to maintain (67%), want access to equity (46%), plan to travel and do not want the responsibility of a house (38%), concerned that they will not be able to care for themselves (30%), and cannot afford to stay in their house (23%).Of the potential sellers in the aged 50-plus bracket, 37% plan to move into a smaller, more manageable home and will use the equity from the sale of their home to support retirement (86%), to travel (48%), to give it to their children (42%), and to purchase a recreational property (7%).
One way that this group continues to defy conventional notions of ‘old age’ is by redefining how and where they want to live. Traditionally, when the time came for the 50-plus demographic to make a move, some popular choices were to downsize, move in with their kids or move into an assisted living facility,” said Soper. “Today, with longer life expectancies, better health and more wealth, the 50-plus group have a plethora of options available to them and there is no longer one best practice.”
The 50-plus are an extremely influential cohort and companies like Royal LePage, The Home Depot and TD Canada Trust have recognized the importance of this group.
“The 50-plus demographic represent the fastest-growing and largest single consumer group, and are changing the Canadian economic landscape and redefining the approach to business in almost every industry,” said David Cravit, senior vice-president, marketing, Canada’s Association for the Fifty-Plus (CARP).
Through specialty programs, such as The Home Depot’s Independent Living Program, which provides products and services to homeowners with mobility issues, and by providing installation of specific products, such as grab bars, ramps and adjustable cabinets, home modification is much more easily accessible. As such, the 50-plus generation has the flexibility to comfortably live where they choose longer than preceding generations.
Source:
http://rismedia.com/index.php/article/articleview/16611/1/1/
Usability, accessibility, and Universal Design are fairly predictable topics, or at least side conversations, at a techie event like the one here in Monterey, California -- Internet Librarian. I didn't expect to discover something relevant to the Rolling Rains Report in a workshop on Mashups but here it is: Travel & Tourism data sets at the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Recognizing that the majority of Americans want to remain in their homes as they age, the American Society of Interior Designers has established a volunteer council of noted experts to look at how design solutions can enhance and support residents throughout the life span. The Council will draw upon its vast experience and networks of professionals to provide the ASID Board of Directors with recommendations on information, research and education efforts that the Society should undertake to better prepare designers and consumers to meet the challenges that come with the normal process of aging.
“It is inevitable that we will all age,” says council member Leslie Shankman-Cohn, ASID, an award-winning designer from Memphis, Tenn. “Whether we do so gracefully or otherwise, we all deserve to be treated with dignity and respect and to ‘age in style.’ We should not be isolated from the day to day activities that make our lives worthwhile. It is essential that designers continue to learn all they can about age-related changes and social and psychological needs to create better environments for older adults. It is equally as important to look beyond the immediate needs of one sector of the population and provide a smooth transition for living needs throughout one’s life and physical abilities.”

Metropolis magazine editor Susan Szenasy will be the featured presenter at La Roche College's 2006 Design Dialogue Series from 6:15-7:45 p.m. Oct. 25 at the Carnegie Science Center, on the North Side.
Szenasy has been editor-in-chief of Metropolis, the award-winning New York City-based magazine of architecture, culture and design, for 20 years.
Her topic, "Making Waves: How the next generation is redefining design," will focus on issues of sustainability, ethics in design, universal design and a thoroughly integrated approach to design that will affect our future.
The presentation is open to the public. Tickets are $30 for general admission, with $10 discounts for La Roche alumni and half-price tickets for students. Tickets can be purchased through the La Roche College Interior Design Department.
Details: 412-536-1024.

Inclusion as a feature of the means of transportation and built environment of travel destinations figures prominently in articles here at the Rolling Rains Report. The seven principles of Universal Design are a recurring theme.
But what about the times when the destination is pristine and the purpose of a trip is to encounter unmodified natural surroundings? Is there a way to "be part of it" even when disability and geography seem to conspire to make that impossible?
Without attempting to answer that question directly author Barry Lopez and managing editor Debra Gwartny illustrate the power of language to capture and engage as they discuss their new dictionary-style book, "Home Ground: Language for an American Landscape." A fascinating consequence of their collaborative effort with 45 writers to produce this work was the creation of a community inspired to renew the language of public discourse through the recovery of tradtional American folksonomy of place.
Listen to an interview at KQED's Forum program.
Accessibility to cultural venues, tourism and leisure services for people with disabilities is still very limited, according to the Spanish Committee of Representatives of People with Disabilities (CERMI). CERMI states that “Guaranties of accessibility should not be considered as a matter of sensitivity or of an agent’s good faith, but more as a matter of fundamental rights which should be guaranteed by the Government through a binding and effective law”.
Their proposals to improve accessibility are very concise: they extend from establishing the necessary legal framework in order to regulate accessibility to audiovisual media (subtitling or broadcasting into Sign Language the program for deaf people, audiodescription of a specific program for blind people) to the elaboration of a National Plan for the development of an Accessible Tourism.Although the main Spanish museums have already been modified for people with disabilities (the Reina Sofía Museum, the Museo del Prado, the Guggenheim Museum of Bilbao, the Dali Museum at Figueras, the Picasso Museum at Barcelona and the IVAM Valencia Institute of Modern Art, among others) the cultural heritage of Spain, in general, frequently presents difficult obstacles to overcome. Access to monuments, installations or cultural activities for people with disabilities is not always taken into consideration.
Even though some initiatives have been made to compile information on accessible hotels, beaches, rural tourism, trekking and tourism services for people with disabilities, the truth is that there is still little specific professional preparation, and more rarely do agencies and tour operators offer travels that don’t entail an obstacle course full of disappointments for the 3.5 million Spaniards who suffer from some kind of disability, and for their families, altogether, 10 million people. According to CERMI’s sources, there is a market with an important potential demand.
Source:
http://www.cermi.es/
http://www.canalsolidario.org/

Gerontechnology Journal is the Official Journal of the International Society for Gerontechnology (www.gerontechnology.info).
Sustainability of an ageing society depends upon our effectiveness in creating technological environments for innovative and independent living and social participation of older persons in good health, comfort, and safety. These objectives comprise the multidisciplinary field of Gerontechnology.
The aim of this journal is to provide a forum for reporting original research and review papers in the broad area of fitting technological environments to living, leisure and working of the ageing. These research outcomes form the basis for designers, builders, engineers, manufacturers and those in the health professions, to provide the proper environment for the greatest number of persons in society.
This is the first international scientific journal devoted to the domain of Gerontechnology. As such it has an international focus with interdisciplinary content. The papers in each issue reflect the broad categories of interest in this field: health, housing, mobility, communication, leisure and work.
A unique feature of Gerontechnology is the clear-cut commitment to highlight the central ideas of Gerontechnology. By tuning the balance between two milestones in current development - ageing and technology -, the journal points at clarifying their complex intertwinements.
Gerontechnology distinguishes itself from gerontology journals by explicit consideration of the technological environment as a domain for improving quality of life and enabling realisation of ambitions and goals of older persons.
In comparison with technological journals, Gerontechnology focuses on embedding innovations in the lives of older persons and in adaptations to ageing processes. It sheds light on the context of use - or lack of use - of appropriate technology by older persons.
I have not read Alain de Botton's The Architecture of Happiness but Katherine Ashenburg's review at the Globe and Mail makes it seem like an interesting read. Interesting also to see if he deconstructs dominant assumptions about what physical and sensory functionalites are available to users of buildings.
She writes...
Alain de Botton only takes on the biggest subjects. Still in his 30s, the Swiss-born author has written eight books on such topics as love, romance, status, the consolations of philosophy and how literature (in his case, Proust) can change your life. Clearly a student of philosophy, but of the most appealing and accessible sort, de Botton always goes back to the basics. In his bestselling The Art of Travel (2002), he asked, why do we want to go to unfamiliar places? What does travel give us? How can we maximize our chances for more delightful voyaging? Now, in The Architecture of Happiness, he considers the connection between our feelings and the buildings in which we work, pray and live.
For more discussion on this book see Wheelchair Dancer's Spetmebr 23, 2006 post, Architecture & Happiness.
The Association of American Geographers, Disability Specialty Group (DSG) has issued a call for papers in their Student Paper Competition - 2007
Students working on topics concerned with the complex and multifaceted geographies of disability and chronic illness are encouraged to submit a paper to the 2007 AAG Disability Specialty Group Student Paper Competition. The goals of the award are to encourage student participation in the specialty group and to recognize outstanding emerging scholarship in geographic research on chronic illness and disability. The successful student will receive a cash prize of $100 and a year's membership to the DSG. Students do not have to be a current member of the DSG or AAG nor must they plan to attend the 2007 AAG conference to submit a paper. International submissions are also invited.
Eligibility criteria: Papers prepared for publication, conference presentation, and graduate or senior undergraduate courses, as well as entries written specifically for this competition, are eligible for submission. Each student may submit only one paper.
The paper should not exceed 25 double-spaced pages (including all notes, references, and figures). 12 point font is preferred along with standard margins.
A cover letter should accompany all entries and contain:
· Current title of the paper and a brief abstract (no more than 100 words).
· Academic affiliation
· Faculty advisor for the paper
· Names and affiliations of co-authors (if applicable)
· Information on where the paper was presented/submitted (or is to be presented/submitted)
· Mailing address
· E-mail address
· Phone number
All entries must be received by February 28th, 2007. Three hard copies of the paper should be mailed to:
Valorie Crooks
Chair, Disability Specialty Group
Department of Geography
Simon Fraser University
RCB 7123
8888 University Drive
Burnaby, British Columbia, CANADA
V5A 1S6
Students considering submitting are advised to contact Valorie by e-mail in advance at crooks@sfu.ca. She will also gladly address any questions or concerns regarding participation in this competition.
Reviewers will be secured and their recommendations will be sent to the DSG Board for the final award decision.
Award notification
The award recipient will be notified shortly after the 2007 AAG meeting in San Francisco. The cheque will be mailed to him/her shortly thereafter. Post-conference announcements will be found on the DSG website (http://isc.temple.edu/neighbor/service/disability&geography.html)
and the GEOGABLE listserv (http://isc.temple.edu/neighbor/service), as well as other appropriate venues.

Hay un curso virtual por Luis Alberto Grünewald y el Fundación Turismo Para Todos -- Como Mejorar la Competitividad de un Empresa Hotelera.
Módulo 1
Objetivo: Analizar y diagnosticar la oferta hotelera.
- Características del Hotel propuesto para el estudio.
- Diagnostico de la oferta hotelera
- Identificación y justificación del Mercado objetivo
- Principios de la Gestión de Negocios en un establecimiento Hotelero.
Módulo 2
Objetivo: Analizar e identificar las necesidades básicas del Huésped de Hotel y comprender necesidades, hábitos, costumbres y deseos del segmento en estudio.
- Perfil del huésped de Hotel - Identificación del segmento en estudio
Módulo 3
Objetivo: Identificación de Productos y Servicios.
- Principios del Desarrollo de Productos y Servicios Hoteleros
- Identificación de las variables de éxito de una empresa hotelera
- Creación de valor de la oferta hotelera
- Determinación, medición y mejora del valor. Estrategias para el segmento en estudio.
Módulo 4
Objetivo: Desarrollo de Programas de venta de productos y servicios
- Como organizar un Programa de Actividades
- Pautas de comercialización de Productos y servicio
Informaciones:
info@turismoaccesible.com.ar
Campus Educativo:
www.turismoparatodos.org.ar/edu
El mejor recurso de turismo para todos en la Espana se llama Boletín Polibea Turismo
Christina Li publishes UI Garden. Her article, Design, Technology and Their Roles in Social Changes, is an interesting piece.
NetSquared is a project to facilitate adoption of new, Web 2.0, social web tools by non-profits. Their informal gatherings and conference in the San Francisco Bay Area are an engine of technology dissemination and best practice sharing.
