Recently in Air Travel Category

Boarding an Airplane from a Wheelchair

BillPay.jpg

A statement from United Spinal Association on the failure of US Republican Senators to uphold the ADA on an international level:


United Spinal Association is extremely disappointed that the Senate failed today by a vote of 61-38 to ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).

"Opposition to ratification of the treaty is based on several extreme assertions by the far right, including that ratifying the CRPD would endanger U.S. sovereignty and that parents would lose their ability to make decisions for their children with disabilities. These assertions are absolutely false," said Paul J. Tobin, United Spinal CEO and President.

The CRPD embodies the protections and opportunities available through the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), but on a global scale. CRPD is a treaty created by the United Nations that protects the rights of people living with disabilities, including: equal treatment and non-discrimination in access to justice, health, education, employment, and rehabilitation.

Ratification of the CRPD treaty is supported by over 300 disability organizations, 21 veterans organizations, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and many other national leaders and organizations.

      • CRPD would have improved access for disabled veterans and other Americans with disabilities that live, work, or travel abroad.
      • The treaty is critical to maintaining America's leadership role on disability rights and to eliminating disability discrimination throughout the world.
      • Ratification of the CRPD treaty would present the opportunity for a reaffirmation of the values inherent in the Americans with Disabilities Act and provide the forum to advance them worldwide.

Failure of the Senate to ratify the CRPD only strengthens our resolve to dispel the myths offered by the opposition and secure ratification of the CRPD in the next session of Congress. We thank those Senators who voted in favor of the CRPD for their support of rights for disabled veterans, and all people with disabilities.



Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/961013#ixzz2EKelciaY

Airlines are facing a possible multi-million dollar lawsuit after a clinically obese woman died while on holiday in Hungary after she was refused a seat on three flights back to New York where she needed medical treatment.

Vilma Soltez, who weighed over 30 stone and had only one leg and used a wheelchair, died from health complications nine days after she was kicked off the first of the three flights.

She was unable to board due to issues with seat extensions and wheelchairs and other equipment that would not hold her weight.

She had travelled to her summer home in Hungary with Delta and KLM Airlines but had reportedly put on weight during her trip.

According to a report in the New York Post, the couple's travel agent had told Delta/KLM before the trip that she needed to return home on October 15 to continue with medical treatment for kidney problems and diabetes.

But her husband Janos claimed the couple were told they could not fly on their original Delta/KLM flight from Hungary because the aircraft did not have the necessary seat extension.

He said they were directed to drive to Prague for a Delta/KLM flight home. At Prague, Soltez could not be transferred to the flight because equipment could not be found that would hold her weight.

Their New York travel agent then found them another flight with Lufthansa, via Frankfurt, but this was not viable for the same reasons despite three seats being available for the passenger.

According to reports, a local fire crew were bought in to help move her into the seats but they could not lift her out of her wheelchair.

Delta, KLM and Lufthansa have issued statements explaining their reasons for being unable to accommodate her.

Lufthansa said: "Lufthansa, together with its local partners, fire brigade and technical experts at Budapest Airport, tried its utmost to accommodate this passenger on board our flight from Budapest.

"After several, time consuming attempts it was decided that for the safety of this passenger and the over 140 fellow passengers, Lufthansa had to deny transportation of the passenger. Safe and reliable operations are Lufthansa's paramount priorities at all times."

Lawyers are now considering legal action against the airlines for violating laws protecting the disabled.


Source:

http://officialwan.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/airlines-face-lawsuit-after-death-of-obese-woman-who-was-refused-a-flight-home/

From D.N.I.S. News Network, India: 


Shivani Gupta, nominated by Disabled Rights Group (D.R.G.) to the Ministry of Civil Aviation Committee drafting a new set of guidelines for carriage of passengers with disabilities, has resigned citing disagreement on the process and the lackadaisical attitude being adopted towards the continuing discrimination by airlines. Incidentally, one of the much publicised incident where the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Disability was humiliated happened in an Indigo flight, which is a member of the said Committee.

Gupta said that while it is important to review the existing Civil Aviation Requirements (C.A.R.) on carriage of persons with disabilities, the Ministry should take at least some steps, even if they are small, to implement the existing C.A.R. to stop harassment at the ground level. The Ministry seems to be buying time and pacifying the sector's anger with the Committee without any definite commitment to stop such gross violations, she said in her letter.

The last straw, according to Gupta was the violation at the hands of Indigo, which happens to be a member of this Committee. "If being part of the Committee is so meaningless then why have it in the first place," she stated.

"There are countless unreported cases that happen on a daily basis. Today each time I want to travel by air, I am actually scared of what treatment I may receive even though I am a member of this 'distinguished Committee'. It is unethical for me to sit on a Committee while no change is happening on the ground," Gupta added.


Source:

http://dnis.org/news.php?issue_id=7&volume_id=9&news_id=1255&i=2


Rosângela ficou indignada ao ser informada de que o filho não poderia viajar para fazer tratamento médico

Rosângela ficou indignada ao ser informada de que o filho não poderia viajar para fazer tratamento médico (Alexandre Fonseca)

Ao tentar comprar passagens aéreas na manhã desta segunda-feira (9), em Manaus, para Campinas (SP), onde submeterá o filho de sete anos a um tratamento médico, a psicóloga Rosângela Fernandes foi surpreendida pela informação de uma atendente do SAC da empresa Azul Linhas Aéreas, de que a criança não poderia voar por ser cadeirante e portador de necessidades especiais.

Para ela, houve discriminação por parte da empresa, para com a criança.

"O que atendente alegou foi que o meu filho além de não ter condições de viajar, a aeronave não tinha como comportar a cadeira de rodas dele. Além disso, não me deram uma alternativa de que forma eu pudesse fazer a viagem", informa Fernandes.

A escolha pela Azul, segundo a psicóloga, se deu pelo fato do destino para o qual ela irá com o filho não contar com conexão, o que ocorre com as outras companhias aéreas.

"Conheço várias mães que já viajaram de Manaus, por outras companhias aéreas com o filho cadeirante ou portador de necessidades especiais, e que não tiveram problemas, ainda que tivessem que enfrentar conexão", salienta.

Ainda nesta segunda-feira Rosângela tentaria adquirir passagens para viajar com o filho, em outras empresas aéreas, ainda que tivesse que enfrentar conexão. Ela também não descarta a possibilidade de denunciar o caso aos orgãos competentes.

Contato
Em contato com a assessoria de comunicação da empresa, a mesma se comprometeu a procurar a psicóloga, por telefone, e oferecer uma alternativa para que ela e o filho pudessem viajar, para a realização do tratamento da criança, em Capinas (SP).


Coat of Arms of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Image via Wikipedia

I will be speaking at the Brazilian Congress on Inclusive Tourism.

The São Paulo State Secretariat for the Rights of the Person with Disability, supported by the Brazilian Tourism Ministry, the São Paulo State Secretariat of Tourism, and the City Hall of Socorro, will hold the Brazilian Congress on Inclusive Tourism, at the Socorro Events Center, from September 28th to 30th, 2011.

The Congress will revolve around discussion of case presentations and success stories considered to be fundamental to support public policies which can assure the rights of persons with disability to fully access tourism. This Congress will be most significant to its audience, which will be composed by the tourism trade and State and City Secretariats on this subject.

Event URL (Portguese):

 http://cbta.sedpcd.sp.gov.br


Enhanced by Zemanta

Seal US DOT

Image via Wikipedia

This excerpt of US Department of Transportation legalese alerts the public that DOT intends to start addressing issues of "mishandled wheelchairs and  scooters used by passengers with disabilities."

 Office of the Secretary, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT or the Department) is proposing to
collect revenue information in a more detailed manner regarding airline imposed fees from those air carriers meeting the definition of a large certificated air carrier. Many air carriers have
adopted a la carte pricing with separate fees for such things as checked baggage, carry-on
baggage, meals, on-board entertainment, internet connections, pillows, blankets, advance or
upgraded seating, telephone reservations, early boarding, canceled or changed reservations,
transportation of unaccompanied minors, pet transportation, third-party services such as hotel
rooms, car rentals, and pick-up and delivery services, et cetera. The Department wants to make airline pricing more transparent to consumers and airline analysts. This action is in response to a departmental initiative and responds to recommendations of the Government Accountability Office. Also, the Department is proposing to change the way it computes mishandled baggage rates from mishandled baggage reports per unit of domestic enplanements to mishandled bags per unit of checked bags. Fees for checked baggage have changed consumer behavior regarding the number of bags they check, skewing mishandled baggage rates. Finally, the Department is proposing to fill a data gap by collecting separate statistics for mishandled wheelchairs and  scooters used by passengers with disabilities.