One topic covered at the NetSquared multi-author blog is Accessibility. In the latest post Sharron Rush looks at Goggle's Accessible Search.

A handbook on Universal Design in Spanish
http://www.rumbos.org.ar/
Stanley Turkel has accomplished something that I have seen few people succeed at. Read his excellent article, Nobody Asked Me But… No. 13 Turning Gray Into Gold
The article combines a checklist of design features, an overview of niche traveler needs & preferences, and an argument that makes business sense. Without mentioning the seven principles of Unversal Design he sums up its benefits introducing his list of design guidelines:
Older Travelers' Physical RequirementsInterior design for senior citizens must take into account the elements of hearing loss, diminished vision, lessened color perception, poorer short-term memory and weakened upper body strength.
While experts agree that hotel facilities for seniors should be designed to offset these difficulties, I believe that, in fact, all hotel guests would benefit from the following improvements
Source:
Nobody Asked Me But… No. 13 Turning Gray Into Gold
The publication of the special forum on travel, disability, and Universal Design in the Review of Disability Studies marks the first sustained look at travel and tourism through the lens of Disability Studies. Below is an abstract of the lead article, "Toward a Global History of Inclusive Travel." The entire work is available the Review of Disability Studies.
With the project of a global chronicle of the development of inclusive travel underway through the work of Laurel Van Horn and José Isola I invite Rolling Rains Readers to submit comments, updates, and contributions of their own.
Toward a Global History of Inclusive Travel
Laurel Van Horn, M.A.
Open Doors Organization
José Isola, President
Peruvian Polio Society
Abstract:
This paper provides an overview of
the development of inclusive travel and tourism,
from its origins in the United States and Europe
following World War I and II to its current status
as an increasingly important and viable move-
ment worldwide. The paper investigates the key
roles played by disability organizations, disabili-
ty rights legislation, technological change, inter-
national organizations and pioneers within the
travel and tourism industry. Developments are
described sector by sector for air travel, ground
transport, the cruise lines and the hospitality in-
dustry. While the primary historical focus is the
U.S., the paper also highlights advances taking
place in Dubai, Egypt, India, Japan, South Af-
rica, Thailand and other countries. It concludes
with a case study by José Isola of the develop-
ment of inclusive travel in Peru. Mr. Isola also
describes disability conferences that took place
in South America in 2004. It is hoped others
will begin to investigate the development of in-
clusive travel in their own countries and regions
and contribute to a truly global history.
Key Words:
inclusive travel, disability move-
ment history, accessible travel
"While the history of accessible travel and tourism is intertwined with the disability rights and independent living movements, sharing their triumphs and setbacks, it has its own landmark events, advocacy organizations, heroes and villains." So begins the first article of volume 2, number 2 of the journal Review of Disability Studies.
The piece is entitled, "Toward a Global History of Inclusive Travel", by Laurel Van Horn, M.A. of the Open Doors Organization and by José Isola, President of the Peruvian Polio Society. In my opinion, one of the landmark events in the progress of inclusive travel is RDS' decision to publish this volume. I am proud to have had the opportunity to edit it - and moreso to have been associated with the scholars whose work is the heart of this issue of the Review of Disability Studies.
Congratulations to those who researched, wrote (and rewrote) for this first examination of travel, disability, and Universal Design from within the field of Disability Studies!
The Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2
Copyright 2006
Table of Contents
Forum: Travel and Tourism, Through the Lens of Disability Studies
Introduction – Scott Rains, Guest Editor
Toward a Global History of Inclusive Travel – Laurel Van Horn, United States & Jose Isola, Peru
Invention of Accessibility: French Urban Public Transportation Accessibility from 1975 to 2006 – Muriel Larrouy, France
Ethnobotany on a Roll! Access to Vietnam - My Lien Nguyen, United States
No. 1 Piano Paralympic in Japan – Lee-ching Heng, Malaysia
Making an Impact: The Benefits of Studying Abroad – Michele Scheib, United States
Optimization of Hotel Reception and Accommodation Service Management for Guests with Disabilities – Marina Flores, Russia
Universal Management: A Proposal to Change the Direction of Accessibility Management in the Australian Tourism Industry to Create Benefits for All Australians and Visitors to Australia – Peter Rice, Australia
Disability Classics
How Long Must We Wait? - Beth Omansky & Mike Oliver
Research Articles
Learning from Each Other: A Theoretical and Applied Overview of the Relationship Between Disability Studies and Peace Studies – Mike Clear & Frank Hutchinson
RASEM Squared: Assisting Students in their Transition to the STEM Workforce –Joseph Misquez, William McCarthy & Stephen Stile
Learning Disabilities, the Missing Discussion in Disability Studies: Is There a Possibility for Alliance? - Waseem Mazher & D. Kim Reid
RDS Information
Subscription Form
Travel and Tourism Through the Lens of Disability Studies
Scott Rains, D. Min.
Zero Divide Fellow, Community Technology Foundation of California
The purpose of this Forum is to establish the topic of travel as a legitimate and illuminating area of inquiry within the broader realm of Disability Studies. My hope is to provide a volume containing works that will be foundational as well as evocative of future lines of research. To that end, this Forum began with a call for papers addressing four topics:
• The history of inclusive travel (travel accommodating those with disabilities)
• The impact of travel on self-identity and disability culture(s)
• The representation of travelers with disabilities in the myth and practice of the travel and hospitality industry
• The place of Universal Design in the sustainability of inclusive travel
History
“Toward a Global History of Inclusive Travel,” by Laurel Van Horn and Jose Isola, is the first published attempt to document the history of inclusive travel. Van Horn, from the USA, and Isola, from Peru, trace this development as one of many topics within the disability rights movement. The authors bring extensive personal knowledge of the emergence of a movement promoting inclusive travel and its maturation process.
Muriel Larrouy examines the development of the disability rights movement in her native France in the article, “Invention of Accessibility: French Urban Public Transportation Accessibility: 1975 to 2004.” She writes as a sociologist through the lens of Baker’s theory of the moral enterprise. Her study analyzes the campaign for accessible public transit in France and the transformative effect on both disability advocacy groups and the definition of disability.
Self and Cultural Identities
An ethnobotanist, My Lien T. Nguyen plunges into the complex intersections created when a Vietnamese-American, wheelchair-using scientist undertakes field research in Vietnam. Part travelogue – recounting the logistical realities of travel and suggesting practical solutions - and part orientation to the work of ethnobotany, “Ethnobotany on a Roll! Access to Vietnam,” also contributes to an understanding of the impact of individuals with disabilities upon their chosen professions.
Malaysian pianist, Lee-chin Heng, reports as a participant in the “No. 1 Piano Paralympic in Japan,” the first Piano Paralympics held in Tokyo, Japan during January, 2005. The event included 99 musicians with disabilities selected from around the world for their high achievement. The tension between great personal accomplishment and the demands of travel with a disability is manifest in various glimpses of the value often attributed to disability cultures – interdependence.
Michele Sheib moves the dialogue on identity forward with, “Making an Impact: The Benefits of Studying Abroad.” Writing from the Mobility International, USA’s National Clearinghouse on Disability and Exchange, Sheib compares the experiences of ten study abroad alumni with published accounts from the general study abroad alumni population and draws out the implications for identity creation.
Travel and Hospitality Industry
The travel and hospitality industry occupies a gatekeeper role in the universe of travel options for those with disabilities. Marina Flores of Russia observes the hospitality industry from within the profession. Her contribution on representation of travelers with disabilities, “Optimization of Hotel Reception and Accommodation Service Management for Guests with Disabilities” is based on original research she has undertaken to measure attitudes toward guests with disabilities and their reflection in the behavior of hotel management and staff.
Universal Management is a concept incorporating the seven principles of Universal Design into the policies and processes of business. Australian Peter Rice provides an in-depth overview of Universal Management in an article of the same name and applies it to inclusive tourism in the Australian context.
Acknowledgements
The production of a work such as this Forum is a collaborative effort. I am grateful for the support of the editors of the Review of Disability Studies, Steven E. Brown and Megan Conway. Their policy of encouraging submissions from previously unpublished authors attracted me to this project and added to its richness. It has been a privilege to work with each of the authors who contributed their work.
With hindsight the years 2004 and 2005 may be revealed as a turning point in the effort to open the travel and hospitality industry to full participation by travelers with disabilities. Australia, Brazil, and Mexico held national conferences on the topic. Taiwan, Japan, Brazil, Germany, and England held regional or international conferences. It is an auspicious time for RDS to bring this dialogue into the heart of the academy with the launch of this Forum.
Scott Rains, D. Min. is a ZeroDivide Fellow of the Community Technology Foundation of California and Director of Programs and Services at SeniorNet, an international organization specializing in technology education for seniors by seniors. He speaks internationally on the topic of travel and Universal Design and the development of tourist destinations. Dr. Rains recently completed a year appointment to the Center for Cultural Studies of the University of California Santa Cruz as Resident Scholar pursuing independent research on the topic. He publishes the Rolling Rains Report on Universal Design, Travel & Disability at http://www.RollingRains.com. He may be reached at srains@oco.net.
Toward a Global History of Inclusive Travel
Laurel Van Horn, M.A.
Open Doors Organization
&
José Isola, President
Peruvian Polio Society
Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the development of inclusive travel and tourism, from its origins in the United States and Europe following World War I and II to its current status as an increasingly important and viable movement worldwide. The paper investigates the key roles played by disability organizations, disability rights legislation, technological change, international organizations and pioneers within the travel and tourism industry. Developments are described sector by sector for air travel, ground transport, the cruise lines and the hospitality industry. While the primary historical focus is the U.S., the paper also highlights advances taking place in Dubai, Egypt, India, Japan, South Africa, Thailand and other countries. It concludes with a case study by José Isola of the development of inclusive travel in Peru. Mr. Isola also describes disability conferences that took place in South America in 2004. It is hoped others will begin to investigate the development of inclusive travel in their own countries and regions and contribute to a truly global history.
Key Words: inclusive travel, disability movement history, accessible travel
SUBSCRIPTION FORM
Please complete this form and mail with payment to the address below.
Please enter a one-year subscription of the Review of Disability Studies for:
Name: ___________________________________________________________
Address: _________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Email: _________________________________
Phone: _________________________________
Please Select:
__Personal $50.00 (personal check only)
__Libraries and Institutions $100.00 (check or purchase order)
__Student $25.00 (please provide a photocopy of a photo ID or other proof of status)
__Additional $15.00 for first class mail outside the U.S. and Canada
Amount enclosed by check or purchase order $____________
Credit Card payments accepted:
Visa or MasterCard only ________________________________Exp Date___________
Name as it appears on the credit card: ____________________________________ VO#_____
Billing Address w/zip code_________________________________________________
Please select if you would like an alternative format to the print version:
__Braille __Large Print
__CD-ROM __Audio Cassette
__Diskette
Email information to Velina@hawaii.edu or
Mail Form and payment to:
RCUH 2144
University of Hawaii at Manoa/CDS
1776 University Avenue, UA 4-6
Honolulu HI, 96822
Attention Subscriptions: Velina Sugiyama
For questions please email rds@cds.hawaii.edu or phone 808-956-5688

"Sailing for Everyone" is the kind of motto that is only possible when folks like Access Dinghies and Socio Engineering Research institute get together.
You can find the seven priciples of Universal Design applied to sailing at Access Dinghies.
Ikea is not promoting Universal Design in these three vignettes on living in a small space but they could become a starting point for some creative thinking about how to apply the seven principles of Unversal Design to built space.