DOT
Docket No. RITA 2011-0001
RIN 2139-AA13

Full document as PDF:

Enhanced by Zemanta

Here's the pitch from Parkat.com:


We are the leading airport parking specalist within the UK.  Partkat compares thousands of airport car parking spaces to offer you the best car parking deals
parkat-logo.png
 available. Mega savings can be made when you pre-book you're car parking space online before you travel... It's not just the airport parking price we take into consideration, we include the finer details which make a difference such as car parking security, disabled facilties and much more. 

So don't throw away your money away on expensive airport parking when  because you can save you up to 60% at any airport in England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. Take a look at some of the trusted airport parking suppliers and providers we compare car parking prices with below:



But let's cut to the important stuff. Have a look at the Parkat Disabled and Reduced Mobility Airport Guide:

What's included in the guide?

  • What happens at security and customs?
  • Airport travel Advice for deaf passengers or persons with reduced hearing.
  • Disabled passengers carrying medication.
  • What help is available at the airport?
  • What to do before you arrive.
  • Return journey help.
  • Passengers with visual impairments.
  • Help at the car park.
  • Travelling with Autism.
  • Guide Dogs & PETS.

Doesn't a site like this seem like the "missing users' manual" that we all knew had to be somewhere if we could only find it? Don't you wish every airport had one?

Bravo Parkat!

A public and heartfelt "Thank You" to Shuaib Chalklen, the United Nations' Special Rapporteur on Disability for weighing in instituitionally on what we all know to be true individually.


The European Union's flagship laws to protect the rights of air travellers are not working, say passenger-rights advocates, in the week that the European Commission acknowledged that tougher enforcement was needed.

Shuaib Chalklen, the United Nations' special rapporteur on disability, told European Voice that airlines were not applying the EU regulation protecting the rights of passengers with restricted mobility. "Something has gone wrong. They are not applying the law."

Chalklen, a wheelchair user, said that last week Swiss International Airlines prevented him boarding a flight from London to Geneva, because he could not use the bathroom alone. "I think it is absurd. I am a paraplegic frequent flyer and I've travelled around the world on my own." After he protested, the airline allowed him to fly five days later. Chalklen said he had frequently met similar problems, especially with Lufthansa. "The legislation is fine; it is the knowledge of it that needs to be improved," he said.

Confused airlines

This week (11 April) a report from Siim Kallas, the European commissioner for transport, concluded that the airlines were confused about the 2006 law on rights of disabled people and those with restricted mobility. Some carriers "tended to mix up" flight safety with passenger comfort, such as eating and using toilets, said the report. The regulation allows carriers to act for safety reasons in exceptional circumstances - but never in relation to comfort.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Metropolis Magazine: Hits and Misses


Universal Design

NOVEMBER 1992


When the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law in 1990, it was not exactly embraced by the design community--indeed, many saw its requirements as hurdles to achieving their vision rather than spurs for creating inclusive buildings and products. Metropolis took a more optimistic approach. Inspired by the ADA, and by a universal-design conference held in New York City in May 1992, we published a special issue that fall devoted to the question of access. It was a multidisciplinary look at a fledgling discipline, with stories on wheelchair design, accessible taxis, senior housing, city planning, retrofitting historic buildings, and the promise of a "barrier-free environment." Almost 20 years later, the design profession has come a long way--but we're still working to fulfill that promise. 

MISS


User-Friendly Skies

SEPTEMBER 1994


"Airplane interiors are ugly," Aaron Betsky declared in this 1994 essay. "Not only are they cramped, but they are the most plastic-filled, confusingly designed rip-offs of Star Trek aesthetics you or I will ever find ourselves inhabiting for any stretch of time." Fortunately, change was on the way! United Airlines was debuting spaces "as tailored as a Brooks Brothers suit." Continental was planning cabin upgrades that would have "the discreet allure of Miesian minimalism." And most promising of all, Boeing's new 777 would be big enough to have a truly open, flexible interior. Betsky admitted that substantive, industry-wide improvement was still years away--and, boy, was he right. Today, more than 16 years later, we're still waiting for the user-friendly skies.


Source: 

http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20110414/universal-design-user-friendly-skies


A TWA Douglas DC-3 airplane is prepared for ta...

Image via Wikipedia

Be ready as a  new debate takes to the skies -- and speak up loudly if you expect to be heard from the "special section" that you may be assigned to - as exclusion-by-design submits a new flight plan:

Across the skies, there's a growing debate over whether airlines should do more to segregate the seating of passengers -- with designated areas for kids, for example. At a time when increasingly crowded jets have helped to make flying less pleasant for many passengers and social media allow them to instantly tweet their frustrations to the world, a comfortable perch on the plane -- and some tranquility around it -- has become ever more precious.

Polls of fliers by the travel search site Skyscanner and of business travelers by Britain's Business Travel & Meetings Show indicate a majority of airline passengers want sections set aside for families, or cabins that are for adults only. Overweight passengers have complained about being humiliated as airlines enforce rules that they pay for a second seat so they won't crowd their fellow fliers. And some passenger advocates say that designated rows for those who are tall, heavy or disabled would be a good idea.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Travel News reports: "A new report from PhoCusWright (The U.S. Consumer Perspective on Air Travel) finds that while traveler attitudes toward airlines are lukewarm overall, consumers report feeling worse about their airline experiences versus a few years ago."


In fact:

"Flyers are essentially giving airlines a grade of C+, which is barely above satisfactory," said Carroll Rheem, director of research for PhoCusWright. "But even more concerning for airlines is that their most valuable customers -- business travelers and those with higher annual household incomes -- are even less happy than the average."


With their new "adequate-service-is-optional" approach airlines may be encountering a mild strain of the same "Freedom Flu" that is toppling governments in the Middle East:

"Consumers are inherently reluctant to buy more services from companies they feel are taking advantage of them -- and unfortunately, many feel that way about airlines today," said Rheem. "Airlines have therefore put a ceiling of their own creation on the potential success of optional services. If they focus on repairing relationships with their passengers, airlines have the ability to break that ceiling. Whether or not they have the inclination remains to be seen."

Or not - and pay $2.5 million in fines. Your choice.

Related articles


Enhanced by Zemanta


Artigo de Adriana Lage sobre o incidente ocorrido com a deputada Mara Gabrilli

Adriana Lage

Li uma matéria no G1 que citava o fato da deputada federal Mara Gabrilli ter ficado duas horas dentro do avião da TAM, na noite de ontem, em Guarulhos, esperando pelo ambulift - veículo motorizado, com elevador, que transporta pessoas com deficiência até o avião; o equipamento é acoplado a uma das portas do avião para que o passageiro possa embarcar/desembarcar com segurança - para que descesse do avião em segurança. Segundo a matéria, a deputada se recusou a descer, carregada, as escadas (escorregadias por causa da chuva) do avião, alegando falta de segurança. Somente após a chegada do ambulift, a deputada desembarcou.

A TAM alegou que não havia finger - túnel que leva os passageiros diretamente do avião ao terminal - livre para que a aeronave em que Mara estava pousasse fora de uma área remota. A companhia aérea lamentou os transtornos causados à cliente e ressaltou que possui pessoal treinado para transportar pessoas com deficiência.

A deputada, por sua vez, ficou indignada com a situação de total descaso. Segundo a matéria do G1, Mara disse que: "Apenas o aeroporto de Brasília recebe 30 passageiros cadeirantes todas as noites. Segundo me contaram, a TAM desembarca, em média, seis cadeirantes por noite só em Guarulhos e estava com o ambulift quebrado há um mês e meio."

Infelizmente, essa foi mais uma situação de desrespeito em relação a pessoas com deficiência. Se fizeram isso com uma deputada federal, totalmente engajada na luta pelo direito das pessoas com deficiência, que viaja com grande freqüência, famosa e profunda conhecedora de seus direitos de cidadã, fico imaginando o tratamento dado a deficientes anônimos pelo nosso país. Seria bom a TAM ouvir o belo discurso que a deputada fez no plenário, onde, entre outras coisas, falou sobre a importância da acessibilidade em nosso país. O Brasil ratificou a Convenção da ONU, na qual a falta de acessibilidade é considerada um tipo de discriminação. Como, em nosso país, discriminação é crime, já está mais do que na hora de tornarmos a acessibilidade uma realidade.