The Washington Post does have Universal Design in mind with its list of accessibility features but does not mention the seven principles of Universal Design. The result is to confuse accessibility -- the sterility of afterthought adaptation -- with UD - style that provides choices for the brodest range of users. See Adaptations for 'Universal Design'
Below is an announcement from the Red Cross seeking qualified individuals to work with persons with disabilities during emergencies and disasters.
Red Cross Seeking Disability "Experts" Nationwide
for Disaster Relief
Apply Today! Deadline for applications June 15!
Training July 10-11 in Washington, DC
Here is an excellent opportunity to get directly involved with
the American Red Cross in providing services to people with
disabilities during emergencies and disasters.
The Red Cross is taking applications for participants in their
new Community Relations activities, part of their Disaster
Services Human Resources (DSHR) program in which they train and
deploy employees and volunteers to serve during emergencies and
disasters.
They are specifically seeking people, with or without
disabilities, who have the requisite specialized knowledge to
advise and assist in working with people with disabilities. The
goal is to train and deploy individuals for both leadership and
direct service duties during disaster relief efforts. The Red
Cross will provide training for the individuals selected and
will work with other partners to coordinate deployment.
There will be a two-day training session in Washington, DC on
July 10 and 11 to prepare the selected volunteers for
deployment during the upcoming hurricane season. The Red Cross
will fund all travel and lodging expenses for those attending
the training. Training details will be provided as applications
are received.
They are also encouraging people who are not already enrolled
in the Red Cross Disaster Services Human Resources system to
register through their local Red Cross chapter prior to
attending the training. Those who do not enroll prior to the
Washington training will be enrolled upon completing the
training session, so they can be deployed when needed.
Deployments during disaster relief efforts are typically for
three-week assignments but can be modified, when necessary, to
accommodate individual schedules.
Please review the selection criteria below and, if you are
interested, submit the attached application form by June 15th,
2006 to Gayle Brock, Director for Diversity, via fax at
202.303.0200 or by email at brockga@usa.redcross.org. Gayle is
also available to answer any questions you have regarding this
undertaking. He can be reached at 202.303.8566.
Selection Criteria for Community Relations Activity
Diversity Values
* Demonstrates a commitment to enhancing diversity and
inclusion.
* Believes that achieving (or enhancing) diversity is a
critical business issue for the Red Cross.
* Values differences (and similarities) in people and respects
their beliefs.
Facilitation Skills
* Demonstrates effective facilitation and discussion skills.
* Able to Initiate and foster relationships with organizations
and individuals representing racial/ethnic minority groups,
people with disabilities, older persons and socially and
economically disadvantaged populations.
Interpersonal Skills
* Listens and responds without making premature judgments.
* Is open to different points of view (accepts alternative
viewpoints).
* Promotes confidence and esteem in self and others.
* Provides constructive feedback and advice in a
non-threatening manner.
* Is flexible and able to adapt to change in high-stress
environments.
* Effective at problem solving; especially across cultures.
Attitudes and Beliefs
* Is positive and enthusiastic.
* Acknowledges that individuals vary in awareness, knowledge
and skills about diversity and inclusion.
Training/Experience
* Background, training or experience in human relations,
diversity or related area desired.
* Background, training or experience directly related to
working with and serving people with disabilities.
______________________________________________________________
For more employment opportunities, see:
http://www.aapd.com/employment/indexemploy.php
The Principles of Universal Design are:
1. Equitable Use: The design does not disadvantage or stigmatize any group of users.2. Flexibility in Use: The design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities.
3. Simple, Intuitive Use: Use of the design is easy to understand, regardless of the user's experience, knowledge, language skills, or current concentration level.
4. Perceptible Information: The design communicates necessary information effectively to the user, regardless of ambient conditions or the user's sensory abilities.
5. Tolerance for Error: The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or unintended actions.
6. Low Physical Effort: The design can be used efficiently and comfortably, and with a minimum of fatigue.
7. Size and Space for Approach & Use: Appropriate size and space is provided for approach, reach, manipulation, and use, regardless of the user's body size, posture, or mobility.
Compiled by advocates of Universal Design in 1997. Participants are listed in alphabetical order: Bettye Rose Connell, Mike Jones, Ron Mace, Jim Mueller, Abir Mullick, Elaine Ostroff, Jon Sanford, Ed Steinfeld, Molly Story, Gregg Vanderheiden. The Principles are copyrighted to the Center for Universal Design, School of Design, State University of North Carolina at Raleigh [USA].
The Principles established a valuable language for explaining the characteristics of Universal Design. They are in common use around the world, sometimes with slight modifications, primarily one or two principles grouped together. It is expected that the principles will be reconsidered on the occasion of their tenth anniversary in 2007 and are likely to evolve in response to experience with implementation and in order to incorporate insights and perspectives from the engagement of more diverse cultures.
Source:
Here's a list of guides on building or altering homes to suit the needs of the elderly or disabled.
AARP Guide to Understanding Universal Design
Very complete Web site includes room-by-room advice and narrated slideshows of homes employing universal-design principles
http://www.aarp.org/families/home_design
National Association of Home Builders' Directory of Certified Aging-in-Place Specialists
Searchable directory of remodelers and contractors who have been trained to understand the home modifications often needed by the older adult population
http://www.nahb.org/directory.aspx?sectionID=686&directoryID=188
The Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University
The leading resource for research and information on universal design provides stock floor plans for houses and detailed plans for home modifications
http://www.design.ncsu.edu:8120/cud
Practical Guide to Universal Home Design
Commonsense, illustrated introduction to universal design with checklist of what to consider when buying, building, or remodeling a home
http://www.tcaging.org/downloads/homedesign.pdf
Universal Design Checklist, Kansas State University
Short checklist of universal-design basics for residences, compiled from multiple sources
http://www.ksu.edu/humec/atid/UDF/ud_checklist.htm
Lifease LivAbility Questionnaire and Report
Personalized report ($19.95) offers suggestions as well as links to products tailored to your specific living situation and physical abilities
http://www.lifease.com/lifease-livability.html
Homes for Easy Living: Universal Design Innovations
Complete with resources and examples, this is the Web site of an award-winning consultant specializing in single- and multifamily universally designed housing
http://www.homesforeasyliving.com
Network of Care, Alameda County, Calif.
Searchable database of more than 21,000 assistive tools for the elderly or disabled
http://alameda.networkofcare.org/aging/assistive/index.cfm
Lowe's Home Improvement How-To Library: Universal Design
Room-by-room recommendations for remodeling projects that can help you around the house
http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=howTo&p=HTindex/universalDesign_index.html&rn=RightNavFiles/no.html
The tourism industry segments the general market of travelers in order to understand its market. Seniors, families, students, various nationalities or ethnicities, luxury travelers as well as people with disabilities all fit into that universe. Wikipedia's entry on tourism got me to thinking about "Health Tourism."
Now, anything dealing with medicine and disability runs the risk of controversy and hijacking into arguments about limits of the "medical model of disability." However, there is an actual industry around travel for medical purposes -- and tourism while at the destination - that is quite competitive. Some basics are discussed at the blog Jigsaw Puzzle:::::: .
Further Reading:
http://tngicubehealthcare.blogspot.com/2005/02/global-health-trade.html
As Buddhists, Zagrodnik and her business partner Scott Thomas see their work as a well-planned holistic view of human nature and their environment.
“In a spiritual sense, we are just being responsible human beings.” “Universal” should in no way be taken to mean “impersonal.” The key term in universal design is “flexibility” and it's never too late to incorporate this idea into your home, either by remodeling storage space to be more accessible, or rearranging furniture throughout the house to allow rooms to be used by multiple people for multiple purposes. There's a lot of beauty in universal design–both in theory and in actuality. “Because the underlining idea is conscientious planning, our designs also use more natural light and windows, and gradual levels to accent space, which can really be beautiful.” Ultimately, universal design means eliminating distinctions between "abled" and disabled. The concepts of ageless design don't have the stigma that the public may attach to recognizable “handicap” facilities.
Source:
There's No Place Like Home When You Do It Right
by Kate Bartkiewicz
Vision Magazine
http://www.visionmagazine.com/5_06/innerart.htm
Travel agencies may be disappearing from the mall but travel agents have adapted.
Here is an advertisement for A-1 Travel Vacation making an appeal to retiring Boomers. Let's hope that the new crop of agents continue to bring the wisdom of Universal Design and Inclusive Tourism to the travel industry.

Do you have an idea for a presentation on Inclusive Tourism?
Consider proposing a presentation at the Special Thematic Session (STS) on Accessible Tourism during the 10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 06, http://www.icchp.org ), 12-14 July 2006, Johannes Kelper University, Linz, Austria
The STS is organized to provide a forum for the discussion of major issues related to accessible tourism for people with disabilities, to identify existing barriers as well as technologies, strategies and approaches to promote barrier-free tourism.
Further information at:
http://www.ki-i.at/ICCHP_06_accessible_tourism.htm
At the University of Minnesota, in the Tourism Center, there are several straightforward articles on Universal Design and Tourism.
Design and Travelers with Disabilities
http://www.tourism.umn.edu/about/news/design.html
Aging and Disabilities: The U Responds
http://www.tourism.umn.edu/about/news/aging.html
Market Issue: Travelers with Disabilities
http://www.tourism.umn.edu/about/news/disabilities_market.html
For more information about this trend and the Center's work, contact Ingrid Schneider at ingridss@umn.edu, 612-624-2250.
The Mature Market offers this interview with Myriam Van Espen co-0founder of SeniorInnovation.
You can read this article with the attention-grabbing title, "Our main concern is to avoid a war between the generations ... " Here is a quote:
And what about Universal Design?
The notion of Universal Design is still too much disregarded by many decision-makers and merits far greater attention in many places. This year, Senior Innovation has dealt with two cases highlighting this shortcoming: the numerical split and seniors, and housing and the aged. There is still a long way to go before this concept takes root …
The obvious, out of the mouths of the rich and famous, often gets a better hearing.
Fortunately for all of us the the rich and famous man who uttered these words of epiphany can be an effective global evangelist for Universal Design. Read Fast Company's article on architect Michael Graves, A Design for Living
Learning from the case of Michael Graves -- disability and business management (from Fast Company magazine):
Fast Take: Out of Commission: Guiding a Company When the Leader Is Sidelined
1. Come to a consensus about how the crisis will be handled and communicated, internally and externally.
2. Communicate as quickly as possible with your staff to maintain morale. Give them honest, coherent messages (and updates) and let them know what they can tell others.
3. Speak personally with clients and professional colleagues. Convey how the firm is handling their projects, whether or not that has changed.
4. If relevant, keep the public informed. Provide forthright and consistent updates, including information about the sidelined leader and how the firm is continuing to conduct its business.
5. Keep the leader in the loop. If illness is the cause of the crisis, balance ongoing productive involvement in the practice with the understanding that health is the number-one priority.
6. Manage expectations going forward, both inside and outside the firm. Explain new policies, if any, in the conduct of your practice.
Sustainabletourism.net is a website which offers information, case
studies and consulting services for sustainable/responsible tourism.