Eu, particularmente, sempre viajo de avião. Cada ida ao aeroporto é uma novela. É impressionante o descaso das companhias aéreas em relação às pessoas com deficiência. A única forma que encontrei para ser um pouco mais respeitada foi andar com uma cópia da Resolução 009/2007 da ANAC, que garante a assistência às pessoas com deficiência em viagens aéreas. Mas, infelizmente, não me lembro de nenhuma viagem em que não tenha tido problemas.

Sem querer puxar a sardinha pro meu lado, gosto muito do atendimento, em Confins, no Aeroporto Internacional Tancredo Neves. Os funcionários são bem treinados, os fingers sempre são utilizados, existem balcões rebaixados e banheiros adaptados, boa sinalização, etc. Faço apenas uma ressalva: a Gol possui um balcão rebaixado para cadeirantes. Só que, em todas as vezes que precisei, os atendentes preferiram me atender nos balcões mais altos. No dia em que perguntei à atendente se o balcão rebaixado servia apenas de enfeite, quase fui linchada!! Precisavam ver a cara da mulher!! Ainda mais que pedi tudo o que tinha direito: auxílio para entrar na aeronave, etiqueta preferencial, etiqueta de frágil e saco plástico para proteger a cadeira de rodas, me recusei a usar a cadeira da Gol indo com a minha até a aeronave, não assinei uma declaração isentando a empresa da responsabilidade de cuidar da minha cadeira, etc. Minha irmã saiu de perto para dar risadas. Nas outras companhias aéreas, também sempre fui atendida em balcões altos. Quando estou atacada, faço o atendente sair do lugar pra pegar meus documentos. Freqüentemente, os funcionários de Confins recebem treinamento. Acredito que, em breve, teremos um serviço melhor ainda. Por causa da Copa do Mundo, o aeroporto está sendo reformado e ampliado.

Podendo escolher, prefiro viajar pela TAM, por ser a única empresa que conheço a possuir o cinto de segurança auxiliar para tetraplégicos. Embora a Resolução exija a utilização desse cinto, sem fiscalização, as empresas não cumprem o previsto na resolução. Só que, muitas vezes, a tripulação nem sabe da existência dele! No ano passado, quando voltava de Brasília para BH, após uma competição de natação, pedi a comissária de bordo que colocasse o cinto em mim. A mulher custou a encontrá-lo. Depois, não soube colocá-lo. Reclamei e ela teve que recorrer à outra tripulação. Quando percebi, apareceram 3 outros funcionários para tentar colocar o cinto em mim. Nem assim, ele ficou 100% certo. Acho que falta treinamento em relação a isso.

Assim como a Mara Gabrilli, também acho muito desagradável ser carregada pelas escadas. Sempre que posso, me recuso. Mas, a pressão é grande. Tanto dos funcionários quando dos familiares que ficam envergonhados com todo mundo olhando. Embora as companhias aéreas falem que possuem pessoal treinado, sempre me deparo com algumas pessoas despreparadas. Em 2008, ao desembarcar no 'submundo' do Galeão/RJ, dois funcionários da Webjet carregaram minha cadeira de rodas. Aleguei que havia visto vários fingers desocupados na pista e que não queria ser carregada. Falei sobre a Resolução da ANAC e nada. Como havia trabalhado o dia todo e já eram 00h 40min, acabei me rendendo pelo cansaço. Saímos debaixo de chuva. Quase caímos. Cheguei ao solo com meu pescoço tombado pra trás. Outra vez, em Vitória/ES, em pleno final de tarde de uma terça feira de carnaval, bati o pé que queria o ambulift para entrar na aeronave. O aeroporto, que é pequeno, estava lotado. O funcionário da Gol queria me convencer de todo jeito. Falou que os vôos estavam atrasados e que demoraria muito para me colocarem lá dentro com o ambulift. Foi juntando gente no check-in... Minhas irmãs e minha prima falaram que estavam morrendo de vergonha com o povo olhando feio pra gente. Como o atendente era bem bonitinho e me garantiu que me levaria em segurança, acabei me rendendo. Mas ele teve que me carregar no colo sem a cadeira de rodas!!

Fico indignada com aeroportos que possuem fingers e obrigam cadeirantes a serem carregados. É muito desconfortável e inseguro. Eu poderia jurar que nunca desceria escadas no Galeão. Doce ilusão!!