The newly redesigned website now offers:
- case studies on sustainable tourism including destination,
organisation, policies and publications/reports
- in-depth resources page with links on ecotourism, responsible
/sustainable tourism awards, green hotel information, the Millennium
Development Goals and certification
- questions for assessing CSR for organisations and companies
See:
http://www.sustainabletourism.net
Universal Design Education Online is a joint resource provided by Center for Universal Design, N.C. State University; IDEA Center, University at Buffalo; Global Universal Design Educator's Network. See: http://udeproto.ap.buffalo.edu/resources/pubs/ShowPubs.asp
Yuquan Shi has published a study entitled, "The accessibility of Queensland visitor information centres' websites"
I was researching a blogging tool, Nucleus, for a new project when I stumbled across The Tourism & Hospitality and Diaries. It is written fo students in the field and does not specifically address universal design but is a helpful resource on trends and studies.
http://www.thetalentjungle.com/hospitality_blog/
Kitchen & Bath Design News writes on the growing acceptance -- they even characterize it as a "boom" -- in Universal Design in residential design. Here are three of their articles on the subject:
Universal Design May Offer Edge to Contractors, Experts Believe
http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/publication/article.jsp?siteSection=3&id=302
Firm Specializes in Designs That Facilitate in Aging-in-Place
http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/publication/article.jsp?siteSection=5&id=2622
A Woman's Place is in the Kitchen Industry
http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/publication/article.jsp?siteSection=18&id=2615
A brief paraphrase of the press release below in Portuguese is that the Othon network of hotels in Rio de Janeiro has launched an intiative to hire 12 hospitality professionals with disabilities. This will bring the total number of employees with disabilities in the 8 Othon hotels in Rio to 42.
My confidence in a hotel, or airline, always goes up when I see "someone like me" reflected in the staff. I do not recall meeting employees with disabilities in my last stay in an Othon in Rio. Parabems Rede Othon! And parabems to those lucky candidates who land the new jobs!!
Rede Othon contrata profissionais portadores de deficiência
Exercendo sua responsabilidade social, a rede Hotéis Othon lança o projeto "Tom do Othon", voltado à inclusão profissional de pessoas portadoras de necessidades especiais.
Inicialmente serão oferecidas 12 vagas para contratação nos oito hotéis da rede no Rio. É preciso ter o 2º grau completo e noções de informática para serviços administrativos e o 1º grau completo com experiência anterior em carteira para serviços gerais. Os currículos devem ser encaminhados para o email curriculo@othon.com.br, especificando o tipo de deficiência do candidato.
Até o final do ano, a rede esperar atingir a meta de ter 60 funcionários deficientes em seu quadro. Hoje, são cerca de 45, sendo 30 empregados nos oito hotéis da Othon no Rio. Esse número aproxima-se da cota máxima prevista na lei federal 8213, de 1991, que obriga as empresas a reservar de 1% a 5% de seu quadro de funcionários a.
A Hotéis Othon já mantém parcerias voltadas à capacitação profissional com a Universidade da Estácio de Sá, com o Senac e o Programa do Primeiro Emprego
Fonte: www.mercadoeeventos.com.br
Douglas Bowman doesn't write about Universal Design. He is, in fact, a very successful visual designer specializing in simple, standards based, online design.
So it was poignant to read his account of an encounter with a blind user who appreciates his though and work. Read A Different Gravity.
Coral Nafie, who writes tjhe Interior Decorating section at About.com has a good collection of resources on Universal Design It has a consumer orientation so does not include a link to another good site Adaptive Environments and their excellent resource pages.
The Community Technology Foundation of California (Full Disclosure: where I am a ZeroDivide Fellow) is a funder of the new DVD release of the exemplary Assistive Technology/Universal Design program from PBS, "Freedom Machines." Read on to find out how to purchase a copy at discount.
(San Francisco, December 9, 2005) The producers of the groundbreaking PBS program announced a special release today of the FREEDOM MACHINES DVD Education Package, a powerful new resource for university and secondary school educators, school districts, staff and professional development, and government and community agencies.
FREEDOM MACHINES premiered as a PBS Fall Special on the award-winning POV series. The film has been praised as "an essential primer on disability in the age of technology" for its exploration of the ways people are recasting their lives with the help of new technologies. Through the stories of adults and children ages 8-93, the film reveals the human and social benefits of providing access to life-enhancing tools to people with disabilities.
-SPECIAL OFFER: 35% introductory discount if ordered by December 31, 2005
The FREEDOM MACHINES DVD Education Package provides an easy to navigate, interactive experience. Among a handful of DVDs worldwide with full accessibility features--including Talking Menus and Video Description for viewers with visual impairments--this innovative product is one of the first in a bilingual format available to users of all physical abilities. It includes:
-Director/producer Jamie Stobie's cut of the PBS program, FREEDOM MACHINES, re-designed for instructional use with chapter cues and segment running times.
-Four new segments with practical information on the types of assistive technology available today, legal rights and advocacy for people with disabilities, how to obtain necessary technology, and Universal Design.
-Downloadable, interactive resources and web support for educators and facilitators.
Executive Producer Janet Cole whose credits include the Oscar�-nominated "Regret to Inform" and "Promises" said, "Fifteen years after the ADA, FREEDOM MACHINES reflects on our nation's commitment to our largest minority group, people with disabilities. Today, physical or mental impairments need not be impediments if people have access to necessary technologies, services, and accommodations. Human ingenuity and technology have evolved exponentially. Now the real challenge is mobilizing the social will to dismantle outmoded stereotypes and nurture the talents of 20% of our citizens."
�FREEDOM MACHINES is required viewing for teachers, service providers, policy makers, and anyone who works with disabled children, adults, or seniors."
--Andy Imparato, President & CEO, American Association of People with Disabilities
"REMARKABLE. FREEDOM MACHINES manages a near-perfect balance of compassion, humor, political insight, and deep admiration for the people it profiles--individuals whose lives have been significantly improved by new technologies that bring hope where none existed before. 3.5 STARS."
--Video Librarian
�FREEDOM MACHINES is the gigantic wake-up call needed by future teachers. I can think of no better way to challenge our attitudes and thinking than by viewing this film."
--Mary Male, Professor, San Jose State University
TO ORDER the FREEDOM MACHINES Education Package visit www.freedommachines.com. Enter the promo code VYSA8S for a 35% discount if ordered before December 31st. For more information, please call: 415-821-3791
FREEDOM MACHINES was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Independent Television Service (ITVS) with funds from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), the Community Technology Foundation of California (CTFC), The California Endowment, and the Sundance Institute Documentary Fund. Support for the production of the DVD Education Package was provided by SBC, the Community Technology Foundation of California, the Price-Galinson Trust, and Parents Helping Parents with funds from the California Consumer Protection Foundation. Translations were provided by the SBC Spanish Translation Group.

Disability Writes has a unique mandate. It is a service for writers with disabilities.
From the web site:
This website has been set up by Just Services with funding from Arts Council England. Many disabled people face barriers in getting support and encouragement to write. This may be because there is:
- A lack of physical access to places where non-disabled people find such support.
- A lack of understanding, or an unwillingness to listen to the support needed by disabled people.
- An unwillingness to consider that what disabled writers have to say is of value.
- An unwillingness to give honest, constructive feedback to disabled people.
Disability Writes actively supports and encourages disabled writers, whatever their previous writing experience. It promotes the work of disabled writers to a wide audience of disabled and non-disabled people through this website and printed publications.
"Usability" is the term common among designers of digital information and information interfaces who are interested in Universal Design. Universal Design arises from disability culture in which human variability is definitive and, increasingly, a source of pride and inspiration. Disability culture and its products such as Universal Design interact with values and artifacts produced by other cultures where non-disability is the dominant cultural norm and the rewarded bodily status.
It is instructive to observe to emergence of conversations such as the one at UI Garden where a threefold self-aware conversation takes place between UD, Eastern and Western cultures.
Even now the solution focused, business-oriented discussion has direct applicability for those pursuing Universal Design in the travel and hospitality industry. The quetions that can be explored in this East/West nexus could not be more relevant to tourism professionals.
I recommend watching UI Garden grow.
Selected Articles:
November Editor's Commentary>
http://www.uigarden.net/english/?q=lisney
Practicing Usability in Hong Kong
http://www.uigarden.net/english/practicing-usability-in-hong-kong
It is always a little disheartening to find out that I am no more than a lemming in my style preferences. The door operators in my home? Lever. The finish on my bathroom fixtures? Brushed nickel.
The Quad City Times tells me I am not alone:
Brushed nickel is a popular finish for new home buyers, even when it costs more...Buyers in higher-priced houses want levers instead of knobs on their doors.
The article doesn't say so but chances are good that these same high-end home buyers respond to lever door handles in hotels, spas, and resorts with the thought, "That's quality - and it feels like home!"
Universal Design is defining the hotel of the future. Once it gets out the door it will define the whole neighborhood -- Inclusive Destination Development.
Some ideologues argue against accessibility because it "beaks the esthetic." The truth is, an esthetic that permits inaccessiblity is already irrecoverably broken.
Launching into study of Christopher Alexander's Pattern Language has been an engaging intellectual exercise. By no means can I claim to have mastered his thought but some initial thoughts occur to me. Resonant with Chomskian sensibilities the search for gramaticality in Alexander's work seems to substitute for the proscriptive esthetics of more precious constructs like New Urbanism. That is a hopeful sign.
Alexander's essay "Methods" which discusses the role of " generative sequence" and its essential feature as being "backtrack-free" strikes me as the Pattern Language argument against retrofitting ("backtracking") - and, by extension, as argument for Universal Design.
This is because Universal Design incorporates the lifespan-aware definition of disability outlined in the International Categorization of Functionality (ICF). Good design, even for those who remain in the temporary state identified and reinforced by the built environment as "able bodied," must take into account the functionalities associated with a complete lifespan -- childhood, temporary injury, tiredness, lapses of attention, the posssibility of permanent disability, and aging. To achieve the goal of livability each action undertaken must not eliminate the possibility a future one made necessary, for example, by disability:
There is one essential ingredient to the sequences, which is perhaps their most salient feature, and which is also the feature that makes them work, and which forms the foundation of the described methodology.A sequence works, or does not work, according to the order of the steps in the sequence. Some sequences allow unfolding, others do not allow it.
This property of being backtrack-free is the essence of what makes a successful sequence.
This approach and business method is fundamentally different from previous attempts to plan, design and construct buildings. The present methodology provides for user participation in the planning design and construction of the built environment in a manner which allows the organic growth of a design through a sequence of generative steps...
It is a major feature of this proposal that urban space is not only made better, not only made coherent and beautiful, and connected, but that it also contains the desires and will and thought of many, many individual people.
Some of Alexander's thoughts on Urban Redevelopment, laid out in his 2000 article on Thessaloniki, seem even more feasible in light of functionalities for collaboration eveolving as "Web 2.0."
The radical democratization of the unfolding of design he envisions can only work, however, if the anthropometrics accepted as "normal" by the dominant culture take into account the full range of human functionality -- childhood, disability, aging. There exists a class of people made invisible and voiceless by all examples of urban space up to this point in history - even the best, most organic, most esthetically pleasing - people with disabilities. They will not automatically be heard simply through access to digital amplification of their peripheral voices.
The recent Paralympic Games did much to raise awareness of difference in Greece but not enough to give the seven principles of Universal Design or the practice of Visitability the ubiquity necessary for this methodology to generate a Livable Community.
Still, the deep insight of Pattern Language remains congruent with a core, pan-disability cultural value -- interdependency. Alexander seems to return often to that theme under the term "belonging", or in the Thessaloniki speech, "deep pleasantness."
I am struck that in biological systems growth ocurs at the periphery. That is the space -- both metaphoric and physical -- to which those with disabilties are relegated. To be true to its fascination with biomimicry, Pattern Language ought to engage itself in sustained, interpreted observation of the patterns produced by disability cultures.
Universal Design arose from within disability culture. It is an actively nurtured and evolving production that authentically expresses, and simultaneously progresses, the vitality of that community.
What would a fully developed dialogue between Universal Design and Pattern Language produce?
Maybe it's time to find out.
The city of the future should not be, as some may think, a fabric to be modernized by stripping out and enlargement of structure, and by destruction. Instead, careful observation, street by street, wall by wall, of the very subtle things which work now, and which make people deeply comfortable, can provide a new kind of solution more in keeping with the humanity of our new century, more in keeping with the promise of the 21st century as the century of biology -- that is, a century which may now be dominated by small scale intimacy, by complexity arrived at by working complexity created by sometimes tiny human structures cooperating to form more complex streets, and spaces, and foci, and opportunities for human life.
Who will "Bring New Orleans Back Home?" Could it be the very people disproportionately left behind to bear the brunt of Katrina's destruction because the very inaccessibility of the city eliminated any chance of retreat from reality? Could it be that the view from the sidelines, disabled and meticulously attentive, holds the secret to renewal and rebirth?
From the Tennesean -- Universal Design as mainstream in private home construction:
Instead of knobs, many people choose levers to give them the upper hand in opening and closing doors.Once marketed only to older people, the levers are now targeted at homeowners of all ages, especially if the builder is using universal design principles in a house.
Full article:
Senior-friendly levers improve door design
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051029/LIVING02/510290346/1007/LIVING
A report, Standards and Anthropometry for Wheeled Mobility, is now available from a study the Access Board commissioned on wheeled mobility and human measures.
The report was prepared by the Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access (IDEA Center) at the State University of New York at Buffalo which is undertaking a major multi-year project to collect human measures data on people who use wheeled mobility aids. Started in 1999, this work will continue at least through 2006. The research team is gathering data at various locations across the U.S. to ensure a representative sample.
According to Dr. Edward Steinfeld, Project Director, sufficient data has been collected to start a dialogue on some of the findings, which suggest that current accessibility standards may not be adequate for today's population of people who use wheeled mobility aids. Drawing upon information collected and developed in completed phases of the project, the report reviews research conducted in other countries (Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada) and its influence on their access standards.
The comparative analysis developed for this report provides a framework for the future comparison of research findings and standards and offers a foundation for improving the utilization of research for standards development. The analysis highlights the importance of integrating research with standards development, organizing international research collaborations, and developing international standards, all of which the IDEA Center is helping to advance with support from the Board in addition to its ongoing work collecting human measures data. The report is available on the IDEA Center's website at http://www.ap.buffalo.edu/idea/Anthro/index.asp.
Source:
The Access Board
Access Currents
Volume 11, No.5 September/ October 2005
Sometimes, all that is necessary is a quote. Dan Bawden writes for Legal Eagle Contractors to make a point even better than I could do it myelf:
The Greater Houston Builders Association (GHBA) is one of the only locations in the country offering regular certification classes in Aging-in-Place/Universal design. We designed the [Certified Aging in Place Specialist] CAPS certification for people involved in residential design and construction says Bawden. Its a welcome surprise that the CAPS training classes also bring in realtors, architects, ASID Designers, and occupational therapists.
![]()
As design-build remodelers, we discuss the wisdom of planning ahead with aging-in-place ideas with all our clients from the beginning - young and old says Howie Sussman, a Project Manager for Legal Eagle, adding Things like lever handle faucets, grab bars, raised washers, dryers, and dishwashers are good universal design ideas for everyone, from seniors to grandchildren. Its a no-brainer.Realtors used to worry that universal design or visitable home would decrease a homes value, having a hospital-like look. They are finding out that the opposite is true. If attractive, non-institutional products and handsome design ideas are used, the value of that home actually increases, according to Bawden.
Or, to use the decsriptor that Mary Jo Peterson used in her excellent presentation to the Northern California chapter of the National Kitcehn and Bath Association on October 20, "Universal Design is 'Access + Esthetics'."
Further Reading:
What is a Certified Aging-in-Place Specialist (CAPS)?
Does FEMA Hire Certified Aging in Place Specialists?
http://www.mjpdesign.com/newsandpublications.htm

I am very pleased to see Turismo Polibea of Madrid, Spain increase its offerings in English. Spain has long been a strong proponent of Inclusive Tourism but their pioneering efforts have been somewhat overlooked by those who cannot access the information in Spanish.
Most recently at their siteLuis Grnewald of Fundacin Turismo para Todos has published a study of quality in inclusive tourism. Much has been written about the nuts & bolts of Universal Design in travel but Grnewald joins a small group of authors such as Peter Rice of Australia in developing the concept of Universal Management.
Read : Quality in Tourism and Inclusive Travel
At the same time, Mexico has just completed their annual conference on Inclusive Travel in Mazatlan. See (in Spanish):
"Consejo Estatal de Turismo para Todos"
Readers of the Village Voice were treated to an articulate review of the field of Disability Studies in the article by Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow The wheel world: Is disability studies academia's next frontier?" Disability Studies scholar -- and avid traveler -- Simi Linton explains in the piece,
"The curriculum had traditionally housed disability in a very sequestered areahow to fix people and take care of them. Disability studies is us looking out at the world and seeing how that looks to us." It also critiques "how disability is represented in all kinds of textsin literature, film, the annals of history."
It is no surprise that the disability studies field also monitors carefully for inclusive travel developments in the travel and hospitality industry. The field of Disability Studies provides the intellectual motivation and rigor behind the growing literature in tourism and people with disabilities.
Source: http://villagevoice.com/arts/0531,education5,66456,12.html
International Accessibility Standards for Persons with Disabilities is the title of a presentation to be given by Betty Dion, Chair of the International Commission on Technology and Accessibility for Rehabilitation International. Betty is the author of Best Practices in Universal Design: A Comparative Study. Her presentation will be in Washington, DC Wednesday July 27, 2005 in World Bank Building "G."
From the Press Release:
Sponsored by the World Bank Disability & Development Team and USAID
International Accessibility Standards for Persons with Disabilities
Who: Betty Dion, Chair
International Commission on Technology and Accessibility A
Commission of Rehabilitation International
When: Wednesday July 27, 2005 12:30 - 2:00 PM
Where: World Bank, G Building, Room G7-161
Chair: Mr. Rob Horvath, USAID, Program Development Advisor
RSVP: sdell@worldbank.org
Abstract:
Betty Dion will provide an historical overview of the development of
international accessibility standards from around the world. The author of Best Practices in Universal Design: A Comparative Study, Betty will provide a global analysis of the similarities and differences in accessibility standards and codes will highlight diverse technical and cultural approaches. She will provide information on international access standards and standards that have been used in the re-building and re-construction of both post-disaster and post-war situations. The presentation will include an example of the costs of
including accessibility into the initial design and construction of buildings and the long term benefits to society, demonstrated by a cost benefit analysis for building an accessible school in Galle, Indonesia.
Presenter:
Betty Dion is the Chair of ICTA Global, the International Commission on
Technology and Accessibility, a Commission of Rehabilitation International (RI), an organization with members from over 100 countries.
She chaired the Canadian Standards Association CAN CSA B651 M-04 Accessibility of the Built Environment for ten years and represents Canada on the ISO TC59/SC16 Committee, responsible for the Accessibility and Usability of the Built Environment Standard.
Betty has worked extensively in Canada and Internationally on accessibility issues relating to human rights and accessibility in the areas of transportation, large public facilities, homes and has conducted accessibilityaudits for human rights commissions in Canada.
Disability Accommodations:
American Sign Language will be provided. For other accommodation needs, please contact us at sdell@worldbank.org.
Location:
The venue is the World Bank G Building at 1776 G Street, North West. The
entrance is on G Street, between 17th and 18th Streets. (Please see Map below)
The room is on the 7th Floor. The closest Metros are Farragut West and Farragut
North.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic17398.jpg)
Security:
After your RSVP is received, visitors? Passes will be available for registered
guests at the G Building front desk. Please bring your photo ID with you.
For more information, please visit our website at:
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALPROTECTION/EXTDISABILITY/0,,contentMDK:20209051~menuPK:472435~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:282699,00.html
Beth Haller has compiled a useful online resource for journalists:
http://spj.org/diversity_toolbox_disabil.asp
National Center on Disability and Journalism (NCDJ) is an independent journalism organization that also has a resource for journalists. Their mission is to educate journalists and educators about disability reporting issues in order to produce more accurate, fair and diverse news reporting:
The conference, Envisioning Universal Design: Creating an Inclusive Society held October 2-3, 2003 produced a document that still has value today. While it only mentions Inclusive Tourism in passing, the central discussion on Universal Design is applicable throughout. Especially in light of the upcoming Australian consultation on developing a research agenda for barrier free tourism, this report still has relevance.
Envisioning Universal Design: Creating an Inclusive Society
http://www.nea.gov/resources/Accessibility/ud/issues_b.html
The German Study, The Economic Impulses of Accessible Tourism for All provides both content and a methological template for those Rolling Rains Report readers who are preparing national policy on Inclusive Tourism and Inclusive Destination Development.
Chapter 1: Introduction and methodology
Economic impulses of accessible Tourism for All 1
Preliminary remarks
In November 2002 Germany's Federal Ministry
of Economics and Labour commissioned
a project group, comprising the
INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY and the
INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT SCIENCE at the
UNIVERSITY OF MNSTER and the consulting
firms NEUMANNCONSULT and REPPEL +
LORENZ, to conduct a study on the economic
impulses of accessible Tourism for
All. The research project was supported by
the National Coordination Agency for Tourism
for All e.V. (NatKo) and various national
disability organisations and tour operators.
The present abridged version of the study
contains a description of the methodology,
the most important results and the ensuing
recommendations.
1.1 Problems and objectives
Following a resolution of the Council of the
European Union, 2003 was declared the
European Year of People with Disabilities.
One of the core objectives of the activities
conducted over the course of the year was
to promote extensive accessibility in all
areas of society.
Besides being a socially relevant concern,
accessibility also has an economic dimension.
This study serves to analyse and
evaluate this economic dimension in relation
to the field of accessible Tourism for
All. The study hence focuses on the
economic, rather than the social, significance
of accessible Tourism for All.
It recognises the fact that in the field of
tourism, too, accessibility is often only considered
in terms of its price tag. However,
if one were to hypothesise that persons
with disabilities generally have the same
travel needs and motivations as everyone
else and are prevented from travelling only
by the presence of barriers, it can be assumed
that their travel intensity and in turn,
the demand for tourism services will increase
if these barriers to travel were removed.
This would turn persons with disabilities
into an important customer group
for the tourism industry, and the promotion
of accessible tourism facilities and
services would become a significant
economic factor (cf. EUROPEAN
COMMISSION 1996, p. 9).
Besides testing this hypothesis, this study
serves to identify the concrete economic
impulses of the implementation
of accessible Tourism for All in Germany,
particularly in terms of
its customer potential, and
the resulting economic impacts.
To date, no confirmed statistical data is
available for travellers with disabilities in
Germany. The same applies to their travel
behaviour and travel spending. Any available
information on their market potential in
relation to Germany tends to be based on
the 1998 study by GUGG & HANK-HAASE.
This and other studies are based above all
on estimates and a limited number of random
empirical surveys (cf. e.g. TREINEN
1998; NATKO 2002; WILKEN 2002;
MALLAS/NEUMANN/WEBER 2003).
The study also intends to produce the
first reliable data on the demand and
travel behaviour of this customer group
in Germany.
2 Economic impulses of accessible Tourism for All
On the one hand, this information will help
to identify this potential target groups concrete
requirements and quality expectations;
on the other, fundamental statements
on the nature of accessible Tourism for All
from a tourism perspective can be produced.
In order to ensure the sustainability of economic
impulses of accessible Tourism for
All, development objectives and strategies
for accessible tourism in Germany
and concrete recommendations for action
must be produced.
Objectives of the study at a glance:
1. Conceptual definition of accessible
Tourism for All
2. Procurement of reliable data and
statements on the customers potential
and travel behaviour
3. Identification of economic impulses
of implementing accessible Tourism
for All
4. Production of development objectives
and strategies for accessible
Tourism for All
5. Development of action programme
including concrete recommendations
for action
1.2 Accessible Tourism for All:
Concept and target group
The idea behind accessible Tourism for All
is based on the Design for All philosophy
that was developed at European level. Design
for All is an approach towards (re-)
designing the built environment, products
and services such that all persons are enabled
to participate equitably in life in the
community (cf. EUCAN 2003, p. 22).