Andei de ambulift em 3 aeroportos e foram experiências meio traumáticas. Minha primeira vez foi em Vitória/ES, no carnaval de 2008. Para descer da aeronave, andei de ambulift. Todas as pessoas desceram e eu fiquei à espera. Depois de uns 20 minutos, o equipamento chegou. Só que, por falta de utilização, os funcionários não sabiam operar o equipamento. Lá se foram mais preciosos minutos! Sem brincadeira, devo ter gasto uns 50 minutos para conseguir chegar à área de desembarque! Na volta pra casa, acabei indo pelas escadas por força das circunstâncias. Minhas outras utilizações de ambulift foram em abril de 2010, em Goiânia e Brasília. Fui para uma competição de natação em Goiânia. A descida pelo ambulift foi tranqüila. Já na volta... O ambulift cabia duas cadeiras de rodas, em fila, e o operador. Fui no fundo. A geringonça é aberta, apenas com uma barra nas laterais. O operador do ambulift travou as cadeiras de rodas e começou a operar o equipamento. Na hora de acoplá-lo a porta da aeronave, ele deu uns pulos. Eu morri de medo. A altura é bem grande para arriscar levar um tombo de lá. Foi só minha cadeira se mexer um pouco que me manifestei. O operador me garantiu que eu não cairia de lá. Pode até ser, mas se fosse tão seguro, por que ele estava segurando em uma das barras?rsrs... O Diego, o outro nadador cadeirante, segurou minha cadeira de rodas e me acalmou. Falou que não me deixaria cair de lá; se caísse, ele iria junto. Já, o ambulift que andei em Brasília, é fechado. Parece um container. Fomos 3 cadeiras de rodas e um funcionário. Ainda tinha muito espaço sobrando. O funcionário travou nossas cadeiras de rodas. Sabe-se lá por que, o equipamento começou a pular e as cadeiras de rodas começaram a andar sozinhas mesmo travadas. O funcionário não sabia quem socorria primeiro. Como era a mais leve dos três cadeirantes e, provavelmente, a mais medrosa, tratei logo de fazer um escândalo e garantir ajuda!! Enfim, não gostei das experiências que tive com ambulift!

Outra coisa que me deixa indignada é o descaso/demora nas respostas da ANAC. Sempre que tenho problemas, abro uma ouvidoria. Desde 2008, aguardo resposta de um chamado sobre a utilização de cadeira de rodas motorizada em viagens aéreas. Nas outras vezes em que reclamei, após meses, fecharam meu chamado informando que a empresa aérea havia informado que recebi o atendimento correto e que lamentavam caso eu estivesse insatisfeita. No final das contas, reclamar junto à ANAC e nada, foram quase a mesma coisa.

Enfim, o descaso com passageiros com deficiência ainda é grande. Já me cansei de reclamar sobre isso nos meus textos. Já tivemos algumas melhorias. Mas, ainda falta muito. Tem funcionário que nem sabe que a Resolução 009/007 da ANAC existe!! O treinamento dos funcionários é bem falho! É raro encontrar um funcionário que sabe transferir, corretamente, um tetraplégico para o assento do avião. Já perdi as contas das vezes em que fui: apertada/agarrada por funcionários que não sabiam me carregar, trombei alguma parte do meu corpo no avião, fiquei com a calça caindo ou com o sutiã aparecendo... Viajar de vestido ou saia, só estando com uma lingerie bem bacana e com a depilação em dia! Nunca que se sabe que tipo de funcionário irá nos atender.

Acho importantíssimas atitudes como essa da Mara Gabrilli. Sou suspeita para falar dela, pois sou fã de longa data. Quem sabe com o grito de uma deputada federal as companhias aéreas passem a nos respeitar mais. Eu me lembrei de uma matéria que li sobre o Marcelo Rubens Paiva, na qual ele comentava sobre o desrespeito nas viagens aéreas. Achei fantástico quando ele bateu o pé e só entrou na aeronave depois que ela estava vazia - conforme estabelece a Resolução 009/007 da ANAC. A tripulação teve que solicitar que os passageiros descessem da aeronave para que o cadeirante fosse embarcado. Só depois disso, é que os passageiros voltaram para aeronave. Outra coisa desagradável é a troca de assentos nas primeiras filas. Já fui obrigada, por exemplo, a me sentar na 6ª fileira, mesmo tendo solicitado assento preferencial com 1 mês de antecedência, porque na primeira fila estavam viajando uma mãe com duas filhas maiores de 9 anos. Como a cliente possuía cartão fidelidade, era vip e tinha mais preferência que pessoas com deficiência. Infelizmente, em muitos casos, para fazermos valer nossos direitos, somos taxados de chatos e chiliquentos. Mas, se não reclamarmos, fica mais difícil mudar a situação.
 
 




Stowage for Ground Operations - Train the Trainers
Quarterly live webinar series

Attend this 60-minute live webinar which is aimed for ground ops trainers, supervisors and customer service reps where we do a short presentation then hands-on training

Agenda

Introductions and background information
What is an assistive device
Who uses them

Review of Open Doors Org stowage CD
Discussion Topics
How to read and interpret diagrams and designs
Lifting techniques and stowage techniques
Applicable laws and regulations
Action pictures and videos

Hands on training--What to do if there is damage
Handling, dismantling and general "kick the tires"
Power wheelchairs
3 and 4 wheeled scooters 
Manual chair

Goals of session
1. Feeling more comfortable and educated about handling assistive devices.
2. Understanding those who use these assistive devices.
3. Understanding of where to find the answers if there are any questions

Brought to you by:

www.opendoorsnfp.org
www.themobilityshop.com

 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

Jaunted likes Delta's new Delta Assist on Facebook. The site even has this foornote:

Disability Assistance
Call 1-404-209-3434
Customers with hearing or speech disabilities please: Dial 711.

Preliminary looks by web accessibility experts report no immediately apparent major design errors.*, ** Could it be that social media once again is fomenting a revolution?

What have your experiences been with Delta Assist? Does the site work with your AT? Is the service positive?

*

1. The "How Can We Help" heading does not <h2> heading tags (violates .22(d) )

2. The decorative image of header.jpg does not have a null Alt attribute (violates  .22(a) )

3. Form fields do not have explicit labeling (violates .22(n) ).  However, they are keyboard accessible. ~ TecAccess

From the Facebook page:

What is Delta Assist?

At Delta, we recognize that the airline industry has room for improvement. While our fliers are looking to social media to share feedback and find solutions, we're listening. Delta Assist, our customer service group, is committed to delivering these solutions in Facebook.

Why bring Delta Assist to Facebook?

We love our fans and appreciate your participation and feedback on our Facebook page. We've listened to feedback on the wall and wanted to give our customers a safe and secure forum for sharing comments and getting the support they deserve. The Delta Assist Facebook tab offers 24/7 support within the Facebook environment.

Delta already participates in conversations on the wall. Why would I use the Delta Assist Facebook tab?

Facebook is great for a lot of things. However, as a public environment, the Facebook wall is not optimally suited for one-on-one customer support, gathering detailed feedback or engaging in conversations with strong dialog. Unfortunately, brands do not have the ability to share private messages on Facebook. The Delta Assist tab provides users with the ability to share their feedback and support communications with Delta in private and with confidence.

What can I expect when I send a message via Delta Assist in Facebook?

When a community member sends a message to the Delta Assist team via Facebook, they will receive an on screen notification that their message has been sent and an automated email confirmation with a ticket number for future reference.

We will do our best to provide a timely response to all messages. Users should receive an email response to all messages within 24-72 hours. We're working in close partnership with all of the appropriate teams across the Delta organization to circulate feedback with key stakeholders and provide the best possible solutions. If you have follow-up questions or require real-time support, please be in touch (using the ticket number provided) via this tab, on Twitter or by phone at (800) 221-1212.

If you need real-time support, please contact us on Twitter or by phone at (800) 221-1212.

Will Delta Assist in Facebook ask me to provide personal information?

Delta Assist has been built to provide as much privacy as possible within the limits of social media. We will never ask for anyone's personal information in public. In order to deliver the best possible solutions, we will ask for your name, email address, Delta SkyMiles® number (when appropriate),the topic of your message and, if needed, your address. We will not share any of this information with anyone outside of the Delta organization or send customers any marketing messages they are not already registered to receive.

How can I share feedback on Delta Assist in Facebook?

We would love to hear your thoughts, ideas or feedback. Please use the Delta Assist tab and select the "other feedback" topic option. We built this tool for you, our fliers, and we're always looking to improve the Delta experience. We look forward to hearing from you!

Source:

https://www.facebook.com/delta?sk=app_184046561629861


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monthly Archives