This planning philosophy also provides the
foundation for the concept of 'Tourism for
All': Everyone regardless of whether
they have any disabilities should be
able to travel to the country, within the
country and to whatever place, attraction
or event they should wish to visit
(NORDISKA HANDIKAPPOLITISKA RDET
2002, p. 17).
In Germany, accessibility (Barrierefreiheit)
is a civil right and its establishment is
based on the currently applicable legal provisions
and standards. The German act on
the equality of persons with disabilities
(Behindertengleichstellungsgesetz/BGG) of
1 May 2002 provides a statutory framework.
At Lnder (federal state) level, acts
on equal opportunities apply that are in
development or have already been adopted
by almost all Lnder, along with the respective
construction ordinances (cf. FREHE/
NEUMANN 2003). The currently applicable
DIN standards, e.g. DIN 18024 und 18025,
are also relevant to the implementation of
accessibility. While they determine the
technical standards, they have no direct
legal or factual force.
The legal force of DIN standards for the
tourism industry is defined by the respective
construction codes or other ordinances
of the Lnder.
Chapter 1: Introduction and methodology
Economic impulses of accessible Tourism for All 3
The implementation of accessibility affects
all areas of society, including the
facilities and services in the tourism
industry. These comprise not just construction
projects, but also means of transport,
electronic, information and communication
systems as well as facilities and services.
1
The accessibility principle is still applied
only to one target group, that of persons
with disabilities. This is incomprehensible,
especially since reports and studies in
Germany and across Europe2 repeatedly
find that implementing accessibility is in
the interest of everyone, not just of one
particular group of persons with special
needs. For instance, it is a known fact that
an accessible built environment is a crucial
requirement for around 10% of the population,
a necessity for approx. 30 to 40% and
comfortable for 100%.
The group of persons for whom accessibility
is a crucial prerequisite for participating
in community life includes persons with
physical limitations (e.g. persons of limited
mobility or manual dexterity, wheelchair
users), sensory disabilities (e.g.
blind/visually impaired or hearingimpaired/
late-deafened persons) as well as
those with mental or learning disabilities or
chronic diseases. The group of persons for
whom an accessible built environment is
1 Cf. the definition of barrier-free in Section 4 of the
BGG: Buildings and other installations, means of
transportation, technical devices, information processing
systems, acoustic and visual sources of information
and communication devices as well as
other designed environments are deemed barrierfree
if they can be accessed and used by disabled
persons in a normal manner, without encountering
any difficulties and as a rule, without requiring help
from a third party.
2 Cf., at European level e.g. INSTITUTO UNIVERSITARIO
DE ESTUDIOS EUROPEOS/UNIVERSIDAD AUTNOMA DE
BARCELONA 2002, EUCAN 2003, EUROPEAN
COMMISSION 2003 and COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES 2003.
necessary includes above all persons with
activity limitations3, e.g. persons who (may)
encounter difficulties in terms of mobility or
activity both in everyday situations and
while travelling. These include e.g. persons
suffering temporarily from the effects of an
accident, parents with prams or baby carriages,
travellers with heavy baggage, families
with small children or older persons.
Ultimately, the establishment of accessibility
in the tourism infrastructure enables all
persons to enjoy simple, intuitive and safe
access, thereby enhancing the level of
comfort, the attractiveness and quality of
tourism facilities and services (cf.
ZEIMETZ/NEUMANN 2000).
1.3 Methodology
The complexity of analysing the economic
significance of accessible Tourism for All
called for a combination of approaches
and methods of empirical social research.
As economic impulses were being
identified rather than directly monitored, the
study employed both direct and indirect
research methods.
A choice was made in favour of direct access
in the form of quantitative and qualitative
surveys. The quantitative collection
method, which employed written and oral
surveys among potential customers with
disabilities and service providers in the
holiday regions, proved highly effective for
recording general tendencies regarding the
3 In the 2001 World Health Organization's International
Classification of Functioning, Disability and
Health (ICF), the term activity limitation replaces the
term 'disability. In consequence, the term people
with disabilities is replaced by people with activity
limitations, which is defined as follows: Those people,
of all ages, who are unable to perform, independently
and without aid, basic human activities or
tasks because of a health condition or physical/
mental/cognitive/ psychological impairment of a
permanent or temporary nature. (cf. WHO 2001).
Chapter 1: Introduction and methodology
3 Economic impulses of accessible Tourism for All
attitudes and requirements of travellers
with disabilities.
The qualitative interviews with tourism
service providers and decision-makers
proved particularly useful in those areas
where the collection of scientifically valuable
information is difficult due to the complexity
and intransparency of problem
situations related to accessible Tourism for
All. Tourism service providers and decision-
makers were surveyed who are particularly
familiar with the spatial and social
circumstances in the five regions selected
for this study.
In addition, written questionnaires (socalled
mystery mailings) and an analysis
of Web presences were used to establish
the quality of tourism destinations marketing
efforts and information with regard to
accessible travelling. This investigation
covered 146 tourism regions, 46 cities and
62 spa towns.
For instance, documents and reports on
promotion programmes for accessible tourism
from 18 European countries were analysed.
Relevant minutes, files, specialist
publications, statistics and press releases
were analysed and evaluated.
The following sections discuss the characteristics
of the various surveys. The full
version of this report also illustrates the
results of the European benchmark study.
1.3.1 Survey among potential customers
The conceptual and organisational focus of
the first phase of the research project was
a survey among the potential users of accessible
tourism facilities.
The first task consisted in drawing up an
database of addresses of those persons
with disabilities who were eligible for taking
part in this survey. In this context, the cooperation
with major German disability
organisations (associations for visuallyimpaired,
blind or physically disabled persons
or persons with learning or mental
disabilities)4, the tour operator mare nostrum
and the German Automobile Club
(ADAC) proved highly effective. An address
list containing some 20,000 persons
with disabilities was thus produced. In February
2003 these persons were sent a
largely standardised, easy-to-understand
questionnaire by post. The questionnaire
was also placed on the internet at
www.tourismus-fuer-alle.de/umfrage, having
been made accessible also for blind
and visually impaired persons.
As, from experience, the rate of return was
anticipated to reach 10 to 15% at most,
some 2,000 questionnaires were expected
back.
However, these expectations were far
exceeded by the return of 4,401 completed
questionnaires which gives rise to
the assumption that accessible travel is of
strong interest to persons with disabilities.
4,062 questionnaires were considered suitable
for statistical evaluation.
Strongly representative results were not
expected prior to the survey, also due to
the voluntary nature of the study that
tended to cause only those persons to respond
who feel strongly about, or are particularly
affected by, the subject of the
questionnaire. Furthermore, when selecting
addressees for the questionnaires it was
impossible to extract a strictly representa-
4 BSK, DBS, DVBS, People First and Pro Retina (cf.
Acknowledgements).
Source:
http://www.bmwa.bund.de/Redaktion/Inhalte/Pdf/doku-526-en,property=pdf.pdf
It is with gratitude that I publish for you, below, the work of Brazilian tourism student, Catharina de Medeiros Lacerda.
Catharina is a student of the prestigious Sorbonne (IREST Universit Paris I Panthon Sorbonne). Her generosity reaches beyond sharing this work with readers of the Rolling Rains Report. She, together with Hugo Crtes de Paula and Cristiane Guimares, are the intellectual muscle behind a Forum on inclusive travel to be launched next week at eTur.com.br. Catharina's post on disability and travel (in Portuguese; http://www.etur.com.br/conteudocompleto.asp?IDConteudo=6160) has brought to light an desire for professional development on the topic among the Brazilian tourism students using eTur.com.br.
We wish you success in your career. A career launched with this spirit of professional service is a bright spot on the horizon.
IREST Universit Paris I Panthon Sorbonne
Etudiante : Catharina de Medeiros Lacerda
TOURISME ET HANDICAP EN ILE DE -FRANCE
Mars 2005
Paris
INTRODUCTION
La rgion Ile de France est considre la premire en terme daccueil et daccessibilit aux loisirs pour les personnes en situation de handicap. Selon le Comit Rgional du Tourisme dle de France, la rgion avait jusqu juillet de lanne dernier, 120 sites labelliss Tourisme et Handicap.
Actuellement, les organismes institutionnels lis lactivit touristique, les associations reprsentantes des personnes handicaps et les professionnels du tourisme sont de plus en plus engags dans une dmarche que vise linsertion des personnes besoins spcifiques dans le secteur du loisir et du tourisme.
Pourtant, avant de fournir une vision plus complte de la relation entre tourisme et handicape dans la rgion Ile de France, il semble ncessaire de mieux comprendre certaines dmarches effectues par le Comit National du Tourisme ( CNT) dans les annes 1999 et 2003, travers de deux rapports qui avaient comme objectif commun, linsertion et laccessibilit des personnes handicapes dans les activits touristiques et de loisirs.
A. LE RAPPORT TOURISME & HANDICAP : LOFFRE TOURISTIQUE
Le CNT a prsent et adopt en 1999, le rapport Tourisme et Handicap LOffre Touristique , ce qui a marqu une amorce importante en matire de prise en compte des ncessits et des attentes des personnes et des touristes en situation de handicap.
Jusqu cette poque, aucune politique navait t ni impulse ni concrtise pour le dveloppement du tourisme et des loisirs pour les personnes en situation de handicap. Cela tmoignait la mconnaissance des problmatiques et des carences lies ce domaine.
Les seules initiatives existantes ont t menes dune part, par les associations reprsentatives des personnes handicapes et dautre part, par quelques expriences releves par des professionnels et institutionnels du tourisme. Pourtant, aujourdhui cette situation na chang que partiellement.
Cest extrmement important de dduire que les touristes handicaps sont, avant tout, des personnes handicapes. Par rapport au tourisme, jusqu cette poque, les revendications des personnes en situation de handicap et de leurs associations reprsentatives taient transmises quasi automatiquement vers les Affaires Sociales. Successifs textes rglementaires, en matire daccessibilit des tablissements recevant du public, ont t appliqus vis vis les efforts des professionnels du tourisme. Mais, ces obligations rglementaires ont eu des efforts contrasts, surtout trois niveaux :
Au niveau de lacceptation de ces obligations ;
Au niveau de la qualit effective des ralisations ;
Et, au niveau des adaptations qui taient souvent lies la seule dficience motrice.
On peut constater donc que le rapport de 1999 mritait une politique anime par la concertation et le rapprochement entre les professionnels du tourisme, associations, institutionnels et les propres personnes en situation de handicap.
Donc, lensemble des problmatiques abordes dans ce premier rapport peut tre considr comme un dbut concernant laccs au tourisme et aux loisirs des personnes handicapes. Il y en a toujours de freins qui ont besoin dtre levs par rapport la ralit de ncessits des personnes handicapes.
Le rapport Tourisme et Handicap - Loffre Touristique contenait dix recommandations majeures, qui seront ici prsentes et analyses synthtiquement.
1. Raliser une tude de march
Cette recommandation visait sensibiliser les professionnels et les institutionnels du tourisme. Elle suggrait aussi la ralisation dune tude de march que puisse regrouper de faon qualitative et quantitative, les attentes et les besoins des touristes en situation de handicap.
LAFIT, lAgence Franaise dIngnierie Touristique a publi un cahier sur ce thme en 2001, ce qui a permis que les organismes touristiques ( publics et privs) puissent avoir conscience que cette clientle est loin dtre marginal. Sur le plan quantitatif. De plus, cette tude a aborde de faon intressante, les attentes et les aspirations des personnes handicapes en matire dintgration.
2. Doter le Ministre ddi au Tourisme dun outil statistique et dvaluation durable
Avec lintention de faire de laccueil des touristes handicaps une proccupation de la politique de dveloppement touristique, cette recommandation induisait :
La prise en compte des certains aspects concernant laccs au tourisme et aux loisirs des personnes handicapes dans tous les systmes denqutes et des recueils statistiques existants ;
La mise sur pied dun systme de suivi statistique de mise aux normes daccessibilit des sites, tablissements et installations touristiques par grande catgorie dactivit.
Par rapport la deuxime recommandation, on constate que les grandes enqutes statistiques nationales sont en train dintgrer la prise en compte des aspects concernant laccs au tourisme et aux loisirs des personnes en situation de handicap. Par contre, cette prise en compte ne peut tre apprcie que par des cycles dvolution longues. Le label Tourisme et Handicap contribue normment cette recommandation, en tant quoutil statistique au regard de la mise aux normes daccessibilit des installations et quipements vocation touristique.
3 . Constituer un ple dinformation, de conseil, de recherche et de documentation destin favoriser la diffusion et la matrise de bonnes pratiques en matire daccessibilit
Cette recommandation impliquait la mise en place dun ple qui pourrait soutenir la recherche, lexprimentation, le conseil et la diffusion des bonnes pratiques en matire daccessibilit des quipements touristiques.
Linstallation du Bureau des Politiques Sociales, au sein de la Direction du Tourisme, favorise la cohrence dans les actions entreprises. Et la publication, par lAFIT, dun cahier du savoir-faire sur le thme tourisme et handicaps contribue aussi apporter des lments de rponses et de conseil.
4. Mieux prendre en compte les handicaps auditifs et visuels
Labsence de rglementation et des obligations concernant la prise en compte des lments architecturaux, de scurit et dadaptation spcifique touche le cadre de vie des personnes souffrant dun handicap auditif au visuel. Ceux ci ont t intgrs dans ltude de march, dans le cahier du savoir-faire, dans le label et dans lensemble des rflexions et des concertations engages.
5. Procder linventaire de loffre accessible
Cette recommandation sert introduire la suivante.
6. Crer un label national daccessibilit ayant vocation sappliquer lensemble des sites et quipements touristiques
Celle ci a t peut tre la plus important recommandation. Elle visait scuriser la fiabilit es informations relatives aux sites et hbergements touristiques et des loisirs.
Elle induisait une information descriptive et objective fonde sur le cadre rglementaire de laccessibilit. Aussi laborer un cahier des charges sur les dficiences mentales, auditifs, visuelles et motrices.
Le label Tourisme et Handicap a t mis en uvre en 2001 et sa gestion a t confie lAssociation Tourisme et Handicap.
7. Encourager les collectivits territoriales amliorer laccs des touristes handicaps aux sites et quipements touristiques
Une ligne budgtaire a t consacre au Droit aux Vacances pour tous , ce qua beaucoup aid concrtiser cette recommandation. Pourtant, il semble tre important de connatre lemploi fait ou venir de cette ligne budgtaire sur le plan des quipements touristiques, de loisir et de la culture. Pour accrotre cette recommandation, il faut conditionner loctroi des subventions pour la rnovation du patrimoine par une prise en compte des critres daccessibilit.
8. Accrotre leffort de formation des personnels laccueil des touristes besoins spcifiques
Comme la mconnaissance gnre des peurs, des maladresses ou des impairs, un enseignement basique englobant la notion de besoins spcifiques a t la principale raison de cette recommandation puisque la capacit daccueil des professionnels du tourisme et de lensemble des personnels en contact avec les personnes handicapes doit tre dvelopp.
Sa concrtisation se voit vraiment au niveaux des BTS Tourisme, avec linstauration du module accueil des personnes besoins spcifiques sous forme denseignement optionnel, dans un premier temps, et aprs obligatoire dans les deux filires de BTS Tourisme.
9. Sengager plus rsolument dans la voie de la coopration internationale afin de favoriser, grce une harmonisation des pratiques et des normes, les courants touristiques internationaux
Cette recommandation na pas suscit des mesures significatives et concrtes. Mais, il y existe une dmarche attentive de certains Etats europens vis vis la politique mise en place dans le cadre du label national Tourisme et Handicap .
10. Mettre ltude les voies ouvrant la possibilit de modifier le rgime juridique de laccessibilit aux tablissements et installations de tourisme pour introduire des mcanismes contractuels et dincitation
Cette recommandation avait comme logique faire valuer certains points rglementaires en faveur dune meilleure rationalisation des efforts raliss. Elle na pas suscit la rflexion attendue. Par exemple, les associations des personnes handicapes nont pas manqu de souligner une restriction de loffre accessible et, surtout, des risques de ghettosation sur certaines structures.
Les recommandations du rapport Tourisme et handicap La chane de LOffre Touristique ont t vritablement marquants parce quelles on suscit la sensibilisation des professionnels, institutionnels et associations lies au secteur de tourisme et aux personnes en situation de handicap.
Pourtant, ces recommandations ont t prises en compte sur un nouvel angle dans le rapport Tourisme et Handicap : La Chane de lOffre Touristique pour le Droit aux Vacances . Certains rflexions qui auraient pu tre associs dans le premier rapport appairassent dans le deuxime comme des points damlioration souhaitables. Cest dire :
Mener des tudes quantitatives et qualitatives sur les habitudes, attentes et souhaits des touristes handicaps au regard prcise des types de dficience, catgorie dhbergement, zones touristiques frquents, secteurs dactivit recherchs ;
Mieux cerner la problmatique de lintgration et de laccueil ;
Assurer les professionnels du tourisme par rapport laide et au soutien direct lors quils envisagent amliorer les conditions daccs dune structure touristique ou de loisirs ( avec la cration dun site Internet par exemple) ;
Stimuler la cration des espaces de conseils et de soutien lchelon local ( des ples des ressources la proximit), pour faire voluer laccueil des touristes handicaps et les adaptations des infrastructures touristiques ;
Introduire les atteintes des personnes souffrant dune dficience mentale dans les dmarches, vu quil y existe toujours des peurs dans la socit et dans le domaine du tourisme par rapport ce sujet ;
Mesurer lvolution de prgnance du label en nombre des dpartements impliqus en mettant en place des missions en direction de ces dpartements et rgions retardataires ;
Dvelopper la notion de fiche descriptive ct du processus du label pour donner des informations supplmentaires que peuvent tre transmises sur demande, par tlphone e par Internet ;
Clarifier la responsabilit au regard de la dlivrance du label en cas de litige, dincident au mme daccident ;
Explorer encore plus la formation et la formation continue des professionnels du tourisme et de laccueil ;
Et finalement, crdibiliser linformation en favorisant des rflexions qui pourraient concerner les rgions europennes.
B. LE RAPPORT TOURISME & HANDICAP : LA CHAINE DE LOFFRE TOURISTIQUE POUR LE DROIT AUX VACANCES
Ce nouveau rapport se voit aujourdhui comme une complmentation du rapport initial. Il stimule la rflexion et linvestigation ncessaires pour que les personnes en situation de handicap puissent sintgrer pleinement dans le tourisme et le loisir.
Donc, pour que leur laccs soit plein, il est essentiel de considrer les conditions de transports, financires, daccessibilit, daccompagnent et dinformation. Ceux ci sont complmentaires et indissociables.
Ce rapport concentre, dans 16 recommandations majeures, cinq grands thmes de rflexion : linformation, les financements des vacances, les vacances spcialises et laccompagnent individuel, les transports et finalement, le confort dusage pour tous.
Ladoption de ces recommandations implique des concertations interministrielles en mme temps quelles peuvent conforter les actions politiques en direction des personnes handicapes. Lobjectif principal tant de favoriser lgalit des chances et damliorer les conditions daccs aux vacances, au tourisme et aux loisirs.
B.1. LINFORMATION
Amliorer linformation est une grande proccupation de ce rapport. Dans ce cas, la cration dun site Internet peut tre un vritable outil de facilitation des changes dinformation et de communication au niveau professionnel et des utilisateurs.
Lide dun site Internet comporte trois rflexions basiques : pour qui ? quoi ? et , comment ? Il doit tre destin aux personnes et touristes en situation de handicap, aux professionnels et institutionnels du tourisme, aux animateurs et accompagnateurs, aux tudiantes et chercheursLe but est de donner une information de qualit et daccrotre la sensibilisation des personnes concernes.
Le site doit contenir toutes sortes des informations lies aux transports, la documentation, lactualit, aux quipements touristiques labelliss ou en cours de labellisation ( aussi ces rfrences par dautres labels), les quipements et services adaptsEnfin, des informations pratiques que puissent tre accds librement et gratuitement, en ayant des liens avec des sites utiles pour les utilisateurs et en tant facilement reconnaissable par les moteurs de recherche. Lutilisation des nouvelles technologies est fortement souhaitable, ainsi que la traduction au moins en langue anglaise pour les touristes trangers dans un premier temps.
Un deuxime point cest la cration dun document descriptif standardis pour tre dsign et annex au contrat de voyage, ce que rassure les professionnels du secteur mais aussi les voyageurs. Aujourdhui, les professionnels sont en mesure de rpondre de faon satisfaisant aux interrogations poses par les contraintes daccessibilit, dadaptation, daccueil et dintgration induites par le handicap ? Ces rflexions donnent lieu deux recommandations lies linformation :
1. Regrouper, au sein dun site Internet, toutes informations relatives la problmatique tourisme et handicap afin de donner une information de qualit aux utilisateurs et daccrotre la sensibilisation des professionnels du tourisme par le partage dexprience et par laccs linformation et la connaissance des attentes et des besoins des personnes en situation de handicap
2. Engager une rflexion caractre rglementaire sur une ncessit descriptive du dgre dadaptation des prestations dans le cadre des conditions gnrales des ventes fixes par le dcret 94-490 de 15 juin 1994 pris en application de la loi du 13 juillet 1992 fixant les conditions dexercice des activits relatives lorganisation et la vente des voyages
B.2. LE FIINANCEMENT DES VACANCES
Le dveloppement du financement des vacances constitue un des principaux lments pour favoriser le dpart en vacances des personnes en situation de handicap. Souvent, les besoins qui correspondent aux vacances sont considrs superflus. Pourtant, le dpart en vacances des personnes handicapes est aussi un besoin lgitime de rupture avec le quotidien.
Les adultes, mais aussi les enfants et les jeunes en situation de handicap qui partent en vacances non spcialises, gnrent des surcots supplmentaires, supports dans la majorit des cas, par leurs familles et les structures accueillantes, ce qui freine leur accs aux loisirs.
En sachant que les vacances sont lun des maillons essentiels de la chane de lintgration, le groupe de travail qui a anim ce rapport a dvelopp 4 recommandations concernant le dveloppement du financement des vacances. Ces recommandations ont t bases sur les ncessits des personnes handicapes ( adultes, jeunes et enfants) ainsi bien que leurs familles.
Des mesures comme lemploi des cheques vacances, le doublement dallocation compensatrice pour tierce personne, linstitution des cheques vacances pour les travailleurs handicaps et lharmonisation du statut des adultes handicaps vivant en tablissement peuvent permettre de rpondre les besoins lgitimes de personnes que souffrent dun certain type de dficience. Les 4 recommandations lies au financement des vacances sont les suivantes :
1. Instituer le principe dune aide financire lgale, sous forme de cheques vacances, afin de favoriser le dpart en vacances des personnes en situation de handicap qui ne peuvent travailler et qui bnficient de lallocation aux adultes handicaps ou dune pension dinvalidit
2. Instituer le principe dune compensation financire lgale, sous forme de doublement dallocation compensatrice pour tierce personne( ou de la majoration pour tierce personne) afin de favoriser le dpart en vacances des personnes en situation de handicap
3. Instituer laccs aux cheques vacances pour les travailleurs handicaps des Centres dAide par le Travail afin de favoriser leurs accs et leur droit aux vacances et aux loisirs
4. Harmoniser le statut des adultes handicaps vivant en tablissement afin de permettre une restitution suffisante et quitable des ressources financires pour favoriser laccs aux vacances et aux loisirs
B.3. LES VACANCES SPECIALISEES ET LACCOMPAGNEMENT INDIVIDUEL
Soutenir les vacances spcialises et laccompagnement individuel voquent des notions distinctes mais trs complmentaires. Elles sont lun des maillons essentiels de la chane de lintgration parce quelles doivent relever le libre choix des voyageurs handicaps sur leur mode des vacances.
La ncessit que les personnes handicapes ont de partir en vacances, en groupe ou mme seules , voque la ncessit davoir un bnfice daccompagnement pendant leurs sjours. Un soutien avec lequel ces personnes puissent palier les actes de la vie quotidienne.
Certaines difficults sont rencontres aujourdhui par le secteur touristique et aussi par les personnes handicapes lors quelles dcident partir en vacances, comme par exemple, un encadrement difficile recruter, un manque des moyens de formation des quipes dencadrement, la difficult de recruter des professionnels diplms, des carences dans les profils recherchs pour les quipes dencadrement et lassimilation dune activit lie plutt au domaine mdico-social qu celui du tourisme.
Pour le soutien aux vacances spcialises et pour laccompagnement individuel, le groupe de travail a formul deux recommandations que, si adoptes, peuvent minimiser les difficults rencontres par les personnes handicapes mais aussi par les professionnels du secteur touristique :
1. Soutenir, encourager, valoriser et dfendre lactivit des organismes des vacances spcialiss tout en veillant la qualit des prestations quy sont proposs
2. Engager une tude de faisabilit que pourrait permettre la mise en uvre dune exprience en matire daccompagnent individuel des personnes en situation de handicap dans le cadre des vacances, en dfinir les modalits mais galement la qualification et le statut des accompagnants
B.4. LES TRANSPORTS
La question des transports est un vritable obstacle pour la vie des personnes handicapes. Malgr lamlioration de laccessibilit des transports publics pendant ces dernires annes, sous laspect prcis du tourisme, il y en a des manques et des points de discontinuit dans la chane des transports.
Combler linsuffisance des cars de tourisme, des vhicules de location adapts, ouvrir les services de transports spcialiss au tourisme, amliorer laccs au transport ferr et poursuivre laccueil des passagers dans les transports ariens sont les grands axes de rflexion qui ont stimul les recommandations suivantes :
1. Combler, par des actions de sensibilisation mais galement par des voies rglementaires, le manque de cars de tourisme accessible en France
2. Combler, par des actions de sensibilisation et de mesures incitatives, la manque de vhicules de location adapts en France tout en favorisant une promotion de loffre
3. Dans le cadre du tourisme urbain notamment, inciter les services de transports spcialiss ouvrir leurs prestations en direction des touristes en situation de handicap
4. Suggrer un meilleur accs au transport ferr et une meilleure adaptation des prestations sur le plan humain que matriel
5. Poursuivre les efforts raliss dans laccueil des passagers handicaps dans les transports ariens et amliorer le niveau daccessibilit des avions
Ces recommandations impliquent une concertation entre le Ministre dlgu au Tourisme et les organismes, publics et privs, lies au secteur des transports en France. Cette indispensable concertation peut favoriser le dveloppement du tourisme en direction des personnes en situation de handicap.
B.5. LE CONFORT DUSAGE POUR TOUS
Pour le groupe de travail, toute notion daccessibilit et dadaptation constitue des lments que favorise le confort dusage pour tous.
Laffirmation de la valeur du confort dusage pour tous, la mise en accessibilit des sites et monuments et aussi le rfrencement de cette notion travers dune documentation crite et des modles concrtes, donnent une nouvelle approche qui aidera renforcer la qualit des quipements.
Aujourdhui, en France, plusieurs sites et monuments ne bnficient pas daccessibilit pour la seule raison que ces adaptations pourraient entraver la valeur historique des sites ou mme dnaturer son purisme dorigine. Pourtant, ces sites ont dj eu damnagements qui visaient amliorer les conditions de visite : dispositifs de scurit, installation des guichets, de sanitaires et des boutiques spcialises voire mme la requalification des sites pour des autres usages. Le groupe de travail croit quune adaptation ralise pour les personnes handicapes profite elles des personnes valides.
Donc, laffirmation de la valeur du confort dusage pour tous, la mise en accessibilit des sites et monuments et aussi le rfrencement de cette notion travers dune documentation crite et des modles concrtes, donnent une nouvelle approche qui aidera renforcer la qualit des quipements. Cette nouvelle approche sexprime bien par les trois recommandations suivantes :
1. Engager une concertation interministrielle pour que la mise en accessibilit des monuments historiques et sites classs puisse tre ralise chaque fois quelle est techniquement possible
2. Affirmer et reconnatre la valeur prpondrante de la notion de confort dusage pour tous en accordant laccessibilit une valeur universelle. Mettre en uvre la cration dun groupe de travail afin de dfinir, rflchir et donner une traduction trs concrte de cette notion dans le domaine du tourisme et des loisirs
3. Editer et diffuser une documentation la fois pratique, fonctionnelle, rfrence et argumente portant sur cette notion de confort dusage pour tous lintention des professionnels du tourisme.
C. TOURISME &HANDICAP EN ILE-DE-FRANCE
Laccs aux loisirs et aux vacances constituent un droit fondamental aux personnes handicapes. Ce droit doit tre conditionn par une bonne accessibilit aux quipements touristiques et par des informations fiables.
Lensemble des acteurs qui participent de la dmarche pour linsertion des personnes handicapes dans les loisirs et le tourisme permet de dvelopper loffre touristique adapte avec une meilleure autonomie des personnes handicapes.
Face au constat que les personnes handicapes ont difficilement la possibilit de partir en vacances, notamment cause du manque daccessibilit des hbergements touristiques, un certain nombre dassociations, dinstitutions et de professionnels de la rgion Ile-de-France sont engags pour dvelopper ladaptation du tourisme et des loisirs pour les personnes besoins spcifiques.
LIle- de- France est considre la premire rgion en matire d accessibilit aux sites de loisirs pour les personnes handicapes. Jusqu juin 2004, 120 sites touristiques ont t labelliss Tourisme et handicap , et plus de 100 dossiers sont en cours de labellisation 1.
Le label, lanc en 2001 par le Secrtariat dEtat au Tourisme, apporte une information fiable sur les sites et les quipements touristiques prenant en compte les quatre types de handicap ( moteur, visuel, auditif et mentale. Il est trs important pour la clientle besoins spcifiques mais aussi pour leur proches et pour les professionnels du tourisme, qui vont tre plus engags dans une dmarche daccueil, daccessibilit et dinformation.
__________________________________________
1- Agence Franaise de Presse, 01/07/2004
La rgion Ile-de-France possde un territoire de 12000km, repartis entre 8 dpartements, avec une population estime en 10 933 000 franciliens. Elle est la premire destination touristique au monde avec 36 millions de touristes par an, dont 60% dtrangers 2. Cest une rgion au patrimoine historique. Cela signifie souvent une accessibilit limite ou complique pour les personnes handicapes. Les efforts dadaptation de la rgion peuvent tre nots dans des diffrentes installations accueillant le public. Plusieurs acteurs et professionnels du tourisme ont t sensibiliss et mobiliss pour une meilleure intgration de personnes handicapes dans le monde du tourisme. Hbergements, restaurants, transports, muses et autres sites de loisirs ont t dj adapts cause de la dmarche volontaire de labellisation, engag au niveau national.
Du ct associatif, lUNAT Ile-de-France ( Union des Associations de Tourisme de la Rgion Ile-de-France), joue un rle marquant dans ce domaine parce quelle a comme mission, dentre autres, de favoriser le dpart en vacances des personnes handicapes. LUNAT Ile-de-France participe aussi la mise en place du label Tourisme & Handicap, en relation avec le CRT Ile-de-France. Avec la ralisation du Guide des Vacances Adaptes , elle recense loffre des vacances spcialement conue pour les personnes qui souffrent dun handicap, gnralement proposs par associations.
Dans ce guide, lon trouve des propositions des vacances des dix associations. Les propositions sont faites selon les types de handicaps ( moteur, mental lger, mental lourd, visuel et difficult dinsertion sociale), lge, la destination et la dure des sjours, la priode dactivit, le mode des vacances ( individuel en intgration, individuel en sjour adapt, groupes en sjours adapts, sjours fixes, sjours itinrants), leurs besoins ( niveau dautonomie, destination, vacances en individuel ou en groupe), des conseils de financement et les cordonnes pour contacter les associations 3.
Encore dans le guide, les lecteurs peuvent trouver des informations pratiques sur des associations pouvant accueillir les personnes handicapes dans la rgion, sur les aides financires, sur la vie quotidienne et les sorties et sur les transports.
_____________________________________
2 www.unat-idf.asso.fr
3- Le guide des vacances et de loisirs adapts, UNAT IDF
D. CONCLUSION
Lon constate que la rgion Ile-de-France possde une importante reprsentativit concernant le tourisme et les personnes handicapes. Malgr les efforts des acteurs concerns et les avances dans ce domaine, surtout au niveau de linformation, il y en reste encore beaucoup faire.
Par exemple aujourdhui, la rgion compte 2 cars de Tourisme adapts ( il en existent 38 en France contre 250 vhicules adapts en Belgique !). A titre dexemple, aucune navette Air France nest accessible aux personnes en situation de handicap. Le mme problme est rencontr dans la location des vhicules adaptsDune part, les loueurs estiment que leur offre est sous-utilis et dautre part, les utilisateurs estiment que leur offre est insuffisante 4 .
En rponse cette constatation, certains questionnements peuvent servir de rflexion et aussi tre poses pour mieux comprendre la complexit lie ce sujet :
Est-ce que les transports en Ile-de-France ( publiques ou privs) sont vraiment adapts laccs et laccueil des touristes et des personnes handicapes ?
Est-ce que la rgion Ile-de-France est prte accueillir des touristes trangers en situation de handicap ?
Combien des offices de tourisme en Ile-de-France sont en mesure de donner des informations adaptes toutes les dficiences ?
Est-ce quil y a un systme de suivi que puisse analyser le niveau de satisfaction des personnes handicapes concernant aux quipements et sites touristiques ?
Les freins et les obstacles majeurs lis au thme tourisme et handicap concernent probablement laccessibilit. Laccessibilit linformation, aux transports, aux quipements, laccueil, aux financements de vacances Le thme est vaste, complexe. Ce nest pas facile deffectuer toutes les dmarches, ainsi que dengager et de concerter tous les acteurs concerns.
Le chemin vers la vraie intgration des personnes en situation de handicap dans le tourisme et les loisirs est long. Limplication de tous les acteurs et les actions mens visant le progrs de cette intgration sont fondamentales, mais le plus important cest de rflchir et de dialoguer pour maintenir cette coordination et brivement, faire du droit aux vacances une ralit.
_____________________________
4. Rapport Tourisme et Handicap- la chane de loffre touristique pour le droit aux vacances
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
Tourisme & handicap : La chane de loffre touristique pour le droit aux vacances
Tourisme & handicap : tude de march de la population handicape face loffre touristique franaise
Le guide des vacances et des loisirs adapts
http://www.pidf.com
http://www.paris-touristoffice.com
http://www.unat-idf.asso.fr
http://www.handica.com